300°

Crysis 2 Remastered Was Just Confirmed by Crytek

After numerous leaks and rumors, Crysis 2 Remastered was just confirmed by Crytek with a screenshot of the game shared on Twitter.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
isarai1471d ago

Can you not base it off the ps3/360 version this time ya dweebs

Crazyglues1470d ago

I just watched the whole thing again on Youtube, was an awesome game, loved playing it when it came out on PS3, but if they are not going to really go in this time and use the latest Crytek 5.6 engine and bring back multiplayer, I don't want to hear nothing about it...

masterfox1471d ago

Crytek should stop fooling around and start developing a proper Crysis game, 2 and 3 story was pretty bad and very annoying imo, not to mention the core gameplay were nothing like the originals.

Kornholic1470d ago

What do you mean, Crysis 2 story was pretty good and engaging.

Profchaos1470d ago

It was pretty enjoyable overall but I would of loved more psycho I know we got 3 but still

masterfox1470d ago

in Crysis 2 , very linear path and very narrow for exploration, since the moving forward was so narrow there were no missions or playthrough for vehicles to move around like in Crysis or Crysis Warhead, there were a few parts in Crysis 2 when you enter some of them but since the streets were so cluttered the vehicles were kinda useless, somehow walking in the city felt claustrophobic, the weapons sound effects effings sucked! in comparison to the first two, the weapons in Crysis 2 sound so weak, not to mention I always end up using same damn gun cause the variety was pretty poor as well, the enemy soldiers with their white suit look so cute lol, they didn't look menacing one damn bit, the whole crysis 2 game were segment of battles after battles it felt repetitive, and for the story I was like , da funk!, Prophet shows it self dying to another character then it kill it self, the other guy uses the suit the turns into Prophet later on?, wtf?, what happened to to the other guy Alcatraz mind?, the whole damn story of Crysis in 2 and 3 turn into a Alien screwing up Alcatr....I mean Prophet's head, in the first two was about the discovery of an Alien Race that probably will screw up the world, and nothing about a damn alien screwing up your head like in 2 and 3, should it be a segment with a psychiatrist or something that you can relax sit back and tell all your Alien mind issues. lol

Still in the end the biggest screw up Crytek did with the franchise imo is that they move away from the interactivity / physics and open world mechanics the first two games had, the first two felt alive, organic and felt you were in a real jungle and the atmosphere was great, a huge village, industrial plant or the green plains can be your battleground, in Crysis 2 are just some streets blocks lol, seriously freaking sucked what they did to Psycho in Crysis 3, heck what even happened to Nomad?.

abstractel1470d ago

@masterfox It's fine if you don't like non-open world games but not every game needs to be so it's not really a fair criticism. I'm for one looking forward to semi-linear Ratchet and Clank PS5 plus recently enjoyed playing through It Takes Two. The rest of your opinions are yours to have but I enjoyed Crysis 2 and even 3. I think they crashed as a studio with the stunning looking game with very repetitive gameplay; Ryse: Son of Rome. Singular big budget games have brought down plenty of other studios.

Speaking of Crytek; they survived on their engine, selling parts of it to Amazon, making a slight comeback with Hunt and trying to make some money from these remasters. Wouldn't mind seeing them bring back the Crysis franchise to current gen consoles. If they've retained any of their technological talent they could get back to showing us what cutting edge looks like.

MadLad1470d ago

They have no monies.
I'm surprised they even managed to keep the doors open the last few years.

Fluke_Skywalker1470d ago

Seems I'm one of the few who agree with you @masterfox,each to their own. But I also think the first game was great, Warhead was great but 2 and 3 were absolutely garbage. That said gameplay was good and obviously the graphics were amazing, but the story was utter garbage.

Trilithon1470d ago

EA sucks. boycott this stupid publishing company. the cigarettes of the gaming industry

Profchaos1470d ago

Crysis came out in a time where EA wasn't reputable by any means but they weren't pushing gaas or loot boxes and to their credit crysis remastered didn't add these things in so my purchase of crysis remastered and 2 is basically me enjoying the game but also me saying I want single player and not with gaas or loot bixes

CrimsonWing691470d ago

Well, they gave us probably one of the best Star Wars games in Fallen Order so I guess they’re not all that bad?

GreatSako20201470d ago

This has nothing to do with EA. EA was the original publisher. This one is done by cryteck

Yui_Suzumiya1470d ago

Finally dammit! The entire trilogy needed a remaster, not just the first. Despite loving the second game, even I'll admit that it ran like ass on the PS3. This is most assuredly wanted. Now do the third as well 😁

Profchaos1470d ago

Agree it was unplayable on PS3 and 360 from what I saw. I did play it on PC and it was the first taste of next gen for me.

Yui_Suzumiya1470d ago

It ran 15 to 20 frames on PS3 normally so seeing it run 60 on PS4 would be amazing. The third game is my favorite so I hope they'll do it as well 😁

MadLad1470d ago

I'm PC now, but the performance of Crysis 3 and FarCry 3 on the 360 is literally what pushed me to throw a little over a grand into my first PC build.

Fishy Fingers1470d ago

Honestly, not sure they could finace it right now. Probably why we're seeing these remasters.

Profchaos1470d ago

It would only happen if these remasters sell well

KTF261470d ago

because they wasted a lot of money opening new studios while not delivering games

darthv721470d ago

No offense but shooters are a dime a dozen. Id rather they make Ryse 2.

MadLad1470d ago (Edited 1470d ago )

I second this.
Felt Ryse was highly underrated. The game was a lot of fun, and still looks impressive visually.
I have it on PC, and it still rivals many modern releases.

lazyboyblue1470d ago

I logged in just to upvote this.

NoFanBoy1470d ago

Easy money, maybe they will eventually if these remasters sell well.

porkChop1470d ago

Because they don't have the money to finance a project of that scale. They're likely hoping the remasters sell well enough to kick-start development of the next game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1470d ago
Show all comments (42)
120°

Mundfish Announces New Project as Atomic Heart Hits Huge 10 Million Player Milestone

Atomic Heart studio Mundfish announces its next venture, Mundfish Powerhouse, a publishing label aimed at helping the smaller developers of the gaming industry.

Read Full Story >>
thethumbwars.com
Relientk772d ago

10 million players for Atomic Heart, nice!

Does this mean we might see an Atomic Heart 2? Crispy Critters!

NovoSlev2d ago

They're launching a new publishing label, Mundfish Powerhouse, but I wouldn't be shocked if they'll be using that to self-publish Atomic Heart 2 - hopefully!

Lightning771d 12h ago

It's on GP. 10 million players and a made another studio? So Did Gamepass help or contribute in making another studio for them? I know its on other platforms which also helped their new venture.

Boy_the_CowRoy21h ago

10 million? Hard to believe for a game with only 400 people playing this game currently and a all time peak of only 37k on PC. Is the difference in popularity of this game on console and PC really that big?

MrDead19h ago

Well done Mundfish, I had a fun time with this game... apart from the 2nd dlc. Great world building, a solid storyline and Bioshock style gameplay. Looking forward to what comes next.

110°

Playtonic Hit With Layoffs

Playtonic has officially announced they had to let some of their staff go; ask that other developers offer them a position if possible.

Read Full Story >>
nettosgameroom.com
Tacoboto1d 9h ago

Layoffs are always sad but in this case, it makes sense? They've only developed two games of their own and their third is a remake of the first that's been taking a very long time. I can't imagine there's much revenue flowing in to sustain them

coolbeans1d 2h ago

Well, they're also dipping their toes into publishing.

-Foxtrot16h ago

It's sad, I was hoping they'd be super successful with how fun Yooka-Laylee was despite being rough around the edges. However they did only 2 games and the 3rd game is a remake, I was kind of expecting a proper Yooka-Laylee 2 by now.

I wish they were allowed to make Banjo-Threeie

410°

Xbox's first-party handheld has been sidelined

Xbox's handheld ambitions continue unabated, but the focus is shifting towards improving Windows 11 for third-party handhelds — for now. The Xbox Series X 'Melrose' successor is safe, with development continuing at full pace.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
2d ago
2d ago
2d ago
shadowT2d ago

Is there really a market for handhelds next to mobile?

Vits1d 15h ago

If they run the same games as the main home console, then yeah, sure.
But if they need specially tailored games just for them? Probably not, unless there isn't a home console for comparison (see Switch).

RaidenBlack1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

I am kinda low-key happy this happened.
Dont want another Series S situation (games to be designed from 4 to 12TF scale and not 10 to 12TF).
Hope PS follows suit as well. Tablet SKU sharing with console for 10th gen, will just continue the cross gen -esque development/design phase/nature.
Want a proper 20+ only TF rasterized next-gen plz (+ frame-gen and the lot).
If anybody wants to continue the cross-gen, the Series S|X, PS5 will remain for that. And Switch 2, if you gotta go even lower in the TF range.

ABizzel11d 11h ago

Yes and No. All of the PC handhelds combined have struggled to sell 7 million units, which would be a flop for any “console”. So the market is extremely niche because of price and target market (the informed hardcore gamer / casuals aren’t picking these up).

These handheld PCs are $500 or more, and offer at best Xbox Series S performance levels, so it’s best for MS specifically to just partner with ASUS, instead of investing millions if not billions.

Sony can make their own with custom AMD hardware due to their partnership, and stronger global brand for hardware. But even then it brings the question, of being a lower resolution PS5, and what does that mean for PS6 cross-gen (likely another generation where the first 3 - 4 years are just upgraded last-gen games).

Kosic1d 9h ago

Imagine a Wii U style console, where the tablet doesn't rely on the console it's self, you download the game on the console under the TV and play in 4k glory, then you can remote play, get some unique game features if using both console and handheld in tandem. Then you can download the games in 720-1080p to play on the go, continue your progress, and continue on the TV when you get back.

Sony could get away with this due to exclusives, and that would be a reason for sales. Look at the portal.

I can picture seeing new hardware having some sort of GPU dock, where the handheld runs 1080p, and the dock has additional hardware to bring in 4k/60 specs.

I do think handheld gaming is going to be a strong future, imagine Nintendo release a new upgraded GPU dock for the Switch 3, every 2 years. More frames, sharper graphics on the same game for an extra £150 for a dock with a built in GPU chip. Console cycles doesn't have to be renewed, just the hardware can be improved by them reselling docks to us again and again with small/yearly upgrades like mobile phones.

GamerRN1d 1h ago

Did you just imply that Sony can make a better stronger handheld than Microsoft? You do realize we are talking about Microsoft, the tech giant, right? If Microsoft can't make one that's cost effective, Sony definitely can't...

Brand and market share means nothing when you are a trillion dollar company

ABizzel19h ago

@GamerRN

It has nothing to do with what company can do it, or what company can spend.

For anyone taking a basic business class there is a term called ROI, and Xbox home consoles are selling at an all time low, meaning their ROI on a handheld is a risk that doesn’t make sense, even if they can afford it. Businesses are there to make money and it doesn’t make sene for MS to invest in a handheld that’s a companion device when their current home consoles they’ve spent 20 years working on are at an all time-low, when they can invest with little risk with what ASUS already has to offer.

This is why Sony can build a better device, because they have less risk involved, meaning they can invest more in their own product, and they already have an exclusive partnership with AMD on creating features and hardware. So in this specific case, YES Sony can built a better handheld, due to custom hardware, customer tools, low level APIs, compared to an off the shelf product running Windows or a Window Xbox kernel =.

TheEroica1d 10h ago

I play steam deck primarily... Don't play consoles or mobile. The deck covers it all.

badz1491d 2h ago

@shadowT

The Switch is a handheld, so will the Switch 2. what are you on about?

Cacabunga20h ago

To run native games offline? Anytime

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 9h ago
CrashMania1d 20h ago

Funny to see the alt already damage controlling and having a meltdown with multiple accounts in the comments already.

Sad for MS if true, a dedicated handheld would go down a lot better than a rog ally 2 with an Xbox sticker on it I think.

crazyCoconuts1d 16h ago

It couldn't have succeeded for a number of reasons. Now they've retreated to the Windows front and trying to keep that relevant for gaming. How long before Windows Central realizes there won't be a real console successor to Series X either?

Lightning771d 12h ago

Except there is. That project is reportedly full speed ahead.

Outside_ofthe_Box1d 9h ago

@Lighting77

So was the handheld until today...

Lightning771d 9h ago

@outside obviously not since they sidelined it and they wanna see how the Asus does. Are you saying they're gonna cancel the next console?

crazyCoconuts1d 8h ago

@lightning - I'm admittedly trying to box you in here - Do you think the next Xbox console will have Steam on it?

Outside_ofthe_Box1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

@Lightning

Here we go with having to spell everything out.

If I told you yesterday that Xbox was going to sideline the handheld console what would your response have been? Probably something along the lines of "I doubt that since Phil has been talking about it for some time now"

My point is just because they are "full speed" ahead now does not mean that will not change in future. As we have seen with the handheld. Do you understand what I'm trying to say now?

Lightning771d 5h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

Box me in? No you said the same thing you've always been saying for years now. Those are the rumors to have Steam integration.

What about it

If you told me they were gonna cancel it tomorrow it would nothing more than fanboy talking points. I only wait for credible sources not what someone else says.

Also this is the handheld not a full blown new console. The Asus is yet to release and they're waiting to see how that thing does. Critical thinking is my strong suit you should try it some time if you can. But Ok cool well you hang your hat on that I guess. Main New console is gonna get cancelled even though the handheld is a different marketing device than the main the console itself.

__y2jb23h ago

I think there is a 75% chance there will not be another Xbox. There is zero reason to buy one now. No way it can possibly sell more than 10m units after Xbox went third party.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 23h ago
BLow1d 14h ago

That's what they do. Goalposts shift like the wind.

I'm really confused on why they are making a "first party" device and also have a Rog Ally with their sticker on it. Make this make sense. How is their own device going to be any different?

Your console doesn't sell and they expect a handheld to?

RaidenBlack1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

The Rog Ally one is gen agnostic ... as you deciphered, it was to be the updated Rog Ally but just with Xbox branding. PC handheld with some Xbox features.
The handheld Xbox is/was supposed to be sharing the same gen/ecosystem with the next-gen (10th gen) Xbox. Think Series S but handheld ... it'll run the Xbox OS or whatever the next Xbox will run.
...
As for anybody wondering/confused why MS is doing another Xbox console ... coz mainly its the 10th gen of home consoles next, which started wayy back in 1972 for the 1st gen. And MS wanna be part in it, in the 10th anniversary gen of consoles. If they gotta bow out, they can't do that at 9th i.e just before 10th. They wanna stick around till the 10th or the X-th gen and check what the fuss happens.

Outside_ofthe_Box1d 9h ago

Curious as to what excuses the spam was saying. Because prior to this news, the Xbox handheld was used as proof that Xbox is still committed to the hardware space. This handheld being scraped is not a good sign...

1d 9h ago
Outside_ofthe_Box1d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

@Spam
You can replace scrapped with pushed back if you like. It's not a good sign either way.

1d 9h ago
1Victor1d 8h ago

asq3= obscured: “ What’s your source on the handheld being scrapped? “
Read the article from Microsoft own website and one of your favorite quotations site when it’s something bad about Sony.
Oh BTW good luck with your next SPAM account.

InUrFoxHole1d 2h ago

Scraped or postponed 🤔

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1d 2h ago
Show all comments (77)