590°

Sony highlights 11 more PS5 exclusives coming in the near future

There are a bunch of China Hero Project PS5 exclusives to come our way and Sony has just made it a lot easier to see what those are.

Read Full Story >>
truetrophies.com
outsider1624352d ago

All this is good and all. But im waiting from the main guys.
ND
SP
Bluepoint
SantaMonica
Guerilla

Gamerscore2077352d ago

Same here, third party devs have been pushing out way more exclusives on PS5 than Sony.

It’s really looking like we might not see these new projects from these studios until next year or maybe (a big maybe) PS6.

Sony really needs a showcase dedicated to what’s only coming out the on PS5. They need to fall back a little on what’s coming out on the PC & now even the Switch. I know that’s more of a Lego project than a traditional Sony one, but still.

Cacabunga352d ago

Yeah man, more than 3 years in and haven’t seen what PS5 can truly achieve.. 3 years into PS4 life i got a 4KTV to enjoy the PS4 power.
We want and we deserve other than cross gen and lego titles Sony

Father__Merrin352d ago

I agree there's no really megaton heavy hitter mid way through the gen

Chard352d ago

Don't forget Gen Design (formerly Team Ico)

VersusDMC352d ago

They are not Sony first party anymore. They currently have a publishing deal with EPIC.

InUrFoxHole352d ago

A new uncharted would be amazing

northpaws352d ago

Sadly it can be a while before we see those, likely why Jim got fired as well. He decided to make them all push for live service games and then cancelled them, so they all probably wasted a year or two there at least.

shinoff2183352d ago

This is what I'm thinking.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 352d ago
Kurisu352d ago

Lost Soul Aside was announced 8 years ago now. 8!

lodossrage352d ago

Look how long ago Gran Blue Fantasy Relink was announced before it finally came out.

Michiel1989352d ago (Edited 352d ago )

I think you're confused with blue protocol. From what I can see it was revealed at gamescom last year

nvm it said reveal trailer there, but it was at least showcased at a sony event before that.

gold_drake352d ago

to be fair, he worked on that alone for the longest time

fan_of_gaming352d ago

It's good to see Sony give this program some advertising (hopefully they'll do a similar page for the newer India Hero Project once some of the games have released from that). I already own Forged in Shadow Torch & ANNO: Mutationem, and after looking up the other 4 released games I'm going to get Hardcore Mecha & Immortal Legacy: The Jade Cipher also. (Animal Force & In Nightmare aren't for me).

Many of the in-development games seem interesting too. The only ones I'm not interested in are Convallaria (if multiplayer-only), Evotinction & RAN: Lost Islands (if multi-player only)

blackblades352d ago

That's good to know those 2 are MP. Sword base games interest me more then Sony 1st party and of course its my opinion and feelings of enjoyment.

neomahi352d ago (Edited 352d ago )

Should've done that in the State of Play but y'all blew it! (I guess I have to edit it). Unless it comes from PlayStation, I wouldn't label it as exclusive. We ought to know better than this by now. Metal Gear USED to be exclusive to PlayStation and then they let it slide. They had a chance to buy the IP from Konami when Konami had no idea what to do. Final Fantasy was once synonymous with PlayStation, moreso than Nintendo. Square now sounds like theyre considering multiplatform more now. Resident Evil somehow went to Nintendo, but again, PlayStation. Recently? Kena: Bridge of Spirits had potential, but PlayStation saw it as a limited time cash grab rather than a talented animation studio that just needed some help on gameplay design aspects. Now? Going to Xbox when Xbox is supposed to be a dying breed and devs were ready to abandon it. You can't trust that stuff anymore. I mean, you never could, it's marketing and you have to be above and beyond and smarter than the company trying to market to you, that's why Xbox has been struggling. Consumers saw through their deceit but, these are timed, if that

70°

Capcom reveals its PC game sales overshadow console, and it's only growing

The earnings reports of Capcom's Fiscal year 2024 showcase the growth of PC over console, with 60% of game sales being made on the former.

Vits13h ago

What’s interesting is that, given how well their games sell, it’s very likely most of them fall into the 25/75 revenue split bracket. The larger ones, like Monster Hunter, are in the 20/80 bracket.

So even accounting for the vastly superior regional pricing on PC, I wouldn’t be surprised if revenue-wise from digital sales, both platforms are close, or if PC is ahead as well.

neutralgamer199223m ago(Edited 20m ago)

Yes PC is the biggest platform and it has definitely improved as a home console of sort plug and play. It's the only platform with actual freedom for gamers with modding. I was a console gamer for over 38 years and now I only play on Pc. Whether you are buying pre-built or building it yourself it's now easier than ever before to jump in

And my experience with pc gamers has been excellent, they are helpful with any questions on pc boards

TheColbertinator12m ago

Make every game available on Steam by default. The consoles are secondary

100°

Tomb Raider 12 dev brings in “external partner” as Embracer delays mysterious AAA game to FY 2026/27

Tomb Raider 12 developer has brought in an "external partner" as mysterious AAA game gets delayed to FY 2026/27 by Embracer.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
RaidenBlack2d ago

What are the chance the mystery game is a Deus Ex?
Yea I wish ...

200°

FTC drops case against Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard deal

The FTC has officially dropped its case against Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
slate914d ago

The sweet smell of tax dollars burning

Killa784d ago

From the unemployment this deal caused, no doubt.

Obscure_Observer4d ago

"The sweet smell of tax dollars burning"

They never stood a chance. It was a lost cause from the start. And yet, still, they´d decided to go ahead and double down on their bs to bleed the taxpayer even more.

dveio4d ago

The IRS demands 29bn USD in not paid taxes from Microsoft.

If we're talking bleeding.

1Victor4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

@slate: “ The sweet smell of tax dollars burning “

The smell of political donations endorsements under the table.
There I fixed it it for you
We all knew Microsoft plan of “10 years of all systems publishing “ and some of its supporters happy that after all the games would be “exclusive to Xbox “ now that things have changed and Microsoft got humbled by the lost of money from CoD going down from OVER A BILLI🤑N to
MILLI😩NS the sales failing of games that would released on PlayStation and be forced by INVESTORS asking for their M🤑NEY to grow faster than the next 10 years it is obvious that it would be a waste of money to continue this litigation.
Edit:@obscured: “ They never stood a chance. It was a lost cause from the start “

Same as your grievance stages.
Have you passed the bargaining stage yet ? Or are you still on the anger stage 🤣

slate914d ago

I knew my singe bipartisan sentence would bring out the crazies. Thanks for the wall

Astrokis4d ago

Not sure if I’m disturbed or entertained but either way I hope you are alright

OtterX4d ago

I think they're convinced now that MS won't (and can't) withhold releases from conpeting platforms. MS on the street corner now like, "Who wants a taste?!"

PhillyDonJawn4d ago

I wont be too sure of that. Gotta wait and see till after these deals expire

OtterX4d ago

That's how it always starts, "I'll just work this street corner for a short while until I get caught up on my bills..."

Tacoboto4d ago

Oh yeah, they're totally gonna make Xbox exclusives again, with the hardware they're totally committed to selling and making available lol

raWfodog4d ago

As far as I'm aware, the only 'deal' that was discussed was for Call of Duty. Xbox had no obligation to make any of their other games multiplatform. They did that of their own accord.

OtterX4d ago (Edited 3d ago )

**btw, I'm talking about street food vendors, just in case there's any confusion!

https://external-content.du...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
Lightning774d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I've seen videos and talk a online speculating MS long game. Some think that MS multiplat move is use to appease the FTC so they can buy more and is somehow a move that could get Sony to open up their platform. In other words them going third party and letting their games go everywhere. MS possible scheme and ulterior motives, speculated by Jeff Grubb is that putting Xbox store on PS via regulation Which would hurt PS buissness very badly because that 30% cut would be even less or not a cut at all. MS buys more because they're "playing nice" by opening up its platform to Epic store and steam which would force Apple and Sony to open up their ecosystem to other stores like MS.

If that's the case that'll mean as I said before, PS fans buying Cod on PS via MS store would give 100% maybe even 90% of the money being pocketed by MS while Sony's store front wanes when it comes to third party because guess what? MS is buying more third party and preying off the extreme ignorance of the FTC. Manipulation of the FTC and MS overtaking the PS store and customers

My thing is this. I know it's a opinion and speculation but why does Sony have to open up its store or force them to go multiplat? If they still believe in selling their freakin console then let them do it. If they want to provide the best games and the best content for its fans then let them do it!? Why because the competition is trash at selling games and consoles for 14 years now Sony has to change? MS using the ignorance of the FTC to overtake gaming as we know it?

Again it's just talk and opinion but man this seems very, very possible imo.

dveio4d ago

Well, at the time, I actually did think the FTC and CMA did a poor job in court. But also the judge.

Having said that - it is what it is.

If 75bn mergers in any industry ain't a threshold to deny them, then I don't know what is.

As far as your thoughts about other 3rd parties getting taken over in the future go:

I think publisher buyouts are off the list now. I think it would be reeeeally difficult for MS to win another trial try taking over any other publisher.

But smaller studios ... maybe.

However, right now I can't see studios out there advocating for a buyout from Microsoft.

That isn't to say an announcement of such couldn't drop on Monday already. Because we today know that Microsoft had approached a plethora of other studios in 2018 to 2021, such as IOI, CD Project, etc.

We'll see. And we can't do anything about it. It's up to trade commissions and then probably courts to decide.

Lightning774d ago (Edited 4d ago )

"I think publisher buyouts are off the list now. I think it would be reeeeally difficult for MS to win another trial try taking over any other publisher."

That's the thing MS is ticking all the boxes by not have anything be exclusive so the CMA/FTC see that they're doing "fair practice" in games and content distribution. Which technically greenlits more aquisions or it makes it easier for acquisitions because MS is a mega publisher now.

"However, right now I can't see studios out there advocating for a buyout from Microsoft."

Hopefully not but them going multiplat could entice Studios to join MS because nothing is not longer exclusive which means more money for them, studio and teams.

We can't do nothing about it but Sony can. They can block xbox games on their console (lose that 30% cut) but Sony won't do that because that's money that will be lost and Sony runs a buissness. That's the only way to hurt or slow down Xbox.

I'm probably over thinking it as I do these things but it's something we shouldn't just ignore and be weary of MS motives here. I'm keeping an eye on them.

Rancegamerx4d ago

The idea that Microsoft is manipulating the FTC and forcing Sony to open its platform is silly and has no evidence to back it up. Microsoft’s multiplatform approach is 100% due to past failures and its laughable position in the gaming industry. Their best attempt was a fluke and a lie, brought on by Sony’s missteps and a poorly made machine that broke down too often.

Sony would never allow themselves to be "forced" to do anything; they control their platform and storefront perfectly fine without the need or desire to add an unnecessary Microsoft storefront. Even if, by some flaw on Sony’s part, Microsoft were able to introduce its store on PlayStation, Sony would adapt rather than collapse. Digital storefront competition already exists (Steam, Epic Games Store, Xbox Store), and PlayStation’s business won’t suddenly "wane."

Also, regulators like the FTC don’t operate on ignorance—they actively assess market behavior to prevent monopolies. Microsoft isn’t secretly overtaking gaming with some ultimate scheme. The industry might be changing or shifting (for the worse, in my opinion), but Sony will continue evolving based on market trends, not because of alleged schemes.

Gaming isn’t about one company "playing nice" or another being "forced" to change—it’s about making money with games, something Microsoft has yet to achieve in 25+ years.

Lightning774d ago

"The idea that Microsoft is manipulating the FTC and forcing Sony to open its platform is silly and has no evidence to back it up."

That's why I said it was all speculation that's what Jeff Grubb opinion. I made that clear several times. You know what's funny? When Jim was in court ppl got mad at the FTC for protecting Jim Ryan instead of the consumer. Maybe he was right to worry about his business. Now look Releasing Xbox games on PS keeps MS studio an a float. Now Xbox games are all over PS now. Maybe Jim was onto something.

MS is still competing with Sony just in a very different way. The FTC back down mainly means they can buy more and MS next steps can proceed. We'll have to see what happens in the future but I wouldn't be so sure on your stance.

InUrFoxHole4d ago

@Lightning77
MS putting games everywhere is the most consumer friendly thing I've seen a game company do.

dveio4d ago

@InUrFox

What does "putting everywhere" actually mean?

This book has so many pages.

• Xbox was dying in revenue
• Regulators put a 10 year deal on CoD
• Microsoft had to give away the streaming
• Spencer himself only offered 3 yrs initially

And most importantly

• Again, Xbox was dying in revenue

Xbox have the benefit of their actual financial situation giving regulators and courts the impression they release games everywhere, what they actually do.

But for reasons they can't be proven guilty of anything in court.

I'm not judging, it's just what it is.

IF the Series generation would have developed differently and was much more successful, I don't hesitate any second to believe in what Spencer had originally planned to do:

• Make everything Xbox exclusive
• We today know that Spencer had also approached Sega, From Software, CD Project, Nintendo, and even Valve was on their list of buyouts.

MS are playing a card here everyone knows why they are doing it.

Putting Doom "everywhere", which even was it already before it got bought, ain't a MS thing.

It would had hurt them in many ways if they'd put it exclusively to Xbox.

But, no matter what - it is what it is.

Xbox bought themselves back into the game. And I think many people just don't have very fond feelings towards this behaviour, wether on corporate nor private levels.

Let's see how they'll run with it.

In 2030, but most importantly after regulations will have expired we will learn better.

Reaper22_4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Seemed like a lost cause anyway. Microsoft gambled and it paid off big time. That's what you call a big boss move. Sony played a huge part in the success of that acquisition.

wesnytsfs4d ago

Bout time. Pointless from the start.

Show all comments (26)