GTA 5 voice actor Ned Luke has called out an AI company for using his voice for their AI chatbot without his consent.
The GTA 5 Agent Trevor DLC episode could have been a real treat for fans on PlayStation and Xbox, before it was scrubbed sometime before 2017.
With the amount of money they generated, I just don’t understand the scrubbing of this. It would’ve been fantastic for fans.
I really want to know who drove the decision to focus on multiplayer was it Rockstar or take two.
Because when online started taking off many of the studio leads began having falling outs and leading including a founder
One of the reason I believe once gta 6 release, most of us thoroughly play it, enjoy the world they crafted then after that no offline support, no dlc at all
Grand Theft Auto V was released on PC on the 14th of April 2015. That means the game will be nine years old in four days, and it’s still among the most-played titles on Steam. With a 24-hour peak of 145K players, it’s as popular as Baldur’s Gate 3, Apex: Legends, and Destiny 2.
The freedom to explore large areas, approach objectives in multiple ways, and stumble across amusing distractions will always be an excellent format for video games, but some do it better than others. To celebrate the formula and parse the best from the best, have a look at the best open-world games of all time so far.
i feel for people in this situation. mainly because i know ai will come for me next. I'm trying to write a fantasy novel as a hobby/side hustle. I can't help feeling in a couple years chatgpt will spit out millions of novels and flood the market making my already slim chance of a book, drown in a sea of computer made novels.
Edit: The other thing is they don't even repay anyone for copying their voice and using it as a baseline. Just like they don't pay copyrights to the images they use to create ai art as a baseline.
This shit is getting annoying. You can't just steal someone's voice, mannerisms, personality, etc., and turn them into some AI. If you don't see a problem with doing that then you clearly weren't raised right.
The thing about these llms is they require a metric shitton of data and the developers don't care where it comes from as long as it's modern information pulled from countless webpages videos images songs etc.
If we trained llms on what is in the public domain they would be pretty useless.
So here we are walking trending a new ground of what letal and just and who has been screwed over.
I don't have any answers outside of copying someone's likeness is obviously wrong but it's also not new we've had deep fakes for around 8 years or so now.
I'm not worried about ai taking jobs right now it's output is pretty bad and untrustworthy I've asked it to code for me at first glance it looks good but the reality is when you actually look at what it's doing it's essentially full of what the call hallucinations essentially made up garbage
This is going to turn into another "occupy wall street": do a few book deals, make some money off of the slacktivist market, brought to you by some Banksy rip-offs. Finally, at the twilight of one's career, do some paid appearance money talking about how AI is bad... Sounds like a plan.
On YouTube I saw an advertisement using Ai with snoop dog supposedly promoting a service