580°

Should Console Scalping Be Illegal? Xbox Series X and PS5 Sales Are Being Abused

KeenGamer: "Console scalping has hit the gaming community harder than it ever has - should it be illegal? Prices on eBay, Facebook, and Amazon are absurd. The gaming community may need to fight back to bring an end to this immoral act. Laws have done nothing, but is there a way to get justice?"

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
RaidenBlack1672d ago

"Console Scalping" be illegal? And other scalping's cool?
The RTX 3000 cards were scalped even more ...

Jin_Sakai1672d ago (Edited 1672d ago )

All online sites such as FB Marketplace and eBay should ban high demand product sales until there’s sufficient supply. F the scalpers.

SullysCigar1672d ago

Totally agree with this. It's more of a moral issue than a legal one, in my opinion.

FB, eBay and the like should not want to be seen to support this. The trouble is, eBay for example, makes money from this kind of practice - and with their fees being percentage based, the more these scalpers can mug a desperate parent for right before Christmas, the better for their bottom line.

ABizzel11671d ago (Edited 1671d ago )

Ebay would never they get a cut of the sell, and the scalpers are just doing what almost every other company does daily and make millions / billions on the population. It sucks but this is capitalism at its finest and instead of buying just wait.

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if the companies were using 3rd party resellers to sell their cards for more than MSRP at this point considering high demand is, and not restocking in full until this settles down. There's no proof of it, but again greed can make people do some backhanded things. Why sell our GPUs for $600 when people are willing to pay $1,500 and up to $2,000 right now.

Just don't be stupid or desperate, and wait.

Spartacus101671d ago

They wont ban anyone unless they get review bombed for not having the ban in place

neutralgamer19921671d ago

Jin

Places like ebay get high profits the more a item sells for so I don't think they care. It's like when this pandemic started and people were charging like crazy for hand sanitizers. Did y'all forget how people were selling bathroom paper towels haha

1671d ago
Dee_911671d ago

are there really people paying over msrp? im more annoyed at those people than the scalpers and bots. Like seriously, Sony and MS will flood the market with consoles by the end of 2022, so why would you pay above msrp just to get it early and play a hand full of games? That makes no sense. I don't really care either way I was going to wait before I get new consoles.
Also I wonder how does Sony feel about this? Knowing they sold out of consoles but a lot of people who wanted one, who could have gotten one, didn't because of scalpers and bots. That has to suck for them. Then again they made their money so they probably don't care.

SullysCigar1671d ago

^ @Dee_91, Sony will care because if consoles are sitting around in a scalper's lockup they're no having software bought to play on them.

As for why people buy consoles from scalpers, I wish they wouldn't, but if people are buying it as a gift and can't get them anywhere else, they weaken and pay a high price. People are dumb!

itsmebryan1671d ago

People should stop buying them and the prices will come down. I went and got a new TV and will wait for supply to catch up. The Q80T I got is a big image upgrade from my old 1080p DLP . So, I'm fine with my X1X for now. I might even get a bundle cheaper and they will work out the bugs later.

UltraNova1671d ago

Prohibit reselling of high demand electronic devices during launch period(~3 months). Problem solved.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1671d ago
northpaws1671d ago

The most efficient way to kill off all scalpers is super simple... don't buy from them, if they don't make money out of it, then they won't do it the next time.

ABizzel11671d ago

This, or waste their time bidding on the products and canceling the order or bid, that way they have to drop the price down to something more reasonable so some other fool buys it, or return it and get their money back.

neutralgamer19921671d ago

Exactly hold off and wait few months. We will be able to get it for MSRP and systems would be updated and bugs/glitches would be fixed

Seraphim1671d ago

the problem is they will because far to many people do and will pay whatever price. That guy with 42 PS5s. At 500$ profit he raked in $21k on those 42 PS5s alone. I've seen plenty of other posts of bot buys ranging from 8 to roughly 29 as well. And when there's that much money to be made and people to spend it we will never curb the issue. At least not when we allow bots and multiple orders.

As others have said I'd like to see ebay and other places ban the sale of new products such as consoles or even graphics cards for the first 3-6 months. Though ideally these companies would come out with ample supply day one to help combat this. From what I can see it appears Amazon US pulled the option to even sell a PS5 by a 3rd party. All of amazon should be doing the same thing. Also why can't retailers just do a limit of one per payment method/address.... Maybe take it a step further and have a master list that retailers share to flag and cancel multiple orders. Same reason why ebay won't ban sales. Greed. it's all about making that money. Walmart doesn't care long as they get a sale and since they seem to be the only retailer getting them. I'm sitting here constantly refreshing every retailer every night. Even Best Buy who have put up multiple open box units is appears bots are scooping those up. it's also pure greed as to why these people use bots and scalp. and don't site supply and demand because that implies that the consumer/end user is the one purchasing. That is not the case with scalpers. They are helping create an even larger deficiency for their own gain. And don't cite capitalism either. Before the internet people bought what they needed/wanted. We didn't have bots and people loading up on a product for profit. By definition scalping is not capitalism.

Noskypeno1671d ago

But some stuff should be illegal, even tho I'm not for complete dictatorship. For example, Uhaul in San Francisco charges 5 times the rate to move out then to move in because everyone is moving out, which leads to people turning to moving companies that aren't legit and some even holding the belongings hostage.

And with this situation, Bezos is a jerk for cancelling a bunch of pre-orders, but he's a jerk in general so... yeah screw that dr. Evil wannabe.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1671d ago
Teflon021671d ago

Ban? Hell no. That's not fair for the ones who buy and end up not wanting or say my cousin wants and I grab an extra for them. They can't see it as any different. They got the 1 per household rule already. The most they can do is keep a track on ips or something.

What they should do is, ban it on a marketplace level. Where within a console/graphics card etc release, the first 2 or so months you can't sell on these sites or anything

Seraphim1671d ago

the problem is they don't have a 1 per household rule. Nor a one per payment method, account, etc. Don't mistake only being able to add one to your cart as a limit of.

rlow11672d ago

Passing a law would only work if it forced retailers to take measures on their own websites. Funny how big retailers do a minimum on combating this, yet they make next to nothing off the consoles. The scalpers wont be buying the extras and that's where the money is at for the stores. So they're basically shooting themselves in the foot and on top of it doing a disservice to their customers. But tough situation that's for sure.

Rude-ro1671d ago

As in your point is logical...
ps5 accessories are sold out too..
Every gen this happens... but not to the extent for Sony where the headphones and controllers sold out
Just imagine if games did not go digital or some would sold out too I bet.

Profchaos1671d ago

We have laws in my country to prevent it however it's only policed as far as concert tickets and toilet paper rolls at the height of covid.

TheOptimist1672d ago

Welcome to reality, a society so deep in the shit of capitalism and materialism where the rich, dumb/selfish and impatient drive the economy.

It's an open market, people can do whatever they please. Since you can't control 7.2 billion people and dont have the resources for it either, all you can do it suck it up.

IanTH1671d ago (Edited 1671d ago )

I agree with the first part, though disagree with the 2nd.

While it is an open market, the US already has laws in place for "essential" goods - most recently, we saw a lot of sellers getting banned or fined for selling toilet paper/hand sanitizer/etc for many times the MSRP. There's no real reason we couldn't have something in place to help at least curb scalping behavior on the whole. There are other similar scenarios where costs above MSRP are either sensible or necessary - like intentionally collectable or limited run products - but I think I have a potential solution. I haven't thought this through further than this comment, so holes may be poked through it under scrutiny, but here's the gist.

I think we could probably have a law in place for products where for the 1st 6 months after release, any product you sell must be at MSRP or below. That way you could set up something for sites like eBay that could query a product database to find the MSRP & launch date. If you try to list above, it just disallows that unless it notes it has been more than 6 months. If big places like eBay and FB Marketplace disallowed it, the value and ease of scalping would likely be limited enough that it might not even need to enforced on smaller sites. The more people who get the product they want, the less strain there is on retail/supply chain. And 6 months would give plenty of time for supply & manufacturing to meet a good portion of the "actual" early demand. Feels like it could work, or at least help ease some of the most egregious scalping anyway.

NotoriousWhiz1671d ago

Seal it. Stamp it. Send it.

dragon_rocks1671d ago

People will easily bypass that by bundling it with old stuff and overprice the older stuff or will put a signsture on the box and sell it for higher price saying cost of their autograph etc. etc. As long as there are people willing to buy stuff at higher price the scalping will continue.

specialguest1671d ago

I don't like scalping, but to have a law for non-essential items is something I'm totally against. No one owes you a chance to get these non-essential items at fair cost, because it was sold out. It is up to the retailers to set up a way to limit scalpers or make it difficult or not worth their effort to stay in the scalping business

IanTH1671d ago (Edited 1671d ago )

@specialguest - How anyone could be against scalpers, but for a system that allows them to thrive - see our current situation - is a tough one to reconcile. Kinda sounds like you're a closet scalper lol.

I don't know why if you hold the opinion that no one owes you a chance at items at a fair cost, that that ends at essential items. If we let the free market work as it does, then essential items should be held in the same regard. If everyone was on an even playing field, scalping probably wouldn't likely be quite as much of an issue as it currently stands. But the playing field ain't even.

Scalpers have bots and all sorts of crap to allow them to buy units at the speed of light, fractions of seconds after a page goes live, automating the process, picking up multiple units. Your average consumer cannot do that, so the system is being completely gamed.

The retailers don't care if a scalper buys a non-essential product or someone else does - they get their money either way. They have no incentive to spend the money or effort to make scalpers lives more difficult. eBay doesn't really either, as they get a cut of the obscene sale prices as well. It would practically have to come down to a law to stop it. I don't know why a 6 month moratorium on new products is a bridge too far.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1671d ago
SmokinAces1672d ago

Probably hard to enforce, the best way to stop scalping is to not pay scalpers, stick them with the units they bought and the money lost and perhaps it will stop, but when people pay them two to three times the price they'll just keep doing it, we have the power to stop them, dont buy from them.

ziggurcat1672d ago

"Probably hard to enforce"

Queues can be set up, and limit it to one per person.

SmokinAces1672d ago

Trust me scalpers are smart enough to work around those measures and have.

GottaBjimmyb1671d ago (Edited 1671d ago )

They have nothing to lose because they have return policies covering their buts until february and can just return unsold units. It is a no risk scenario for them

SmokinAces1671d ago

And that's fine as they still make no profit at all doing that and have to deal with the inconvenience and then they can go onto the store shelves and be sold to people that want and deserve them for the regular retail price..

GottaBjimmyb1671d ago (Edited 1671d ago )

@smoking there is almost noone who got more than 10 who hasn't sold at least a few, there is still a profit. The stores are to blame TBH. Can't say 1 per customer then let people pickup 50 in store or ship 50 to one address.

SmokinAces1671d ago

Ok you're flip flopping your comments now, you suggested they would just return them to which I said they'd make no profit doing that, now you're saying they're selling them and making a profit, please pick one or the other for your argument. Look I dont disagree with you that the retailer plays a large part in the problem but again the short term solution is for us the consumers to not pay theses people their ridiculous asking prices.

GottaBjimmyb1670d ago

It is not flip-flopping, I am saying there will always be some who buy them. Their ABSOLUTE worse case scenario is wasted time and no money lost. But the reality is they are going to sell most of them way above MSRP and at worse maybe have a few left that they can return cutting any chances of a loss. Not a hard concept.

SmokinAces1670d ago

And I'm saying if people simply stopped buying from scalpers the problem would go away, not a hard concept either.

GottaBjimmyb1670d ago (Edited 1670d ago )

@Smoking, but yours is not ever going to be a reality, and like I said, their absolute worse case is wasted time and possibly some gas money

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1670d ago
Knightofelemia1672d ago

It not console scalping that should be illegal it's scalping period look at those who scalped toilet paper, face masks, concert tickets, sporting event tickets. If you see a PS5 selling for $2000 on Ebay just avoid it people who buy from the scalpers are sheep simply doing an impulse buy. On the retailers end its hard to enforce I can go to Best Buy buy a PS5 if they say limit one per customer I can either get a friend to go in and grab a PS5 or I can simply go to Wal Mart and grab a PS5 from there. On the selling side like putting a PS5 or Series X on Ebay how are you going to prove that I didn't get that extra console as a birthday or Xmas present I didn't know before I went out and bought one now I have an extra machine. I want scalping to be illegal but to prove it is hard to do unless you're a complete idiot and make a video of yourself buying 5 machines.

Bladesfist1671d ago

Yer those who scalp medical equipment at the start of a pandemic are extra disgusting, it's just such a horrible thing to do for profit.

Show all comments (133)
290°

The Real Enemy of Gaming Isn’t DEI. It’s the CEO

From Horse Armor to Mass Layoffs: The Price of Greed in Gaming. Inside the decades-long war on game workers and the players who defend them.

Read Full Story >>
rushdownradio.net
jambola10d ago

maybe a real enemy is people who use terms like "the real enemy"
there can be more than 1 bad thing, t's not like a kids show with 1 big bad

senorfartcushion9d ago

This is very much a “dummy who volunteers themselves to the middle” comment.

The real enemy is a common phrase, people use it all the time.

Calm down.

jambola8d ago

i'm very calm
you seem very upset however

Notellin8d ago

You don't seem calm at all. Don't take this so seriously, you seem desperate responding to others defending your opinion that lacks any value or critical thought.

jambola8d ago

stop projecting
i'm not desperately dong anything, i'm tapping at keys on my keyboard bud

PapaBop8d ago

It's not like kids show with one bad guy? I present to you.. Bobby Kotick

ABizzel18d ago (Edited 8d ago )

DEI was never the problem and it was an ignorant take to begin with.

DEI is why games like Kena Bridge of Spirits, South of Midnight, and Ghost of Tsushima exist.

DEI is why we have a huge resurgence in Japanese, Chineses, and Korean developers producing games like Stellar Blade, Black Myth, and why Nintendo & Sony exist.

DEI is why more and more games have HUGE accessibility options with both Sony and MS fully behind this.

DEI was never a bad thing, the entire purpose of DEI is representation of all people, genders, disabilities, etc…

The problem was people used DEI as a default derogatory term to describe what they believed was forced representation, which allowed colorist, racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, and xenophobic fools to run away with the negative DEI narrative.

jambola7d ago

you don't get to decide other people's motivations
sorry to break it to you

ABizzel16d ago (Edited 6d ago )

To each their own, however, nothing you said invalidates why some people take offense to DEI incorrectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6d ago
Sciurus_vulgaris10d ago

Executives seem to often have an obsession with perpetual revenue growth. There is always a finite amount of consumers for a product regardless of growth. Additionally, over investment is another serious issue in gaming.

Killer2020UK8d ago

The fact that they also rarely have any real expertise in game development compounds things. They'll look at what's been successful elsewhere, lack the knowledge to properly understand why they have been successful and then force a team to 'reproduce' their badly interpreted idea of that success.

We see it so often with sequels to games that were successful too. The team are left well alone, they have a break through hit and all of sudden the money men descend on the IP and completely railroad the dev team's ideas. Usually winds up being 'make the same game but MORE'

LoveSpuds8d ago

This is true throughout all of the corporate and public sector organisations to be honest. CEO's generally move amongst the corporate world without any need to have experience of a particular industry, they simply need to rely on their senior leadership credentials. A CEO of a retail giant will just as easily transition to a CEO role in the energy sector for example.

Not defending CEOs here to be clear, I think it's a huge part of the reason the western world is so fucked up. CEOs don't need to care about the sector they work in, in fact it's better if they don't care if they want to screw everyone to make profits.

GhostScholar8d ago

Companies don’t hire executives to break even. If the goal is breaking even then why start the company in the first place.

Soy8d ago

That's understood; it's getting record profits and expecting to always beat those record profits, and seeing anything less as a total failure. Then they lay people off and raise prices to reach those record profit levels again, just to sate shareholders. It's setting expectations way too high just to spike share prices, then inevitably falling short. It's feeling entitled to being more successful than everyone else. It's the CEOs doing all this to boost their own bonuses.

ABizzel18d ago

Growth benefits the company’s profits and therefore the company’s stock if publicly traded, which pleases the shareholders making them more and more rich, which is why Growth is always at the forefront of the vast majority of any publicly traded company.

More growth = More Money and the people at the top want all the money they can get. I can’t really blame them anyone would love to see their profits go from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, to multi-millions it’s almost like a gambling addiction.

But it also goes to show someone how morals can go out the window for a lot of these people, and how amazing some CEOs are when they catch this early and provide a balance solution that takes complete care of their employees across the board while keeping the business sustainable IE: Insomniac Games ALWAYS on the best places to work list. The rest of the industry could learn.

jambola10d ago

honestly, the "real" enemy of gaming, is ourselves
if nobody bought horse armor, shitty dlc would have died almost overnight
if we stood firm and nobody bought games from companies that were bad with layoffs, it would be solved
we're the idiots supporting awful business practices, we are the ones enouraging it

TiredGamer9d ago

I think the reality that we don't want to convince ourselves of is that without the rise of "horse armor" and DLC, game budgets would have essentially stagnated (smaller teams/smaller games), or game prices would have risen much more dramatically than they have. There was an incessant drive for bigger worlds, infinite detail, and hundreds of hours of "gameplay" over the last two decades, that while perhaps a natural evolution of things, needed a suitable funding stream to accomplish.

HyperMoused8d ago

What...CEOs make tens of millions and that doesnt include SLT etc etc...we now have multiple editions of games, in game currency, MT's, battle passes.....and what do we get..worse game than what was coming out 20 years ago....dont drink the cool aid, its this nickel and dime crap that is absolutely leading us to gaming destruction.

senorfartcushion9d ago

This is the worst possible answer to this conundrum. Blaming the masses is blaming the only people who are constantly “told” to buy.

Consumers are the only ones not to blame here. People make their own choices all the time. Disney movies are bombing and DEInis being blamed. Has that been enough to put Disney out of business? No and it never will.

Christopher8d ago

Disagree. Businesses are able to do what they do because people are bad consumers and don't think critically about purchases. Disney got away with doing shit stuff for years and it's just the last year where people got tired of it. It's not like it didn't work for 5 years or so for Disney to do the things they've done. They'll just move onto another way to get people to see movies and it will be just as bad but more profitable until people wake up and realize it.

TiredGamer8d ago

Consumerism drives business behavior. It's not so much "blaming" as it is observing behavior. The point I'm making is that the direction that games have gone are driven by the spending. Consumers are spending on DLC and they are driving the expectation of more glitz and padded out (lengthier) games. If they continue to pay, they will continue to drive that direction until a threshold is reached that forces a change in behavior.

senorfartcushion8d ago

Corporate advertising is the most powerful force on the planet.

This is N4G for god sake, every day there are arguments between people who are Team Xbox and Team PlayStation because they’ve been convinced that having an identity built on paying money to Sony and Microsoft matters more than having one as individual gamers who can play whatever they want.

And THEN we get to the corporate advertising part: to play whatever you want is to sink MORE into the advertising pits, making it so that you can more than one specific product.

jambola8d ago

ah you're right
they were told to buy it, it's clearly impossible to avoid that
if enough people stopped supporting, it would stop
disney not stopping would only be because enough people didn't stop

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8d ago
victorMaje8d ago

Agreed. I’ve been saying for years, announce you won’t be buying the upcoming game because of the practices of the previous game, then you only have to stick to your guns once, see how quickly things change for the better.

We have to unite in what we shouldn’t purchase.

jambola8d ago

just imagine a world, fifa came out worse, nobody buys the next one until they see proof it's better and stick to it
or games being forced online for single player and nobody buys it
things would change so fast

HyperMoused8d ago

Just like scooby doo, you have shown us the real monsters are us

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8d ago
Inverno9d ago

Greed and greedy people have and always will be the main issue for everything wrong in the world. Everything is a product to be exploited for monetary gain. Even when there are things that could help progress us along for the sake of making our lives easier that thing must be exploited for monetary gains. Anything that tells you otherwise is propaganda to make you complicit.

coolfool9d ago

I've never thought "DEI" (although the way most people use it doesn't match it's real definition) is the problem with games. Good games have continued to be good when they have a diverse cast, and likewise, bad games have continued to be bad. There isn't a credible example I've seen where a diverse cast has been the direct cause of a game being bad.

Show all comments (51)
70°

Why We Partnered With St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital

Matt Miller: "Every subscription to Game Informer now raises funds for St. Jude. We want you to know what that means."

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
thorstein13d ago

I subscribed to this not knowing about how some of the proceeds go to St. Judes.

Really cool that some of the money goes there.

Even if people don't subscribe to the mag, it might bring people to the charity.

jznrpg12d ago

One of the main charities my wife and I donate to. They help a lot of children and being a parent of 5 children I can’t imagine what those parents go through. I’ll probably get a sub to GI because of St Jude and of course because I love video games.

80°

Dungeons and Dragons is About to Break a 6-Year Trend

Though Unearthed Arcana's content primarily consists of subclasses and spells, WOTC's latest UA drop is set to shake up Dungeons and Dragons' future.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com