MW and Cold War feel completely different. How can they introduce guns from Cold War without ruining the balance? If they get rid of all the MW loadouts that would be slap in the face to anyone who grinded or spent money on the microtransactions (especially if they own the free version). I hope the two games remain separate.
Maybe they just said F*** balance? I kind of like the idea. Clever marketing in pushing people into the next game by generating curiosity. “A show”. Balance is just numbers and tipping the scale does them no favors. The “newness” sells itself.
All different games meeting one spot sounds awesome to me. The next world at war game can have WW2 classes running around.
A separate dev works on Warzone. That's why MW and Warzone are already balanced differently. They would likely take any assets from Cold War and rebalance them to fit Warzone.
So if you want new guns in warzone then you have to by the new game? Would be a way to get people off the free version and get Warzone only players to upgrade.
Super confused...
MW and Cold War feel completely different. How can they introduce guns from Cold War without ruining the balance? If they get rid of all the MW loadouts that would be slap in the face to anyone who grinded or spent money on the microtransactions (especially if they own the free version). I hope the two games remain separate.
Thinking outside the box but what if black ops warzone is completely separate from MW warzone. Perhaps that's what they mean by separate loadouts.
So if you want new guns in warzone then you have to by the new game? Would be a way to get people off the free version and get Warzone only players to upgrade.