I just watched the whole thing again on Youtube, was an awesome game, loved playing it when it came out on PS3, but if they are not going to really go in this time and use the latest Crytek 5.6 engine and bring back multiplayer, I don't want to hear nothing about it...
Crytek should stop fooling around and start developing a proper Crysis game, 2 and 3 story was pretty bad and very annoying imo, not to mention the core gameplay were nothing like the originals.
in Crysis 2 , very linear path and very narrow for exploration, since the moving forward was so narrow there were no missions or playthrough for vehicles to move around like in Crysis or Crysis Warhead, there were a few parts in Crysis 2 when you enter some of them but since the streets were so cluttered the vehicles were kinda useless, somehow walking in the city felt claustrophobic, the weapons sound effects effings sucked! in comparison to the first two, the weapons in Crysis 2 sound so weak, not to mention I always end up using same damn gun cause the variety was pretty poor as well, the enemy soldiers with their white suit look so cute lol, they didn't look menacing one damn bit, the whole crysis 2 game were segment of battles after battles it felt repetitive, and for the story I was like , da funk!, Prophet shows it self dying to another character then it kill it self, the other guy uses the suit the turns into Prophet later on?, wtf?, what happened to to the other guy Alcatraz mind?, the whole damn story of Crysis in 2 and 3 turn into a Alien screwing up Alcatr....I mean Prophet's head, in the first two was about the discovery of an Alien Race that probably will screw up the world, and nothing about a damn alien screwing up your head like in 2 and 3, should it be a segment with a psychiatrist or something that you can relax sit back and tell all your Alien mind issues. lol
Still in the end the biggest screw up Crytek did with the franchise imo is that they move away from the interactivity / physics and open world mechanics the first two games had, the first two felt alive, organic and felt you were in a real jungle and the atmosphere was great, a huge village, industrial plant or the green plains can be your battleground, in Crysis 2 are just some streets blocks lol, seriously freaking sucked what they did to Psycho in Crysis 3, heck what even happened to Nomad?.
@masterfox It's fine if you don't like non-open world games but not every game needs to be so it's not really a fair criticism. I'm for one looking forward to semi-linear Ratchet and Clank PS5 plus recently enjoyed playing through It Takes Two. The rest of your opinions are yours to have but I enjoyed Crysis 2 and even 3. I think they crashed as a studio with the stunning looking game with very repetitive gameplay; Ryse: Son of Rome. Singular big budget games have brought down plenty of other studios.
Speaking of Crytek; they survived on their engine, selling parts of it to Amazon, making a slight comeback with Hunt and trying to make some money from these remasters. Wouldn't mind seeing them bring back the Crysis franchise to current gen consoles. If they've retained any of their technological talent they could get back to showing us what cutting edge looks like.
Seems I'm one of the few who agree with you @masterfox,each to their own. But I also think the first game was great, Warhead was great but 2 and 3 were absolutely garbage. That said gameplay was good and obviously the graphics were amazing, but the story was utter garbage.
Crysis came out in a time where EA wasn't reputable by any means but they weren't pushing gaas or loot boxes and to their credit crysis remastered didn't add these things in so my purchase of crysis remastered and 2 is basically me enjoying the game but also me saying I want single player and not with gaas or loot bixes
Finally dammit! The entire trilogy needed a remaster, not just the first. Despite loving the second game, even I'll admit that it ran like ass on the PS3. This is most assuredly wanted. Now do the third as well 😁
I second this. Felt Ryse was highly underrated. The game was a lot of fun, and still looks impressive visually. I have it on PC, and it still rivals many modern releases.
Because they don't have the money to finance a project of that scale. They're likely hoping the remasters sell well enough to kick-start development of the next game.
I was getting screen tears and frame rate stutters. PS4 Pro and Xbox One X should be able to run it fine. It just seemed rushed. EA must of been on Crytek to get this game out early.
Dead Space was such a waste on EA's part. They had what could have become their own Resident Evil. The first was fantastic. They pushed the second to be a little more action oriented, but the team made it work well. The third .... they basically were forced to just make it an action shooter with some light horror elements. Tie in some microtransaction nonsense and, oh, we'll shelve the series if it doesn't sell an insane amount of copies, as we alienate the fanbase with the idiotic changes to the series we're pushing on you.
Can you not base it off the ps3/360 version this time ya dweebs
Crytek should stop fooling around and start developing a proper Crysis game, 2 and 3 story was pretty bad and very annoying imo, not to mention the core gameplay were nothing like the originals.
EA sucks. boycott this stupid publishing company. the cigarettes of the gaming industry
Finally dammit! The entire trilogy needed a remaster, not just the first. Despite loving the second game, even I'll admit that it ran like ass on the PS3. This is most assuredly wanted. Now do the third as well 😁
Why will they not make Crysis 4?