320°

The next big leap in PC gaming performance isn't just about bigger, faster graphics cards

PC Gamer : There's a smarter way to bump your frame rate.

masterfox1276d ago

"There's a smarter way to bump your frame rate"

Yeah is called optimization lol, I hope PC gaming starts using that more often, lots of people don't realize that their old card probably never used its true potential cause lazy developers and so people thought they needed a new card, I mean just look the past old consoles what they can do, or even easier example is, I been using that FSR mode in some games and the FPS boost is freaking insane without lowering the resolution in the video settings and I'm using a freaking 1060 GTX 6 GB old card, DLSS could work as well but Nvidia blocked its mode to only 2000 series cards and above, AMD end up being the most customer friendly cause I can use its mode in a branded NVidia card, a really good reputation increase for AMD no doubt.

RaidenBlack1276d ago

"their old card probably never used its true potential cause lazy developers and so people thought they needed a new card"
~ Amen, brother.

PeeShuter1275d ago

You want to see optimization??? Look no further than Doom Eternal. That game looks freaking amazing still runs great. I am running same card as you and get smooth 60fps on high setting @1080p.

NickN1275d ago

Rest assured that the next Doom game, won't be using Vulkan because that IP is now owned by Microsoft. I'm sure it'll likely be DX12 or 13, etc.

GoodGuy091275d ago

I was able to run doom 1 1080p 144 easy on my gtx 1060 gaming laptop lol. Indeed great optimization.

LordoftheCritics1275d ago

Bethesda can put out Doom Eternal, possibly the most optimized AAA title last gen and at the same time release Fallout 76 the most......

Tapani1275d ago

I agree! I'd like to see much more optimization from devs, seems like PC is always the afterthought. But at the same time, typically after 12-18 months of patches and new drivers for GPUs, the games tend to perform linearly compared to consoles in the end. I mean I remember my PS4 Pro looking stunning on Shadow of the Tomb Raider checkerboarded 4K, but if you put the PS5 version against similar RDNA2 parts, they actually perform as per the specs. Consoles do tend to slightly punch above their weight at release, but PC catches up within a year or so.

Love the options such as DLSS, NIS, FSR, RSR, XeSS + settings tuning. To me though, who's more interested in the games and their contents (albeit tech is interesting as well), I typically just set my display resolution and the highest possible settings as long as the fps is locked 60fps without drops under 55.

Michiel19891275d ago

as if its possible to optimize for 200+ different cards. and you think your console gets max performance during the whole gen? maybe only santa monica's and ND's last games of the gen squeeze out most performance out of the console.

The reason consoles can get away while being relatively underpowered the whole gen is because there is no variables in the hardware and everything is focused on gaming. Every dev will develop for the exact same hardware specs making it way easier to optimize for it. This will never happen for pc unless the pc market changes drastically.

Rainbowcookie1275d ago

To be fair and this is coming from a console gamer. Its easier to optimise for console since you have either 1 or at most 3 with the backend being the new variants. With Pc you have many different combos motherboards, ram hardrives, gfix cards ect. That said a game with certain specs should run at those speca, like you said. I feel pc development since graphics cards came out have been to throw power at it and it will run right, before then there was better optimisation. I remember having a 486 2mb ram 114 mb hd and it ran everything...then came along quake. The framerate was bad but it was playable. I added more ram or upgraded to a pentium 1 i think and it was better again. Then came unreal and you had all these cards. Voodoo chipset this and that and then you could see the difference in different setups.

IanTH1275d ago (Edited 1275d ago )

1) If you like FSR, check out Nvidia Image Scaling since you have a GTX card, assuming you haven't already. It's a driver level setting that does a comparable job to FSR in upscaling games, and you can use that in any game. You can access it either through the Nvidia Control Panel or, more easily, Gefore Experience.

2) I'm not sure what you mean by FSR mode "without lowering the resolution in the video settings". The whole thing with FSR/NIS/DLSS is that it is rendering in a lower resolution & scaling that up to a higher output resolution.

Einhander19711275d ago

Well said couldn't agree more, that's why I prefer consoles. Its not always about cutting edge tech, it's about pushing the hardware to its limits and optimization!! PC graphics cards hardly see there full potential, before the next one comes out.

KeeseToast1275d ago

"DLSS could work as well but Nvidia blocked its mode to only 2000 series cards and above"

You have no idea what you are talking about. DLSS is using Tensor cores for AI acceleration, something that is only present in 2000 models and upwards. FSR is completely different to what it does. DLSS could be more open yes, but it would still need specialized hardware for that. We'll see how intel's XeSS is goint to handle upscaling.

telgou1275d ago

Even good developers stopped optimizing their games like they used to... now everyone depends on the raw power of the newer (non existent) GPUs and even these GPUs are now recommended just for 1080p Raytracing...

jonivtec1275d ago

L'optimization n'est pas toujours si mauvaise....mais plutôt le réflexe de toujours vouloir pousser les details en niveau Ultra sans faire de concessions...quand en réalité la différence réelle avec les details en medium n'est pas si grande.amen.

CaptainHenry9161274d ago (Edited 1274d ago )

I have a rtx 3080 and I still be having problems. Far Cry 6 wasn't optimize that well either

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1274d ago
Fntastic1276d ago

Only in the last year or so we've gotten decent 27" 4k monitors with good pixel response and 160+Hz. We still need next gen cards to drive that resolution and speed as the graphics get more complex.

People will probably rave about 8k next but it's not much good when games will run like crap, have high pixel response times and probably be limited to 60Hz along with being expensive.

plmkoh1275d ago

Having a 3080ti you can see it's very unsustainable and the heat generation is fairly awful to game with.

Unfortunately with the exorbitant prices orchestrated by Nvidia and signs they intend on keeping it that way, I can't see them putting the brakes on bigger and bigger graphics cards.

Rainbowcookie1275d ago

somewhere the heat will catch up and the whole way we create cards and cooling will need to change. Otherwise we will have a stalemate. I just fear for online only cloud computing machines that are bandwith driven meaning only some will benefit, and you essentially dont own anything.

XbladeTeddy1274d ago

"somewhere the heat will catch up and the whole way we create cards and cooling will need to change."

It has, liquid cooling. Been around for years though not something needed just yet as standard.

Rainbowcookie1273d ago

@Xblade you gotta over clock that sucka 😂😂

Bobertt1275d ago

The leaks say the 4000 series cards are gonna use even more power. On the bright side you may not need a space heater if you keep your computer on lol.

Rainbowcookie1274d ago

no I know about liquid cooling and the alternatives, I was meaning after that.

XbladeTeddy1274d ago

@ Rainbowcookie: But we haven't even reached the point where liquid cooling is needed as standard yet. How far do you want to reach in the future lol.

NickN1275d ago

It's a shame Steam Machines didn't take off. Coupled with Vulkan, it would have allowed low-level access or "coding to the metal" on GPUs.

It also would have been a one size fits all OS (Linux kernel) that wasn't bloated, taking away from the processing pipeline.

annoyedgamer1275d ago

Steam Deck is being released soon.

Wretchedstain1275d ago

Optimization for sure, Deus Ex Mankind Divided is a prime example. With my 3070, on max settings, terrible FPS for a game that is now 6 years old, and isn't stellar in the looks department.

Show all comments (34)
60°

Famitsu sales (6/16/25 - 6/22/25) - Nintendo Switch 2 still dominating in Japan

The latest Japanese hardware sales from Famitsu are as follows:

Switch 2 – 140,026
Switch Lite – 5,212
Switch OLED – 5,110
PS5 – 3,581
Switch – 2,442
PS5 Pro – 1,676
PS5 Digital Edition – 749
Xbox Series S – 107
Xbox Series X Digital Edition – 47
Xbox Series X – 37
PS4 – 28

Read Full Story >>
nintendoeverything.com
rlow11d 13h ago

Ouch for everyone except Nintendo

Neonridr1d 1h ago

Nintendo - 152,790 units
PlayStation - 6,034 units
Microsoft - 191 units

Nintendo selling 25x as many units as the next closest competitor.

raWfodog22h ago

“ Nintendo Switch 2 still dominating in Japan”

Such a strange headline. I mean it’s a brand new console released on June 5th. It would be weird if it wasn’t still dominating in sales.

repsahj16h ago

It would be even stranger if the headline was that the Switch 2 wasn't selling. XD

wesnytsfs21h ago

I figure its dominating everywhere. I stopped with consoles this gen sticking with PC and the switch will get 99% of the games this way.

repsahj16h ago

Going strong sales! The Switch 2 was launched here in Southeast Asia on June 26. I was among those who pre-ordered. I got my unit the same day with Cyberpunk 2077, and there was a long line of people getting their pre-orders, not as long as the line when a NBA 2K series launched, but it was different because it will be released on all platforms.

I want to see how well the June and July world wide sales.

Show all comments (7)
170°

Nintendo Switch 2 May Be Held Back by Software Limitations, Developer Says

The Nintendo Switch 2 is more likely to be held back by software limitations than hardware limitations, according to a game developer.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
VenomUK20h ago

The Xbox PC X and the PS6 will be more powerful than the Switch 2.

MDTunkown18h ago

Secretly to you: in 30 years cheap smartphones will be stronger than ps6

jznrpg17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

PS5 XSX is more powerful than Switch 2

Profchaos1h ago

Yup but try and play them on a plane

Jalapeno19h ago

It blows my mind that Nintendo didn’t bother to add the Hall effect to their analog joysticks after the NS1 was plagued by that. Is it too much for Nintendo, Xbox, and PlayStation to do a simple fix on their gamepads even if it costs a bit more?

jznrpg17h ago

I have someone who mods my controllers for me. A set of Hall effect modules are around 15$ retail. It should be standard these days.

mooreneco2117h ago

Unfortunately, they could not use them due to the electromagnetic field from the magnets in the Switch 2 joy-cons, ironically it would cause drifting!

MetroidFREAK2116h ago

Any software that's released as a Game Key Card is an automatic skip so I can see that

anast3h ago

The price tag is huge though.

110°

Nintendo Switch 2 review

LLC: "Nintendo Switch 2 is a massive upgrade in every way that matters on a day to day basis, and with some firmware updates it could be even better."

Read Full Story >>
lootlevelchill.com
jznrpg1d 17h ago

It’s definitely an upgrade, not sure about massive.

Grilla1d 16h ago

It is massive compared to the switch 1. 6-10X the power, but compared to current standards it’s the bare minimum.

RedDevils1d 16h ago

It's just a minor upgrade nothing special. Could have included the Oled screen but greedy Nintendo have something planned for it already.

Yesyes1d 15h ago

Oled screen means nothing when people have OLED tv's.

Rage771d 15h ago

You are self aware of how dumb and "sheepy" that tagline of "greedy" sounds like at this point in time, right?
Every little entitled twat on the internet has used it ad nauseum, as if all of a sudden you somehow struck gold or something. it ALMOST sounds as infantile as the other meme vomit brain rot: "Defending the billion dollar company, blah, blah" FFS. tell me its "irony" at least what you are trying to express, so at least i can give you some credit for being "clever" or bold. I refuse to believe you ACTUALLY believe what you are saying, unironically,

repsahj1d 16h ago

Great review! We have almost the same impression of the Switch 2. I don't care if the screen isn't OLED, because when I put it next to my friend's Steam OLED screen, they barely deviated in quality.

anast1d 15h ago

Better than the Steam Deck not as good as the other consoles on the market.

PanicMechanic1d 5h ago

Steam deck is the best handheld on the market, so no.

Neonridr1d 1h ago

as an owner of a Steam Deck OLED and a Switch 2 I can wholeheartedly disagree with this statement.

The Steam Deck is nice as I can play my Steam library on the go. But until the Steam Deck can run Mario Kart World or DK Bananza at 60fps then honestly, I can't even begin to compare the two.

Dudububu1d 1h ago (Edited 1d 1h ago )

And yet people will buy it regardless of the other "good" consoles lol. People want to have fun, not to gawk at dem gwafics like some of you would.

Neonridr23h ago

it can do better graphics than the Steam Deck. Higher resolution screen and it can use DLSS which is superior to FSR.

gold_drake22h ago

upgrade sure, massive i dont know ha.

COS16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Screen response time is incredibly poor at over 33ms it is not true HDR (handheld screen) due to low brightness LCD. 120hz screen really is not a big help. Still fun, but an overpriced handheld IMHO