430°

Starfield Is The Most Played RPG Of 2023 Despite Baldur’s Gate 3 Being The Most Acclaimed

There were a lot of great games released in 2023, but Baldur’s Gate 3 received huge acclaim from critics and players, and it can already be called the main project of the year, although the results are still being summed up. Most of the Game of the Year awards went to Baldur’s Gate 3, as did many of the Best RPG titles of the past year. But players seem to be spending more time in Starfield, which has been heavily criticized since its release.

203d ago Replies(1)
Markdn203d ago

Erm starfield was given away free, bg3 was not.

Einhander1972204d ago

Starfield:: Mostly Negative (8,098)

Current Players: 13,487
30-Day Avg: 12,159.6

-663.3 -5.17%

all-time peak :330,597

Baldur's Gate 3: Overwhelmingly Positive (33,383)

Current Players: 224,236
30-Day Avg: 141,139.7

+9,331.9 +7.08%

all-time peak: 875,343

Lightning77204d ago

At this point I doubt anyone cares anymore. Still the most played lol.

Reaper22_203d ago Show
Christopher203d ago

"No one cares about the negatives except those other games that are more liked, we only want to focus on the positives."

shadowknight203203d ago

What kind of fanboyism do you spew. The puke and regurgitate kind.

Angyobangyo202d ago

Seeing as you replied multiple times on this thread subject, obviously you "care". Quality over quantity, something XBots will never get accustomed to.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 202d ago
204d ago Replies(3)
Zeref203d ago

It was mostly positive at first for Starfield and then some influencers said they didn't like it and then it started going negative lol.

It's the most blatant example of bandwagoning I've ever seen.

Nothing about the game changed since launch and all of a sudden people "hate" it?

Einhander1972203d ago

Do you think that's more or less impactful than Microsoft only giving review copies to review sites that would give them high scores?

Because, if you watched metacritic the score dropped significantly after the first wave of cherry picked reviews.

Zeref203d ago

@Einhander

I'm talking about the Steam reviews.

The metacritic is still at 83.

Einhander1972203d ago

I feel like you don't understand what I am saying.

Microsoft gave this game out to select sites to provide the initial reviews, which were very high mostly 9-10's then when more sites got the game we saw way more 7's and lower. So just like Steam the reviews started out inflated then dropped.

And the user score on Starfield is a 70 on metacritic. Which is questionable, since it was 63, but then metacritic removed the exact amount of negative reviews to push it back up to an exact 70.

Crows90203d ago

Absolutely false. At launch people said there are clear issues...most were overlooked because Bethesda but when players got their hands on it...yeah we didn't overlook that shit.

I asked a friend of mine who payed it before I did and all he could say was it is "alright/meh" mind you this guy was super excited and he was about to buy the PS5 for starfield! I told him about the Bethesda purchase and that it wouldn't be on PS5. Saved him regret and yet now I'm thinking he still has regret. Lol

Christopher203d ago

*** It's the most blatant example of bandwagoning I've ever seen. ***

As opposed to the initial bandwagoning by those same influencers who said they liked it at first?

203d ago
Petebloodyonion203d ago (Edited 203d ago )

@Enhander
Get your facts straight man
Bethesda didn't give a single review code to any media in the UK, they didn't cherry-pick they denied all of them.
The ones that got to review the game were media (IGN for example) who asked for a code via the USA branch and provided it to the UK branch.

Now I'm sure that the media that got denied made a non-biased review of the game that in no shape or form illustrates their frustration of the situation because Media never does that (surely not IGN with Pray or Gamespot with Harry Potter).

anast203d ago

They played a bit longer and found out it wasn't a redeeming experience.

poppatron203d ago

Have you played it?

It isn’t terrible, and starts off quite well, but the cracks soon begin to show and minor annoyances that you looked over in the beginning soon overwhelm any good and after a while it’s an exercise in pure frustration. Just my opinion of course. I left it 20 hours in

Hereandthere202d ago

The game is trash that looks and runs like it was made for the xbox 360. Shame on the xbox twitter influencers spamming game of gen for that garbage.

shinoff2183202d ago (Edited 202d ago )

I don't think it was the influencers as you suggested. I think it's more people got more time with it. It wore off quick with me I only got 20 hours or so into it before I ditched it waiting for updates and whatnot. Call fanboy all you want but I didn't buy a series x to say I didn't like starfield. I wanted to love it like I do fallout. It's lacking in lore, exploration, and other areas and needed more time in development, and I'm convinced it was pushed out the door so xbox had something for the holiday.

Yui_Suzumiya202d ago

Sheep mentality at its best is what I call it

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 202d ago
Grievous203d ago

Steam shows unbiased numbers as everyone paid for it.

Lightning77203d ago

@Chris the game gets plenty of negativety. Article after article allot of it is just reaching at this point in fact that's all you see. Basically what you're saying is let's continue to focus on the negative and not even mention any of the positive. The little positive that That it has.

Yet the player counts go up and the engagement is up. That's why I said it doesn't really matter anymore. Negative or positive the game is still in the social loop and still played.

203d ago
shinoff2183202d ago

I didn't see much positive though. People glamor about the ship building but I wasn't impressed. The game was cooking for 8 years (probably more inreality). It should not have released in such shape. Other bethsada games do what this game does but better. How is that possible? Again I think they will get it right eventually I was just hoping it was right from the beginning and I was let down.

JackBNimble203d ago

You're certainly on the hate campaign bandwagon.
Have you played it, do you own it or are you just another psfanboy?

Move on if it ain't for you, people will vote with their wallet.

recoctimocassirnff203d ago

I immediately called BS when I read the title.

Those steam stats really are really very telling.

Chevalier202d ago

Weird all Xbox fans do is point out engagement numbers, but, when someone brings up negative numbers according to those same people it's unimportant or no one cares.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 202d ago
Terry_B204d ago

Only because of gamepass lol

Walalon203d ago

Idk why you are being down voted because it's true... With Gamepass you can play Starfield, meanwhile with BG3 you have to paid(low for the awesome experience the game is) to play it. But of course, fanboys will always support MS, the company who call them if they are sick, hug them if they are sad or send you a gift when it's your birthday...

Terry_B203d ago

Its the same 5-10 xbox people here that downvote anything that might be negative when it comes to xbox. No matter if its a simple fact or not :-)

InUrFoxHole202d ago

Fanboys will always support MS.. You do realize your complaint is gamers are supporting a service that provides them with solid games and 1st party day 1 vs. Paying full price for a game? Lol that's hilarious 😂.

CPTN MITCHELL203d ago

Not only game pass but also a bag of Doritos will give you access to GlitchField

Crows90203d ago

I used that actually! 😂

JackBNimble203d ago

"Only because of gamepass"
But they're still playing it even with all the other games on GP.

It's easy to list the games we hate and give weak arguments why other people are playing them. Excuses for why game is doing better then we hoped for.

It's pretty sad really

204d ago Replies(5)
Lightning77204d ago

Larian. Players had played 452,556,984 hours in Baldur’s Gate 3 by December 5, 2023.

Bethesda. Players had spent 534,823,944 hours playing Starfield by December 20, 2023.

It's in the article. Not like it matters, the salt will commence anyway.

Neonridr203d ago (Edited 203d ago )

I don't get why people care. Call of Duty puts in more hours each year than some amazing 1st party titles. Do people cry and stomp their feet? No.

But because it's Starfield, let the hate/excuses commence.

dumahim203d ago

Baldur's Gate info is a bit older now and there's over 10 times as many people, on average, playing on Steam than Starfield. BG3 is holding up while Starfield has been falling off. Not to mention BG3 since released on Xbox since those BG3 numbers. How do you think those numbers would look with current info?

mrcatastropheAF203d ago

The bulk of starfield players are probably playing through GP or on Xbox so idk why people keep referencing the steam stats as if they demonstrate the larger picture.

That being said, Starfield is chips. Love xbox and gamepass, but Starfield is chips

dumahim203d ago

@mrcatastropheAF

The Steam numbers are telling because those are all from people who paid for the game and have more incentive to have their money spent be worthwhile. Yes, the GP numbers will be higher due to no added cost, but there's even less incentive to keep playing there.

itsmebryan203d ago

You didn't add since BG3 is a muti platform and Starfield (which I'm still playing) is a Xbox console exclusive the numbers for Starfield are even more impressive. 😉

MrNinosan203d ago

BG3 just became a multiplatform, but when the stats is from before BG3 Xbox stats.

BG3 was available on PS5 and PC.
Starfield on Series S, Series X, PC and GamePass.

ChasterMies203d ago

What a piece of shit click bait title.

Crows90203d ago (Edited 203d ago )

Wait....so they gave starfield more days?

15 more days is a lot.

porkChop203d ago

No. Bruh, use your head. Starfield launched a month after BG3. So Starfield actually had less total days, even with that "extra" 15.

Crows90202d ago

@porckchop

I already thought of that. But it's irrelevant since bg3 had 3 different launches throughout platforms.

1st on PC then on PS5 and recently on Xbox.
So comparing a mixed release like that vs a free game on Xbox and pc is tough.

If they're going to say it has more playtime then pick a point in time and compare the 2...don't do some silly shenanigans to try to get your desired result.

porkChop201d ago

I think you misunderstood the article. They didn't cherry pick the data. They used the official stats released by Larian on Dec 5th and Bethesda on Dec 20th. Those are the most up-to-date stats, and they include all platforms.

notachance202d ago

hogwarts legacy had 400mil hours by March 23 so eh

Angyobangyo202d ago

Current steam concurrent data:

Starfield: 8,500 lol
BG3: 186, 000

Yes, let the salt commence.

Lightning77202d ago (Edited 202d ago )

Gee I'm so salty.

Doesn't change anything like I said nobody even cares anymore about Steam numbers high or low that's just one platform. still top 10 most played on Xbox still.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 201d ago
Show all comments (112)
120°

BG3 is still seeing 100k concurrent players, proving that not every game needs to be live-service

With so many live-service games to choose from it can be incredibly overwhelming to decide what to play these days.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
just_looken20h ago

Gta from 2008 can at times have ten times the player count than suicide squad 2024.

gtaiv
https://steamdb.info/app/12...

SS
https://steamdb.info/app/31...

There is a pool of players that want to be milked bdsm style that pool is not growing as fast as the amount of players that are needed to support so many of these live service titles. The limited time crap is also a chore for alot of users like how diablo 4 forces user's to max out a character every 3 months to get the new gear.

andy8520h ago

Not surprised. Probably the most attention to detail in a game ever.

Popsicle12h ago

I have 300 hours in the game, and while I see why it isn’t for everyone, I never played a game with such freedom and attention to detail. The world feels alive in a way I have personally never experienced.

On a side note, my wife has never liked video games, but I got her to try this one. She now has 150+ hours in the game. It took 17 years, but I can now share one of my favorite hobbies with her. Amazing game!

CrimsonWing6917h ago

I think GaaS proves not every game needs to be GaaS. Sony’s finding this out the hard way.

StormSnooper14h ago

How about MS? Their games are almost all gaas.

CrimsonWing6911h ago(Edited 11h ago)

I mean, that’s like picking on the special needs kid. MS hasn’t been doing so hot since they launched that sh*t show of an Xbox One. In their defense their exclusives coming up look a lot hotter than say Concord, Marathon, or whatever that GaaS Heist game Sony has.

My point was less console wars and more that GaaS is the most volatile of all models of games to produce. Jim Ryan made it an initiative to double down on them. I see far more failure than success and yet these scum bags keep pushing it almost out of spite for most of them not being supported. It’s pretty revolting to be honest. There’s literally ONLY one reason GaaS exists and it’s pretty damn greedy reason.

VersusDMC10h ago

What did Sony find out with the 12 million sales of Helldivers 2? And we didn't even find out yet with Concord as it hasn't released yet.

And is every PS5 exclusive this year GaaS? Check your math on that.

CrimsonWing699h ago(Edited 9h ago)

First off, pull your head out of Sony’s ass. There’s no math to check. I said Jim Ryan’s focus on GaaS. So, work on your reading comprehension skills.

While we’re at it, since I know this is going to twist into an Irrational discussion, let’s just table this for when Concord releases. I get that it’ll ruffle fanboys feathers.

I only name dropped Sony because of their GaaS focus and, well you’re on this site quite frequently, let me know the ratio of Concord negativity articles to the positive ones…

I’m also shocked at the support for GaaS. This is why we’re at this point in the industry, though.

VersusDMC8h ago

@crimson

Who is supporting GaaS?

I'm just pushing back on your statement that "every game is GaaS". Which is obviously brain dead looking at the single player games Sony published or had exclusively released so far this year compared to live service. And after Concord there's Astro Bot and Silent Hill 2.

And Helldivers 2 is clearly the game the devs wanted to make and Firewalk is a self proclaimed multiplayer game studio so they wouldn't have made a game you wanted to play anyways.

So take your head out of your own ass and stop with the hyperbole.

CrimsonWing697h ago(Edited 6h ago)

First off, “the every game as GaaS” was staying on the same line as the article title, “proving that not EVERY game needs to be live-service.”

I mean, holy sh*t, why get a wild hare up your a** over that? You saw me mention Sony, which I did over Concord’s reception and the fact that they have plans for more GaaS, and you totally go into defensive fanboy mode.

“Who’s supporting GaaS?”

Literally brings up how successful Helldivers 2 is.

It’s like impossible to discuss anything with fanboys because as soon as they pull away from swallowing Sony’s gravy they’re so out of touch with any negative fact over their precious brand that it just turns into a sh*t show to have any sensible discourse.

Facts: reception to GaaS games are mostly negative than positive.

Facts: More GaaS fail over GaaS games that do succeed.

Facts: Concord is getting poor reception

Facts: Sony has a bunch more GaaS in the pipeline.

So, yea get your head out of Sony’s ass and learn to interpret and comprehend what’s being said instead of losing your sh*t and claiming hyperbole. It’s super f*cking annoying.

VersusDMC6h ago

You're just a baby that throws tantrums when a game genre comes out that you don't like.

And when you see one be unpopular you claim they all are so they stop making it like a child without considering there are people that like these kind of games and would like new ones. I don't like them. But i'm not a narcissist to go out and demand people stop making that type of game.

You have the same mentality as the executives that closed down Japan studio. "They don't sell, nobody likes them, spread the devs to other studios to make games that people actually like and buy."

Sony had one break records and one that might bomb. That won't stop them from making more. So keep seething.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6h ago
Furesis13h ago

What? Live service is there to milk money. Even if BG3 had 5 mil concurrent players it still wouldn't generate any extra money, that is the point of live service and for u to not own anything. BG3 being popular will sell more copies sure but this is not the point. And this is one of the best and biggest game in recent history of course it will have good numbers, it is relatively new too. I get what you are getting at but you are kinda brute forcing your point. Kinda of a no brainer take anyway tbh

phoenixwing10h ago

What dumb sh!t article and thinking is this that concurrent players means a thing worth talking about? It has zero influence on how much lifetime money these companies make. Bg3 sold millions of copies at 60 dollars a pop and made bank. Having a bunch of players later on revisiting the game does little to say anything other than ppl like to play it. If the numbers go down compared to a live service game it makes no difference.

Tldr: concurrent players means nothing for single player games amd this article is a waste of time on what must have been a slow news day

Christopher5h ago

Are we arguing for company profit or for player happiness?

phoenixwing1h ago

It doesn't show player happiness either only a snapshot of ppl liking to play it at that point in time. It makes nonsense

Christopher44m ago

***It doesn't show player happiness either only a snapshot of ppl liking to play it at that point in time.***

You really need to reread what you just typed phoenixwing. Number of people playing GaaS doesn't show profit either, btw. But, 100k people regularly playing a game, let alone a SP game with no season pass or the like, absolutely is a sign of player happiness.

Show all comments (17)
290°

10 "Bad" Games I Actually Enjoyed

TNS: "We're shining a light on a bunch of "bad" games that may've been left wanting when it comes to their critical or audience reception."

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Good list I've had similar reactions to some games even ones on the list like the order and Callisto

Also I recently grabbed forspoken for, 5 dollars at a eb games Clarence sale and I am actually enjoying it more than I thought I would

Sometimes you just need to give critically panned games a chance

FTLmaster2d ago

Oh gosh, good shout on Forspoken! Genuinely forgot about that one, and haven't got around to playing it. It's on my to-buy-in-a-sale list!

Cacabunga1d 15h ago (Edited 1d 15h ago )

Knack was great ! Had a blast with the first one. Haven’t tried the second one though due to backlog

The Fight: Lights Out was also a game i enjoyed very much and highly detailed with great motion control when you understand how they work, which is what pushed people away from this game..

LoveSpuds1d 13h ago

Both The Order and Calisto were harshly treated in my view. I am not saying they are perfect, but the were both really solid games. I personally really liked them despite acknowledging their flaws and coincidentally, got the platinum trophy for both games.

Evil West is another really fun game that's worth checking out for sure.

andy851d 13h ago

Forspoken was great. Never really understood all the criticism. 2nd best traversal in a game after Spiderman

Profchaos1d 6h ago

Yeah gameplay wise I get huge infamous vibes with its combat starting out as low level eventually becoming a unstoppable power spewing killing machine with a wide variety of powers infamous is one of my favourite franchises obviously it's not the same but I love the combat of it so far.

ChasterMies2d ago

I feel like we’re finally starting to see a sea change in how we treat our favorite games. Sure, we all acknowledge that a game can suck and we can still enjoy it. Hopefully this results in meaningful review scores. Personally, I find a lot of bad games are better if you blast through them on the easiest difficulty. Callisto protocol on the image is a good example of this.

LoveSpuds1d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

I really liked Calisto, harshly treated for sure and I don't necessarily think it needs to be played on easy to enjoy it. It's not perfect, but it's not the car crash the media portrayed it as either.

I have said it before, but part of the issue is that there is a mind share going on in games coverage, with all the main outfits being personal friends and talking too each other. As such, there is a risk that everyone ends up sharing in the same opinion rather than thinking from themselves. I reckon that's why some games get a universal bashing when consumers actually like the game and equally, games get great reviews across the board and the game doesnt land with consumers.

RaidenBlack2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Actually, I started liking FO76 after the wastelanders DLC ... it has been my guilty pleasure
other games I can think of Order 1886, Driveclub, Resident Evil 6 (only the Leon part), Alpha Protocol (pretty unique, needs a remake), XIII Remake (after patches), Medal of Honor 2010, Medal of Honor Warfighter, Homefront The Revolution, Enemy Front, Legendary The Box, Faces of War, Conflict: Vietnam, Conflict: Global Storm & Codename: Panzers – Cold War

CosmicTurtle2d ago

Driveclub was genuinely a good game with a poor launch. Alpha Protocol is superb, just a few archaic design choices for the time.

RaidenBlack1d 15h ago

I want past games with interesting setups/mechanics but having some flaws (due to crunch or budget) to be remade so that the gaming community can appreciate and enjoy them as was envisioned and intended by the developers. In contrast to a successful game being remade again just with prettier coat of paint.
Alpha Protocol tops that and I'll include FO:NV as well as an exception (it is popular but features were cut due to limited dev time). And also Vampire the Masquerade: Bloodlines I, Singularity, KOTOR II and maybe Daikatana.
There might be others which I can't recall atm.

SonyStyled2d ago

I loved Enemy Front. I pre ordered it months prior and remember calling the store to check if it came out that day. The guy never heard of it but confirmed my copy was ready to pick up. Game was simple and basic in a good way. Didn’t have any tacked on extras. A simple mission and objectives in each level. Kind of reminded me of the first Crysis in a way

gold_drake2d ago

The Order was really good. abit short

RiseNShine2d ago

I loved The Order, ridiculous graphics for it's time and a very interesting setting, it was linear but not as bad as people say. Similar thing with Callisto Protocol, i admit that i played it a long time after release so maybe issues were fixed by then, but it was a fantastic Dead Space-like horror game with some of the best graphics i've seen in my life.

LoveSpuds1d 13h ago

Yup, I am afraid to say I waited on Calisto and picked it up for around 30 quid. Once I played it on felt really badly for the devs because the game was really decent.

Show all comments (26)
100°

Earth Becomes Habitable Again in Starfield, Thanks to this Mod

Thanks to the Starfield Creation Kit, the "Earth Restored" mod has transformed the Earth into a Pine Forest and filled the sea with life.

Read Full Story >>
gamerstones.com
4d ago