The Long Dark is the latest game to leave Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce Now and according to the developers, they had to ask for removal since Nvidia added the game to the GeForce Now library without their permission.
The Razer Iskur V2 is a high quality, premium gaming chair that your back will thank you for.
AMD has long been the best value option if you're looking for a new GPU. Now even their latest Radeon RX 7000 series is getting cheaper.
With all the PlayStation games that are now coming to PC, is it time for Sony to release a dedicated PC launcher?
Unless they are trying to kill their recently created PC business, I would advise against opening a dedicated PC store. It's an extremely hard endeavor, and people, in general, are very comfortable with Steam. Even Epic, with their billions of dollars invested, is still struggling to find a foothold, and they have Fortnite.
Can tell who ever put this together is not all that clued up on pc gaming.
It's just a known fact. The PC gaming community prefer Steam and Steam alone. They don't like different launchers. I personally don't mind them. But majority just stick with steam. Hence why EA and Ubisoft went back to on releasing on steam and why Microsoft release games on steam as people hated buying from the windows store.
The only other launchers that I imagine are doing ok is GOG due to being drm free and epic games due to the free games every week. Sony shouldn't release any sort of pc launcher n
This is just another ridiculous double standard article.
It's like how Microsoft can spend 20 years of making nothing but gaas and live service style games to sell microtransactions, dlc and subscriptions and get praise for doing it, but if Sony wants to make a single game like that every website under the sun is writing articles saying how Sony is anti-consumer or whatever.
I'm happy to see the dev getting criticised for this on Twitter. It's like he doesn't understand how Geforce Now works or what it is. He seems to think we are playing games chosen by Nvidia themselves rather than our own games that we purchased from places like Steam. All people are doing is renting a machine to play their games on.
I don't even understand why Nvidia is asking permission :/ The cloud gaming principle is well explained and players know they can have a good or a bad experience depending of external factors. Its basically paying for a remote desktop service, this has nothing to do with the owned library.
In fact, its even better for the devs/editors to be visible on GeForce Now, because players will buy games without worrying about the performance (or their weak PC). The games will always run just fine.
it is an internet cafe why the hell would permission be needed.
I just don't understand. Surely GFN helps developers? So far my experience with GFN has been great. I have been playing through Dark Souls 3 using solely GFN (free service) and a notebook that is not designed to play any sort of game. Yet I have been playing Dark Souls 3 most nights for a hour or so with no input lag at 60FPS and a resolution what looks like 900p.
I have a best of a gaming PC. But if all I had was this crappy notebook. Then I would 100% use GFN and gladly give developers money on Steam for there games.
I guess I need to ask the Long Dark developers for permission to play their game on a new pc. Seems like its the same logic