380°

Can PlayStation Now Compete With Xbox Game Pass?

Sony is putting a heavier emphasis on their PlayStation Now service, but can it compete with Microsoft's Xbox Game Pass subscription?

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AspiringProGenji1648d ago

It just needed downloads and to be priced closer to gamepass. And Now it can compete. It has everything except for day one exclusives releases, which I think I doesn’t necessarily need. Exclusives are selling well and people don’t mind that. That was just MS way to get people get their exclusives. It hasn’t been a good Generation for those

rainslacker1647d ago

Ms hasn't even proven that game pass is a sustainable model in it's current form...even assuming they arent practically giving it away

Obscure_Observer1647d ago

@rainslacker

"Ms hasn't even proven that game pass is a sustainable model in it's current form...even assuming they arent practically giving it away"

Must be the reason why they´re merging Game Pass with XCloud instead of make it two separated services. /S

Lol! In 2 years, Sony dropped PS Now support for their Vita, PS3, Playstation TV, Blu Rays and TVs for WINDOWS PCs!

In less than 2 years Microsoft announces Xbox Game Pass for PC with its own unique game library!

Yeah, i think Game Pass is sustainable and it´s here to stay!

rainslacker1647d ago (Edited 1647d ago )

@Obscure

Merging it with another service doesn't prove that it's a sustainable model in it's current form either.

What exactly is sustainable about expensive day one AAA games going to these services at $10 a month, coupled with the costs of having to license all that additional content? A $10 a month, just to match the revenue for a smaller AAA game budget of say 50 million, you'd have to have 5 million subscribers for that month. That doesn't take into account revenue and certainly doesn't take into account profits.

Sony did drop the price of PSNow, because the price they had it at, they didn't have enough people using it. but the service changed to accommodate that price. There is no more a la carte rentals like it started out with. Sony also doesn't put it's high budget games on there day one, and waits some time until after they've made their money at retail. PSNow is a way to make additional money using products that have already made a return on investment. The more recent price drops came in a way to likely compete with Game Pass, and xCloud in the future. but, Sony isn't buying expensive content to put on the service.

Maybe MS will find a sustainable model for the long term. Maybe the model already is sustainable.

But that doesn't mean MS has proven that it will be sustainable, and chances are, MS will never disclose the profits or revenues of the service itself to be able to have any public scrutiny over the matter.

You're assumption that it's successful and sustainable is about as valid as my assumption that it probably isn't.

I will agree with you that it's probably here to stay, but MS goal right now is to move people into their services, not just provide a cheap as all hell product or service for their consumer.

Kingthrash3601647d ago

Wait....we arguing services now?
Like we are literally arguing rental services.
I mean pay for access level stuff.
What is this.
How about we just tell them to bring better games....not better services.
Both of these services take away ownership and control of what games you play.
They both aren't substantial enough to argue over.
Stop letting these corporations manipulate you so easily.

rainslacker1647d ago

@Thrash

Are you addressing me or Obscure?

Either way, yeah, we're arguing services, because that's the topic at hand.

I was originally addressing the OP comment, which stated that it needs to be more like Game Pass. Game pass right now is probably the better choice in terms of games and value. I've said that multiple times.

But I also believe that just following MS to try and win the consumers heart before it's become a proven business model is not sound advice.

I originally called out MS because of the nature of the comment, and followed up because of what Obscure said, but I will extend what I orignally said to say that it's quite possible that Sony's current model isn't sustainable either. Google's model may not be sustainable. None of it may be sustainable. None of it's proven, so for our part, we're only really valuing these services based on what's best for us....not what's reasonable for the future of the businesses.

bouzebbal1646d ago

I think by now all ps games legacy should be in there.. I want them to create some channels by publisher.. I'd love to have all snk and Sega games in there

Brazz1646d ago (Edited 1646d ago )

I agree whit you. It's all good talk when game pass is at $2 and whit day 1 game like Gears 5, but are people going to keep sign in after this? Are things going to work like Netflix and milions are just going to "carry on" and pay normal price after beating the "day one game" or after the $2 promotion expires?
Too soon to say, game pass is untested, a new model that can end as a bad move from xbox.... or perhaps not, it can also become stroke of a genius!!

TK-661646d ago

@Kingthrash360

"Both of these services take away ownership and control of what games you play."

Look at who's late to the party. Where were you when PS+ launched? PS+ has been around for nearly 10 years so it's way too late to go down this line of thought.

1646d ago
milohighclub1646d ago

As a recent gamepass customer I can tell you I wont be renewing after my £2 for 2 months offer has ended. I havent even played any of the games for the last 2 weeks. I'm about 8 hours into gears and can tell you I'm not gonna finish it cos its crap.
This is in the same month as buying a new gaming pc (always been console) and even the excitement of having a new system in the house playing at much higher graphics and framerate than my pro isnt enough to keep me playing.

Imagine getting a ps5 then within 2 weeks of getting it, its solely used for youtube because the games are so bad that not even the hype of a new system drives you to play them.

Tell you what though, went back and smashed tlou on grounded again.
I've literally got some of the best games xbox has released this gen at my fingertips all for £2 and I'm playing a ps3 game. Tbh wish I could get my £2 back...

milohighclub1646d ago

@Tk

What does ps+ have to do with taking away ownership?

KillBill1646d ago (Edited 1646d ago )

They already have over 10 million subscribers per month to Game Pass. Earning them an estimated $150 Million a month/$1.8 Billion a year. Tell me again how that is not sustainable? And that was as of May this year... estimates are likely many more subscribers per month added.

You can go ahead and second guess Microsoft... but likely you won't be earning the type of money they are anytime soon.

gangsta_red1646d ago (Edited 1646d ago )

@kingthrash

"Both of these services take away ownership and control of what games you play."

Who would have thought that renting something means you don't own it.

Exactly what type of control are you going to have over the game? I never understood this and yet a lot of people keep echoing the same thing.

"I mean pay for access level stuff.
What is this."

Like we do for multiplayer? Where's the control and ownership there?

It's always fun reading "owning the game" or "supporting the dev" and not "paying for services" but will happily accept free digital games from a paid service that charges you to access online.

The double irony of hypocrisy is mind altering.

343_Guilty_Spark1646d ago

Why do more devs keep adding games to it?

343_Guilty_Spark1646d ago

@kingtrash360

If you can play and compete the game at your own leisure what does it matter if you don't own it? If a game is incredible you might buy it any way...games on GP get up to a 25% discount for being a subscriber. I'm sure you'd argue selling your games but the margins have never been that great.

Obscure_Observer1645d ago

@rainslacker

You almost got it! Yes, with Game Pass, it´s a long-term strategy. I don´t think you understood what Microsoft was trying to say with their "Netflix of Games" moto!

They´re literally following the "Winner Takes All Market" business strategy, here. MINDSHARE!

That´s why you need to stop thinking that Microsoft´s strategy with Game Pass is somehow similiar to Sony´s PS Now strategy. It´s not!

rainslacker1645d ago

I think their strategies are similar in some ways, different in others.

But none of that means MS has proven that what they're doing is a sustainable model in it's current form.

For all the talk, you haven't actually proven that either. My first comment was simple, and all i see is all these other things which don't counter what I say, even though I'm willing to admit that maybe it is sustainable, and I'm just making assumptions based on reasonable conclusions.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 1645d ago
chiefJohn1171647d ago (Edited 1647d ago )

You're very mistaken.

Obscure_Observer1647d ago

@AspiringProGenji

"It just needed downloads and to be priced closer to gamepass."

Translation: They just need to copy Microsoft.

Sony can do better than that.

TK-661646d ago

"It has everything except"

Nice...

KillBill1646d ago

"It has everything except for day one exclusives releases, which I think I doesn’t necessarily need." - nope... pretty sure that is a major factor as to why subscribers appreciate the service. Sony best change their Now service before they start losing potential subscribers.

Xavi4K1646d ago

if I have a chance to pay only 10$ for Ps Now (and I'm a member by the way) to play all exclusives I will never buy another exclusive unless it's multiplayer.

normally when I beat a singleplayer game I may replay it if it has new game+ mode or if I really like the game like The last of Us. So, in this case, subscription service is a much better option for me.

Another example I enjoyed Gears 5 and finished the entire game but to me, it's not worth 60$ yet thanks to game pass I got to play the game and beat it for as low as 5$ a month my point even if exclusives are selling well there are many people who prefer to rent or borrow some games overpaying it give them this option and you will make tons of $$.

Orionsangel1646d ago

Yep, they need launch titles to be part of PS Now. I got Gears 5 for 2 dollars at launch thanks to Ultimate Game Pass. That's hard to compete with...

gravedigger1646d ago

Of course it can compete.

You DON'T NEED a PS+ sub to play PS Now games online if you are subscribed to PS Now ( Of course, PS4 games which aren't on PS Now, you'll need a PS+ sub. ) unlike Gamepass only sub. you'll need an XBL sub. to play online.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1645d ago
CaptainCook1648d ago (Edited 1648d ago )

No, because Microsoft expanded their game pass to PC, you can download the games locally which will always be superior. About 6 Games are added every month to Xbox Game Pass for PC and Console. All newer indie and triple A games are added day one or a few weeks after to Xbox Game Pass like...
The Outer World
Outer Wild
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Metro Exodus
World War Z
Dirt Rally 2.0
Shemue collection
etc..

crazyCoconuts1648d ago

Btw, kinda apples and oranges because xb GamePass doesn't stream yet, but PSNow has streamed to PCs for a while. I still would rather have xb GamePass with dl capability, but just saying...

1647d ago
crazyCoconuts1647d ago

Exactly. Not for PSNow - it's a hybrid. Apples and oranges

Livingthedream1647d ago

But you can only stream at 720 p which sucks, I was actually looking to get the service for a bit til I found that out

Obscure_Observer1647d ago

@crazyCoconuts

"Btw, kinda apples and oranges because xb GamePass doesn't stream yet"

Game Pass is not gonna be like PS Now, don´t expect streaming via Game Pass! That´s what XCloud is made for.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1647d ago
1647d ago
SocialDanny1231647d ago (Edited 1647d ago )

Sony simply isn't aggressive enough to court Indies to release their content on PSNow Day 1. Microsoft simply has better dealings than Sony in this regard.

When getting onto other platforms Microsoft is WAY better in creating partnerships and has a much bigger reach than Sony.

UltraNova1647d ago

Nearly all major 3rd party content deals this gen are with Sony. I don't know if that's a good or bad thing anymore, I digress, but your comment holds no water in that regard.

yomfweeee1647d ago

All PS4 games can be downloaded locally. PSNow has way more games than Game pass.

"All" indies and triple A are added within first few weeks? What are you smoking?

Livingthedream1647d ago

@yomfweee yeah that's great however you can't download on PC and only streams at 720p which isn't really worth it. Anyone know if they will increase the res in the future?

1647d ago
ABizzel11646d ago

Both are good services, however, I give the nod to GamePass for Now (a funny). PS Now has come a long way, and you can download games on to the system so long as they are PS4 and most PS2 games (PS3 games can't be downloaded for obvious reasons). Also in the long run PS+ / PSNow is cheaper than GamePass Ultimate or XBLG + GamePass.

Gamepass is still the leader of the pack when comparing the two services at least for this gen, because there are likely changes PlayStation can make with Now and PS+ with the releases of the PS5, but for Now GamePass is the better service for consumers especially if you take advantage of the 3 years for $151 promotion (buy XBLG for $50 / yr 3 times, then do the $1 GamePass promotion and boom you have 3 years of GamePass for $151).

Gamepass: 10/10 (consumers literally don't have to games for their Xbox console anymore, besides AAA 3rd party)
PSNow: 8.5/10 (cheaper, largest selection of games, but generally games at least 1 year old or more.)

opc1646d ago

I have both on my PC. Gears 4 and 5, and sunset Overdrive were great to play locally, but you know what's even better... streaming God of War, Infamous Second Son, Gravity Rush, Until Dawn and Uncharted 4. Aside from them being better quality games, they just look better when streamed... because my computer is about 7 years old.

There's a tiny bit of lag but it's easy to adjust to it. On the other hand when I played Gears 5 locally, the cut scenes always had the absolute lowest quality textures, almost to the point where it looked like a glitch. It was quite ugly, good game though.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1646d ago
gangsta_red1648d ago

At this point in time, no. Game Pass still offers a much better library to choose from.

1647d ago
nowitzki20041646d ago

Gamepass library is boring af, I have PS Now and GamePass and Besides Gears and couple other games there really isn't much on GamePass worth playing.

BizarroUltraman1645d ago

Pretty much the same can be said about PS Now and that garbage ass service been around for a while nothing but old games.

Kribwalker1646d ago

i’d say the next closest service to gamepass would be a gamefly sub. If you had gamepass and gamefly you’d be in a great position to play all the exclusives that come out on either system day one (you could do it all with just gamefly, but it’s not as convenient as gamepass as you gotta work through a que)

gangsta_red1646d ago

Yessir, that's exactly how to do things.

With Gamefly though you can only rent games that come out in retail so I wouldn't be able to play games like Dead cells, Bloodstained, Mutant Year Zero. That is where Game Pass truly shines.

Gamefly on the other hand let's me play all the big time third party AAA games and Sony only games.

If and when PsNow starts offering more of their games for download then the Gamefly may get cancelled.

Silly gameAr1647d ago

Xbox fans will say gamepass is better, PS fans won't really give a crap either way. That's usually how articles like this go.

1647d ago
timotim1647d ago

Do you consider yourself a "PS fan", because if so you've just rendered your whole point (along with many of the people who agreed with you) contradictory haha. The mere fact that you posted, shows that you do give a crap in some type of way. In the end, its just a question, asking for an opinion to be given...the very type of articles N4G has no problem approving, yet tries to pretend they care when people debate about the topic...

1647d ago
BizarroUltraman1645d ago

Xbox fans will say its better cause it is! PS fans can't say that about Now.... they just talk about how much things sell.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1645d ago
PhoenixUp1647d ago

It definitely can. Sony also needs to expand this service to more platforms again as well

Sophisticated_Chap1647d ago (Edited 1647d ago )

Personally, I think they should have a download service on PC and have everything integrated with PSN on consoles. I think they will get there at some point, especially when most analysts agree that both Xbox and PS will sell far fewer consoles this gen, due to a longer life span that people will get out of their PS4s and Xbox Ones, since their game libraries are huge, they stream Netflix, Twitch, Mixer & YouTube, and you can also surf the web.

On top of that, all of the big free to play games like Fornite and Apex Legends will continue to receive support on those platforms. Even today, when you go back onto the PS3 and Xbox 360, and especially in the case of Xbox 360, you have many people still playing online games from last gen. This effect will be far larger with the current gen consoles. And then you have smart phones/tablets and PC/laptops, which will also take a bite out of console sales.

PhoenixUp1647d ago

The reason you’re able to download PC titles on Xbox Game Pass for PC is because those are PC games. You’re not streaming PC games on PS Now, you’re streaming PS2, PS3 & PS4 games on the service. It’d be impossible to make them downloadable on PC or any other platform this service may expand onto.

Analysts thought PS3 & 360 would be the last of consoles yet here we are with another pair of consoles set to release next year. Analysts shouldn’t be treated as unquestionable beings who preach gospel, they make miscalculations all the time. The same things you brought up were the same things brought up before PS4 & XO released.

Consoles aren’t going to die or dramatically diminish. They offer various advantages that other methods of gaming can’t provide.

Sophisticated_Chap1647d ago

"The reason you’re able to download PC titles on Xbox Game Pass for PC is because those are PC games. You’re not streaming PC games on PS Now, you’re streaming PS2, PS3 & PS4 games on the service. It’d be impossible to make them downloadable on PC or any other platform this service may expand onto."

Do you think I was born yesterday? Of course PS Now is just a streaming service on PC for the moment. A PlayStation Store/Download Service on PC would sell downloadable 3rd party PC games, just like Steam, Epic, Origin and Uplay currently do. Sony would need to port their big name exclusive games onto PC for this to work. It actually wouldn't be that difficult, seeing as how they have already ported GoW3 and the Uncharted Collection over to the PS4, which is essentially PC hardware.

During the PS3 days, EA, Ubisoft, Activision, Take Two and everyone else, were porting games from PC/Xbox 360, and putting them on the PS3. In some cases, the PS3 was the lead platform, and they then ported over to PC and the 360. It's not like it would be an unworkable task, to hire a company like Bluepoint, to port Killzone 2/3 and Infamous 1/2, over to PC if they really wanted to support a PC download service. If they did actually do it, the PlayStation download service on PC would be a major money maker, since it would have a library of games that no other service would have. it's a no-brainer really.

PhoenixUp1647d ago

Sony has no reason to sell their games on PC like every third party publisher along with Microsoft does. Might as well also suggest Nintendo also release their games on PC

Show all comments (134)
210°

PlayStation beat Xbox cloud gaming users in 2021, new CMA data indicates

PlayStation dominated cloud gaming users throughout 2021, beating Microsoft's xCloud streaming by over 10%, but Xbox swings back at PlayStation in 2022.

Read Full Story >>
tweaktown.com
Nanukas433d ago

Good, i want sony to feel heat. Ordinary people win from good competition.

BehindTheRows433d ago

“Good competition” is not something Microsoft offers often. You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better.

Nanukas433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

Agree. I wish sony would be more afraid of gamepass to get better games on ps+

Obscure_Observer433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

Phil Spencer started to acquire studios back in 2018, after that, Xbox Studios only had 5 studios. Now Xbox has 23 almost 5x more studios. Not to mention third party exclusives like Flight Simulator, Contraband and Project Dragon.

Plus, unlike Sony, Xbox Studios won´t be distracted with things like VR, all of their first party efforts goes towards Xbox first and foremost.

Sony so can expect a much more robust Gamepass in terms of first party and third party exclusives games from Xbox from now on.

Since Sony have less studios and won´t release their games day one on PS+, they better make sure andl deliver high quality games like Ragnarok. Because so far, 2023 hadn´t started well for them with Forspoken.

https://www.videogameschron...

Sony spent millions to secure a AAA third party exclusive game build from the ground up for PS5, not to mention more millions spent on market to be outperformed by a AA game which costs less than half on Steam, had an EPIC day one surprise announcement AND release with ZERO money invested on promotion and marketing.

If that´s not good competition, I don´t know what it is.

BehindTheRows433d ago

@Obscure_Observer

It isn’t.

Obscure_Observer433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

"It isn’t."

Oh yes, it is. You can bet your life that both companies cares about their money and investments.

The simple fact that Sony continues to pay multiple publishers to keep games out of Xbox forever, is nothing but a reaction to Gamepass.

Imo, Sony now fears that once their timed-exclusive contracts ends, those games will be available on Gamepass the moment the said games hits the Xbox platforms.

Sony fears the scenario where gamers realize that it´s not worth to invest in every single game released on Playstation at full $70 once they´ll be getting it for "free" on Gamepass eventually, just like Yakuza, Dragon Quest, Octopath Traveler, Nino Kuni, Persona series and more.

ARK 2 (exclusive on Xbox consoles), S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2( exclusive on Xbox consoles), Flintlock, Wo Long, Atomic Hears, Lies of P, Eiyuden Chronicle, Hollow Knight: Silksong. Minecraft: Legends, MLB 23...

Those are just some of the games that Xbox players will be getting for "free" day one while Playstation gamers will have to pay for all of it.

So at least you´re rich or something, Xbox players will be getting way more NEW games to play than you. That´s just facts.

BehindTheRows433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

@Obscure_Observer

I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet.

As a fan of theirs, you should want them to do better and offer more than subscriptions services and unfulfilled promises.

tay8701433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

@obscure. Well Sony can't control 3rd party games quality, but their 1st party certainly trounces MS's. Spiderman 2 is going to a absolutely dominate the holiday season, just like ragnarok did this past holiday season. Sony easily has the best gaming studios out of the big three. It's.not Sony who has to worry about their 1st part output, it is MS.

MIDGETonSTILTS17433d ago

@Obscure: what AAA games would I buy an XsX today to play?

I own a ps5 and XsX, and I don’t know of one game that would have motivated me to buy an XsX ( I bought it to appease my dumb Xbot friends).

I bought a ps5 for Demon Souls (best looking game on consoles), Returnal (top 10 game of all time for me), and Dualsense upgrades for shooters (completely changes R6 for me).

So, can you illustrate how XsX is competing? I liked HiFi Rush a lot, High on Life too, but neither make we happy about the $500 I sunk into the hardware to play them.

Mr_cheese433d ago

Obscurer, you're saying an awful lot without talking much sense at all.

VR isn't a distraction, neither does it take games away from playstation. Sony have been building and harnessing studios just for this while working on their 1st party none VR titles.

Microsoft is fully committed to gamepass and that's fine for them and those that like to game that way. It will be an even better product if Microsoft can nail their 1st party games.

What I'd hate to see are more moves like the Activision and Bethesda purchases and attempts because it destroys the gaming ecosystem. I'd say the same for Sony as well because once the ball is rolling, they'll all start buying and diving gaming.

Obscure_Observer433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

"I can bet that one company brings actual competition, isn’t afraid to share losing numbers, and doesn’t buy huge publishers due to said weaknesses. That’s what I can bet."

Unfortunately for you, MS or Nintendo aren´t forced to play by yours or Sony´s rules. Fyi, Sony used to buy publishers back in the day. The only reason they aren´t doing it now is simply because they can´t.

As it is, Sony already owns 14.09% of Kadokawa´s shares while Tencent acquired 16% of the company's shares, which means 1/3 of the entire company ownership.

The only reason why Tencent owns more than Sony is because Sony couldn´t pay more for it. So spare me from this "victim complex" bs defense for Sony.

Phil acted as the "nice guy" for too long. To the point where stupid fanboys were all happy when Xbox acquired new studios and publishers, because the idiots were under the illusion that all future Xbox games would become multiplatform and be released on Playstation.

Yeah, they were stupid to the point of thinking that MS would turn into a third party developer for Playstation.

Reality hits hard and here we are. Now that they KNOW those games aren´t coming to Playstation, all that they can do now is cry and moan over games paid and developed by Microsoft to not be on their platform of choice.

They think they´re entitled to have anything and everything otherwise it´s not good competition.

Phil Spencer won´t stop. Be the Activision/Blizzard deal approved or not, he can just go after a single studio like CDPR for example and you´ll be here crying all the same.

I don´t care if Sony or Nintendo buys SquareEnix, From Software or even SEGA tomorrow. Because I have no problem buying products from those companies if they have the games I want. I care about games first and foremost. So don´t expect me to be on your sad place complaining about big a$$ companies running their business as they see fit.

Lightning77433d ago

"You should want THEM to feel enough heat to actually do better."

But when they do attempt to do better ppl complain about it.

BehindTheRows433d ago

@Lightning77

What genuine attempts have people complained about?

Lightning77432d ago

With the whole Bethesda thing. There was article on here not too long ago talking about how Bethesda investment will pay off for MS. The whole comment section everyone was whining about how MS was taking games away. So when MS competes everyone here complains on here. No matter what MS hurts feelings. It's quite funny actually.

BehindTheRows431d ago

@Lightning77

In other words, outside of publisher acquisitions, they have not really attempted to compete.

And "whining" happens on both sides, so I hope you are just as entertained when people bitch and moan about moves Sony makes.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 431d ago
Crows90433d ago

Ps+ extra already has better games than gamepass. Just look at the highest scoring games...ps extra has more of them.

Obscure_Observer433d ago

Lol. What a joke.

PS+ relies on old games. Gamepass not only has day one first party games but also day one third party as well. Even from Sony. XD

S2Killinit433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

Exactly. “Day one” is a buzz word that makes these guys think they have a better line up but it has not amounted to much. If you look at what they have at any given time on their service its not that rosy. Not to mention “day one” also exists on PS plus just not for the first party AAA story games (which is fine w me as long as they continue making the hits).

Check out their list of day one releases for all the years they had gamepass. Its a joke.

Crows90433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

@obscure

I'd take good old games then new Bad games. Besides that wasn't his point and that has nothing to do with what I claimed. The op said that they should offer better games but they already offer better games. He did not say new games. Or even New Quality games. But to your point, I know that game pass lovers do enjoy their day one bad or mediocre games. It's all about value with you guys and not quality

GamingSinceForever433d ago

Some are going ape shit over Hi-Fi Rush but completely forgot about the Tokyo Wire dud the same developer last released. My point being there are hits and misses.

433d ago
433d ago
Obscure_Observer433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

" It's all about value with you guys and not quality"

Lol. Your false narrative didn´t aged well.

All Metacritic scores for day one first party games
.
Ori and the Will of the Wisps 92 on Metacritic
Flight Simulator 90 on Metacritic
Forza Horizon 5 92 on Metacritic
Halo Infinite 87 on Metacritic
Grounded 85 on Metacritic
Pentiment 87 on Metacritic
Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition 87 on Metacritic
Hi-Fi Rush 88 on Metacritic

And that´s only from first party games/IPs on Xbox series consoles.

So much for your "quality vs quantity" BS narrative.

Oh, and we "Gamepass Lovers" also love old quality games as well. I also can give you a large list of high quality third party on Gamepass. Just ask. ;)

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 433d ago
GamingSinceForever433d ago

@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure.

Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly.

Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming.

Crows90433d ago

They're so anxious to try to nail Sony on something that they'll even bring up third party developers not under Sony. Oh look this time's exclusive that wasn't developed by a Sony studio was bad so Sony doesn't know how to do good games.

433d ago
Obscure_Observer433d ago

"@Obscure_Observer… Forspoken was not a 1st party game from Sony nor should it be treated as such. Square Enix will comeback nicely with FFXVI I’m sure."

In no moment I said it´s a first party game. Both Forspoken and FFXVI are exclusive Playstation 5 games which Sony invested large sums of money to secure to their platform. Just like the original Spiderman from Insomniac. (which till this day Sony fans treat it like a first party/IP)

So it´s pretty obvious if the game fails, Sony also fails and loses tons of money which could had been invested on first party games.

"Besides Sony is entitled to some misses here and there because they actually take chances on new titles and release them regularly."

True.

"Bu the time Spiderman 2 releases everyone will have forgotten all about this terrible start you’re claiming."

Also true. The same can be said about FFXVI, imo.

Abear21433d ago

The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does.

Obscure_Observer433d ago

"The leader, Nintendo, doesn’t care what the competition does."

Couldn´t agree more

BehindTheRows433d ago

The Switch is leading the PS5 because it launched three years prior. PS4 won last gen is all forms (money made, units sold, software totals).

No hate for Nintendo though, as they are another company who actually puts out quality games in high numbers, but just a little perspective.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 431d ago
Orchard433d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

From 20-30% up to 60-70%? That’s some crazy growth. Probably thanks to Fortnite.

SurgicalMenace433d ago

That's what's up, young fella. You feel better now?

The Wood433d ago

All the other stats dont matter. Especially the ones where ps is tearing xbox a new one

433d ago
Obscure_Observer433d ago

“In 2022, Microsoft took the lead with 60-70% of total MAUs”

Probably one of reasons why Sony won´t return Activision´s calls.

BehindTheRows433d ago

Oh, yeah, THAT must be it….

Outside_ofthe_Box433d ago

You're not asking for numbers now, I noticed? 🤣

Orchard433d ago (Edited 433d ago )

Oops, somebody didn't read the article.

This isn't a "YoY increase". It's market share, so we know they had 60-70% of the streaming market.

MIDGETonSTILTS17433d ago

That’s why we game: to celebrate YoY growth!

Three cheers for first-party content-starving fueling third party max’s and subscriptions.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 433d ago
Tacoboto433d ago

What a clickbait headline. Why mention 2021, when the tides turned in 2022 for the obvious reason of one company making the Cloud service one of their biggest marketing pushes throughout the entire year while the other company was able to promote the games they had coming out?

And it's imprudent to suggest crazy growth when we only know proportions - did Xbox grow its proportion by attracting from the competitors' bases, did their marketing pay off and attract new users, or did cloud gamers on competitors just not play as much? The MAU figures don't point to shifts as significant as the Cloud proportions do, and Microsoft's lack of raw subscriber numbers that they happily boasted about in 2021 is telling too.

70°

Assassin's Creed Odyssey available on PC and Xbox Game Pass today

Ubisoft's brilliant Assassin's Creed Odyssey will become available via Xbox and PC Game Pass today, Microsoft has annou…

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
RavenWolfx580d ago

At the time of this comment, I am not seeing Odyssey on Xbox or PC yet.

320°

56 Games to Leave PS Now in May Including Metal Gear Solid 4

The PlayStation Brahs:

"Playstation Now will soon cease as exist as it combines with PlayStation Plus to be one super subscription, titles that won't carryover to the PlayStation Plus revamp will begin to leave the service in May."

Read Full Story >>
theplaystationbrahs.com
Orchard722d ago

Wait, what? I thought PS+ premium would carry over the games from PSNow?

Also this basically leaves MGS4 dead in the boneyard unless you play via RPCS3…

TGGJustin722d ago

That was never going to be the case. Sony said that Premium would have 340 PS3, PS2, and PS1 games. There are like 400 PS3 games alone on PS Now right now so it was obvious some of them weren't going to carry over.

darthv72722d ago

If they are just combining forces... there is no reason why any games would leave. Unless they were already planning on removing them regardless of the merge (licensing issues).

Orchard722d ago

MGS could be licensing I guess - isn’t the HD collection still unavailable / in licensing hell?

I’d like to think Konami are yanking everything MGS because they’re about to announce a 1-5 collection but… we know Konami better than that.

TGGJustin722d ago (Edited 722d ago )

I forgot to include PSP in my comment. So yeah you can see that when Sony says there will be 340 PS3, PS2, PS1, and PSP games while there are currently 400 PS3 games on PS Now that a good chunk of those current PS3 games are going away. They aren't just rolling them all onto the new PS+ otherwise the number would be much higher than 340

Orchard722d ago

Yeah I guess I just never really did the math on the numbers they announced so this caught me off guard.

Eonjay722d ago

PSnow is a platform and it will not exist after next month. Them being on one service doesn't automatically mean that they will be on another service. Contracts are drawn up and compensation may include things like per player reimbursement. Therefore you shouldn't automatically expect a game to go from one platform to another.... if Sony can strike a deal with Konami then the game will come to plus (if it already hasn't been decided).

But to be clear all PSNow games are leaving the service because the service will cease to exist.

JackBNimble719d ago

400 ps3 games that you have " no Choice" but to stream, doesn't make me want to upgrade ps+ . As it is , if you keep the basic ps+ you're going to lose1of the 3 games a month to begin with.

Nothing here for the new upcoming service seems like a worthwhile subscription.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 719d ago
ApocalypseShadow722d ago (Edited 722d ago )

Or, you know, you could play it on an actual PS3.

If you don't have one there's almost 90 million systems to track down, cop one and do that.

Here's the game too
https://www.ebay.com/itm/40...

Orchard722d ago

Is that you Don Mattrick?

The ideal solution would be a proper back compat implementation.

I shouldn’t have to crack out my 16 year old console to play a legendary game like MGS.

Also MGS was basically a PS franchise yet somehow it’s now basically an Xbox franchise if you want to play it nowadays.

Hopefully the new “preservation” team at Sony tackle this problem.

mkis007722d ago

Orchard

4 isnt on xbox. Incomplete series on xbox. Pc you would need now.

Orchard722d ago

@mkis The PC is always the place where you can get everything thanks to emulators etc.

But still, XSX and XB1 plays substantially more metal gear games than any other recent console, so my statement stands true.

King_Noctis721d ago

Or you know, you could play it on the console that you ACTUALLY HAVE without having to resort to ebay to buy a a console from two gen ago with scalper’s price.

itsmebryan721d ago (Edited 721d ago )

I have a OG PS3 (big boy) just gathering dust. I think it even plays PS2 games. I guess I'll put it on eBay.

thornintheside721d ago (Edited 721d ago )

so basically throw money at the problem.

sure it works, as long as not everyone is doing it. Is it ideal?....maybe for the sellers

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 721d ago
ApocalypseShadow722d ago

Oh. So orchard can lie and say that the only way to play the game is through an emulator. Which is false.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/13...
Here's a console for $50 and 7 games. Buy MGS4 above and that's 55 bucks before shipping. Can play it forever.

Orchard722d ago

“Also this basically leaves MGS4 dead in the boneyard unless you play via RPCS3…”

Looks like what I wrote is accurate if your only alternative is to go on eBay and buy a console from 3 generations ago which is no longer manufactured.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.

TravsVoid722d ago

I agree you should buy a PS3 if you are really interested in it's games but don't come on here linking to a eBay auction that has a price that will definitely increase before it ends and act like that is what they sell for. More accurate prices seem to be around $100.

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i....

Only reason I want PS3 emulation on PS5 is because a lot of the original games aren't even 1080p, some even sub 720p and we could see these games up to 4k and smoother framerates on PS5.

Z501721d ago

He forgets. Some of us still have PS3's. So, RPCS3 is NOT the only way.

SonyStyled722d ago (Edited 722d ago )

Orchard, PSNow has 800+ games. PS+ Premium was announced for 700+ games. Some games were expected to be removed as one service cancelled and combined for another, and now we know which ones. What are you so surprised about, or did you not know PS+ Premium was loosing 100 games from PSNow while simultaneously being compared to a Gamepass competitor?
And yes actually, a lot of lifetime PS gamers have a PS3. I have one in my living room with the rest of my consoles and one in my bedroom. They aren’t like ancient record players today like their competing consoles. The PS3 came with features we expect today in a new device that were very premium for 2006 hardware. I can use my PS3 as a blu-ray player in 2022. I can’t with my 360 since 2005. I can also put MGS4 in my PS3 in 2022, or any of my 220+ on the game shelf.

I think you’re scaling PS gamers abandoning their prior consoles at the rate Xbox gamers did with the 360 and One. If you are a gamer and enjoy PS, chances are you don’t have to ‘crack’ out a 16 year old device and suffocate on the floor in a web of cords around your neck wishing we were loyal to Phil Spencer to swoop in like Superman to save us from imminent death

721d ago
outsider1624722d ago

I sure hope MGS4 comes to PS pass or whatever. It's the one game i want to replay. Man i loved that game.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 719d ago
Petebloodyonion722d ago

It's actually a lot of games that will leave at the same time.
Probably to leave some space for the PSP games that are gonna be added to the premium service.
As for MGS4, I would expect Konami to be behind the move.

TheColbertinator722d ago (Edited 722d ago )

Unfortunate that MGS4 is leaving regardless. Played it with PSNow on PC and enjoyed having one of my favorite PS3 games to play again.

TravsVoid722d ago

It's going to suck if these PSP and PS2 games they are referencing are the few already released on PS4 store which were included with PS Now.

Cackocacho722d ago

Ah, yes. Bask in the "service" era. Where what you see today, is not what you'll see tomorrow, thanks to an overcomplicated system.

The "service", is simply, off the charts.

gangsta_red722d ago

Complicated how?

Also, you can always buy the game. Just like other services that offer third party content, they are on their for a limited time or however long the contract holds.

BrainSyphoned722d ago

Well, yes, when I subscribe to a service I hope to have different games cycle through. PS Now gives you a time frame to finish the games you want to try and Xbox is generally a year for most titles. They both give warning when titles are leaving. There are multiple web pages dedicated to each service if you need help figuring out which carton of milk needs finished first.

TravsVoid722d ago

Big difference between PS Now games leaving that are only available for streaming and games you can purchase even if they leave the service. Every game on Game Pass you can purchase without a subscription unlike PS Now.

thornintheside721d ago (Edited 721d ago )

im not really sure how the complexity of the PS3 architecture, and the "service" era are related. They seem like two completely separate entities with no interaction worthy of mentioning. Maybe you meant it as a problem that can exists in both entities.

Vengeance1138722d ago

So when games leave PS Now, it's a huge issue but when games leave GamePass it's just fine? All subscription services have games / movies leave all the time.

Vengeance1138722d ago

Everyone whining and crying in this comment section?

TravsVoid722d ago

You can still purchase every single Game Pass game regardless of if it's on the service. If a PS3 game leaves PS Now it's gone for good, do you understand the difference?

Bathyj721d ago

I do.
You're saying owning a game is better than renting it. I agree.

King_Noctis721d ago

I think it is the other way around.

GoodGuy09722d ago

This is why I dislike subscriptions lol.

Show all comments (47)