On this weeks show the guys talk Jedi Survivor, The Last Case of Benedict Fox, Final Fantasy 7 Remake, the state of Xbox and more!
Fallout 76 is no longer Bethesda’s least popular game on Steam, as players complain about bland gameplay and a lack of depth and variety.
After the excitement wore off and the held back reviews started hitting people started taking notice. Same janky ugly NPCs, limited exploration, and loading screens galore. Your typical Bethesda game. Not to forget the outdated Creation Engine.
Funny, considering it's the deepest game they've released since Morrowind, over 20 years ago.
I'll be honest, I've kind put it to the side, I'm hoping they come through with an update that adds a bit more to it. Like some lore I can read about in scattered books, pc's, it seems extremely limited in this area. Fallout games seem to have more. Considering this is such a big game it was disappointing. The addition of maps would be useful. I've said it before the game doesnt feel quite finished but something had to come out
Most of my friends seem to have moved on too. They say it was a good game but they're over it. A lot of them have moved on to Lies of P or went back to Baldurs Gate. Seems the honeymoon period for Starfield is over already. I havent played it yet myself but I'm not in a hurry to either
I never trust reviews and this is why. I love this game. I’ve been hooked since launch.
Shouldn't trust articles either.
This one is based on the steamDB data and it's specifically about the Bethesda Game Studios games, but it's specifically about "main" versions. And why does that matter?
Well because if it was Bethesda as a whole, they would have to consider both Bethesda Game Studios and Bethesda Softworks, the latter being mostly commonly seen as the publisher. But it's also listed as the developer for some key older Bethesda games like Arena and Daggerfall, but more importantly for Redguard and Battlespire both of which have a lower score than Starfield. But that could be a mistake, after all is true that Bethesda Game Studios is the most commonly known of the two.
But the bit about versions is a different story. Because if they took into consideration the VR games - that are sold separately and are separated instalions - Fallout 4 VR also has a lower score than SF. And it's very hard for this to be a mistake as the author did list the two different versions of Fallout 3 with two different scores. So they definitely saw that on the listing.
And I could give the benefit of the doubt to the author, but given that this same publication gave SF a 6/10. I would argue that it was likely intentional.
Forza is the best racing game. Xbox will continue to work hard to create Japanese titles.
I wonder how the gamers in Tokyo feel after Phil's email came out about how much he'd like to buy Nintendo.
Nintendo is probably laughing rn since they're winning and doing amazing my friend XD.
"Forza is the best racing game. Sure, it has fewer tracks and no VR, but it's better. Promise."
fr0sty
And it's cars and tracks cost money and there is a battle pass, but it's better.
I'm in Tokyo right now, and I can pretty much promise you that the vast majority of gamers in Tokyo don't give a flying F about that.
I’m sure they wouldn’t want Nintendo owned by a Western mega corporation that can’t even figure out what to do with their own gaming division.
Outside of places like this no one really cares that much. Anyone with some common sense knows it ain't happening. Nintendo's investors would never go for it, and regulators would never approve it. No console manufacturer will be able to buy another. Even if MS were to go software-only, with Bethesda and ABK they'd be way too big to allow that purchase.
The most we'll likely see is further collaboration between the two. Maybe a bespoke version of Game Pass to stream games that otherwise aren't available for purchase on Nintendo systems. Or maybe Nintendo will use Azure to revamp its online infrastructure.
Here's a gem
"First, regarding PC Game Pass, since it is on the same PC platform as Steam, we believe that it provides users with a choice. The choice of which library to build is left to the user's discretion."
I've heard this term before from him..."build a library"
Only your comparing steam to gamepass. On gamepass once you stop paying your library is gone so not really a library like steam which you can always go bac, to play your purchases built over thr years, without paying a penny more.
Saying gamepass is a library implies this, but as we know, it's nothing like this.
Keep using this word 'library' sits wong with me.
It's a collection. A library in something you can reference and go back to to look at your dusty booka you loved as a child. With gamepass m$ can yank any title, at will and throw it in the bin,
No one would do that in my library.!
Of course. With Phil it's 10 percent truth and 90 percent lie.
It's like you said, stop paying and you play nothing because with game pass, you own nothing. There's no library.
Only truth was that it's on PC and a choice between it and Steam.
You mean like how all Subscriptions work? You think you get to keep all those PSN+ games after you unsubscribe? Netflix Hulu, you still think you get to watch movies after unsubscribe?
"Only truth was that it's on PC and a choice between it and Steam."
Which is exactly what he just said and exactly what he meant. Congrats you read it but failed the comprehension (so close). Either have GP library or build it on PC or steam since games hit day one their.
