260°

Rockstar parent insists ‘things couldn’t be better’ following Houser exit

Take-Two doesn’t expect further departures.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
MadLad1966d ago

Time will tell on that one.
My two cents is whenever a senior creative talent leaves, it rarely results in better output from said developer.

sander97021966d ago

My theory is that Sam is only waiting for GTA 6 to release so he can claim royalties on that and then leave so Leslie, Sam and Dan can start their own company so they can make games without having to be vassalized under Take Two.

Smokehouse1966d ago (Edited 1966d ago )

That’s what I was thinking. I have been trying to see where he is going and if he is staying in the industry but couldn’t find anything. I bet he goes back to a smaller studio as well. Many Prominent devs have gone back to the smaller studios where you don’t have to manage 600 people. Big studios pump out big games but they ultimately kill innovation and experimentation.

ssj271966d ago

Tell that to GOW and etc they can also get better by my experience so your opinion doesn't count mine neither. This is Rockstar it has probably over 500 employees one guy leaving doesn't change much. Specially when it was the one who wrote the boring uninspiring script the games had. Hopefully they can level up they writing abd actually make it intriguing and good

MadLad1966d ago

"Yours and my opinion doesn't matter"
Yet you still comment :^)

As far as I'm concerned, my opinion does matter. I'm also not wrong that when a creative lead leaves a studio, it tends to be a detriment to said studio.
One man in an important, creative lead could be more relevant than 50 randoms in a large team. You always have bad takes.

ssj271966d ago

You opinion or mine doesn't meter because 1 you don't kno what happens. 2 what if the next guy is way better? It coul be wose yeah sure. But it's not like Rockstar are losing Williams Shakespeare's or someone to that caliber. But i see you got ego issues sure your opinion matter if thinking that makes you happy cool. I have seen tupid comments saying Rockstar will bcome konami because they lot this guy wo nobody knew who he was probably not even his family know he works for rockstar lol

MadLad1966d ago (Edited 1966d ago )

@ss

I have an ego? You have called people idiots. You belittle people who hold different opinions on video games than you. If there's a game you don't like and others do, you literally state they have low standards.

It's not really my problem you don't like the writing. Many people really enjoyed the stories he's spun over the years.
And to state that his family doesn't know if his work is just silly. Rockstar is possibly the biggest name in gaming, and he's a large part of that. You think his family thinks he just woke up one day with millions in the bank?

ssj271966d ago

I called people idiot pr you? Wtf ..
And sure there are idiot's here and there aboit certain stu3or times. Even i have been a idiot many times nobody is perfect only jesus God. Good that you find gta or rdr writing to the levels of greatness the guy should star writing his own books maybe he will be successful and do better or whatever he wanna do i am pointing oit the guy was whatever is not like he was a writer bobody can take his place because he wrote memento or saw script. Sound like you know the guy or maybe it's you and you are salty about me saying his writing can be done by anyone lol get over it bye godbye

roadkillers1965d ago

Rockstar had over 1000 people work on GTA5 before initial release. As sad as it is to see someone this influential leave, I cant see how his role would become more diminished as more people join the team.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1965d ago
jairusmonillas1966d ago

I hope their next GTA game doesn't have crap controls like rapidly press X to sprint like wtf.
They still release DLCs for GTA Online but can't even include a boost mode for PS4 Pro or Xbox One X. Talk about being super lazy.

Muzikguy1966d ago

You'd think with all the money they make they'd do it without question.

LucasRuinedChildhood1966d ago

Tapping X to Sprint is part of the charm of their games, just like holding A to run in Gears Of War. It's more fun. Otherwise, you're just boringly clicking down on the stick which can also be a pain in a long play session.

I'm pretty sure you can change the controls anyway, at least you can in first person.

Muzikguy1966d ago

I don't mind the tapping X to run either. It works for the game. Plus, why be exactly like every other game out there?

FPS_D3TH1966d ago

We need QWOP controls! Lol

MadLad1966d ago

That rapid X thing was an implementation added later in the series, because doing so was an exploit in earlier releases, allowing an infinite sprint.

It's a throwback, if anything.

ssj271966d ago

I agree their controls are very outdated and menus. Their in game guide need to take hints from games like metal gear Horizon or days gone. Specially their outdated shooting controls and menu and wheel quick menus

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1966d ago
Traecy1966d ago

Far as financially they are definitely fine.

XXXL1966d ago

Lol. What else would they say?

Fiddlerblue1966d ago

"After Houser exit, things have been a disaster! The office caught on fire and we're out of coffee! Send help!"

Show all comments (28)
50°

Blacknut Announces a New Partnership With Kalypso Media

Blacknut has announced a brand new partnership with Kalypso Media. This will see Kalypso's gaming portfolio arrive on Blacknut.

The partnership will take hold from June 27th with the arrival of a selection of Klaypos Media titles onto the Blacknut cloud gaming platform.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
160°

It Shouldn't Take Expedition 33's Success to Remind Square Enix That Turn-Based Still Sells

TNS: Expedition 33 was the wake-up call Square Enix needed, telling it turn-based RPGs are still popular, but that shouldn't have been the case.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Relientk7715h ago

True, but if it does get it through their thick skulls, then that works.

Although, the Dragon Quest 1 + 2 HD remakes will be turn-based and (the worst kept secret) Final Fantasy IX remake should be turn-based I would imagine. Let's see if any newer games go turn-based too.

thorstein12h ago(Edited 12h ago)

DQIII HD Remake was turned based and very successful. Then there was a really obscure turn based game came Balder's Gate 3. I heard it might have done well.

Profchaos9h ago

I wouldn't be shocked if they switched ff to the vii remake combat system

PapaBop5h ago

It won't get through to them though, despite E33's success, they still won't risk going fully turn based for their big budget projects simply because they are still in the mindset that it needs to be action combat to appeal to the mainstream audience. I hope I'm wrong but don't underestimate just how stubborn Japanese execs can be

DivineHand12515h ago

While it is true that Sqaure Enix has moved away from turn based games compared to how they were in the past, there is a good reason for it.

Older gamers will know this but during the ps2 era, we were flooded with turned based games from Japanese studios and this created a form of fatigue back then going into the next generation.

When Square released FF13, they received heavy criticism for making the game turned based like every other FF game and not doing enough to innovate. This is why they made FF15, FF7 Remake and FF16 have real time combat. It gave the series a fresh spin and has brought in new fans to the series.

I personally would be happy with either turned based FF or the real-time combat version we see today.

Shane Kim14h ago

Remake and Rebirth have "turn based" if you set it in the settings.

Lexreborn212h ago

Dang wish I saw your post before I made mine because we definitely feel the same way lol

Profchaos9h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Yeah hit the nail on the head but its like ww2 games we get hundreds of them then a decade of nothing and people start missing them i think we're going to start seeing them return

Claire, dragon quest even yakuza have seen turn based return

andy8515h ago

Only need to look at their own game DQ 11 approaching 10 million to show there's a market. And that's not as big of a name as FF

Tacoboto14h ago

Another article about Expedition 33 and Square Enix and turn-based games? This is starting to sound like propaganda.

The game didn't sell because it's a turn-based game; it sold and is enjoyed because it's a really freaking good game that released completed at a good price without gamer drama attached to it. No Mtx, no wait-until-it's-patched, minimal bloat, a self-contained story, no multiplatform BS. Just a solid original game that absolutely nails what it intended to do.

Redemption-6414h ago

I was just about to say the same thing.

anast13h ago

This comment should have a 100 upvotes, at least.

CrimsonWing6914h ago

Maybe try actually listening to the fans who have supported the series for decades. This habit of ignoring your core audience just to chase people who were never interested in Final Fantasy in the first place makes no sense. And when that approach fails, doubling down on it is beyond baffling.

The battle system has never been the main reason non-FF or non-JRPG players stayed away. Gutting the series’ identity to chase a broader market doesn’t attract new players. It just alienates the loyal ones.

Keep going down this road and we’ll end up with Final Fantasy Fortnite abomination or a F2P Battle Royale game.. Oh wait…

Show all comments (19)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted2d ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast2d ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay2d ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted2d ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl34852d ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK2d ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)