500°

Final Fantasy 16 PS5 Exclusivity Explained by Square Enix

Final Fantasy 16's PS5 exclusivity explained by Square Enix, as it involves optimization and promotional support offered by Sony.

Obscure_Observer832d ago

Square/Enix choses Playstation and that´s business as usual. Bethesda choses Xbox and that´s business as usual.

It is what it is.

Babadook7832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

I think it’s more accurate to say that Final Fantasy fans have been choosing PlayStation for decades. This deal is just the latest example of SE recognizing that brand loyalty. Promotional support doesn’t likely have to amount to much in terms of actual dollars spent by Sony to be the deciding factor. Sorry Xbox fans but that’s how it works.

Obscure_Observer832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

"This deal is just the latest example of SE recognizing that brand loyalty."

Square used to be a solid partner for Nintendo which they had millions of fans worldwide before they´d decided and left them behind to follow Sony to never look back; so I don´t think SE recognizes "loyalty" as major factor.

PS5´s userbase is 30 million vs Xbox Series consoles with a 18.5 million usersbase, not much of a staggering difference to warrant a decision to not port for Xbox consoles imo, so I´m positive that SE would undoubtedly make more money going multiplatform, but still...

They chose to go exclusive with Playstation for whatever reason and that´s ok.

Bethesda knew they would lose some Playstation faithful when they decided to be acquired by Microsoft.

Square/Enix knew they would lose some Xbox faithful when they decided to go exclusive with FFXVI on PS5.

They don´t care about our feelings, they care about their money! !fter all, they have a business to run.

Gamers wil chose with their wallets. Like I said: Business as usual. It is what it is.

Babadook7832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

"Square used to be a solid partner for “Nintendo which they had millions of fans worldwide before they´d decided and left them behind to follow Sony to never look back”

Prior to the decades I referred to.

“PS5´s userbase is 30 million vs Xbox Series consoles with a 18.5 million usersbase“”

Check Final Fantasy 13 or 15 sales. Playstation titles (FF) outsells Xbox by 2x - 4x.

Obscure_Observer832d ago

"Check Final Fantasy 13 or 15 sales. Playstation titles (FF) outsells Xbox by 2x - 4x."

Still not a reason to refuse and port for a 18.5 Million userbase.

Anyway, I just hope for PS5 owners to make SE´s risky decision with FFXVI worthwhile, because Babylon´s Fall floped hard and Forspoken got luminous productions shut down.

Final Fantasy isn´t nearly as popular as it used to be back in the day, so I hope for this new iteration to be more successful than their last FF main game.

Now, Playstation and SE seems pretty confident though, they gonna release FFXVI in the same month that both Street Fighter 6 and Diablo 4 will be out, which is a pretty bold move.

2023 will be an awesome year for gamers all around.

Godmars290832d ago

FF fans have been choosing Playstation since FF7. MS might have managed to lure Square away during the 360 era, but nothing really came of that. Not on the level of FF7, much less anywhere close.

andy85832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

@obscure it is a reason though. Japan doesn't like Xbox but it's not even that, if they made a version for Series X then they would have to make a dumbed down version for Series S. 80% of XVs sales were on PS and that gap would be even wider now that Xbox gamers seem more reliant on gamepass which it wouldn't be on. It probably isn't worth the effort.

wiz7191832d ago

@babadook it’s more PlayStations in people’s homes then Xbox’s so wouldn’t it be obvious that it would sell more on PlayStation ?? Given when FF13 was on 360 it was on multiple disk , didn’t nobody want to hassle with that. It sold more due to circumstances not just popularity , but with a 117 million PS4s being sold and the FF7 remake only shipped around 6 million , how many are you really supporting ?

fr0sty832d ago

"PS5´s userbase is 30 million vs Xbox Series consoles with a 18.5 million usersbase, not much of a staggering difference to warrant a decision to not port for Xbox consoles"

This fails to factor in the extra money needed to invest into optimization of the game so it will run on Series S, or having to remove features from all versions in order to make the full game playable on S.

Obscure_Observer832d ago

@fr0sty

"This fails to factor in the extra money needed to invest into optimization of the game so it will run on Series S, or having to remove features from all versions in order to make the full game playable on S."

In my opinion this game is far from impressive from a visual and performance perspective, imo. If the S can run games like Flight Simulator, Hellblade II, Gears of War 6 and Forza Motorsport for example, I can´t fathom why it wouldn´t be able to run FFXVI.

But that´s just me and my two cents.

Besides, Xbox Studios would gladly help SE with any technical support they would require. That´s not a good excuse.

But I´m not here crying for this game to be ported to Xbox, Sony can have it, I don´t care. If I want it, I will just play it on a PS5 or PC.

CobraKai831d ago

@Obscure

I felt Nintendo had a hand in Square moving to PlayStation. Sticking to cartridges at the time wasn’t the best for the games Square was making. In this case, technology was the deciding factor.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 831d ago
Aloymetal832d ago

Enix chooses PlayStation because that's where most of the games will sell as usual. Bethesda chooses xbox because Todd has always been in bed with MS/Phil and received a big a$$ check and that's business as usual.

rlow1832d ago

Suurrreee , it’s always the same with you guys. Everything sells on PlayStation and MS just gives big fat checks. How original.

SonyStyled832d ago

Aloy, you’re a PS fanboy don’t paint the rest of the PS community in a very good light similarly to how a couple others do for another console. The vast majority of the PlayStation community is twice your age or more

Aloymetal832d ago

@SonyStyled
You assume too much but at least you got the ''you're a PS fanboy'' right, been that way since 1996 and never been disappointed, but wait, was I supposed to be upset because you called me that???...

DashMad832d ago

dragon quest sell more on Nintendo platform than PS that doesn't stop SE to make PS version, DQ 11 originally was meant to be PS4 exclusives, the leak said that board director said it would sell far less so they decided to make 3DS version and yep the 3DS version outsold PS4 version. announcement of DQ12 suggest it would be PS exclusive the moneyhat must be sweet for them to ignore their main audience lol.

wiz7191831d ago

@Aloymetal MS was the ones who helped Bethesda get into making games for consoles in the first place ..
https://www.polygon.com/pla...

If it wasn’t for Microsoft , Bethesda wouldn’t even been in the console space ..

Gamer_Dude831d ago

Why doesn't Square choose all platforms and sell their game everywhere?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 831d ago
shinoff2183832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

Obscure

It is a bit different though. On xbox they have only missed a couple games. Square releases alot on xbox still. Forspoken , ff7 remake ff16 and maybe a couple more. Where as bethsada if you own a Playstation your sh out of luck for anything from them

Now onto Nintendo and square. That relationship was ruined by alot of stubbornness. From what I've read square went to Nintendo. Hey this cartridges aren't doing it could you go disc based. Nintendo being Nintendo decided not to heed squares advice and square moved on to Sony due to Nintendo sticking with cartridges. Alot of developers did the same. Sony was more in a right place right time situation. Thats the just of what I've read.

Maybe right now but what about reports of in the uk ff15 selling 80 percent on ps and only 20 percent on xbox. Not a good look from xbox gamers. You don't think that played a part in squares decision. Like I've said before. They probably talked about a deal. Square took xbox numbers(square game sales on xbox) crunched some numbers and seen the deal was worth making it exclusive.

I'm not saying this or about every Xbox gamer but it's readily available information that for whatever reason they aren't buying and just relying on gamepass. It can't be discredited.

I use gamepass myself but some games I'll still buy physical. Starfield fallout most obsidian stuff and inxile.

gangsta_red832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

"Maybe right now but what about reports of in the uk ff15 selling 80 percent on ps and only 20 percent on xbox. Not a good look from xbox gamers."

These percentages don't really tell the whole story and I know there's a fallacy that can probably be applied to these type of comments. Of course FF will sell more on PS considering PS has a larger install base, but whats the ratio of sales for Xbox in the wild? I'm guessing FF sold enough for Xbox's install base for them to continue to release FF games on Xbox.

Let's not forget that Square dropped exclusivity of FF Versus to make it multiplatform. If Xbox sales for FF were that dismal, I doubt Square would even bother to release games for Xbox. I could also argue if the game sales were so bad then why the need for Sony to continue to pay for exclusivity for their own system?

"From what I've read square went to Nintendo. Hey this cartridges aren't doing it could you go disc based. "

Square actually had a FF in development for the N64 and it was cancelled in favor of FF 7 for Playstation. I remember seeing pictures for the next FF in Nintendo Power.

"Sony was more in a right place right time situation."

You can also thank Nintendo for this. Fun fact, the playstation was supposed to be a CD add on for Nintendo's system at the time. Nintendo and Sony were to announce their joint partnership, but Nintendo announces that they would not go with Sony for their disc based system. Sony was pissed because that was some ultimate disrespect and decided to take their add on for Nintendo and make it it's own console, Playstation.

GotGame818832d ago

You can play Bethesda games on PC and cloud. Nobody is out of luck if they don't have an Xbox.

Stanjara832d ago

I just wanted to write your comment.
Those FMV CGI animation could not fit even on one black PS1 CD back in the day.

I would also add PS Japan fans also buy merch.

FF limited editions, figurines, mc Donald deals, clothing brands and all hent... Kmmhmm... Anime stuff.

Xbox zombie fans searching for $1 GP codes on the street.

Psst..$1 GP dude... -What did you say to me?

$1 ... Gppp....game pisssst

shinoff2183831d ago

Gangsta red

Literally its said square left nintendo behind due to them having major problems trying to get it(ff7) onto cartridge. I know all about the history. Nintendo just wouldnt budge due to being stubborn.

wiz7191831d ago

@Shinoff the things is Bethesda is still releasing multi platform games tho and still supporting the ones that’s already out. Only games that’s been exclusive are new IPS , why wouldn’t they be though ?? It’ll be the same thing Sony is doing with Bungie. How much you’re willing to bet the next dishonored or Doom will be multi platform ? They currently doing it now , every new Minecraft game and expansion been getting multi platform releases. Psychonauts 2 is also multi platform after Double Fine was bought by MS. Elders Scroll 6 being an exclusive is a given , ES always been associated with Xbox. Bethesda had a tight relationship with MS for 20 years now , the ES Morrowind was the first console ES and that was because of MS. Bethesda wouldn’t even though about making ES on a console if it wasn’t for MS.

https://www.polygon.com/pla...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 831d ago
Crows90832d ago

Except not true. Bethesda sold much more Skyrim on PlayStation than Xbox. all Bethesda published games did better on PlayStation. Not business as usual.

Obscure_Observer832d ago

"Except not true. Bethesda sold much more Skyrim on PlayStation than Xbox. all Bethesda published games did better on PlayStation. Not business as usual."

I said: "They chose to go exclusive with Playstation for *whatever* reason and that´s ok."

Translation = They don´t have to justify their reasons for doing exclusive business with Sony. It´s their business and they´ll run it the way they see fit.

Oblivion sold more on Xbox. Did Bethesda skipped Skyrim on Playstation or even the Wii because of it? NO.

Xbox games sell more on STEAM when compared to Playstation games sales.

Would YOU accept a Half Life 3 exclusivity for Xbox consoles? No, I don´t think you would.

The problem with part of the Playstation community is that self-entitled people live under the illusion that just because they have the best-selling console every studio or publisher should bend to Sony, something that never happened and never will.

Sony always had closer ties/relationship with Capcom, Kojima, Square/Enix, From Software...

Microsoft always had closer ties/relationship with Bethesda, CDPR, VALVE, SEGA

So Microsoft always had a closer relationship with Bethesda and according to Todd Howard, that relationship definitely weights over the decision to be acquired by them, it´s not just a money thing.

I see the same scenario happening in FFXVI case (obviously in a much smaller scale).

Crows90832d ago

@obscure

Xbox did bring PC games to consoles. That's it. How do partnerships exist with MS? They're not successful. There's no real partnership other than $$$.

Obscure_Observer831d ago

"There's no real partnership other than $$$"

https://www.engadget.com/20...

https://wccftech.com/gabe-n...

https://www.pcgamer.com/mic...

Gabe Newell always had a closer relationship with Microsoft in comparison with Sony. ALWAYS!

Since he thinks Xbox Series X is better than the PS5 (same opinion applies to X360 vs PS3) he could make the SAME deal Sony did with Square and bring Half Life 3 exclusively to Xbox Series consoles.

Would you accept and respect his decision? Or would you be here crying yet again because another company chose Xbox over Playstation? I guess we both know the answer. Lol XD

wiz7191830d ago

@Crows90 boy now you know that’s BS LOL
https://www.polygon.com/pla...
XBOX launched ES on consoles .. it’s also funny Skyrim is ratings is sitting at a 9.3 on 360 and a 9.0 on PS3 lol
https://www.vgchartz.com/ga...
The PS4 and Xbox One versions , yeah it sold more on the PS4 .. but I mean that would be common sense since technically the Xbox One sold like shit compared to the PS4.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 830d ago
Nacho_Z832d ago

Square chooses Sony because they want to work hand in hand to make the best game possible.

Bethesda chooses Microsoft because they stumped up the money to buy them.

That's how it is.

Obscure_Observer831d ago

"Square chooses Sony because they want to work hand in hand to make the best game possible."

From Pete Hines:

"As we’ve all shared, the expectation is that Bethesda Softworks and our studios will continue as we have in the past, just with more support and resources than we’ve ever had before."

More support and resources than Bethesda ever had before, which means Starfield and all of the Bethesda future games will be better than ever thanks to Xbox Game Studios support AND resources!

We´ll see which one will turn out to be the better game. Lol.

Traecy832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

Luminous productions has merged within S-E, so basically it's still a part of Square Enix. From the recent previews of FFXVI most media outlets that played the demo are praising the game. FFXVI will be a hit for S-E & PS5. Babylon Fall was a Platinum game published by Square Enix.

MADGameR832d ago

Bathesda is dumb as hell for choosing X Box lol That's like saying ''Hey! I want to take guarenteed BIG losses on my finances!'' absolutely illogical and stupid.

DOMination-831d ago

Bad take

Naughty Dog are dumb for being owned by Sony because they’d get another 10 million sales if they were multiplatform

See how that’s not really how it works

gold_drake832d ago

thats not the same thing and you know it.

DarXyde832d ago

It might make more sense to say that Xbox picked up big publishers that were wounded. Zenimax was acquired during the Fallout 76 chaos, ABK deal went public when the scandals came out.

Obscure_Observer831d ago

You forgot to mention Obsidian, which PS fanboys on N4G said at the time of the acquisition were in a near bankruptcy state.

It´s gonna be awesome to see those crippled/wounded publishers and studios deliver awesome games now that they have proper support and resources now they´re under Xbox Games Studios.

DarXyde831d ago (Edited 831d ago )

Obscure_Observer,

A few things:
1. Not sure if you're implying I'm a PS fanboy. If so, that's a pretty lazy mischaracterization of where I stand. I am quite far removed from "rah rah Sony".

2. I'm very clearly talking about publishers. Obsidian is not a publisher.

3. I don't think resources were ever the outstanding issue with Zenimax. Love the not-so-subtle "ABK is one of those wounded publishers that will be under Microsoft" point you slipped in there. Maybe, maybe not. Let's not speak with such certainty on things we know nothing about.

4. Irrelevant to this reply in general, but did you seriously say Microsoft has a closer relationship with SEGA? Based on what, Jet Set Radio being on Xbox? Please explain because I would personally argue they're closest with Nintendo.

ChasterMies831d ago

Bethesda to chose Xbox because Microsoft bought Bethesda.

DOMination-831d ago

It’s that simple. Don’t know why there’s so much arguing

Also Square work with Sony because Sony gives them money. Again, it’s just that simple.

sinspirit831d ago (Edited 831d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

Square chooses PlayStation because it sells so little on XBox it's not worth developing for it, and hampering their game design and output for the Series S is not worth it for them. Square turned a leaf on their decision to use Unreal and prioritize game development quality and efficiency versus using an in-house engine to save a good buck. Next gen was coming up and might have even allowed their engine to work well enough and they still made that decision. Alongside that decision is also whether they should develop for a platform that not only does not sell that much, but also requires them to develop for a box severely underpowered for this generation. If XBox first parties already have issues with supporting the Series S and are having issues delivering on promises then why wouldn't a major third party seeking high fidelity gameplay experiences?

You're living in the distant past and comparing apples to oranges. Your examples make no sense either. A decision financially beneficial based off of consumer feedback versus a company selling because the owners wanted money is night and day.

MS thought they could use the cheaper option to gain market share and draw in consumers and it backfired because they didn't care about the developers, again.

Tired of the forced comparisons with intent to mislead and play down a side while playing up another. It's ridiculous that so consistently we have try-to-be stealthy fanboys always first-posting every thing and trying to manipulate the rest of the comments this way. We know this is particularly a certain-sided habit on here and it's quite worth being labelled as trolling. Get off whatever group chat and discord channel you guys are using to run this group that does this and just be a real part of N4G for once.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 830d ago
z2g832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

promotional support is just fancy talk for: "Sony paid us to keep it off other platforms".

This is just more of Sony's hypocritical MO.

The3faces832d ago

Without MS funding Stalker 2 would of ceased development.

Goosejuice832d ago

That's just one example though. There have been games where Sony funded as well but still got hate for that. MS has plenty of 3rd party and indie exclusives every year just like Sony. But only 1 get hated on for it

Pedantic91832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

Tit for tat i suppose . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Goosejuice832d ago

Guess it just confuses me how some of these people hate sony for having 3rd party exclusives but not MS who also have multiple of them

DOMination-831d ago

But Sony have been doing it since the mid 90s. They are both guilty of this practise.

Exclusives give identities to consoles. First or third party. If anything they are much rarer than they were in the 90s when the Xbox and PS2 had radically different libraries.

Dawknight316832d ago

Wait so games like Starfield and Stalker 2 and those timed exclusive indies like Tunic and Deaths Door don’t matter? They weren’t bought.

Stanjara832d ago

Eastward... Jesus that thing is not on PS yet.

BandarHub832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

If you ask me this it's strange to make this game exclusive.
FF has always been more popular on the PS and they were going to outsell Xbox 10:1, no matter what. Why spend millions securing it as an exclusive?
I think that Sony bought it to show that they had exclusives mid-way through the year. If they didn't then they only would have Forspoken and Spiderman 2 for 2023.

excaliburps832d ago

Maybe Square Enix doesn't think the Xbox market is big enough to warrant the dev and marketing cost? Just guessing but maybe given the Xbox brand is pretty much dead in Japan, and JRPG's are mostly popular in Asia and Japan (where the Xbox brand is very, very weak), they didn't think it's worth it?

Traecy832d ago

Agreed.Folks saying Sony paid for exclusivity when there's a possibility Square approached Sony with the deal of exclusivity.

JEECE832d ago

Yeah the "Sony moneyhatting Square Enix to get an exclusive" situation always seems like a better deal for Square than Sony, because they were already going to sell far more copies of their games on Playstation than on Xbox. If they can get Sony to throw them a bunch of money and still sell almost as many copies as they were going to sell anyway (plus cutting out or delaying the costs of porting the game depending on whether it is full or timed exclusive), why not do it?

phoenixwing832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

It is a better deal for square but Sony gets some clout with jrpg lovers this way. The main reason I wanted a ps5 in the early days was knowing it would be on ps5 first and foremost.

Now though I keep my ps5 because of 3d audio. It's just that good with the headset.

Crows90832d ago

Well for one the series S is quite a problem for devs. Secondly they development costs and headaches of making it run on another system wasn't worth it to them.

This gen Microsoft insulted gamers with yet again the weakest console available.

Traecy832d ago

Imagine playing FFXVI on the Series S in blurry 720/900p.

Obscure_Observer832d ago

"Well for one the series S is quite a problem for devs. Secondly they development costs and headaches of making it run on another system wasn't worth it to them.

This gen Microsoft insulted gamers with yet again the weakest console available."

We´ll see about that when we get games comparison between Starfield and Fable running on Series S vs FFXVI and Forspoken running on PS5. Oh, there´ll be comparisons between GT7 (PS5) vs Forza Motorsport (XSS).

We might found out soon enough.

GotGame818832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

PSVR2 just released along with free patches for some games like RE Village and GT. That more than makes up for fewer 1st party standard game releases. From what I've seen PSVR2 is amazing.

Also Sony has a very strong 1st party lineup already available for PS5.

MeteorPanda832d ago

How is it strange when Sony have had their engineers working alongside the devs to make sure this game pushes the specs of the ps5 along with it's unique loading times.

The Japanese work closer together than western development teams - you always see colabs amongst themselves

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 832d ago
Exvalos832d ago

The facts are final fantasy sells like trash on xbox, and has sold well on sony consoles for decades, we as a community have pushed ff14 to being the world's most popular mmo, xbox gamers just don't really play final fantasy, it is what it is.

Workshyskiver832d ago

The Xbox One which sold fair less of a share to the PS4 than the XsX has to the Ps5, accounted for 21% of FF15s first weeks share. If you as a business can't make that large of an increase to sales worth it for minimal return, then you are incompetent. But given its Squaresoft thats looking pretty reasonable.

Chevalier832d ago

Really? That's some crap reasoning. Xbox 360 were basically tied with PS3 for console sales and 2/3 of the sales were still on Playstation even with Xbox best selling system.

Xbox gamers don't buy JRPGs anywhere near where close to Playstation and Nintendo customers. Would explain why Octopath 2 only released on the Switch and PS4 recently for example and skipped Xbox completely.

Auron832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

Sony paid. And we will find out soon what else they paid for. Thanks to the ftc case.

gold_drake832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

we might never find out, documents like these dont tend to be for the public to have access to.

and Square might aswell approached Sony, as their games sell better on playstation

Show all comments (94)
200°

Final Fantasy XVI Maintains 60 FPS on Xbox Series X via FSR, but With Lower Resolution Than PS5

Final Fantasy XVI runs at a lower resolution on Xbox Series X compared to PS5, maintaining stable 60 FPS but with visual compromises.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
raWfodog21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

"While the PS5 version maintains superior resolution and visual fidelity, it cannot consistently deliver the same frame rate stability, especially in its Performance mode. Even the more powerful PS5 Pro struggles to keep frame rates within its VRR window when the action intensifies.

For players who prioritize performance above visual quality, the Xbox Series X version may offer appeal due to its stable frame rate. However, those seeking the best graphical presentation may find the lower resolution and various graphical compromises on Xbox a drawback. Digital Foundry concluded that while the port is serviceable in its current form, several issues, such as broken foliage rendering and contrast imbalance, remain in need of technical refinement."

----

As someone who prefers better framerate over visuals, it seems the X has the edge over PS5 in that department. But it apparently comes at the cost of more degraded visuals than one would imagine in this case. Perhaps it has not been fully optimized for the X yet, as the article also pointed out that this port perhaps derived from the PC version rather than the PS5 version. We'll see what the future brings (if anyone cares lol).

Obscure_Observer20h ago

I´ll take performance over graphics, thanks.

raWfodog19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

That's always my preference as well. More importantly, I prefer a smoother, stable framerate more than simply hitting higher framerates. But I do like it to look pretty as well lol.

Lamusiqa19h ago

That's usually my preference. But at 720p in 2025 with a 4K TV? Yikes.

CrashMania14h ago

I wonder if you had the same energy with Hellblade 2.

PhillyDonJawn12h ago

Yeah im not really a graphics 304. I feel like graphics has hit its peak and prioritizing graphics over gameplay has made games less enjoyable.

andy8512h ago

I took performance mode on the PS5, genuinely didnt look bad even at a low resolution

Snookies128h ago

@andy85 - Yeah, the performance mode was definitely the way to go. I guess with everything going on in battles, I never noticed the lower dynamic resolution kicking in. I was kind of stunned to hear how much the resolution drops when in battles.

I just wish the PC port had been good... I was getting 100 FPS in some areas, and under 30 in others no matter how I configured settings. Sad that Square-Enix has such an awful reputation for their PC ports.

gold_drake6h ago

it depends.
720p on my 75 inch tv aint pretty at all lol

but this is hardly a hardware issue but a square enix issue.
the games pretty but there isnt a whole lot going on in general in the game, outside of battles

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6h ago
Elda9h ago

Nothing worse than looking at & playing a nice looking game with good graphics but the visuals are blurry.

badz1493h ago

12TF for 720p 60fps in 2025...WOW!

50°

LOGOS: The World of Final Fantasy XVI and The Art of FF XVI: Echoes of the Rising Tide Announced

Square Enix has announced two new books which expand the lore and world of Final Fantasy XVI.

Read Full Story >>
nettosgameroom.com
240°

FINAL FANTASY XVI - Available on Xbox Series X|S and Xbox PC today | Xbox Games Showcase 2025

The legacy of the crystals has shaped our history for long enough.

3d ago Replies(1)
Kurisu3d ago

Great news for fans of Final Fantasy on Xbox.

raWfodog3d ago

I’m sure Xbox gamers are also looking forward to FFVII Remake dropping this fall/winter, probably more so than FFXVI.

Kurisu3d ago

I didn't realise that had been announced as well!

Scissorman3d ago

But will it sell well? Let's see if everyone that was bemoaning this title as a PS5 exclusive now has the balls to back it up and purchase this game on Xbox. This game sold over 3 million copies in three days on PS5 alone. Let's see how many Xbox players will show up.

Elda3d ago

I'm curious to know if only XB Series owners will buy the game as well.

tay87013d ago (Edited 3d ago )

They are not gonna buy them.

3d ago
2d ago
Christopher3d ago

Why do we even ask this when the facts will speak for themself in the future? Let's just be happy the game is more available to more gamers. We can discuss the sales of the game when they actually happen.

Terry_B2d ago

^^ this. Good third party games should be available on as many platforms as possible.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH3d ago

Why do you care so much about how well this game sells on Xbox? What do you gain by learning how well it sells? Maybe you should focus more on why the game STILL runs like crap on PS5…

tay87013d ago

Runs like a dream on ps5 pro. Man the s is gonna struggle big time.

Traecy3d ago

Why do you care why some people care if it sells on XB or not? What do you gain by trying to call them out for wanting to know that info. The pot calling the kettle black.

kpgs2d ago

"Maybe you should focus more on why the game STILL runs like crap on PS5…"
Isn't that on the devs to fix?
And if it can't run well on PS5, isn't Xbox in trouble too?

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH2d ago

@KPGS couldn’t the same be said about him worrying about sales? Shouldn’t stock holders be the one worried about that not consumers?

@tay8701 unless you’re playing a completely different version of FF16 than everyone else it still runs like crap on PS5 and on Pro so I’m not sure what dreams you be having…

At Traecy Oh you’re one of those guys i see. Ok I’ll play along, why are you worried about me be worried about someone being worried about sales? See what I did there…

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
3d ago
3d ago
Petebloodyonion3d ago

It's not about selling, it's about mending bridges.
Honestly, a huge chunk of ppl owning an Xbox do own a PlayStation console, something that Phil Spencer alluded to before the release of the Series X with why releasing a Series S console.
https://www.gamedeveloper.c...

And true Final Fantasy fans probably bought a PS5 when they announced only on PS5.
So don't expect a lot of sales for these games.

Pickledpepper8h ago

I was a true final fantasy fan up until the game turned to a hack n slash. Turn base was much better and gave the game more depth and challenge

thesoftware7303d ago

So, and old game that was later called "not really a FF" game and many concluded that has annoying gameplay issues(no real elemental structure)which everyone know about..and you expect it to seel super well.

They hype has been gone for this game, and the fact that there are so many other newer stellar RPG currently available.

Extermin8or3_3d ago

Thry don't buy games hardly at all anymore. It won't sell well. Will likely leave square Enix scratching their heads and thinking "oh shit, maybe taking money and dev assistance from Sony for it to be exclusive is the better financial move after all"

Workshyskiver3d ago

It won't really be a true reflection of what marketshare the Xbox platform would have of the game if it had released day and date. I would have been a day one buyer but its been out for so long I've since bought it on my PC and I can't imagine I am alone in that.

On the game itself I thought it was extremely disappointing and such a dull game outside of the big boss moments. Had a potentially great story and I just don't think they delivered on its potential.

FF7 remake is another one that whilst I liked and I loved reunion, cutting out a lot of the waffle they introduced and having those two games as one entry would have been better. Chadley is a horrible addition to those games.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 8h ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Bought for 55.16, have to support blockbuster games like this.

Levii_923d ago

I’m replaying this game right now on Ps5 and while i like it a bit better this time (cause i knew what to expect) some of the choices made in this game gameplay and traversal wise are still mind-numbingly baffling to me.

Show all comments (32)