240°

The Ayaneo Air Is An Amazing $500 Ultra-Thin OLED Handheld PC

The Ayaneo Air, an OLED Windows handheld PC that is smaller than the Steam Deck and available in several models, is on the market and has started shipping.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
jznrpg998d ago (Edited 998d ago )

The problem with PC is not much I can’t get anywhere else . I stick with Switch and PS and I have everything I want that I can’t get elsewhere and the rest . Sure PC has some games I can’t play but nothing worth me building a PC for yet … the old days there was a lot on PC only and I built PC’s back then but now it’s just a waste of time and money until there are numerous games I can’t get elsewhere .

nevin1998d ago

I'm not a PC expert but what are the exclusives they have?

YourMommySpoils998d ago

For starters every censored game in the market.

XbladeTeddy998d ago (Edited 998d ago )

"I'm not a PC expert but what are the exclusives they have?"

Switch, SNES, N64, Mega Drive, Amstrad, Spectrum, Neo Geo and anything else emulation. Backward compatibility with every game made since the 80's. Crazy mods that enhance games. 120FPS and over support. Full on ray tracing. Graphics beyond any consoles capability. VR through many different headsets. Steam. Ultra-wide gaming. I could go on but you get the point.

Giblet_Head998d ago (Edited 998d ago )

About 40 years worth. But one important one that comes to mind is the S.T.A.L.K.E.R series. Anomaly, a community standalone of all three is perhaps one of the best experiences one can hope to have in gaming. Exceedingly customizable and it's completely free.

https://youtu.be/GV8T8uCtRs...

Exclusives are more of a console rationale though.

ZycoFox998d ago

"Waste" not when you'll get better performance, especially with next gen GPUs around the corner.

Each to their own, some act as if a PC is only good for gaming when it can do a lot more.

MadLad998d ago (Edited 998d ago )

I mean, Microsoft fully supports PC, Sony is quickly fully supporting PC, Nintendo keeps choosing to support hardware that can be easily emulated on a decent PC, and PC allows many developers to create games without the fee of insane charges just to put them on a console.

So what games are you really missing out on? You miss out on more games not playing on PC than you do. And it's really not much cheaper if your narrative is you need to buy all the consoles to not miss titles. Especially considering you have to pay to play online games over a generation.

And then, at the end of the day ... you have a PC. Consoles still barely run search engines in a passable way. Let alone anything else.

DogJosha998d ago

I love having PCs, but I need to refute a few of your points. Sony's slight support of PC doesn't mean 3rd parties support it. Nintendo emulation doesn't get you online gameplay and early emulation tends to focus on getting popular games running while other games can run like trash, if at all. More games being on PC doesn't mean those are the games a person wants to play. If you have to pay to play an online game, then emulating or possibly not having the game on PC does not fix that situation, so that is a moot point. Lastly, lets not pretend that anyone is bothered by using a search engine on their cell phone, even when they may have a PC. PC is great, and I'd recommend one for certain people, but you are delusional if you think it is the best choice for everyone.

MadLad998d ago

@dog

I want to be polite here, but you're wrong about almost everything you said.
Sony's "slight support" went from being non-existent to having an official Steam page, an acquired studio who focuses on proper PC ports,
porting games that were openly stated would only remain on Playstation, Sony openly stating they'll be putting more and more games on PC, and even investing in PC hardware. Over the span of 2 years ...
3rd parties heavily support PC. Not sure what you're getting at there. Virtually every 3rd party games come to PC. The issue is actually the reverse; many PC games don't come to console.

Emulation is always hit or miss, but the more consoles just become PCs, rather than proprietary hardware, emulation becomes easier and easier. The Steam Deck runs most Switch games better than the Switch does at this point. Let alone a legitimate tower PC.
PC allows for dedicated servers, even through emulation, and there's not a single PC game I know of that requires you to play it, outside of subscription MMOs. That's a far cry from what consoles are doing at the moment.
And yes, you can easily look things up on your phone. You can do it on PC as well. It's kind of a feature that you can say justifies the cost of either device. That was entirely my point. You pay more for a PC, but you get more out of a PC.

DogJosha997d ago

@mad
"Slight" is not a measurable term so it is a bit hard to classify that as wrong. I'm not saying the support is worthless or that it isn't growing, but it is still only a small portion of all their titles, which is why I would call it "slight".
You say virtually every title comes to PC which is the keyword, virtually. Not everything comes to PC and some things can take years. Those games may be more important to others than it is to you so it is worth mentioning.
Emulation being hit or miss is why I mention it. I love emulation and would suggest it to people, but it still isn't a cure-all and people should know that. I believe CEMU stated 30% of the library runs perfectly. That is an example of something someone should look into if they wanted to get rid of their Wii U.
Dedicated servers doesn't mean a living breathing online experience. Same could be said for consoles, but consoles tend to retain online communities longer for less popular games so again, it is just something worth looking into when considering PC.
My point about looking it up on your phone is that most people will probably own a phone and default to using their phone so the benefits of a PC are becoming less and while they are a big boon to someone like me, they are completely meaningless to a lot of younger people.
Also, none of what I said was misinformation or false. Everyone has their priorities and they should be considered when looking at PC vs consoles. If I'm bored out of my mind and waiting to play FFXVI and FFVII Re2 (its my favorite series even if I haven't been overly impressed since IX) then why shouldn't I look into getting a PS5?

Schriefer9998d ago

I agreed with you about PC’s at one time. Bought a MSI gaming laptop and was surprised with the amount of time I spent on it. Even if re-playing older games or changing settings for higher frame rate. PC isn’t cheap but is far from a waste. Being able to optimize a game to your preferences adds replay value to games.

crazyCoconuts998d ago

But there isn't a portable PS so, that's where these handhelds step in

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 997d ago
XxINFERNUSxX998d ago

You can play Switch roms on this easily and the games will run much better than on the stock switch by a long shot.

RickRoland998d ago

Ultra thin, handheld gaming PC with no mention of battery life? This should go well.

MadLad998d ago

So the battery probably dies within an hour, and the thing runs hot so hopefully you got a warranty for it.

crazyCoconuts998d ago

I love that there are a few choices in the PC handheld space, but right now I really hope lots of people pick up a steam deck. With enough momentum it could really make a difference in portable gaming and push more games to be Linux/Vulcan friendly.

Show all comments (24)
150°

30 Years Ago, Sega Took Its Biggest Gamble With Saturn And Failed

"That’s not how you launch a system".

Read Full Story >>
timeextension.com
thorstein16h ago

The Dreamcast was the biggest gamble and way ahead of its time.

OtterX15h ago

I wish we lived in the Alternate Timeline where Sega was still a dominant force in the console space and it hadn't been Microsoft.

darthv7213h ago

Saturn was a fantastic piece of kit... they just went a little too ambitious with its dual CPU setup. which turned a lot of developers off (at the time). The homebrew community have done some amazing work many years later, thanks to multichip experience. It is still the best platform for arcade fighters and shmups of all time. Dreamcast is a close 2nd though.

Profchaos3h ago

Yeah it was a interesting decision especially when looking at how dual CPU is considered a root cause of why the Jaguar was a failure.

Also the hardware rendered four sided polygons where the standard was three if they kept with triangle polygons I feel the systems development would have been easier to work with and we would have seen more third party ports in the west.

I think it was a victim of its time more than anything it saw huge success in Japan but the leadership and internal turmoil in the west meant games were not getting localised along with a focus on arcade like games were the PlayStation and later the N64 were pushing more in depth experiences over coin munching high score driven games.

Knightofelemia11h ago

I still enjoy my Saturn it was the first console I mowed lawns for and saved up for to purchase. I went so far as to purchase a used Saturn to run off an SD card. I even have a second Dreamcast modded to run off an SD card as well.

Show all comments (15)
70°

NES Games That Hold Up Brilliantly

Unlike most SNL special guests from the 00s, a lot of NES games just do not age.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
90°

How Sony Fixed Their PS3 Launch Mistakes

This is the story of how the creators of the all-time best selling console almost crippled its own successor’s early life.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
ABizzel12d ago

They retired Ken Kutaragi, moved away from overly expensive custom hardware, and went with more traditional hardware available to the market and listened to developer needs.

Profchaos1d 5h ago

It's true but also PlayStation publicly came out and stated third party wasn't important to them.

ironic that what worked for them the previous generation caused them significant pain in the subsequent one.

The PS2 was actually a significant challenge to develop for far worse than the PS1 ever was but the competition at the time was struggling so much they couldn't make up the ground Dreamcast had a stigma of being a last gen console by the time the PS2 came around and looked inferior compared to games like grab Turismo 3, the GameCube and Xbox were still a ways away and PlayStation had the reputation as being the place to play it was a perfect storm for them and the GTA games not coming to Dreamcast and Sony's embrace really helped.

Third party basically drove PlayStation yi success over more capable consoles Xbox may have looked better at the time but it didn't have GTA 3, vc, Sa or the stories games the mainline entries didn't hit the Xbox until many years after being on PlayStation.

Then the PS3 with it's cell architecture ramped it up again and just hurt Devs they didn't focus on the GPU as much as they should have and they didn't realise their deals they made with IBM could have resulted in the cell architecture being shared with Microsoft which it was and it did help them develop the 360

But really the 90s and 2000s were a wild time for game consoles now it's a little boring it's all off the shelf components and everything is mostly the same

gunnerforlife1d 7h ago

After losing so many 3rd party exclusives, they buckled down and concentrated on amazing first party games! God of war 3, Killzone 2, resistance, uncharted, the last of us, MgS4, little big planet, demon souls and so many more games!! They won the gamers back by playing smart! Even though the media and all big gaming websites from ign, gamespot, kotaku etc were all against it!! I had fun with ps2, but it's ps3 where I really grew up and had the time of my life.

BlackCountryBob21h ago

It’s weird to look back on how even today the games media narrative was stuck in 2006 to say it was overpriced and had no games which was outsold by 360 (all incorrect).

In many ways, it’s similar to how the Xbox One was never really able to move past the launch even though after a year or so it was an entirely different proposition (but Microsoft didn’t do nearly as good a job as Sony did to recover IMO).

gunnerforlife4h ago

I'm glad it received the hate from western media! It humbled them quite a lot and forced them to buckle down and concentrate where it mattered most! Games games games!! And they learned a lot from their mistakes with ps3 and they made one of the greatest consoles ever in ps4!!

So true! Where Sony realised their mistakes and corrected everything, MS were either too arrogant to change course or just didn't have the tools/capabilities to correct course and get back to basics! Games games games! Which is sad because with no rival, Sony this generation has stagnated a lot!! This generation is a write off in my books!!!

OhReginald17h ago

I was committed to that whole generation. What turned Ps3 around from being a failure to a success was in 2009 with the releases of the first ps3 slim model with a cheaper price tag, the kevin butler marketing campaign, and a ton of 1st party AAA games that were critically acclaimed and loved by the fans like Uncharted 2 (this was a bigger deal than the first game), Killzone 2 (91 on metacritic), inFamous, LittleBigPlanet (a serious threat to mario at the time), Demon's Souls( it was very niche but the word of mouth and gamespots goty award helped it and helped ps3). The big game everyone that bought a ps3 was waiting for was mgs4 in 2008 and GT5 in 2010. Anyways I think the ps3 was way ahead of its time with the games I mentioned above and breakout hits like the last of us.