Gameinformer : We gathered all of the playable fighters and ranked them using science. That means it can't be wrong, right?
Being a denier of all things science I was extremely happy to see the list is actually subjective. I enjoyed the read.
Nice read and a surprisingly decent list although there’s a few odd choices. Johnny Cage would not be in the top 10 of my list lol
Ha! It is funny because I found Johnny Cage to be the most out of place of all the rankings as well. Not sure why, but I just never really appreciated Johnny Cage. Maybe because I never really enjoyed using him. IDK. Would have ranked Goro a bit higher, but overall a good list.
Scientific rating finds that the 2 most popular characters are also the best fighters....... When actually Liu Kang is obviously the best considering he always wins and beats everyone.
I agree with the top20 Characters but I would rearrange a few.
How much would it cost to buy all of those?
The list is spread over multiple games so you can’t purchase the whole list in any one game FYI
Yeah, I get that. But how much would it cost?
This make 0 sense nor is it scientific. They have a demigod bottom 3 lmao
It's satire, bruh. The headline isn't serious. The author recognizes it's subjective, and not actually based on science. FYI, I've never read a scholarly study where the preview, or any part of it really, that says "That means it can't be wrong, right?" If you click the link it's immediately obvious the intention of this piece isn't to settle anything, scientifically or otherwise. It's just an opinion piece that makes no pretense about being anything else.
Cole is the absolute worst.
The first character on the list I've heard of wasn't until #57.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.