120°
9.0

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla – The Most In-Depth Review Ever | ThisGenGaming

TGG says: "An Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Review. In March 2021? Surely you must have been living under a rock, the game has been out since November last year! Well, no. I’ve actually been playing it all this time and if you’re somewhat familiar with this review format, you’ll know that you’re in for a (long) ride as we’ll be doing a deep dive into EVERYTHING that makes the game tick."

Read Full Story >>
thisgengaming.com
RazzerRedux1500d ago

I have almost 200 hours in this game. There is something very wrong with me.

Darkborn1500d ago

I couldn't go more than like 12 hours in that game my dude. Nothing really wrong with it, I just got bored. I do get bored quickly these days in open world games though.

RazzerRedux1500d ago

I typically spend a lot of time in open world, but usually it is 40 to 60. This game is tweaking my OCD or something. I keep going back in to play. It is a good game. Just not sure why it has its hooks in me.

Ubisoft probably has some subliminal messaging jacking me up. Skald!

bloodyspasm1500d ago

To me, the (bi) yearly Assassins Creed is like comfort food: I set the difficulty to easy and enjoy what it has to offer, in bite-sized chunks. ^^ I'm usually playing one of the titles as my default game when not under the pressure of reviewing something else

spss111500d ago

Same, I love this game. I'm always looking for a good dark ages or medieval rpg so this one obviously got my attention. Strangely, Odyssey was a dud for me. It wasn't bad but I like ancient Egypt and dark ages Britain more.

bloodyspasm1500d ago

It depends on how the setting vibes with you. Origins was amazing with its egyptian theme, but the sandy desert wasn't really my kind of environment. Odyssey blew me away with the white marble, blue water, sunny locations and greek mythology.

bloodyspasm1500d ago

I had 280 hours in Odyssey because I replayed it to see Alexios' acting :D Really looking forward to the next Story DLC of Valhalla, I have a few questions left unanswered

anast1500d ago

How much does the game cost for the complete experience?

bloodyspasm1499d ago

They're charging $99 for the Gold Edition which has all the DLC, but it's an Ubisoft game: you'll probably see a lot of discounts throughout the year

anast1499d ago

Cool. Does that include XP boosters?

bloodyspasm1499d ago

@Anast: no, it doesn't include any XP boosters, those are part of an even bigger bundle. but IMO: you won't need them. The only thing I missed having, were some of the exotic costumes & skins for my raven & horse. (which aren't in a bundle)

90°

Assassin’s Creeds' Cutscenes And Voicelines Have Digressed Over Time

Assassin’s Creed has always been a staple for good cutscenes that engage the audience. However, it's grown lacking of the latter now.

Chocoburger283d ago

The story was at its most interesting early in the series, but has eventually ended up spinning its wheels going nowhere. The games don't feel linked together anymore. This is to make it easier to constantly churn out endless sequels.

gold_drake281d ago

absolutely agree.

it was so interesting and then ..

montebristo281d ago

The smaller more intimate maps and historic references are lost. The setting used to be a character in AC. Now it’s just a massive empty shell of its former self.

180°

Almost every Assassin's Creed game is $12 or less — get them cheap

There's never been a better time to get into Assassin's Creed thanks to these deals.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
CobraKai290d ago

Im so behind on AC. I gotta start up Brotherhood 😄

anast290d ago

I got Odyssey and Mirage to play still.

CobraKai290d ago (Edited 290d ago )

Ha. At least youre in the more current side of AC.

The_Hooligan289d ago

Last one i played was origin. I am also behind on AC games.

anast289d ago

@Cobra

The older ones are kind of a chore. I did enjoy Syndicate and Unity, though.

@Hoologan

I had a good time with Origins for the most part.

anast290d ago (Edited 290d ago )

If they are all Gold versions, it's definitely worth it.

Chocoburger289d ago (Edited 289d ago )

Waste of money, after the Desmond story arch, but even worse is that its a waste of time. The franchise is just spinning its wheels going nowhere. The further you progress through the series, the more 'corporate' it begins to feel, until its nothing but an empty husk, begging for you to spend money on its micro-trash-action store. There are loading screens in Origins informing you that if you spend money on "fun costumes" you'll feel better! Despicable.

Save your time for something better. Modern day Ubisoft is garbage.

MeatyUrologist289d ago

To each their own I guess? I really enjoyed them up until odyssey and valhalla was decent. I still really enjoy exploring the massive detailed worlds and the characters, stories, gear, and combat.

I have never once been swayed by a loading screen trying to get me to buy DLC as these games have 10x more content than you would ever see anyway. I do agree the series seems to be going the wrong direction at the moment, but would still highly recommend origins, odyssey, and to a lesser extent, valhalla if you enjoy adventure and exploration games.

gold_drake289d ago

not every AC game is worth playing tho ha.

i feel like it stopped being good after 3. and 3 was even a stretch.

1 and 2 tho? amazing.

110°

Modern Games Are Getting Too Long

While there’s a lot to love about modern video games, there is one trend — particularly in the AAA space — that tends to grate: their length.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
GoodGuy09402d ago (Edited 402d ago )

Games are coming out with too much fluff and side activities that are horribly dull. That's my main issue with all these open world games. Open world should be about exploration, discovery and wonder, not have some stupid 10s or 100s of boring activities spread throughout.

IAMRealHooman401d ago

100% agree
All these ubisoft titles, Farcry, AC, Ghost recon, boast huge maps, but with the same, 3 missions or the same base to clear 100s of times. Hour 1 of any of those titles is the same as hour 100, there big for the sake of being big, with the illusion of player freedom, where we really want depth and player expression.

Ninver400d ago

Give me a solid 15-20 hour engaging single player driven IP any day. Life's too short you dig.

isarai401d ago

I stopped buying overfluffed games like a decade ago. Cant stand games with the Ubisoft mindset of just filling maps with uselss collectibles and fodder. Make it mean something. Ill gladly take 1/4 size of the map and 1/10th the "content" if it all meant more, were more unique and greater affect on your progression.

Abnor_Mal401d ago (Edited 401d ago )

Well people complained like the world was ending when a few games were six to ten hours of gameplay. Developers listened and started making longer games full of repetitive gameplay, time wasting fetch quest and other forms of bloat. In doing so they were able to justify the high cost of a game being sold to the customers at seventy dollars or more.

H9401d ago

Filler, it's like a 80 episodes show where only the first and last episodes actually matter

Inverno401d ago

It's been a problem with pretty much every modern AAA game all through last gen and this gen. God forbid you point it out tho because all these big games are masterpieces and people lose their minds if you criticize them. Death Stranding is a fetch quest fest, but people will die defending it cause it's a "masterpiece".

Show all comments (14)