Iran White writes:
When it comes to the First Person Shooter genre on the Nintendo Wii, gamers tend to be cautious. Largely due to the relative ripoffs that were Red Steel and Call of Duty 3. Many Wii owners who enjoy FPS's are waiting on High Voltage Software's The Conduit since it has become very clear that an unprecedented amount of effort from a 3rd party Developer is being made for the console. However, both EA's Medal of Honor: Heroes 2, and the recently released Call of Duty: World at War by Activision and Treyarch are decent games that are worth playing. Which one is the better experience? Let's compare the two.
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 Zombies Terminus Island map is recreated for World at War and it looks scarier than the original version!
Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."
Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.
2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.
A very devoted fan of Call of Duty: World at War racks up incredible in-game stats while playing regularly for the past 15 years.
Of course you will hit a ridiculous stat after 15 of anything.
My main character for Everquest had over 500 days played in the first 6 years of the game. I was young then and had a lot of time on my hands. I don’t think I could duplicate that again until I retire and not sure I could match it if I tried.