220°

AC Valhalla Backlash as Fans Accuse Ubisoft of Focusing on Microtransactions Over Bug Fixes

Assassin's Creed Valhalla has been on the market for over two months now, and although the game's in a better state than it was at launch — particularly on PS5 — it still has its fair share of annoying bugs. Some of these issues are minor at best, while others are preventing players from completing quests or advancing the main story.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
phoenixwing1589d ago (Edited 1589d ago )

those bugs must be egregious if it's to the point people are complaining like this. I'm not buying their next game no matter what they say. They pulled the bait and switch on me with saying there was no paying for boosters then added it a month later after it released. I can't trust this publisher and plan to not really buy games from them now.

Eidolon1589d ago

Yeh, get it on discount, when it's complete... might be a while. I definitely have the backlog to wait, and also no next-gen system. 😭😭

1589d ago
Atom6661589d ago

Not sure I'd ever automatically think Reddit complaints meant they're egregious haha.

But there are some bugs that keep messing with progress for some. I had to do some save reloads, and there are sound bugs here and there.

Boosters weren't necessary at all for me. If you want to skip around and get through the story as fast as possible, you'll either need to drop the difficulty or use the boosters though. I wish they weren't included too, but aside from the free helix points they give you, I never went to the store over 100 hour playthrough.

--Onilink--1589d ago (Edited 1589d ago )

Why do you care if there are boosters? There are people that dont have as much time and prefer to use them.
I’ve never even considered the possibility of buying them playing regularly and if anything I normally have to raise the difficulty.
I just dont get why people say the games are balanced to make people buy them, they are barely a challenge to play on Normal difficulty

1589d ago
phoenixwing1589d ago

The game having boosters basically to the point that assassin's creed does it means the game was designed around being a slog in order to sell the dlc

--Onilink--1588d ago

How though? The game is a slog because its just a big list of pointless activities and an absurldy large empty world, its not gating you at every point or excessively difficult (rather easy tbh) which are what the boosters would help with

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1588d ago
jonivtec1589d ago

Im 50hours ish in the game and honestly the bug isnt a concern...the problem is that the game is to long for nothing, repetitive and 95% of in game cinematic and dialogue sucks.They should focus on a more story driven next instead of filler quest and useless protagonist.I just want to finish the game to cancel my ubiplus subscription.

Espangerish1589d ago

Playing origins and odyssey and they are hugely bloated with repetitive activities. They would better games if they took 20 hours repetition and cookie cutter locations out for a cleaner more streamlined experience

More is not alway best.

Dee_911588d ago

you just described most of ubisoft's latest titles. Pretty to look at, boring to play.

badz1491588d ago

why are they getting great reviews though?

Dee_911588d ago

@badz149
maybe the reviewers liked them, I however didn't.

Rachel_Alucard1589d ago (Edited 1589d ago )

I will never buy another AC game again after seeing what happened with Odyssey. I skipped out on origins and I'm at least thankful for that, because this new formula for AC is like buying a giant box of bland off brand cookies for $3 at the grocery store with how diluted it is. It's like someone just never stopped water downing the liquor bottle. None of these games ever end it feels like. I don't know how people can just zombie their way through this series and still put it on a pedastal.

Atom6661589d ago

Still one of my favorite series. And it's similar to that MP game you might be into, or a lengthy RPG. If you like the mechanics, then it's quite enjoyable during the story, side missions, and random encounters.

The new formula has led to higher sales, so I doubt they're going back.

If you're looking for a 20 hour tight narrative game, they are not for you. Even just focusing on the main story will take twice that time (at least).

--Onilink--1589d ago

With Odyssey I was bored after a while but eventually reached a point in progression through some of the major quests to finally pull me in. On Valhalla right now Im at a point where I get bored after 30min of playing haha. Still waiting to see if that story moment to make things click ever happens, but yeah, waaay to much bloat, the maps are unnecessarily big

annoyedgamer1589d ago

So...people got tired of climbing towers and revealing the area for the millionth time?

anast1589d ago

UBI makes $15 games. They are filled to the brim with micros. It's almost like playing a really nice cellphone game.

Show all comments (23)
90°

Assassin’s Creeds' Cutscenes And Voicelines Have Digressed Over Time

Assassin’s Creed has always been a staple for good cutscenes that engage the audience. However, it's grown lacking of the latter now.

Chocoburger323d ago

The story was at its most interesting early in the series, but has eventually ended up spinning its wheels going nowhere. The games don't feel linked together anymore. This is to make it easier to constantly churn out endless sequels.

gold_drake321d ago

absolutely agree.

it was so interesting and then ..

montebristo321d ago

The smaller more intimate maps and historic references are lost. The setting used to be a character in AC. Now it’s just a massive empty shell of its former self.

180°

Almost every Assassin's Creed game is $12 or less — get them cheap

There's never been a better time to get into Assassin's Creed thanks to these deals.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
CobraKai329d ago

Im so behind on AC. I gotta start up Brotherhood 😄

anast329d ago

I got Odyssey and Mirage to play still.

CobraKai329d ago (Edited 329d ago )

Ha. At least youre in the more current side of AC.

The_Hooligan329d ago

Last one i played was origin. I am also behind on AC games.

anast328d ago

@Cobra

The older ones are kind of a chore. I did enjoy Syndicate and Unity, though.

@Hoologan

I had a good time with Origins for the most part.

anast329d ago (Edited 329d ago )

If they are all Gold versions, it's definitely worth it.

Chocoburger329d ago (Edited 329d ago )

Waste of money, after the Desmond story arch, but even worse is that its a waste of time. The franchise is just spinning its wheels going nowhere. The further you progress through the series, the more 'corporate' it begins to feel, until its nothing but an empty husk, begging for you to spend money on its micro-trash-action store. There are loading screens in Origins informing you that if you spend money on "fun costumes" you'll feel better! Despicable.

Save your time for something better. Modern day Ubisoft is garbage.

MeatyUrologist329d ago

To each their own I guess? I really enjoyed them up until odyssey and valhalla was decent. I still really enjoy exploring the massive detailed worlds and the characters, stories, gear, and combat.

I have never once been swayed by a loading screen trying to get me to buy DLC as these games have 10x more content than you would ever see anyway. I do agree the series seems to be going the wrong direction at the moment, but would still highly recommend origins, odyssey, and to a lesser extent, valhalla if you enjoy adventure and exploration games.

gold_drake329d ago

not every AC game is worth playing tho ha.

i feel like it stopped being good after 3. and 3 was even a stretch.

1 and 2 tho? amazing.

110°

Modern Games Are Getting Too Long

While there’s a lot to love about modern video games, there is one trend — particularly in the AAA space — that tends to grate: their length.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
GoodGuy09442d ago (Edited 442d ago )

Games are coming out with too much fluff and side activities that are horribly dull. That's my main issue with all these open world games. Open world should be about exploration, discovery and wonder, not have some stupid 10s or 100s of boring activities spread throughout.

IAMRealHooman441d ago

100% agree
All these ubisoft titles, Farcry, AC, Ghost recon, boast huge maps, but with the same, 3 missions or the same base to clear 100s of times. Hour 1 of any of those titles is the same as hour 100, there big for the sake of being big, with the illusion of player freedom, where we really want depth and player expression.

Ninver440d ago

Give me a solid 15-20 hour engaging single player driven IP any day. Life's too short you dig.

isarai441d ago

I stopped buying overfluffed games like a decade ago. Cant stand games with the Ubisoft mindset of just filling maps with uselss collectibles and fodder. Make it mean something. Ill gladly take 1/4 size of the map and 1/10th the "content" if it all meant more, were more unique and greater affect on your progression.

Abnor_Mal441d ago (Edited 441d ago )

Well people complained like the world was ending when a few games were six to ten hours of gameplay. Developers listened and started making longer games full of repetitive gameplay, time wasting fetch quest and other forms of bloat. In doing so they were able to justify the high cost of a game being sold to the customers at seventy dollars or more.

H9441d ago

Filler, it's like a 80 episodes show where only the first and last episodes actually matter

Inverno441d ago

It's been a problem with pretty much every modern AAA game all through last gen and this gen. God forbid you point it out tho because all these big games are masterpieces and people lose their minds if you criticize them. Death Stranding is a fetch quest fest, but people will die defending it cause it's a "masterpiece".

Show all comments (14)