410°
6.0

Hogwarts Legacy Review - Sleight Of Hand - Gamespot

Hogwarts Legacy brilliantly adapts all of the source material fans of the Potterverse will expect, but wastes it on a rote open-world filled with mundane quests.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
metalhead846d ago

Biased garbage review. GameSpot said they weren’t playing it a week ago because of JK and now they’re trashing something that functions better than Assassin’s Creed at launch.

This review is utter trash.

Jin_Sakai846d ago (Edited 846d ago )

“Although she is not personally involved with its development, she stands to profit from its success. For more, read our in-depth article on how Rowling's comments have impacted the trans community. In this article, you will also find links to trans creators you can support, as well as charities you can donate to.“

After that never even bothered reading. As a matter of fact nobody cares about your garbage review. Millions of people are enjoying the game. Bet that hurts doesn’t it.

metalhead846d ago

I read it and it reads like they’re just making stuff up. I do not find this game any where near as repetitive as AC or other games they praise

Jin_Sakai846d ago

“I read it and it reads like they’re just making stuff up. I do not find this game any where near as repetitive as AC or other games they praise“

Of course they’re making stuff up. This review is about J.K. Rowling in disguise.

Vengeance1138846d ago

Are the charity donations to help them get the mental help they need to correct their mental illness? Maybe become normal people again.

NecrumOddBoy846d ago (Edited 846d ago )

“Hogwarts Legacy is developed by Avalanche Software, a subsidiary of Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment. The game has been embroiled in controversy due to transphobic remarks from Harry Potter author JK Rowling. Although she is not personally involved with its development, she stands to profit from its success. For more, read our in-depth article on how Rowling's comments have impacted the trans community. In this article, you will also find links to trans creators you can support, as well as charities you can donate to.“

Straight up activists and why are they masking the reviewer?

Who actually reviewed this? We want to know!

RNTody845d ago

After that excellent paragraph I'm definitely buying the game! At full price too!

coolbeans845d ago

@Vegeance1138

You know that's not the case. And phrasing it like "becoming normal people again" is a distasteful way of putting it. You can go about criticizing the review w/out doing that.

ChasterMies845d ago

No problem with a trickier going Meta. I’m still non plussed by Will Smith and that will bleed into how I receive movies that he stars in. But indirect profit is a weak reason to avoid media. Every project will indirectly line the pockets of all kinds of people. Lest we forget all of the developers who are directly profiting, and we have no issues with them!

savedsynner845d ago

Right...it's like giving Dante's Inferno(a Ps3 game from a while back) a bad score because you disagreed with Dante's politics hundreds of years ago. Review the game, not some political bias you have against the creator of the IP. Imagine not buying a Volkswagen because the company was started under the Nazis. Just stupid, ignorant review.

Is this what gamespot has become...you have to agree with the developers' politics to like a game? So if Hideki Myazaki(sp?) was a conservative, would they give Elden Ring a 6/10?

frostypants845d ago (Edited 845d ago )

So sad what's become of Gamespot. Taken over by blathering ideological idiots to the point that it is NOT the same publication it used to be. It just shares a name with a once great outlet. And JK Rowling never said anything "transphobic". Anyone who reads what she said and thinks she is transphobic is utterly devoid of rationality and unworthy of consideration or even acknowledgement.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 845d ago
RpgSama845d ago (Edited 845d ago )

"By GameSpot Staff on February 17, 2023 at 12:43PM PST"

They didn't even had the courage to put who wrote the review in there (checked other games, they all had who wrote it), they just put a generic GameSpot Staff, this is how much even them know this is all BS and activism disguised as "journalism".

savedsynner845d ago

Gamespot is a shell of it's former self and honestly, kind of a useless site not that they don't have good exclusive content, but that game reviews are so plentiful now, it's not like is was in the early 2000s where a great gamespot review could seriously boost sales. We have so many honest alternative review sites, gamespot can go live in cancel culture world and reap the consequences.

jambola845d ago

Yeah, I'm not going to say it invalidates a review, but it definitely makes it less credible when there's a clear agenda

845d ago
lelo2play845d ago (Edited 845d ago )

My opinion is the most important one. Played Hogwarts Legacy, and finished the main story. It's a good open world game (set in a the fascinating magic world of the Harry Potter universe), with interesting gameplay, story and side-quests.
I give Hogwarts Legacy a 8 out of 10.

Hogwarts Legacy is a sales success, hope the developer does a sequel.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 845d ago
anast846d ago

They probably gave all AC creed games a 10.

metalhead846d ago

They gave Valhalla an 8 and it was a broken mess at launch.

savedsynner845d ago

From the looks of it, it also didn't innovate much at all. It looked like Odyssey and Origins with a Viking mod. I've given up hope for the AC series to be anything but a constant cash grab by Ubisoft.

SonyStyled846d ago

That’s weird. I remember assassins creed games receiving 8-9s from gamespot… But around that same time period gamespot did give 6 to an original AC game which is the same as this score. I’d say that 6/10 AC game is great too.

I really miss the old AC though, I’m not an RPG fan of the new ones so I don’t know what gamespot reviewed them. Just liked the historic setting GTA/sandbox style Assassins creed. Also loved the Saboteur for the same reason.

metalhead845d ago

Did you remember the reviewer getting fired for giving AC a 6? That shows how messed up they are

Bobertt845d ago

This is why i don't go to IGN and Gamestop for reviews. Steam reviews and certain youtubers usually are better.

GotGame818846d ago

It is a great game! Leave JK the hell out of it!
It is more fun, and original than a lot of games. It is also challenging. Crap biased review!

VenomUK845d ago

Gamespot has done a 180, likely for the controversy.

When you’re not reviewing the quality of the game but scoring down to make a political statement then you’re being unethical and not being honest with your readership.

Don’t ever trust them again, don’t give them your clicks, or your views, don’t approve their stories - it’s a simple as that.

Ashunderfire86845d ago (Edited 845d ago )

Everything woke turn to shaaats. I don’t care what the angry 😤 alphabet mob has to say! This is an extremely bias review! No one waited for Gamespot review anyway! YouTuber like ACG I trust said this game was great, and give a detailed an more honest review than even IGN, that made it look 👀 like it was this generic game.

ABizzel1845d ago

What a bunch of cowards.

Usually I'm of the everyone has the right to express their opinion crowd, however, if you do then stand on it, and people have the right to express their differing opinions as well.

These cowards at GameSpot didn't even put an actual reviewers name to avoid any potential backlash for the reviewer, added an unnecessary paragraph about someone who is not involved with the creation of this game, and turned the comments off so they didn't get rightfully dragged.

So it's okay for Gamespot to drag the developer and attempt to hurt the success of their game and the hundreds / thousands of developers who made it, because they disagree with the viewpoint of someone labeling cis / trans genders, goes to show just how ignorant these people can be. They're so blind in their ignorant hate of JK for the alleged "hurtful" things she said, that they are too busy trying to stick it to her and not taking a moment to realize the hurt they're causing to actual everyday people and families.

Then you block the comments from this one review, to avoid any backlash. Pure cowardice.

savedsynner845d ago

How is the combat? From the gameplay clips, it looks to be it's weakest feature.

GotGame818845d ago

The combat is challenging. You have to use combos to beat enemies. It isn't hack and slash.

845d ago
Exvalos846d ago

Probably can't take this particular review seriously. If you legit don't like the game that's okay not everything is for everybody. However this particular site has publicly stated there distaste for Rowling.

mkis007846d ago

The good thing about this game in particular is that it makes it easy to see which publications can't be objective...gamespot is now on that list as is the guardian. And yes even publishing a 3rd party review without issueing a retraction is enough.

sadraiden846d ago

Game reviewing as an exercise is inherently subjective. Games are a form of art, and everyone has differing tastes. Biased or not against Rowling, it's their take. Why do they need to issue a retraction?

esherwood846d ago

They’re obviously making the review seem like it’s about the quality of game when it has nothing to do with that. Its dishonest

mkis007846d ago (Edited 846d ago )

That is why this game makes it easy. Subjectivity is one thing entirely different from trolling a game.

Review activisim shouldn't exist

Ashunderfire86845d ago

I think you need to retract your comment you got a lot of downvotes🙃

Show all comments (99)
160°

Hogwarts Legacy Nintendo Switch 2 Rivals PS4 Pro Performance, But Series S Maintains Visual Edge

Hogwarts Legacy on Nintendo Switch 2 delivers performance close to the PS4 Pro version with faster loading times.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
CrimsonWing6921h ago

I mean, did anyone think the Switch 2 would be comparable to current-gen? Yea, I’m pretty sure it’s going to give you PS4 quality looking/playing games and in a couple years we’ll be onto PS6 and most third-party games will either be downgraded to hell or just not be available on Switch 2 🤷‍♂️.

Profchaos19h ago

I was never under any illusion it would compare to series s imagine the battery life

ABizzel118h ago(Edited 18h ago)

It’s doing exactly what I expected and what it needed to do base Xbox One settings in most games upscaled to 2x the resolution with DLSS when docked, and running with better performance. What more can you ask for out of a 10w - ~57w~ platform

Current-gen AAA Games (SX/PS5): 540p @ 30-40fps most games upscaled to 1080p @ 30-40fps
Last-gen AAA Games (XBO/PS4): 720p @ 30-60fps most games upscaled to 1440p @ 30-60fps
PS360/Switch AAA Games: 1080p @ 30-60fps most games upscaled to 1440p-4K @ 30-60fps
Rare cases the PS360/Switch games at 1080p@120fps games like Metroid

And that’s perfectly fine, except docked mode on AAA games could become fairly blurry on large 4K displays.

Babadook717h ago

Sorry, I disagree with this sentiment. The Switch 2 is a current gen machine and well above the PS4 Pro. It goes toe to toe with the Series S due to great DLSS and a modern architecture in many games. This game (Hogwarts Legacy) has always been the poorest example of what the Switch 2 can do and appears to simply be a bad port. Cyberpunk 2077 is on the other hand a great port.

OtterX20h ago

for a handheld it's quite nice, but don't go in expecting a serious console. Keep your PS5 and/or PC. You can tell a huge difference in those long distance shots w the foilage/grass. But again on an 8 inch screen, I bet it looks and plays decent enough.

Neonridr20h ago

the way I look at it, the PS4 Pro still had some gorgeous games. If I could have games that looked like TLOU2 on the system, would I really care about what it would look like on a PS5? No.

OtterX20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

Only on my 55" 4k do I care for that extra oomph. I would be blown away to have a game on par graphically w the PS4 Pro version of TLOU II on a handheld!

Grilla16h ago

Graphics are irrelevant if it’s not running at 60fps

anast16h ago

Switch 2 is around $450 to $700 depending on the country. Let that sink in. Get that nice '280p' Cyberpunk...

They are comparing the S to the PS4. HA!

Show all comments (16)
50°

Hogwarts Legacy's Sequel and Nintendo Switch 2 Could Be a Match Made in Heaven

Hogwarts Legacy 2 is years away at this point, but the sequel could be the perfect game to make use of the Switch 2's features.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
70°

Hogwarts Legacy 2 Enemy Wish List

Hogwarts Legacy 2 could benefit from an expansion of the first game's enemy roster, and luckily, it has a large pool of creatures to draw from.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Becuzisaid38d ago

Couldn't go 2 sentences without bringing up JK Rowling's viewpoints (which are now acknowledged and supported by the UK Supreme Court). Time for all the "progressive" whiners to latch back on to reality.