Darth while the halo infinite moment was bad for Microsoft it was good for the game. If their game is looking crappy then wouldn't you want the public to let them know so they can do better?
If its another halo infinite then its not going extremely well.
@phoenix If the public needs to let you know your game doesnt look good compared to whats out there or expected then maybe they shouldnt be working on top tier IP.
Eh. Microsoft has been getting a lot of grief on their showings (much of it is deserved, I would say).
Best to wait until they're ready to show it. Maybe they want to show it when they lock in a release date within months of that showing. It very much is wait and see, which I can actually appreciate.
It 100% should not be shown until they are confident and ready to show it otherwise they create negativity around the wait and any potential delays that follow.
Take your time, work the game and then reveal when ready. Best business practice possible.
That may be true but so were CDPR before the Cyberpunk disaster, or DICE were competent once and claimed BF2042 was "way ahead of schedule".
Regardless of who is making a game, always best err on the side of caution. Especially this project after The Coalition claimed it was going great and labelled it "AAAA" previously before CD were called into save the title from what may still be a disaster.
I do believe CDPR were capable...I just didnt expect what others did and chose not to forget that Witcher 1, Witcher 2 and Witcher 3 all had tons of bugs at launch and performance issues....soooo yeah.
🤡🤡🤡pl ease go. DICE and CDPR are legendary developers, but a game has to abide to the will of the companies shareholders and their release schedule.
CDPR managed to deliver a BANGER in an extremely old engine that they had to push to it's absolute design limits; it had a LOT of bugs yes, it was unfinished yes, but you have to be an absolute CLOWN not to see the quality, work, aesthetic and unique nature of the game and all those different mechanics it encompassed.
And if I am correct, they never said AAAA it was a recruitment agency that printed that (possibly on error) and it got twisted by the gaming media so it looked like the dev had said it
Funny, that's not the impression that was given when every green xsnot and their overlords were screaming about kickass AAAA and stealing all of Sony's talent now was it. Remember that delusional shit? A certain 'gaming' fanbase seriously suffers from convenient memory loss so often, I'm surprised they can still remember their names. But the dumb never learn.
@Sonic The big 3 pay other companies to make games that they publish all the time. It’s known as 2nd party.
If it is 100% them, then they will be credited as the developer. If it’s co dev (which is also extremely common in the industry) then they will be credited as such.
Then show it. All we need is to see some gameplay.
Not surprised, Crystal Dynamics is a capable team.
CD is probably carrying tbh.
PLEASE be good...