Not a complaint, I just find their claims about the longevity of this game exaggerated and pointless. This isn't a MMO game, I want to hear how fun the game is, how good the story, the quality of the side quests (which was not good in DL1). 500 hours playtime and 5 years of support seems both hyperbole and is pointless if the game's mediocre!
I mean, would u really believe them if they came out and said this game is fun, goty material, story grade A Oscar worthy? Why set themselves up like that.
These things are specifically targeted for the current player base of 1. If the games good, then knowing it’s going to get the same kind of support as the first is great. Seems like you haven’t been paying attention to how they’ve handled post launch support before
wow chill people, I am not 'complaining' I just find their claims a little bit exaggerated and funny. 500 hours and 5 years are the stuff of MMO games and the likes not a single player zombie game.
They supported the first one for just as long. The first title also a hefty amount of content compared to other titles. You can easily put 100 hrs plus in the the first title..not to say we're getting 500 hrs of content:
Let's just hope it turns out good. The first is great, but the second had a pretty dodgy development cycle. Their plans for dlc will definitely lean on the performance of the game, itself.
Techland is not CD Project, when it comes to Cyberpunk 2077. Their Dying Light 1 is already good and part 2 is building up from that success. Dying Light 2 is going to be miles better than Cyberpunk 2077, the game actually has wall running in it too. Remember that canceled feature that never made it to Cyberpunk? Well it’s in Dying Light 2, 500 hours of content and still can play everything in coop from beginning to end! No other game has achieved that! This is a game that is going to be worth the $70 dollars 💵 It’s feature complete, and they still have more DLC, seasonal events and etc to sink your teeth 🦷 in! What more can we ask?
I'm just saying you can ne excited, but be cautious about it.
I'll frame it this way. CDPR had a track record of putting out amazing work, and then they didn't. Which surprised us. Techland had a track record of putting out pretty middle of the road, to straight up bad, work, and then found their lightning in the bottle with Dyling Light, and that surprised us.
I want the game to be great, but the development of it definitely threw out a red flag. You also have the issue seen time and again, when these developers find their breakout hit, and overhaul the sequel so much it feels fairly dissimilar to the original, and old fans get turned off of it. That or they throw in so many new mechanics to make it feel like a true "sequel" and many come out looked over and half baked.
I'm not hating on it; I want it to be great. I've put a lot of time into the original over the years. I just don't want to see this be a bunch of people's Cyberpunk, where a bunch of hype was built on past works, just to disappoint.
Oh just like the first game Dying Light 2 will definitely be well optimized for PC! Part 1 was one of the best optimized games ever made on PC! Part 2 will be GOLD!
So 500 hours of playtime over 5 years ? for a zombie game? 😅
Hopefully Dying Light 3 will be out before 5 years
Not surprised, they still roll out post game support for the first game
Let's just hope it turns out good. The first is great, but the second had a pretty dodgy development cycle. Their plans for dlc will definitely lean on the performance of the game, itself.
Hopefully the PC version is optimized well