1040°

PSP 2 Graphics Processor Revealed?

PSP World speculates on the specifications of the graphics chip in the PSP successor.

Read Full Story >>
pspworld.com
clinker6043d ago

Wow those demonstration images look amazing, and they aren't even from the new SGX55x, which is what is going into the PSP.

I can't wait to see what games are going to look like on this thing.

Doppy6043d ago

Why not design a cheaper, easier to use, and slightly less powerful cell processor. It would help the cell processor, become a lot more profitable, and developers would have an easier time developing for the PSP, and PS3. And if the rumors of the PS4 using multiple cell processors then it would make since to use this in the PSP2.

TheIneffableBob6043d ago

The Cell is a complex beast. To make it fit into a mobile device form factor would take a lot of time and money. It probably isn't even viable given the way it works.

Kami6043d ago

Quote: "next-generation PSP GPU to be somewhat in-line with the graphics capabilities of the RSX chip currently found in the PS3"
DAMN!!
nuff said.

ThanatosDMC6043d ago

If Capcom announces that the new PSP2 is coming out with a MH3 then this baby will sell like pancakes in Japan. Cuz i know i will... i'll be lining up for one if it ever came out with MH3.

Also, those images looks somewhat similar to those that that Sony released when they used the PS3's Cell to create graphics images without the use of the nvidia card.

Gondee6043d ago

The Cell isn't really low power!!!! -_-

Doppy6043d ago

I think a mini cell would be great for the PSP2. It would make the PlayStation brand become more apple like. Everything would have the same development PS3 games may be able to be played on the PSP2 (remote play is OK, but think of it all first party games can be played on your PSP2 since they have a similar architecture), both systems should share the same PSN (play PSN games on PSP2). If they have the same or a similar architecture, than it just makes everything that much easier for the PSP and Sony. The only thing Sony would have to do is provide a battery that can support the cell, and find a way to add more features to it since it has a lot already.

Oh and earlier when I said make a less powerful powerful cell, I meant less power consuming.

socomnick6043d ago

Well, it might be because the cell is not going to be supported by Sony after the ps3 is finished. I will expect sony to put a more traditional cpu in the ps4 and abandon the cell, it so far has been a failure its not inside of anything other than ps3s.

ChickeyCantor6043d ago

" it so far has been a failure its not inside of anything other than ps3s.
"

WTF? Seriously where does your logic come from?
SOny basically worked with IBM to create the Cell designed for the PS3...who says there won't be other chips taking this concept of the Cell?

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 6043d ago
Fishy Fingers6043d ago (Edited 6043d ago )

Ha, I have a friend who works for Imagination, b*stard kept quite about this if is indeed accurate. I'll be bugging him later to see if I can get anything out of him, although very unlikely.

Specs seems promising, the iphone has a lot more raw power than the PSP and the PSP2 should follow suit over the iphone. Quite a way off yet though.

clinker6043d ago

Yeah, I can't believe this, it's like the perfect storm of news.

I mean, we didn't even have confirmation that Sony was developing a PSP successor, and now we know that it is.

Fishy Fingers6043d ago (Edited 6043d ago )

Well technically it isn't confirmed this is for the PSP2 although it is very likely to be. That's what I need to try and get out of my friend.

Id also like to know about the interface/controls. Id like to see multi sense touch screen with dual analogs (mainly for FPS). Plus, with what on paper should be quite fantastic visuals for a handheld, a "TV out" might be nice as well.

Screen Res is another.

I get giddy over new hardware. Sad but true ;)

thor6043d ago

Touch-screens are just a gimmick like motion control. They're not precise enough for games - I'd much rather be pressing buttons.

2nd analogue is a must though. And I agree with the TV out - but doesn't the PSP already have this? Or am I imagining things?

thereapersson6043d ago

And I agree on the fact that a second analog stick is needed for most games, especially FPS titles. Pressing face buttons to look around in a game is the dumbest control method, IMO.

MrPink6043d ago

but good motion detectors and a small camera(for various gameplay stuff) I would like.

uie4rhig6043d ago

but i doubt sony won't put it in this psp..
and and.. a touchscreen is always cool.. as long as it don't jack up the price...

f7897906043d ago

The PSP is releasing games too slow. They need a successor soon.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6043d ago
aiphanes6043d ago

It need a multitouch screen...but have dual analog sticks for games. It needs the R1\R2 and L1\L2 buttons and six axis control and rumble built in. And a 6 hours battery life with everthing turned on. It needs wifi 802.11n...and 32 GB of flash memory built in...plus memory stick and conpact flash support for additional memory. A built in camera, that is at least 3.2 megapixels..

uie4rhig6043d ago (Edited 6043d ago )

lol no way they'll achieve that for a low price.. if that would happen.. price will be at least £300/$400/€400 lol

micro_invader6043d ago

Yeah, I agree with superaktieboy, you're asking way too much.

The_EE_God6043d ago

is it needs to be 10-12 Ibs

TOO PAWNED6043d ago

Am i only one not impressed by those numbers? If it turns out that it is going to be as powerful as RSX(which i doubt) than it could be cool

Jdoki6043d ago (Edited 6043d ago )

You have to strike a balance with a handheld console.

What's the point of having something as powerful as an RSX in a handheld when a) the screen resolution is so low that most of the power would be wasted, and b) the battery life would be measured in minutes not hours (or would require a battery far to big to carry around)!!

clinker6043d ago

You can't tell very much from clock speed or polygons/second

The pixel fill rate of the current-gen SGX530 is already twice as high as the PSP GPU. With directX 9.0 pixel shaders this thing is going to rock your world.

uie4rhig6043d ago

lol directx? you do know that directx is only used in MS products.. you would be talking about openGL lol not directx

clinker6043d ago

Microsoft does not own Imagination Technologies or Nvidia.

Video card manufacuters make cards that support different graphics specifications, such as DirectX and OpenGL.

ShiftyLookingCow6043d ago

hah thats exactly what I was gonna say. And these days, OpenGL is no more the leader in defining new specs, so manufacturers invariably use DX specs to give an idea of what their card is capable of.

uie4rhig6043d ago

make the RSX a directx compatible device as much as you want.. you still wont be able to let it render dx graphics through the ps3.. sony simply wouldn't be allowed coz of MS :P

castdreams6043d ago

They haven't released any of the specs for the chip that will actually be used in the PSP2. The numbers they give in this article are from the current generation PSP and the current generation PowerVR chips.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6043d ago
heylo6043d ago

"Note that the specifications above are for the current generation SGX530. The SGX55x, which is still in development, is expected to be much more powerful."

Show all comments (54)
290°

The Real Enemy of Gaming Isn’t DEI. It’s the CEO

From Horse Armor to Mass Layoffs: The Price of Greed in Gaming. Inside the decades-long war on game workers and the players who defend them.

Read Full Story >>
rushdownradio.net
jambola5d ago

maybe a real enemy is people who use terms like "the real enemy"
there can be more than 1 bad thing, t's not like a kids show with 1 big bad

senorfartcushion4d ago

This is very much a “dummy who volunteers themselves to the middle” comment.

The real enemy is a common phrase, people use it all the time.

Calm down.

jambola4d ago

i'm very calm
you seem very upset however

Notellin3d ago

You don't seem calm at all. Don't take this so seriously, you seem desperate responding to others defending your opinion that lacks any value or critical thought.

jambola3d ago

stop projecting
i'm not desperately dong anything, i'm tapping at keys on my keyboard bud

PapaBop3d ago

It's not like kids show with one bad guy? I present to you.. Bobby Kotick

ABizzel13d ago (Edited 3d ago )

DEI was never the problem and it was an ignorant take to begin with.

DEI is why games like Kena Bridge of Spirits, South of Midnight, and Ghost of Tsushima exist.

DEI is why we have a huge resurgence in Japanese, Chineses, and Korean developers producing games like Stellar Blade, Black Myth, and why Nintendo & Sony exist.

DEI is why more and more games have HUGE accessibility options with both Sony and MS fully behind this.

DEI was never a bad thing, the entire purpose of DEI is representation of all people, genders, disabilities, etc…

The problem was people used DEI as a default derogatory term to describe what they believed was forced representation, which allowed colorist, racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobic, and xenophobic fools to run away with the negative DEI narrative.

jambola3d ago

you don't get to decide other people's motivations
sorry to break it to you

ABizzel12d ago (Edited 2d ago )

To each their own, however, nothing you said invalidates why some people take offense to DEI incorrectly.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Sciurus_vulgaris5d ago

Executives seem to often have an obsession with perpetual revenue growth. There is always a finite amount of consumers for a product regardless of growth. Additionally, over investment is another serious issue in gaming.

Killer2020UK4d ago

The fact that they also rarely have any real expertise in game development compounds things. They'll look at what's been successful elsewhere, lack the knowledge to properly understand why they have been successful and then force a team to 'reproduce' their badly interpreted idea of that success.

We see it so often with sequels to games that were successful too. The team are left well alone, they have a break through hit and all of sudden the money men descend on the IP and completely railroad the dev team's ideas. Usually winds up being 'make the same game but MORE'

LoveSpuds3d ago

This is true throughout all of the corporate and public sector organisations to be honest. CEO's generally move amongst the corporate world without any need to have experience of a particular industry, they simply need to rely on their senior leadership credentials. A CEO of a retail giant will just as easily transition to a CEO role in the energy sector for example.

Not defending CEOs here to be clear, I think it's a huge part of the reason the western world is so fucked up. CEOs don't need to care about the sector they work in, in fact it's better if they don't care if they want to screw everyone to make profits.

GhostScholar4d ago

Companies don’t hire executives to break even. If the goal is breaking even then why start the company in the first place.

Soy4d ago

That's understood; it's getting record profits and expecting to always beat those record profits, and seeing anything less as a total failure. Then they lay people off and raise prices to reach those record profit levels again, just to sate shareholders. It's setting expectations way too high just to spike share prices, then inevitably falling short. It's feeling entitled to being more successful than everyone else. It's the CEOs doing all this to boost their own bonuses.

ABizzel13d ago

Growth benefits the company’s profits and therefore the company’s stock if publicly traded, which pleases the shareholders making them more and more rich, which is why Growth is always at the forefront of the vast majority of any publicly traded company.

More growth = More Money and the people at the top want all the money they can get. I can’t really blame them anyone would love to see their profits go from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, to multi-millions it’s almost like a gambling addiction.

But it also goes to show someone how morals can go out the window for a lot of these people, and how amazing some CEOs are when they catch this early and provide a balance solution that takes complete care of their employees across the board while keeping the business sustainable IE: Insomniac Games ALWAYS on the best places to work list. The rest of the industry could learn.

jambola5d ago

honestly, the "real" enemy of gaming, is ourselves
if nobody bought horse armor, shitty dlc would have died almost overnight
if we stood firm and nobody bought games from companies that were bad with layoffs, it would be solved
we're the idiots supporting awful business practices, we are the ones enouraging it

TiredGamer4d ago

I think the reality that we don't want to convince ourselves of is that without the rise of "horse armor" and DLC, game budgets would have essentially stagnated (smaller teams/smaller games), or game prices would have risen much more dramatically than they have. There was an incessant drive for bigger worlds, infinite detail, and hundreds of hours of "gameplay" over the last two decades, that while perhaps a natural evolution of things, needed a suitable funding stream to accomplish.

HyperMoused3d ago

What...CEOs make tens of millions and that doesnt include SLT etc etc...we now have multiple editions of games, in game currency, MT's, battle passes.....and what do we get..worse game than what was coming out 20 years ago....dont drink the cool aid, its this nickel and dime crap that is absolutely leading us to gaming destruction.

senorfartcushion4d ago

This is the worst possible answer to this conundrum. Blaming the masses is blaming the only people who are constantly “told” to buy.

Consumers are the only ones not to blame here. People make their own choices all the time. Disney movies are bombing and DEInis being blamed. Has that been enough to put Disney out of business? No and it never will.

Christopher4d ago

Disagree. Businesses are able to do what they do because people are bad consumers and don't think critically about purchases. Disney got away with doing shit stuff for years and it's just the last year where people got tired of it. It's not like it didn't work for 5 years or so for Disney to do the things they've done. They'll just move onto another way to get people to see movies and it will be just as bad but more profitable until people wake up and realize it.

TiredGamer4d ago

Consumerism drives business behavior. It's not so much "blaming" as it is observing behavior. The point I'm making is that the direction that games have gone are driven by the spending. Consumers are spending on DLC and they are driving the expectation of more glitz and padded out (lengthier) games. If they continue to pay, they will continue to drive that direction until a threshold is reached that forces a change in behavior.

senorfartcushion4d ago

Corporate advertising is the most powerful force on the planet.

This is N4G for god sake, every day there are arguments between people who are Team Xbox and Team PlayStation because they’ve been convinced that having an identity built on paying money to Sony and Microsoft matters more than having one as individual gamers who can play whatever they want.

And THEN we get to the corporate advertising part: to play whatever you want is to sink MORE into the advertising pits, making it so that you can more than one specific product.

jambola4d ago

ah you're right
they were told to buy it, it's clearly impossible to avoid that
if enough people stopped supporting, it would stop
disney not stopping would only be because enough people didn't stop

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
victorMaje4d ago

Agreed. I’ve been saying for years, announce you won’t be buying the upcoming game because of the practices of the previous game, then you only have to stick to your guns once, see how quickly things change for the better.

We have to unite in what we shouldn’t purchase.

jambola4d ago

just imagine a world, fifa came out worse, nobody buys the next one until they see proof it's better and stick to it
or games being forced online for single player and nobody buys it
things would change so fast

HyperMoused3d ago

Just like scooby doo, you have shown us the real monsters are us

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Inverno4d ago

Greed and greedy people have and always will be the main issue for everything wrong in the world. Everything is a product to be exploited for monetary gain. Even when there are things that could help progress us along for the sake of making our lives easier that thing must be exploited for monetary gains. Anything that tells you otherwise is propaganda to make you complicit.

coolfool4d ago

I've never thought "DEI" (although the way most people use it doesn't match it's real definition) is the problem with games. Good games have continued to be good when they have a diverse cast, and likewise, bad games have continued to be bad. There isn't a credible example I've seen where a diverse cast has been the direct cause of a game being bad.

Show all comments (51)
80°

Silly Polly Beast: A Silent Girl's Fight for Freedom • VGMM

Play as Polly, a silent girl on the run from her dark past in this neon-soaked psychological horror shooter.

Read Full Story >>
videogamesmademe.com
60°

Ratatan: March to the Beat of Your Own Drum • VGMM

In Ratatan, groove-loving adventurers use the power of song and magical instruments to command armies of loyal Cobun companions.

Read Full Story >>
videogamesmademe.com