640°

Apple's mixed reality 'Vision Pro' headset revealed, 100 launch games, Unity support

Apple's new headset is coming next year, and will launch with over 100 Apple Arcade games and have support for Unity-based games.

Read Full Story >>
overkill.wtf
crazyCoconuts315d ago

Yeah clearly not designed primally for gaming

kickerz315d ago

Whatever happened to Microsofts Augmented reality glasses? That came out years ago and no one really cared lol. I guess that tech is pretty cool. Not $3500 cool though.

kneon315d ago

Hololens was never going to live up to the hype. I've used them quite a bit when I was working in VR and they are interesting, but getting a clear consistent image in AR glasses is probably impossible. The only way is to design it like a vr headset but with a camera so you can overlay on top of the captured video stream.

Extermin8or3_315d ago

Microsoft cancelled it completely recently and laid off pretty much everyone involved in its development.

Extermin8or3_315d ago

Yeah and yet it costs almost 4k loool

OneLove314d ago

Extermin8or3_ a quick Google search says they haven't canceled it lmao wtf you on?

Bobertt315d ago

Also it's $3500 so overpriced as usual from Apple. Maybe in 5-10 years it will be worth it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 314d ago
Eonjay315d ago

The "PSVR2 is too expensive" articles died that day.

JEECE315d ago

Except everyone writing those articles probably spends over $1000 on apple products every year anyway, so I'm sure "the apple quality is worth it."

Umb315d ago

The way I see it, the price is justifiable in Apples eye's is because there's the 'PRO' word attached to the product.

That there is an automatic extra $1000!!!

StormSnooper315d ago (Edited 315d ago )

the crazy thing about the "PSVR2 too expensive" articles is that they did not even make mathematical sense. They were comparing apples to oranges.

DarXyde315d ago

Yeah.

You won't see my defending Apple and their crazy price points, but I do have a MacBook Pro and I think it's worth it for the sheer productivity value and app suite (I mainly do research, but I also write/publish, do project management, and data analysis). Idk, it just works for my work.

Do I hate their outlandish prices? Yep! They're good and well out of their minds.

VariantAEC310d ago

@StormSnooper
More accurately, they were comparing Apple's to PlayStation's.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 310d ago
kneon315d ago

This is the same company that charges you $700 for a set of fucking wheels

https://www.apple.com/shop/...

The last time I gave Apple any money was for an Apple ][, and that will be the last time

bloop315d ago

@kneon: Jesus H Christ that's the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.

Eidolon315d ago

What'd you expect from Apple. they sell a monitor stand for $1000.

fr0sty315d ago

$3499 and it won't fit over your glasses, so you'll have to fork over even more for special lenses.

Profchaos315d ago

A products value and worth is subjective a 100k tractor seems pointless to a office worker.

But in this instance Apple has been sniffing their own farts again

DarXyde315d ago

Unfortunately, I doubt that.

Never underestimate their enthusiasts. They'll likely make a killing in San Francisco, Denver, and New York City alone.

roadkillers315d ago

At $3500, will any store stock it? The most returned item to Best Buy has to be the VR headsets..

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 310d ago
sparky77315d ago

I will wait until the non pro version releases for $1000 but this would be good for someone who doesn't own a Mac or a TV and is likely the only way VR/AR ever become mainstream.

DOMination-315d ago

Honestly the Vision Pro was never intended to be a mass-market consumer product.

This is more aimed at developers but with the long-term goal of eventually getting the form factor down to a pair of regular looking glasses. As someone with not the best eyes, the health features being touted down the road, automatic lens adjustment and of course advances in AR tech means I'm interested in that end product. Unfortunately, even for Apple, that's probably a decade away.

Having another player in the market will hopefully encourage everyone to push on with this tech to get to that end goal. It has the potential to be as important as the smartphone.

Grilla315d ago

It’s about the apps also, by the time it goes mainstream it’ll have a decent library of apps ready to go.

Profchaos315d ago (Edited 315d ago )

I'd understand that argument if they showed it off in a work environment similar to the hololense but this was basically hey look you can play games and see your photos and watch it on a plane while looking like a total tool we know you want it because we put a logo on it.

If the product isn't picked up by a market segment it will die then all these ideas will never trickle down to an affordable price point.

DOMination-314d ago

"It’s about the apps also, by the time it goes mainstream it’ll have a decent library of apps ready to go."

Yes exactly , hence why it was announced at the WorldWide Developers Conference. This is a stepping stone to releasing something far more consumer friendly in future. And during that transition, they get to work with third parties to build into their ecosystem.

"I'd understand that argument if they showed it off in a work environment similar to the hololense"

HoloLens journey actually went the other way imo. It started off with big ideals of being a big consumer product before Microsoft established what most others have - it's a cool bit of tech that doesn't really solve problems that the majority of people have. It was even shown at E3, not once but twice to demonstrate games. Then it was put on the same shelf as Illumiroom, never to be seen again.

shadowT315d ago

they said psvr 2 is too expensive

Jin_Sakai315d ago

PSVR2 isn’t AR, is tethered to a console, doesn’t have Micro OLED, doesn’t have dedicated audio, has lower resolution, isn’t as bright, and most importantly is a mass market product in which the Vision Pro is not.

mkis007315d ago

I mean you get what you pay for with psvr2 though...With apple that's never a sure thing...see wheels for $700 and stand for $1000.

1Victor315d ago

@jin: “PSVR2 isn’t AR, is tethered to a console”

Did you missed the presentation and just skip to the psvr2 attack mode?🤷🏿
The device is tether to a power line or you could buy their power bank for a 2 hours “roaming free”

AngainorG7X315d ago

@Jin
Vision Pro is AR, don’t bother, they don’t get it

DOMination-314d ago

"Did you missed the presentation and just skip to the psvr2 attack mode?🤷🏿
The device is tether to a power line or you could buy their power bank for a 2 hours “roaming free”

Sorry, I don't want to come across as aggressive but that's missing the point entirely. The Vision Pro has both M2 and R1 Apple silicon chips inside. It IS the computer. It runs everything natively. PSVR2 is a completely different type of device. Just because they are worn on your head, doesn't mean they should be compared. If you can't understand the difference in price, then you are the one who needs to watch the presentation again.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 314d ago
MIDGETonSTILTS17315d ago

Most expensive potential gaming rig ever.

Anomander314d ago

Except name a big time Apple Game you that have to play and tell me it’s worth $3500? Apple is great at launching new product lines and getting Mass adaptation. The problem with this is I think they priced themselves out and it’s not consumer ready.

Show all comments (92)
170°

Dbrand Faces Social Media Backlash and Offers $10K Apology

Dbrand, a renowned producer of skins for mobile devices and console faceplates, found itself in hot water recently due to a controversial incident on social media. The company, known for its "witty banter" with customers, took it too far this time, drawing criticism from the gaming community.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
MetroidFREAK212h ago

I really hate when companies try to be edgy... like it's not funny, never has been funny and never will be

Andrew3361h ago

Do you speak for everyone? I wouldnt consider making fun of someones last name as "edgy" either tho.

Abnor_Mal1h ago

Everyone wants to be the next Wendy’s social media rep. Since they do it and seemingly get away with it cause comments actually trolls for such a response, every company is trying to get in on being edgy.

neutralgamer19921h ago

Yes d brand tries to be humorous but if a customer reaches out to you with a question the last thing should be to make fun of their name

Did the right thing apologize and move on. Given the cancel culture and snowflakes it seems everyone is offended by everything. This next generation is so damn soft

Crows9034m ago

I need 10k too...let me go ask them a question... hopefully they respond the same and I can get rid of some debt...lol

This story sounds like a joke 🤣

280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple1012d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref2d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde2d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander19722d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville2d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff21831d 18h ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos1d 17h ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 17h ago
isarai2d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref2d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan2d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0071d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander19722d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

2d ago Replies(3)
Einhander19722d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

2d ago
2d ago
Zeref2d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde2d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander19722d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander19722d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier2d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto2d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff21831d 17h ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto1d 15h ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 15h ago
Hofstaderman2d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts2d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts1d 3h ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 12h ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
240°

Is Driver (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

"Driver was a technical achievement for PS1, a pioneer in cinematic gaming, and an often brutal challenge - TechStomper asks if its brand of 70s car chase antics still holds up."

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
PrimeVinister3d ago

The driving holds up, most of everything else does not.

PrimeVinister2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@Shane Kim

Well, I mean the driving physics hold up. The draw distance, police AI, visuals in general etc do not

Cacabunga2d ago

One of my all time favorites on PS1. I spent a summer vacation playing this was so good

isarai2d ago

Sadly youd be hard pressed to find any driving game with better physics these days. But the draw distance really kills it for me

PrimeVinister2d ago

The physics hold up ridiculously well. And the draw distance is a real hurdle at first.

__y2jb2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Nonsense. The physics in any modern game or any 360 game is light years beyond Driver.

Dandizzle2d ago

This game is hard, you will fail and quit

PrimeVinister2d ago

But you will get there eventually... maybe

jznrpg2d ago

Stop with is it worth it articles. If you want to play a game play the damn game!

anast2d ago

I loved this game awhile back.

Barlos2d ago

Yeah but is it worth reading pointless articles?

__y2jb2d ago

It wasn’t worth playing in the 90’s.

Espangerish2d ago

My thoughts exactly. I bought it at release for full price and got frustrated and bored with it very quickly.

Show all comments (41)