Stopping my Baldur’s Gate 3 playthrough halfway to play Starfield highlighted the stark differences between the two RPGs
Interview with Stephen Russell, Actor for (Nick Valentine, Codsworth, My Handy) in Fallout 4 which is a vast open world role playing game set in the apocalyptic wastes of Boston, the Commonwealth. The career goes further with other Bethesda games from Starfield to Prey to The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim.
Expectations for Starfield were sky-high, and while many felt it fell short of them, raw sales and other statistics tell a different tale.
I'll never forget advertised as an open world sandbox game but you run into invisible Star Trek barriers when exploring. GTA has never done that and neither has No Man's Sky. If people love this game good for them I am not touching it. And if Microsoft does say port this game to Playstation I am still not touching this game.
I started playing a few weeks ago and am enjoying it thoroughly. Perfect, absolutely not. Yet it's nowhere near as bad as what people make it out to be. Plenty of quests to get side tracked with. The gunplay has been tightened up significantly in my opinion since Fallout 4. I originally listened to the online crowd absolutely crap on the game and made me curious to see if it was that bad. It's not. It's a good and fun game. It just didn't live up to the developer hype and peoples expectations. Which wouldn't be the first time Bethesda, or Microsoft promised the world, and gave us the moon.
I will say that the beginning few story missions really kind of drag, but once you unlock powers it picks up. I think that first few hours soured a lot of folks who left it behind before really digging in to it. Which is understandable.
Bethesda may have just dropped a major hint regarding the upcoming Shattered Space DLC for its action role-playing game, Starfield.
Finishing Starfield, then moving onto Payday 3 for a palette cleanser, then going to dig into Baulders Gate 3 over Christmas break. I can't imagine trying to play all 3 at once.
I put about two hours into Starfield so far, and it's not bad at all. The menus and user interface certainly aren't great, but I'm surprised that it runs pretty dang smooth on PC. Running it on a 3070 at 4k on all high settings and it's holding up really well without many dips in frames (at the moment.) I'll have to see how well the game holds up down the line, but I'm enjoying it from what little I've played. Nothing mind blowing yet, but It certainly doesn't seem like a bad game by any stretch of the imagination right now.
Same thing occurred for The Witcher 3. These games are, an exception, to everything else. That is what also makes them so special
TheGamer, Videogamer and previously Gamingbolt, Kotaku and Destructoid ruined Game Journalism for me :-)