470°

European Commission Approves Microsoft/Bethesda Deal With No Conditions

William writes: "In what is sure to be welcome news for Xbox fans, the European Commission has approved the Microsoft Bethesda deal. While this does not signify the closing of the deal yet, it is an important final step before the two companies merge."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
lelo2play1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

Soooo... what happens now?

DJStotty1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

They get taken over by Microsoft.

Come a few months Microsoft will own the entirety of Zenimax Media with no conditions. Essentially meaning Microsoft can do what they want with any IP and any studio.

And there was some that were saying they would have conditions to be multiplatform imposed lol.....

StarLink1550d ago

You sure. Maybe the "no conditions" could be referring to something outside the contract MS and Zenimax signed? I don't know so someone else let me know.

DJStotty1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

I'm quite positive that is what "no conditions" means. If it was "outside" the MS/Zenimax deal, then it is nothing to do with the deal.

It is a takeover, not an exclusivity contract between the 2. When taken over, Microsoft hold the reigns and can dictate what they want regarding games/platforms.

Exciting times ahead!!

cammers19951550d ago

Don't know why people are disagreeing with you because you are right. And sadly, I feel microsoft is gonna purge some zenimax subsidiaries.

RaidenBlack1550d ago

Master Chief and Doom Guy sharing a beer.

annoyedgamer1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

Or both being put into a grave given how bad Halo Infinite looks. And im not a sony fanboy either, just a longtime fan watching the entire industry crater.

Zhipp1549d ago

@annoyedgamer
I think Infinite is the best looking Halo since Reach...

RedDevils1549d ago

Both are meh games. Power Ranger in FPS

RazzerRedux1550d ago

Microsoft gets out the checkbook.

RazzerRedux1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

@DJStotty

If they have handled all the regulatory requirements then isn't it normal to assume that the transaction will go through?

"They get taken over by Microsoft."

You basically just said the same thing.

DEEHULK881550d ago

Is that a trick question or are you someone who just doesn't understand how business works?

RedDevils1549d ago (Edited 1549d ago )

Business uses Checkbook all the times.

Orchard1549d ago

It's like buying a house - Microsoft provides the cash, gets the keys, and has a house (or a lot of new exclusive games in this case).

RedDevils1549d ago

MS bought the house, is their they own it outright they can do what the f they want with it; included burning it to the ground if they want.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1549d ago
DJStotty1550d ago

"One thing is absolutely for certain though, Xbox fans have a lot to look forward to in this coming generation."

And i can not wait to see what games for the future holds for my beloved miniature black fridge!!!

RaidenBlack1550d ago

Now only if MS would acquire Crytek, as well.
They are a seriously talented bunch, just in need for financial support.

DaveZero1549d ago (Edited 1549d ago )

I wished MS would acquire Ubisoft and Sega, those are my two, but Crytek are good as well.

RedDevils1549d ago (Edited 1549d ago )

Not bad, I want to see their games full potential on my 3090.

DiRtY1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

Finally.

Let’s see what they will do with it.
Microsoft can easily position themselves as the go-to console for RPGs

with

Fable
Starfield
Avowed
The Elder Scrolls

as possible exclusives.

Same for shooters by the way

with

Halo
Wolfenstein
Doom
Rage
Gears of War
Perfect Dark

as exclusives.

DiRtY1550d ago

Oh I forgot Fallout for RPGs and Prey for shooters.
What an insane lineup.

MadLad1550d ago

The Prey reboot was far more a RPG/immersive sim than an actual shooter. You can get through pretty much that entire game just being smart and bending the world in your favor.

RaidenBlack1550d ago

The projects that were already announced (Even if lacking the info regarding the platforms) and close to release, those might release as multiplatform titles i.e Starfield, Ancient Gods II.
But regarding titles that are wayy off like ES6 and Indiana Jones, I am not sure. (timed exclusive?)
Same also goes for future supposed titles like Wolfenstein III, Doom Eternal sequel or Quake Reboot and Prey sequel.
They might also consider selective exclusivity. Like some games becomes entirely exclusive to Xbox n PC henceforth while some titles continues to be mult-platform.

Zhipp1549d ago

I'm gonna go with selective exclusivity. Especially for Indiana Jones. Disney might want that one to stay multiplat.

Kilua1549d ago (Edited 1549d ago )

It only needed to be bought, MS has a great talent in money spending. Well done to them for writing a cheque.

SlothLordPootus1550d ago

We were lucky enough to get a 2nd Rage. Don't hold your breath for a 3rd.

ThePacemaker1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

Very good. I can play all of these great games day ONE on my RTX 3080 ti PC 👍🏻

StoneyYoshi1550d ago

Good luck getting one especially since the TI variant hasn't been released yet.

RaidenBlack1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

Your "3080Ti" PC?
At least let Nvidia announce the damn product first.

DiRtY1550d ago

This comment is such a failure.

1st: The product you claim to have isn't even announced.
2nd: The product will be like 3 times the price of an Xbox Series X.
3rd: The game still requires you to play on a Microsoft platform: Windows.
4th: Microsoft will still appreciate your purchase for the game. Or your subscription to GamePass. I doubt they really care.

anubusgold1550d ago

You forgot about Crimson skies which they havent did a sequel yet for.

DaveZero1549d ago (Edited 1549d ago )

Theres that Hood game from Sumo Digital on the way out that I think looks very nice..

potedude1549d ago

Microsoft paid $7.5 billion for Bethesda based on present and future earnings. Those earnings include selling games on all consoles. If they start making games exclusive then the company isn't worth $7.5 billion.

That's not to say they won't take the hit and make these games exclusives, damaging Bethesda's profitability, but the bean counters would be well against that.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1549d ago
stupidusername1550d ago

Would be nice if MIcrosoft forced some quality control on Bethesda's own games.

Sephiroushin1550d ago

Hopefully because their games are a bug fest!

Darkborn1550d ago

Then they'll take 15 years to release a game instead of like 7 or 8.

Sephiroushin1550d ago

@Darkborn ... No, they need to hire better team members to support their current teams, their games has way too many bugs some are unplayable at launch

RedDevils1549d ago

They can join up with the Cyperpunk team, and release even more unplayable games at launch.

DaveZero1549d ago

With those types of games it's easier I think to release the game and have the community route out the bugs and then the devs go take them out. PC MMO's have done it like that for ages and it's much faster having a forum open for bug reports so players can ticket them. Games like that for a dev team can be like finding needles in a universe but get a million or more players playing and your universe in shrunk.

Sephiroushin1547d ago (Edited 1547d ago )

Doesnt matter the kind of game bathesda developers always makes buggy games except a few selected ones were they actually only publish... and theres a difference betwen fixing some stuff and adding mods than fixing a unplayable game that people are charged full price because the developers are deficient and dont even know how to fix their shit!

These are the assess that wanted to monetize mods and get a cut from mods people make to fix their shit as well....

They get away with it because dumb people keep buying their infinished mess!

Highrevz1550d ago

Great news.

Looking forward to seeing what grows from this further down the line.

MrDead1550d ago (Edited 1550d ago )

It means other tax dodging tech giants who want a gaming service are going to start taking entire publishers for themselves, as of now they will have no choice but to do so if they want to complete with MS.

I know fanboys will have their company branded knickers in a twist at me saying this but I don't care, I'm a gamer

Extermin8or3_1549d ago

I agree I think the practice of buying an entire publisher and it's IP's rather than individual studious abd building new studios and IP's is an appalling one for the industry.

Show all comments (107)
140°

Introducing Project Defiant, the first wireless fight stick designed by Sony

First look at the upcoming controller, which uses PlayStation Link technology to deliver wireless connectivity with ultra-low latency for fighting games.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
darthv7220h ago

Interesting.... I'll get one.

16h ago
Babadook716h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Great for Marvel Tokon Fighting
Souls (which looked amazing).

Disccordia12h ago

It can also be used wired which is fairly important to note. Anybody using this thing competitively won't go anywhere near wireless.

170°

CD Projekt RED History Suggests The Witcher 4 Demo May Be More Marketing Than Gameplay

The history of CD Projekt RED suggests that the recently shown demo for The Witcher 4 may be more marketing than actual gameplay.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Sonyslave31d 3h ago

Not only CDPR but Epic Games as well i still haven't seen any game with that fidelty of that Ps5 tech demo .. that was 2020

VenomUK19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

Digital Foundry in its reaction video said they believe the demo reflects real performance, as overstating it’s competence on PS5 could bring significant risks to Epic Games’ shareholders and legal risks.

https://youtu.be/5PIyPpB83V...

Eonjay3h ago

Actually Horizon Forbidden West exceeds this in image quality. So it seems very plausible. Intergalactic is actually beyond this presntation in IQ, RT and resolution and thats locked 60FPS as well. As far as the usage of hardware RT in UE, they were able to reduce the CPU overhead.

This was a tech demo for UE 5.6. That was clearly stated and is evident by the presentation itself where several of the new features of UE are highlighted

This article title is inaccurate because this was not a demo for Witcher 4. It was a technical demonstration of Unreal Engine 5.6.

Christopher1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

***Cyberpunk 2077’s gameplay features that were showcased in initial footage but never made it into the final game***

They literally made a big deal of telling everyone that they changed the gameplay of CP2077 during development and then did a new demo of the game with the new gameplay. There was no hiding this to the public. CP2077's problem with the buggy as heck and obviously too early release.

This is really bad journalism to promote this line of thinking. It's an attempt to rewrite history. You can definitely say you preferred the initial demo, but they were very open and clear when they moved from third-person to first-person that it would include major changes in gameplay and showed those off multiple times a year prior to the game's release.

---

As to the point of this article? Yeah, the whole event is a marketing event. I don't trust anything until it's released, tbh. No matter who is making it. I can still be excited by what I see, but it's not going to get me to pre-order a game or get me to go out there and sell what I saw as if it will be just like that in the full release.

neutralgamer199220h ago

What about the fact CDPR showed gameplay behind closed doors which wasn't real? They dusnt allow anyone to bring their phones or any tech so once media came out of that gameplay reveal CP2077 was hyped to the moon and back. CDPR didn't show console gameplay so let's not act like they were transparent when they switched from 3rd to 1st person when they lied at launch of the game

Christopher20h ago

You mean rumors? You want me to comment on rumors from Bloomberg? We arguing the belief of rumors now and not news?

Here's that fake demo - https://www.youtube.com/wat...

If you've played the game, you know how much that lines up with the final product. That's what I know.

***let's not act like they were transparent when they switched from 3rd to 1st person when they lied at launch of the game***

They literally re-demoed the game with the change, so they were transparent. You're just acting like they weren't when in 2018 they literally demoed the new gameplay. That's 2 years prior to release.

I don't know what they 'lied at launch of the game' is supposed to mean.

-

This game had enough wrong with it at release that we don't need to be arguing rumors and online hatred of the gameplay changes shown in 2018.

neutralgamer199220h ago

Christopher, just to clarify — I'm not trying to be overly negative or dismissive. I fully acknowledge that CD Projekt Red was transparent when they switched from third-person to first-person and even re-demoed the game to reflect that. Credit where it’s due — they did show that change publicly.

But the real issue for me is how the game launched. Despite that transparency earlier on, they deliberately withheld gameplay from the console versions and still charged full price for something that was nowhere near ready. That’s where trust was broken. The game was released in a clearly unfinished and broken state, and it took years to get it into a playable condition. That goes beyond mistakes — that’s a serious failure in leadership and consumer respect.

So when I see something like the Witcher 4 tech demo — and yes, I understand it’s Epic showcasing Unreal Engine 5 — I can’t help but approach it with caution. It’s not blind skepticism, but earned skepticism. A lot of the original developers have left CDPR, so we can’t assume this next game will automatically reach Witcher 3 levels of excellence.

I want it to be amazing. We all do. But I’m not going to fully believe the hype until independent gamers and trusted content creators — people with a reputation for honesty and not being paid off — get their hands on it and say, “Yes, this is great.” Until then, it’s just marketing.

They built up enormous goodwill after The Witcher 3 and the free DLCs — but they lost much of that with Cyberpunk's release. Even platform holders like PlayStation and Xbox, who once trusted CDPR to self-certify, don’t anymore. That alone speaks volumes.

Again, it’s not hate — it’s caution born from experience

CrimsonIdol18h ago

"Despite that transparency earlier on, they deliberately withheld gameplay from the console versions"
It was a multiplatform release, and yes they botched it, but clearly consoles weren't lead development platform, PC was. They clearly were hoping that they could get everything together by launch, and this was a mistake. I think them showing this running on a PS5 is a clear indicator that they've learnt from this.

But there are plenty of reasons not to get too excited about this, and it's not hidden behind any lies, it's right there watermarked on the footage. this is a technical presentation of the Unreal 5 engine, running on the PS5 at 60fps. This is technology that may be in the Witcher, this is not the Witcher.

Lightning771d 1h ago

Because it is marketing. Epic did the flying sand girl in 2020 now this with Witcher. I still wanna see what games shows the original showing of Unreal 5? It's been 5 years exactly.

Michiel198921h ago

ofc it is, no real gameplay suddenly xrays a horse to show how its muscles are moving realistically.

CrimsonIdol18h ago

It literally had text telling you it wasn't gameplay.

Extermin8or3_1h ago

They were literally showing off the fact it seamlessly can transition from gameplay to ctsceme those aspects of presentation were clear cutscenes....

Show all comments (23)
90°

Giant Skull, A Studio Founded By Respawn Veterans, Is Making A D&D Game

The studio was founded in March of 2024 by Stig Asmussen, director of the Star Wars: Jedi games.

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com