380°

Bethesda Expected To Make Almost $1 Billion On Starfield

According to financial projections released as part of the Xbox data leaks, Bethesda expected to make almost $1 billion on Starfield.
That estimate comes over a four-year span. In year one, the company projected $600 Million followed by $215 Million in year two. Years three and four see the numbers fall a bit as the game’s lifecycle moves on with projections of $50 million and $35 million, respectively.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
MrDead215d ago

I don't think it's going to happen as only one platform is paying full price and that platform as of right now has double the amount of people currently playing Baldurs Gate 3 then Starfield also Starfield is currently fallen to a 75% rating on Steam.
I'm enjoying Starfield to a point, the problem is a vast universe of reused locations and no real exploration. There's one reused location that confused me for a while, the one where a sniper is on a roof of a science facility. The sniper sits next to a cool box thats surrounded by empty beer bottles and I always wondered how they would drink anything outside with zero air, then I landed on a planet with a breathable atmosphere and it all made sense. The reused locations are not atmosphere dependant, they just turn up on any planet with the same loot, the same enemies in the same location talking about the same thing. Very disappointing, I can't see me filling this with over 300+ mods and spending a years playing it like Fallout and Elder Scrolls

ChasterMies215d ago (Edited 215d ago )

Starfield is now enough of a curiosity that it can make up ground at discount prices. Some folks will want to see how bad it is. Black Friday isn’t that far away. And folks can always sign up for a month of Game Pass. This brings us to the real issue here. Microsoft really doesn’t care about one-time sales anymore. They would rather you subscribe.

S2Killinit214d ago

This is probably prior to MS taking the game off other platforms.

Jin_Sakai215d ago (Edited 215d ago )

Developers only make a fraction of retail. The cost of development supposedly started at $200 million and ended up being $400 million with 500 developers. However I do see $1 billion being possible. Revenue vs. profit would be interesting.

ken2813214d ago

Only way this happen if they Port the game on PS5. Gamepass not only would have to pay Bethesda but also all the other publishers on the monthly platform.

itsmebryan214d ago

@ken

The $1 billion estimate is without PS5. Over 2 million paying players in early access alone. It sold very well on steam. This was proof of concept that they don't need PS5 to be successful. Or are you going to say 2 million paying early access customers before launch is a flop?

peppeaccardo214d ago

500 developers to make this piece of TURD !? Just WOW ...

anast214d ago

Yes, it is that shocking.

purple101215d ago (Edited 215d ago )

1bn down, 6.5 to go.

BehindTheRows214d ago

We can tell who didn't read...

Anyway, that's a tall order. Perhaps the PC version will pull the bulk of the weight to reach this. Otherwise, I don't see it happening.

PunksOnN4G214d ago

thats 1BN in 4 years dumba$$ LOL
Sony mad that in what 3 days with Ragnarok made 800mil in 3days starfield wont hit 1b Profit for over 4 years HAHAHAH

Profchaos215d ago

I don't see it given the bulk of players will be subscriptions but there's probably some internal metric that translated gp plays to a $ value

The only way this game would be long term profitable is if it loses its exclusive status

Stanjara215d ago

Game exclusivity in this case benefited Starfield because it raged console players and fanboys.

Hagwards Legacy is another example.

ken2813214d ago

We wouldn’t know if it benefited until the console sales numbers for September come out next month. How many people you think jumped shop for gamepass?

Cockney214d ago

The only way they make out that it made 1 bil is if they count engagement as a sale, 1 person on gamepass tries it = £70, its monopoly money yes but if you squint it seems real enough

1Victor215d ago

With the leader console it could easily be achieved but without it I got my doubts it’ll get close to it but only time will tell IF they do get their billion in for years.

Show all comments (52)
70°

Bloober Team Working On 2 New Games Already

Discover the latest news from Bloober Team: they are working on 2 new games, including a new IP in partnership with Private Division.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
280°

Steam’s Refund Policy Change Won’t Affect You Unless You’re A Lowlife

Steam is changing its refund policy, but you probably won’t be affected

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
thorstein23h ago

Should have happened a long time ago. People wanting refunds after 50 hours in game.

fsfsxii19h ago

Pc gamers will take this as an excuse to pirate things

KyRo19h ago

I'm not sure why you're getting disgrees. Whilst not all PC gamers are petty, an awful lot of them are lol

Crows9018h ago

Entirely untrue. Not any more petty than console gamers. The only large difference is console gamers don't have much of a choice.

Michiel198910h ago

Not sure why you're getting agrees. an awful lot of console gamers are overemotional twinks ready to go to war over a plastic box, I'll take being a pc gamer then.

Speaking about overgeneralizing much.

Nooderus1h ago

"X" type of gamer conversations are cringe

qalpha19h ago

Daily reminder that 'TheGamer' is a corporate-generated, anti-gamer, anti-consumer, clickbait web site. They are mostly A.I. generated articles that villainize gamers. They provide nothing positive and actively try to provoke and divide the community through extreme view points and politics. Do not give them any clicks.

Inverno19h ago

Only scumbags? As if people don't play their games on console put in the most amount of hours and return it to GameStop and trade it in for another game. But also how many people are actually do this? And what games have been allowed to be refunded?

DustMan19h ago

You can refund any game you've purchased as long as it hasn't been longer than two weeks, and you've played less than 2 hours. I wish they would change it to 3 hours because some RPG's have so much exposition that you may only get an hour total of complete gameplay. That's my only knock on it. I've refunded plenty of stuff I was just curious to try. I typically stay away from Early Access titles which are the only ones affected by this policy change.

Inverno18h ago

Apparently early access doesn't count, only complete games with a play early preorder bonus.

Gaming4Life198119h ago

I definitely know if I want a refund in 2 hours.

SegaSaturn66910h ago

I never liked refunding anything. Even if a film is bad, i dont want my money back. Sometimes things just aren't for me, and it's not the creator's fault necessarily.

Gaming4Life19815h ago

I feel you and i have never walked out on a bad movie cause I payed my money. I also don't refund games cause I'm a gamer and I know what to buy lol. I think having a digital refund is great.

Show all comments (15)
100°

Media Molecule’s Next Game is Going to be a New IP

A job listing published by the UK studio reveals that its next project will be another entirely new IP.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
Inverno1d 14h ago

The only PlayStation dev I care about tbh.

Inverno19h ago

Dayum did I hit a nerve. Sorry for not liking most of this gens games coming from PS, not really doe.

Cacabunga1d 14h ago

Hopefully doesn’t take them a complete gen to release it

TheColbertinator1d 9h ago

Good. Something not boring, not one of those "make your own game" crap and also on Steam would be nice.

Stopac1d 7h ago

I too like to look for things in the wrong places.