European Commission Deputy Head draws ire for public comments regarding the Microsoft-Activision merger, but he is not involved in the merger unit.
Hopefully this gets Embracer group back on track
Huzaifah from eXputer: "With Larian Studios washing their hands of the IP, what is the ultimate fate of the legendary Baldur's Gate series?"
If anybody's gonna mention BioWare, then look at Archetype Entertainment, they're the new BioWare
or else
Obsidian is still a good choice but not independent anymore.
No, WoTC is pivoting to mobile. They can use Larian's work to justify DnD Go and everyone will accept it.
Honestly, we're talking completely new engine and none of Larian's built-in stuff with regard to environments and the like that they had from their past divinity game. No one is going to have that just ready to go. So, they need to shop for a dev studio that has a past game that shows what they want.
Obsidian doesn't have that, maybe the closest being Dungeon Siege 3 or Pillars of Eternity, but those are very basic, not as open, very little environment related and altering capabilities. So, we're talking a step way back on what Larian delivered. Zero scene experience to line up with what was done in BG3. Okay conversation tree designs, but still needs more complexity.
inXile has Wasteland 3 as a base model engine, and I think that's better than Pillars of Eternity from Obsidian. But, still needs to be more open world, more environmental effects, and a much heavier rules set adaptation. But, not a bad overall engine as a base, but still a ton of work. Zero scene experience to line up with what was done in BG3. Needs a ton of work on that entirely.
Tactical Adventure did the Solasta game. Really good and more accurate as far as 5e rules than BG3. But, again, if the expectation is similar to what made BG3 a big hit, engine isn't designed for moving the camera, is a bit outdated in graphics, doesn't have in-game scene elements, and needs much better writers/voice actors.
Owlcat of pathfinder games is another choice, even though they've recently moved on to WH40k licensed games. Again, though, the engine is the biggest issue here to match up, but it's a much better option overall than Tactical Adventure. Another question is writers/story telling, as much of their overall story telling bits are very limited with a lot of random worldbuilding elements that are just +\- of some attributes.
TBH, no matter who takes over, it's just not going to be like BG3 much like how BG3 isn't at all like BG1/2. And BG3 was so successful because of how much Larian was able to put in with their engine and how focused they were on players having ridiculous control over the story being told. I just don't see the next BG being the same and depending on what it is, it might be good but I'm not as big of a reach as BG3. It's way more likely players are going to go into BG4 (or its spiritual successor if it moves away from Baldur's Gate and into Neverwinter or something like Plansescape) expecting much of what is in BG3 with more options, new and older characters, and the same level of control over what they're doing. If it doesn't have that, regardless of who makes it, it won't be as successful, IMHO.
As part of its latest financial report, Devolver Digital has announced that upcoming physics platformer Human Fall Flat 2 has been delayed beyond 2025.
I don't think it matters if he is involved with the unit or not - he will likely have contact with said people.
He has single handedly just handed Microsoft their biggest legal defense against any decision by the EU commission that they are not happy with. They will just point towards this guy and say "Look, the case was already decided before they'd even reviewed any evidence".
Hopefully European commission does block this, or on the condition that Activision sells Blizzard, Crash and Spyro, and most of IPs to other companies or form a side company to house these IP in as a consequence for this huge purchase but nah that ain't reality.
It’s a bad look for the EU commission no matter how people try to spin it. This can definitely play into MS’s favor if this guy is legit.
The gaming community's response on this case is a prime example of how childlike, immature and immoral most gamers are; how out of touch, unknowledgable and two-sided they can be and how entitled they can feel.
Activision Blizzard is a company facing an internal collapse, bleeding talent and facing legal trouble from it's employees. With a board of directors that can not assess the situation properly and fix the company's internal problems and their game quality (especially blizzard) has been on a sharp decline compared to what they could have been.
Most franchises, on the other hand, are being bled to death and communities like WOW are starting to die.
Yet, despite microsoft being able to fix the internal problems and aliviate the stress between management and employes, gamers choose to attack the acquisition that could actually save the company. The acquisition that could possibly save and bring back the life to World of Watctaft, diablo, overwatch 2, Tony Hawk etc etc.
It is beyond me, as such, to think that someone can be so small as to ignore the actual death that is lurking around Activision's ip's corner, so that he can still play call of duty in that single console of his.