120°

Pokemon Scarlet And Violet’s Tech Problems Are On Game Freak, Not The Switch

Game Freak is to blame for how bad Pokemon Scarlet and Violet are performing, even if Nintendo should upgrade the Switch soon too.

-Foxtrot943d ago

Sad thing is because people blindly buy these games resulting in the sales being huge for them launch wise, they will never change.

I just find it hilarious most of these big gaming sites are generously giving it a 7 or 8 when the technical issues are pretty in your face obvious among other things. Imagine if other exclusives from Microsoft or Sony did this, they'd be ripped apart limb by limb

PhillyDillyDee942d ago

I agree with your point about blindly buying a product but this is pokemon. Fans will buy it because there isnt (much) competition.

Interestingly, the metacritic reviews place gen 9 at 77 and gen 8 at 80. So to me it means they did a lot right this time and the only thing keeping the game out of a 90 or above average is the abysmal performance.

I think Gen 8 averaged 80 because it was a decent bump from the handheld games but did nothing to change the formula.

I do hope they spend the next few months ironing out performance. Time will tell though.

luckytrouble942d ago

Had a stream going on the side last night and the streamer was doing fights in these big outside arenas. The game was regularly dropping to maybe 10 FPS if I'm being generous. Really choppy even in the battles at that point. It was inexcusably bad and unfortunately you're bang on about the fact that these games will be blindly bought regardless. Even the biggest critics of Pokemon have already dropped their $60 just so they have something fresh to complain about.

This is absolutely something that is happening at all though because this is Pokemon and Nintendo. Even if people don't want to admit it, any performance based article will find people critiquing Sony or Microsoft for having the inferior system because one game version runs at 57 FPS while the other runs at 60 FPS. I've never understood why it's just accepted that some Switch games get to run so insanely badly by comparison.

H9942d ago

I am wondering why it took so long for people to realize this, Game Freak are some of the laziest devs in the Industry and because of the money they have no intention to change, what makes it more absurd is people blaming the switch, if Monster Hunter Rise and Xenoblade were mostly stable then there's absolutely no reason for this not to be, it's just laziness

execution17942d ago

Idk if they're lazy... it's just that they might be too much on their plate buy releasing too many games in a short amount of time

Stanjara942d ago

Wrong. They are pumping way more pokemon games than they can handle.
Probably crunched to death.

For such a huge Nintendo IP, I'm baffled that Nintendo didn't provide these guys with some technical team from their first party devs or hire them a third party support.

--Onilink--942d ago

Because Gamefreak is not a Nintendo developer, they are actually equal partners with Nintendo and Creatures in The Pokemon Company.
Nintendo doesn’t have a direct say on how Gamefreak operates and wouldn’t necessarily just “lend” some of their teams in the same way that internal teams do.

Now, given how Gamefreak operates in one of the most strict release schedules in the industry, its clear that the best approach would be to (significantly) increase in size, but as to why they haven’t done that, its basically a guess at this point unless we ever get some better insight into TPC operations

H9942d ago

Why do you think they were capable of doing so many all the time, it's because of how identical these games have been, reusing everything, anything new comes out broken, their laziness is the source of it all

FinalFantasyFanatic942d ago

Maybe Nintendo should devote some extra resources and help Game Freak out a little more, considering Pokemon games are big system sellers for them. That and Game Freak are clearly struggling since development jumped to the Switch.

--Onilink--942d ago

I doubt its that simple. All 3 of them have equal share in The Pokemon Company with each one having a very specific role.
Gamefreak is the one handling game development while the other 2 handle other stuff. So Nintendo probably cant just step in in that regard without some changes in how they all operate

Good-Smurf942d ago (Edited 942d ago )

On Latest DF Direct Weekly John Linneman didn't hold back criticising the game's poor performance and basic buggy graphics even calling it a game technically came from 2001.
Shocking that this still happened to one of the most popular and profitable IP ever and it better be since they appear to spent peanuts on R&D of their 3D games.
Seeing stuff like Monster Hunter Stories 2, I think Capcom would do far better on Pokemon 3D games than Game Freak themselves.

lellkay942d ago (Edited 942d ago )

The game is garbage and Nintendo and Gamefreak should not be able to repeatedly get away way it.

Expect and demand better.

The reviews on websites have been so disingenious with their reviews as well. If any Sony or MS game had even a few of these issues they would get absolutely dragged for it.

Show all comments (13)
60°

Pearl Abyss Issues Statement On CCP Games Sales Rumors

Amid rumors it was looking to sell Eve Online developer CCP Games, Pearl Abyss has given a statement to Insider Gaming.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
150°

NetEase Announces AAA Action-Adventure Game Blood Message

Get ready for Blood Message, a game that combines stunning visuals and compelling storytelling from NetEase Games and 24 Entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Obscure_Observer16h ago

Truly amazing!

Draws inspiration clearly draws gameplay inspiration from Assassins Creed and action cinematics from Uncharted!

Powered by UE5!

Definitely on my radar!

raWfodog9h ago

Eastern devs are putting in that work this gen. The quality of their games have been top-notch across the board. Looking forward to seeing more of this game in action.

Other devs need to take notes and step their game up, figuratively and literally.

Lightning7719h ago

Looks very good why wasn't this at SGF?

Obscure_Observer16h ago

Probably because this trailer wasn´t ready yet.

I doubt the developers would miss the opportunity to reveal their games to millions of gamers on four major events like Summer Game Fest, Future Games Show, State of Play or Xbox Showcase on purpose.

Scissorman1h ago

not everything needs to be at SGF. and judging by the reaction and the amount of views the trailer has already garnered, it didn't really need to be there.

Napoca8611h ago(Edited 11h ago)

This feels like 90% stolen from Uncharted and the guy is also falling or almost falling to often down. Nah this is to much show, something is strange here.

Sonyslave310h ago

It does look like it could be staged or the combat might be like hellblade, but i have hope the devs made naraka battle royal game.

Lightning776h ago

Ryse had staged area like combat. So did Hell Blade. Linear story based games do this. It's very cinematic like gameplay. The game did remind me of Ryse, how Ryse would of looked if they had a sequel of sorts.

pwnmaster30008h ago

This reminds me a bit of uncharted, ghost, Gow and AC.

Count me in.

Show all comments (14)
120°

The director of the original Silent Hill: “I look forward to seeing bold interpretations.”

Keiichiro Toyama—the creator and original director of the 1999 Silent Hill—shared his personal thoughts on the recently announced remake by Konami, reflecting on what the project means to him after more than two decades:
“I felt something similar when the game was adapted into a movie. It deeply moved me to see the names of the characters and locations I had created come to life visually, even though I wasn’t directly involved. That wouldn’t have been possible without the continued support of the fans and the dedication of the developers who’ve kept the series alive.
I’m really looking forward to seeing how the remake evolves this time. With the advanced technology we now have, I’m sure I’ll be surprised by how the game is reimagined. Since the original was built for the first PlayStation, there will naturally be challenges—like the camera and controls—but I’m eager to see bold and creative solutions to those elements.”

Read Full Story >>
www-alhub-me.translate.goog
senorfartcushion18h ago

Haha Not only is bold and creatively not what the industry wants, it’s not what most people want.

They want to get scammed and pay twice for a thing they already own.

Nightcrawler8917h ago

Hope they use his vision in the game

Inverno17h ago

Was the SH2 remake even bold? Or was it more or less just a 1 to 1 over the shoulder remake?

Scissorman1h ago

it was not. it greatly expanded the areas and puzzles to the point where it felt like an entirely new game. the enemies and boss fights were given a MASSIVE upgrade. the abstract daddy fight in particular was incredible. and the team added two new endings.

Pedrof17h ago

I wouldn't hold my breath on "bold".

Show all comments (7)