440°

Starfield exceeds 6 million players, becomes Bethesda's biggest game launch

Bethesda's latest RPG Starfield has surpassed 6 million players, making it the biggest Bethesda game launch of all time.

shadowT634d ago

Fallout 4 shipped 12 million copies on launch day, according to Bethesda.

Jin_Sakai634d ago

Everyone fell for the hype. That and Xbox fans are thirsty.

343_Guilty_Spark634d ago

It’s going to be okay.

Now back to Starfield 😊

GhostScholar634d ago

Like you wouldn’t be playing it if it was on ps5. I wish it was on everything too, but don’t be silly and act like it’s not a good game.

PhillyDonJawn634d ago

Shhhh, everythings going to be okay baby *caresses hair* I wish I could play too.

Sonic1881634d ago (Edited 634d ago )

@GhostScholar

I agree that it's a good game but it's not great. It's not better than Elders Scrolls or Fallout. Starfield was overhyped by Xbox fans saying it would be the GOTY

S2Killinit634d ago (Edited 634d ago )

Question is how many are on gamepass? How many will stop playing it after a try.

Show us the breakdown.

MatrixxGT634d ago

Jesus dude, do you go outside? It’s a decent game. Get over it.

shinoff2183633d ago

Ghostscholar, at some point you just have to admit maybe stsrfield just isn't for everyone. Not me I bought my xbox for it but if this was a new elder scrolls game instead I wouldn't be interested. My favorite game from them is fallout and prey, probably stsrfield to once I get more time in. Just realize not everyone is interested in a space rpg just like it takes alot for me to be interested in a medieval type of rpg

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 633d ago
-Foxtrot634d ago

I looked this up and I guess you are right, they did

https://www.gamespot.com/ar...

So why are they saying here that THIS is the biggest launch? If 12 million people bought the game then surely it means 12 million were playing at launch.

Snookies12634d ago

Shipping 12 million is not the same as selling 12 million. Retailers have to order extra copies beyond any that were pre-ordered to have them in stock as well. Granted, I haven't really looked into the sales of Starfield or Fallout 4. Just pointing out that shipping and selling copies are quite different.

Lightning77634d ago

It's shipped vs sold. skyrim shipped 7 million copies but sold 3.5 million. Fallout 4 actually sold13.5 million copies as of 2021. Maybe Fallout did 4 or 5 million sales wise.

Since Xbox entry to gaming is through gamepass (and conventional means) players counts can be much higher as we've seen here.

If you want actual SF sales yeah MS won't give that out. IMO Bethesda needs to give that out if MS won't release sales figures since they're being ran semi independently and all.

VenomUK634d ago

What counts as a player to Microsoft? My understanding that it’s a person who has launched the game once.

For Starfield, and all other games, Microsoft can also measure how many people played for different time increments eg 1-2 hours, 2-3 hours etc. it would be insightful to know how many players as a percentage have played for five or more hours then you can see how many people are playing padded the intro.

Sonic1881634d ago (Edited 634d ago )

How many people of the 12 million played it on gamepass for a $10 dollar monthly subscription? That's what I wanna know

senorfartcushion634d ago

This is very company in America. Happens every major launch for Xbox and PlayStation

shinoff2183633d ago (Edited 633d ago )

Keyword bought. We will probably never know how many we're bought.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 633d ago
GotGame818634d ago (Edited 634d ago )

Shipped, isn't SOLD. It also isn't current players.

Kakashi Hatake632d ago

Players is an awful indicator. I'd take shipped as a better indicator than people that downloaded and pressed start. By that logic, Sony can add downloads to their sales numbers of games like Ratchet and Clank. Keep drinking the kool aid Xbots.

Lightning77634d ago

Now that's more like it. Yes I made a slip up. 1 million concurrent players is very, very good. I thought it was 1 million players.

6 million players exceeds Forza Horizon 5 by a million. I can't find the stat for Halo at launch 343 didn't post.

Regardless the most played Bethesda game at launch is also pretty incredible.

Crows90634d ago

Likely also the least sold. When you practically give out a free game ...yeah..more people will grab it.

Gamepass for PC is quite cheap through Ms edge rewards...

Lightning77634d ago

Yeah that's the plan for MS. Tango game works aren't complaining. They expanded there studio and Pere Hines said that studio will take more risks and future support that studio more all because of one game All through GP. I dunno how the the pay goes but that's not for us to worry about.

Off topic but Todd also teased Indiana Jones to be shown off next year. Possibly next E3 hopefully. More Bethesda goodness.

Sonic1881634d ago (Edited 634d ago )

Gamepass for PC is quite cheap through Ms edge rewards...

Hey, that's supposed to be a secret. We don't want the whole world to know that. Microsoft has been saving me money bro.

FPS_D3TH634d ago (Edited 634d ago )

Literally just saying what everybody even microsoft knows and acknowledges. They don’t expect subscribers to buy a copy of every game on gamepass they enjoy lmao

PunksOnN4G634d ago

Halo Launch Numbers was 20mil in the 1st week idk about concurrent. buit Halo was much bigger then starfield in my eyes

Lightning77634d ago

No it wasn't. That was reported in January 25 2022 not first week. There are no first week numbers for Halo Infinite. Anymore lies I can clear up? I can do this all day, and I often do.

ChasterMies634d ago

Don’t know about Halo Infinite, but the at the apex of Halo, Halo 3 had 1M concurrent players at launch and 13M lifetime sales on Xbox 360. On the high end estimate, Halo 3 May have sold 8M in the first week. That was on Xbox 360 only.

Reaper22_634d ago

I'm loving this game. Definitely one of the best ever. Huge win for Microsoft. Congrats to Phil for making this happen for xbox gamers. Game of the year for sure.

Soulsborne634d ago

Youre giving credit the the wrong person here, also its on PC where it will thrive longer....

Reaper22_634d ago

Youre right. I also thank Sony and Jim Ryan for failing to keep the game on playstation and helping the PC version that will thrive longer and make Microsoft even more money. From the bottom of my heart I thank you.☺️

Lightning77634d ago

Phil's team was responsible for the games overall polish of the game Advance Technology Group or ATG came in early last year to tighten everything up. I was pissed like everyone else when the delayed was called but definitely well worth it. Anyway MS granted them a delay out of last year for said polish. There's some hitches here and there not 100% perfect but it's a absolute farcry from past Bethesda games that's for sure. It's doesn't have that classic Bethesda jank.

No MS wasn't there at the start of development obviously but they certainly helped Bethesda reach the Finish line.

senorfartcushion634d ago

Phil Spencer is quite careless with game launches. Starfield only shipped in a relatively polished state because the last few MS exclusives shipped in terrible conditions. Forza is the only series that shipped in a good state prior to this game

BaughJaughs633d ago

Gears has always been high quality on launch too.

Armaggedon634d ago

Get ready to be crucified for liking it.lol

vTuro24634d ago

What did Phil do other than take it away from Playstation?

shinoff2183633d ago

Jackbnimble, you guys get 1 actually good game in the last decade and suddenly jump on the high horse. Lol. Yall funny. Ps I'm playing through starfield so don't trip

vTuro24633d ago

JackBNimble who are you calling a "Sony Fanboy"? Overly sensitive much? I play on pc you clown. It makes no difference to make if Starfield makes it to PS or not and I'm not even talking about the quality of the game. I asked a simple question. What did Phil actually do to deserve praise? The game was going to come to Xbox regardless.

andy85633d ago

For you maybe, it may not even make the shortlist, and FFXVI might not either.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 633d ago
PunksOnN4G634d ago

6mil?? Thats it out of 30mil gamepass subs,Mobile,console stream,Samsung tvs, Tablets LOL. But xbox kids were sayign GOW:R was a fail with 5.1mil sold in 3days at 70$ a POP LOL

Reaper22_634d ago

No need to be salty over it. Starfield deserves all the praise it's getting. It's a really good game and there's nothing else like it on consoles or PC. It's a huge win for xbox whether people want to admit it or not. It's clear now why Sony was so against this being exclusive. This game alone is gonna make xbox a lot of money.

634d ago
PunksOnN4G634d ago

More money yet Sony this year during the marketing Quarter double what xbox did stop bro you xbox kids be lyign and coping :) Nice try though

Soileh634d ago

I find it amazing that so much of Starfield defense has reduced down to "there is nothing else like it." NMS exists and does exploration better than Starfield. I can already predict your next response which would be "but NMS isn't as good an RPG as Starfield!" Well sure, but Starfield isn't as good an RPG as BG3, so it's not an argument. Starfield's scope is is most defining feature - in a bad way. This is what most people will remember it by, and judging by the user scores on metacritic, the slowly decreasing user reviews on Steam, the poor reviews on Xbox store (2.8/5 from people who PAID for the game to have the privilege of leaving a review) it's going to be remembered as a weak game in the end. Certainly inferior to previous BGS games.

Soileh634d ago

Yeah the numbers are pretty bad once you dig down into all the metrics. BG3 had one million CCUs almost on Steam alone, and by Phil's Spencer's admission of 1m CCUs (meaning 1:4 Steam to Xbox platform) 75% of the players of the game are on Xbox, where the game is free on Game Pass. So 6m players is not good, because they are not sales. BG3 cost full price on release, but managed 1m CCUs, and Starfield was free to play for 30m people accounting 75% of the CCUs, and could only manage the same. Fallout 4 did over 5m sales (to consumers) in the first week, and this has been out a week and only managed 6m PLAYERS, not sales. I'm sure it's acceptable for their metrics, and Xbox doesn't care about taking a loss on the $400m dev costs to get it on Game Pass, but still it's a large decrease from their previous releases, and considering this game was hyped to be "game of the generation" by so many people, but could only manage as many PLAYERS, not sales, as BG3 I think it's safe to say Starfield massively underperformed.

Lightning77634d ago

I'm sorry who said these things? Where's your proof?

Besides we're you expecting 20 million in one day? Yeah right. That's like saying Gow should of done 20 million in a few days after launch. Not freakin happening try harder.

PunksOnN4G634d ago

God of war R. Sold 5.1mil in 3days at 70$ a pop Bud dont disrespect GOD OF WAR R with starfield trash homie

PhillyDonJawn634d ago

1 game had an install base of 100million.
And you think 1/4th reach is nothing? That's amazing. GOW would've had to sold 25-30 million to reach that ratio

Lightning77634d ago

You said ppl said GoW failed with 5.1 million sales at 70$ I don't remember seeing anyone making fun. You're just making stuff up because of course you are.

I'm not comparing nothin what you said didn't make any damn sense at all.

thesoftware730634d ago

Who said GOW:R was a failure? Could you point me to where that was said?

You might be making things up, That was not a general consensus on here.

Also, It's pretty standard for an entire user base not to like, play, download, or buy a game. A good example would be the Stellar Super Mario Odyssey, Switch has like 125 million units sold, and Mario, arguably the biggest franchise ever only sold 27 million. Same for Pokemon, 20+ for a system with 125 mill userbase.

Your comment is silly.

ChasterMies634d ago

Not surprising. Even the best games with the broadest appeal like Spider-Man will sell to less than a quarter of the install base. Even when you give a game away, like publishers did with Lego games and Horizon Zero Dawn during the pandemic, you won’t see the needle move much. That’s why Bethesda was a $7.5B purchase and not a $70B purchase.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 634d ago
Profchaos634d ago

So 50% of the fallout 4 day 1 player base is celebration worthy?

634d ago
porkChop634d ago

Bethesda "shipped" 12 million copies of Fallout 4 for launch day. Shipped does not equal bought.

Gameseeker_Frampt634d ago

"Shipped does not equal bought"

Neither does Starfield's 6 million players since a majority of them are playing through Gamepass.

Charlieboy333634d ago

Do retailers not pay for the copies that are shipped to them ?

porkChop634d ago

@Frampt
No one said it did.

@Charlie
A bit irrelevant considering Profchaos specifically mentioned "day 1 player base". Typically game sales are only ever reported as sold through.

ChasterMies634d ago

In today’s subscription gaming world, played does not equal bought.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 633d ago
Show all comments (110)
60°

Report: Inside Ubisoft's Project Renaissance, a Cancelled Minecraft-Like Voxel Game

In recent years, Ubisoft has canceled several games, one of them being a project code-named Renaissance.

210°

Activision Forces Adverts into Call of Duty Black Ops 6 and Warzone Loadouts

With the launch of Call of Duty Season 4, Activision quietly put adverts inside loadouts for Black Ops 6 and Warzone, sparking a backlash in the process.

2d ago
2d ago
lukasmain2d ago

Putting Ads in a pay-to-play Premium title? Well done Microsoft. Well done /s This is really scummy.

jjb19811d 22h ago

This game will never change because these sweatlords love buying up all the skins and bundles that become obsolete the following year. They're the ones perpetuating Activision's greed.

VenomUK1d 3h ago

If Microsoft introduces adverts into its other games I hope it can do them without disrupting the immersion of the game world. So for example in the new Fable game it would look out of place if there was a billboard advertising Cadillacs.

A far better way to do it would be to have a wizard conjure a 'dream cloud' in front of your character and then in the cloud you can see the Cadillac car and see the text with price and availability and hear a booming sales voice promoting the car. That would work so well as it wouldn't be a billboard and completely, 100%, fit in with your character's adventuring in Albion. Doesn't that sound so much better?!

crazyCoconuts1d 2h ago

@venom, or how about our of 100 farts in Albion, 1 of them has a Cadillac pop out

VenomUK1d 1h ago

@crazyCoconuts That’s undeniably off-beat - but it could really work!

1d 21h ago
Show all comments (19)
240°

SteamOS seems to destroy Windows 11 on gaming performance and battery life, as well as usability

The first direct and natively supported comparison between identical Windows 11 and SteamOS gaming hardware is here. And it's pretty much a bloodbath for Microsoft.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
2d ago
Terry_B2d ago

"And it's pretty much a bloodbath for Microsoft."

OOOKAY! ..Interesting choice of words for that topic lol

ocelot071d 23h ago

Maybe a bit extreme lol. But it's really interesting. Seen one or two videos of Forza Horizon 5. One of the testers used a low end Rx 6500 xt GPU. Using windows FH5 got a average of 62fps fairly respectable. But the same setup using Steam OS using the same settings FH5 got a average of 94fps. Thats a massive gain.

ZycoFox1d 12h ago

Racing games are pretty much always easy to run though. Look at the more demanding ones, 5-13fps gain, not bad but if you already have a decent PC to begin with those gains are small. For a handheld though I guess any boost is a decent boost.

MastaMold1d 16h ago

Yup I would also say that the last time a Windows operating system was good was Windows XP

Software_Lover1d 22h ago

Its an O.S. built SPECIFICALLY for gaming. Am I missing something???

Inverno1d 21h ago

It has basic Linux in it, and you can stuff it with the Linux equivalent of all the apps your casual PC user uses on Windows. The Steam portion of it basically acts like Steam Bug Picture mode which it loads up automatically to that for a more console like experience. It isn't JUST made for gaming.

crazyCoconuts1d 2h ago

And anyone that has tried to extend the life of PCs knows the best way to improve the performance is to replace Windows with Linux

Amplitude1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

@crazyCoconuts:
I dunno, man. I switched to Pop OS exclusively about two weeks ago and when it comes to games i've gotta say i'm a bit disappointed. I had to stop playing A Plague Tale Requiem because i was getting a fluctuating 15-20fps. On Windows I was around 45fps, letting me lock down a perfect 30. With RT. Even Ghost of Tsushima, which i had running at a perfectly locked 60 in Windows, chugged with Proton on the same settings. I had to turn on DLSS Frame Gen to achieve anything even slightly playable (while still looking nice). I really don't like the look of frame gen, not gonna lie. Had to stop playing that as well.

Even RPCS3, which one would assume would run better in Linux, is noticeably worse. Siren Blood Curse chugs like crazy in the split screen segments when it otherwise never did. Plus HDR just isn't possible. I'll say the mandatory UE4 shader compilation step does solve the stutters that otherwise destroy Windows games, though. That's one plus. Needs some work, though. Maybe native Linux games are better.

Still worth it to get away from Microsoft tracking my every move and throwing ads at me every chance they can. Plus it looks CLEAN as hell. Likely never going back to Windows.

crazyCoconuts1d ago

@amp, yeah totally agree. While Linux as an OS is clearly leaner and faster, as long as we're relying on compatibility layers for games, things can get squirrelly on a case by case basis. Publishers need more Linux gamers to justify a separate build target, so it's kinda a chicken and egg problem right now

badz1491d 13h ago

@Sorftware_Lover

Aren't you forgetting the fact that almost all games are "made for Windows"?

crazyCoconuts1d 2h ago

It would be a long road, but that could change. At least a start would be ensuring all games run under proton. Eventually moving away from DirectX. That's probably wishful thinking though

Petebloodyonion1d 21h ago

Should we be surprised?
Steam OS is built solely for gaming, whereas Windows 11 is packed with numerous security features and various overall processes.

Inverno1d 21h ago

I switched to Mint couple months back and it was the best decision I made. Turns out my laptop isn't a complete POS, Windows is. Windows has been a complete headache since I got my laptops a few years back and Linux fixes all those problems. I don't even game on my laptop, I just use it for basic stuff and I cannot recommend switching enough.

badz1491d 8h ago

having the same problems right now with no way back. I have been refusing W11 upgrades all this times with my PC and laptop at home - both Ryzens. but suddenly last week, both of them started to have stability issues for no reason.

the PC with RX6600XT connected to a TV keep crashing and losing display, where I had to keep reinstalling the Radeon software after each reset but no matter what I did, I couldn't get the HDMI audio working anymore despite it has been working fine all this time. the laptop was even worst, it abruptly crashed while I was using MS word and listening to music on YT and then never able to recover again. the Asus recovery, startup repair, restore point, reset windows...nothing worked!

for the PC, I said "F it" and proceeded to W11 upgrade. didn't take long and would you look at that, the Radeon software and HDMI audio working fine from the first boot. this made me think, do MS and AMD have some deal in the back, forcing users to upgrade by purposely messing up their drivers? on the other hand, my laptop was beyond saving, so I fresh installed Windows using USB. thing was, I forgot the USB installer I used was for Win11 not Win10 as I helped a friend build a PC last couple of months and he wanted W11. and yeah my laptop works now.

BUT these don't feel like upgrades at all! they both work but they are noticeably SLOWER than they were when I was on W10! like WTF MS?? it's official that W11 is a bloated, unoptimized mess of an OS that is hiding its flaws behind fast hardware!

CantThinkOfAUsername1d 7h ago

By any chance, did you update Windows 10 recently? The May 13th update, dubbed 'The last security update for Windows 10,' is bricking a lot of Windows 10 PCs (including mine) to force people to upgrade to Windows 11.

badz1491d 4h ago

@CantThinkOfUsername

yeah...I think I might have installed it without knowing. I remember reading about it but it completely skipped my mind at the time. shaddy as hell!

babadivad1d 2h ago

I really don't like Windows 11. If you use an external HDD, it will literally stall out Windows Explorer everytime you open it. It will freeze your PC until the external drive wakes up and spins up.

It does this even when you aren't trying to access anything on the drive. It's so freaking annoying.

Windows 10 didn't have this issue and Windows 8.1 was even better. Windows has been getting progressively slower for a while.

They need to get the Windows 8.1 team to speed this thing up. It has nice features, but it has bogged down the OS.

Features shouldn't use resources unless they are requested.

blacktiger1d ago

All corporations under same investors do that, release virus, broken drivers. That's why I hate Windows update cause they fk up on purpose

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d ago
Show all comments (29)