Ascendant Studios is a fledgling AAA studio full of legendary talent, and CGMagazine was lucky enough to get an early look under the hood of their debut title Immortals of Aveum.
AMD FSR 3 is finally available for a direct comparison with DLSS 3 in Immortals of Aveum. It has better average FPS but stutters more.
I was watching comparison videos this morning and I swear some of the other games test had micro-stutter. At least FSR 3 is pretty good and will eventually be perfected.
Immortals of Aveum dev Ascendant Studios confirmed it is working to port AMD FSR 3 to consoles. The PS5 may have a problem with it, though.
Im sure Sony will develop it’s own solution for FSR3 to work well and devs can plug that in their game engines.
It’s a good bet. It’s tough to know if frame generation would work well enough on either console though. It’s not great on PC yet.
No. This article is irrelevant because it says nothing of the PS5 graphics API. They are not privy to it and neither are we.
In addition just yesterday Dogital Foundry did a technical review of No Man's Sky running on the Nintendo Switch using a custom version of FSR 2. There isn't just 1 version of FSR that all platforms use. I doubt WCCtech is privy to capabilities of the PS5 GRAPHIC API.
FSR 1 xbox fanboys said it wouldn't be on PS5, then the first game to use it was on PS5
FSR 2 xbox fanboys said it wouldn't be on PS5, then the first game to use it was on PS5
FSR 3 xbox fanboys said it wouldn't be on PS5, I'm sure the first game will be on PS5
And either way PS5 has it's own upscaller with it's hardware based checkerboarding that as far as I am concerned looks and preforms way better than any implementation of FSR. No game with FSR has yet to perform or look better than Sony inhouse games using checkerboard.
"A technical caveat might be an extra obstacle to AMD FSR 3 implementation on PlayStation 5. FSR 3 uses a DX12-based replacement swapchain that handles the Optical Flow and Frame Generation workloads asynchronously. As explained in this GPU Open blog post, the Unreal Engine 5 plugin does offer an alternative option for non-Windows platforms, but it does not work asynchronously and will, therefore, offer inferior performance.
With the Unreal Engine 5 plugin, there are more options to provide a starting point for supporting non-Windows platforms and that control frame pacing. The AMD FSR 3 UE5 plugin contains two backend types: RHI and Native DirectX 12.
The RHI backend is platform agnostic and should work effectively in most circumstances. However, it does not support asynchronous execution of the AMD FSR 3 compute workloads, so these jobs are serialized, with an associated performance cost. Additionally, frame pacing is handled by Unreal’s underlying presentation framework. The ideal use for AMD FSR 3 using the RHI backend is when VSync is enabled on a high-refresh 120+ Hz monitor.
The Native DX12 backend fully supports asynchronous workloads and full frame pacing, so it can have higher performance in certain circumstances. "
in this case its not a xbox fanboy at all though its wccftech saying the possible technological limitations. What actually happens who knows but this isn't even going to apply to all games. This is immortals of avevum one UE5 engine game and games ares still barely UE5
@mrcatastropheAF
I have accepted its just like that here. Can literally quote the article posted and come at it completely clear . Yet they still will disagree. Its wild to see on a game many of them won't even play though
That isn't a hardware restriction, it's an API restriction, they did not code support in for asynchronous use on non-directX systems. The developer would have to do it themselves.
what it is, is a whole lot of words for "hmmm I'm not sure. sony will know"
Are you able to sight examples of these situations? I dont recall any such dialog but surely you can back up these statements.
Not disagreeing... just asking for clarity. Thanks in advance.
No, I will never do what you ask unless it's what I want to do.
But I will mockingly post this link to xbox fanboys circling around themselves trying to convince each other that PS5 couldn't do ML and wasn't even RDNA 2.
https://www.purexbox.com/fo...
Let me clarify my previous comment, it was xbox fanboys claims that the reason PS5 wasn't going to have FSR was because it wasn't RDNA 2 and didn't have ML.
PS5 does have FSR proving them wrong on 3 counts at once.
@darth there are no legitimate examples - AMD themselves made it extremely clear as many devices as possible would be compatible with FSR, both 1 and 2.
I mean, part of the announcement was it even being run on Nvidia GTX cards...
I think you're confusing FSR2 with RDNA2.
PS5 is not full RDNA2. Many tech channels have talked about it and explained it. It's a sort of hybrid.
Why are xbox fans still trying to claim this, its a customised rdna 2 card, micros is more off the shelf lol.. there is no rdna 1.5 there is no hybrid ffs🤦♂️
No, it's fanboy bs, no facts involved.
The known facts are simple, sony looked at what amd were working on, went "hmmm, that rdna 2 stuff looks good, let's work together to make the chip better for us and what we want it to do"
Ms did the same thing, but to a lesser extent, thats all there is to it, the fact you still tryna cling to a made up claim is kinda sad, whats wrong? Starfield not do it for ya?
Ah ps5 technology limitation compared to the 12TF series X lmao fsr3 will be on ps5 and it's likely to be first console to get it.
Those 25% of xbox series users that are X owners really are sticking to the ps5 sux mantra
