120°

Masuda on why Game Freak doesn’t expand and keeps team sizes relatively small

Compared to the some of the big developers out there, Game Freak is relatively small. Companies like Ubisoft, Activision, and EA have massive amounts of staffers working on their projects. Meanwhile, the core team at Game Freak has only around 180-200 people working on Pokemon Sword/Shield, which may seem small in comparison.

Read Full Story >>
nintendoeverything.com
Immagaiden1682d ago

You really comparing one developer to the biggest third party publishers of the industry? At 143 developers, Game Freak is a mid tier sized developer

-Foxtrot1682d ago

They should have expanded over the years, the Pokemon games have always done well in sales thanks to the brand name alone so there’s no excuse to not expand your team so you can make each next project better than the last.

Recently it came out that 1000 people have worked on Sword and Shield, mostly from outsourcing it. Now for what the game looks like and the little jump it seems to have had for the next brand new generation of Pokemon with the first ever console game is ridiculous, they should have taken it more seriously.

I know it’s different for each studios and what specific game they make but CD Projekt Red has roughly 886 staff, NaughtyDog has about 336, The Collation is like 300ish, Platinum Games 224 etc. Point is look at what they accomplish and yet here’s GF who can’t even utilise 1000 properly

They have Nintendo’s backing so it’s not like they would be left in the shit.

Neonridr1682d ago

why don't we wait until the game releases before we judge the game? You have seen snippits. I know it isn't Horizon Zero Dawn, but it still might be a good Pokemon game. You guys are something else judging something that isn't even out yet.

-Foxtrot1682d ago

Oh come off it, we've seen enough, why is it we can judge other games but it's off limits here? Even you have judged other games before it's out so why is this any different? We all do it because it's perfectly acceptable to.

"Snippets" Really? Nintendo have been marketing this game for months now.

Sure it'll probably end up getting rave reviews and sell a shit ton but it's Pokemon, Sun and Moon weren't all that good with some of their choices they decided to go with the game but it did well anyway

Point is the game, for being the first ever console Pokemon game, does not look like it's taken a big enough jump as it was supposed to. People have had big hopes for it over the years and the great features they've wanted to see resulting in Unreal Engine 4 videos and artwork like this

https://www.nintendoenthusi...

https://www.nintendoenthusi...

https://i.redd.it/ktheb6eed...

GameFreak would rather fill the game with battle gimmicks and remove features from past games, including most of the Pokemon that made up the National Dex. Instead they rather waste their time doing a dumbed down Pokemon Go styled remake of Yellow and a new IP, now that's fine IF you had a bigger development team and know you have a huge upcoming game on your hands with the first ever mainline Pokemon game on a console. Priorities.

Neonridr1681d ago

@Foxtrot - what games have I judged before they are out? I never do, I always reserve judgement until I play a game myself.

I just don't know what everyone was expecting. The game visually falls perfectly in line with The Ultra Sun / Moon line of games. I don't know why that is such a bad thing.

What does the Let's Go game have anything to do with this one? That's a completely different style of game. Nobody is introducing Pokemon Go styles in the core games, we all knew that.

I dunno, I guess with Nintendo everyone always expects the world. You can call it a failure, blah blah blah. I will wait until next month when I actually play the game. What about you? Are you getting it for your Switch? Or will you just jump on any negative reviews and declare some sort of justification?

Xaevi1680d ago

If they want to start doing more than POKEMON then they're going to need to expand. Else they'll struggle juggling between it and their new IP if it takes off after release

150°

Helldivers II sales top 12 million

Gematsu writes: "Cooperative third-person shooter Helldivers II has sold 12 million units as of May 5, publisher Sony Interactive Entertainment and developer Arrowhead Game Studios announced."

shadowT4h ago

Congratulations Arrowhead Game Studios!

Hofstaderman4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

And well-deserved. I'm having a ball of a time so far. Just need to change out my heavy armour, it's a murder on my stamina and sprinting.

derek3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

SIE managed to find success with gaas quicker than I suspected. Arrowhead did a great job getting past that initial launch difficulty, I've been playing again recently doing mostly solo missions. Can't even get off the damn planet after completing everything, lol.

Lexreborn23h ago

12 million is crazy, but it also paints an opposite picture to what the forums would have you believe about gaas. And it being more successful then the single player games of late also kind of proves to an executive gaas IS. what the consumer wants.

RGB2h ago

Disagree, most GAAS games are free, cheaper than or around the same price as Helldivers.

Helldivers II sold very well because of the viral campaign and word of mouth, I can't think of another game that has done numbers like this that wasn't completely free or attached to a service like GamePass/Plus Extra~Premium.

Helldivers II is an exception to the rule, not the norm.

Lexreborn237m ago

That’s a hard coup, considering the online campaign that happens with death to ALL gaas the forums campaign. To only turn around and try to explain the hypocrisy of it?

Either people hate GaaS, they don’t hate GAaS or they hate a practice in the GaaS but they DO love GaaS. But, the online campaigns as if you paying 40 bucks for a game then willingly paid an extra 20 for cosmetics THEN you buy more cosmetics in the 40-60 dollar game that is ONLINE only that alledgely people hate.

Or you don’t hate any of those things and you just act like you do when something isn’t being made how you want it to be on initial impressions. Regardless how many disagrees happen it doesn’t change the fact there is a clear hypocritical practice happening here when we discuss what is an “acceptable” game (swearing single player is the way with robust content) then buying the game that you swear is the death of gaming (gaas that have always online requirement, you don’t “own” the game, tied to online restrictions and isn’t truly a complete game as they continue to add content that could arguably be done day 1)

But go ahead try to make it seem like 12 million people didn’t just convince executives they want this over say the 3-4 million that support FF7R/FF16 or even the million or 2 that bought stellarblade or RoR.

You can’t convince people that live service games aren’t the future after they are supported more then the single player experience.

Show all comments (16)
340°

Square Enix Preparing for Layoffs in U.S. and Europe Amid Heavy Restructuring

In a town hall that took place on Monday, Square Enix president Takashi Kiryu reportedly confirmed imminent layoffs in the U.S. and Europe.

20h ago
lelo2play18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

Square should ask Sony for more money...

Outside_ofthe_Box13h ago

Square should ask Microsoft to buy them out...

FinalFantasyFanatic11h ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box,
So that Microsoft can close down the studio after doing nothing with them? Right...

gleepot18h ago

Sad but true. It's the consequence of a shift in player habits, massive overhead, and out of control budgets across the industry.

blackblades19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

What did NA and EU did anyways? Just translate or something? I would say it might help them get back to there roots but DK.

Hofstaderman18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

Actually, you are correct they play a hand in localization especially in Europe with the many languages. That and marketing.

Show all comments (59)
270°

Xbox Gives Incoherent Explanation For ‘Hi-Fi Rush’ Studio Closure

The gaming world is still reeling from the announcement that Microsoft is shuttering Tango Gameworks, the studio behind last year’s big Xbox hit, Hi-Fi Rush.

Reaper22_14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

They have a reason but they don't need to give a explanation. Gamers nowadays think they have a say so in telling people how to run their company. It's not the end of the world, fanboys. Microsoft is gonna due what benefits them the most. It's never been about you. Same with sony. Some of you need to get a grip. The crazy part is that some of the ones complaining don't even own an xbox.

enkiduxiv14h ago

I don’t own an Xbox and I have no real interest in HiFi Rush. I just hate to see a talented group of people lose their jobs when they did everything that was asked of them. You know… the decent, normal reaction to have when something like this happens.

Relientk771d 17h ago

There's no logical or good reason to give for closing Tango Gameworks. They make great games consistently and Hi-Fi Rush was the highest rated Xbox game in literal YEARS. Closing the studio was just plain stupid and nonsensical.

notachance21h ago

It’s quite strange to not see Phil Spencer in any talkshow or podcast… usually the dude would talk almost daily when there’s even a bit of news from xbox.

Hofstaderman21h ago

Muzzled and/or in on it from the very beginning. You have to be a very stupid person not to anticipate that your division is going to be under scrutiny from shareholders after 80 Billion Dollars worth of acquisitions

Aloymetal20h ago

The beauty of being a CEO here in America is that when your company does well, you get extra money as a reward...
And when your company does badly, you get extra money to encourage you to stick around and lead it through the storm...And at some point, you get to bow out and float toward retirement on your golden parachute, which means and you guessed it, MORE MONEY!! What a deal for snake oil man Phil!!

20h ago
19h ago
-Foxtrot16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Oh god no

You see when shit like this happens he throws Sarah Bond to the wolves

Seriously I only hear from her when it’s the yearly big Xbox showcase or when it’s super bad.

When the whole multiplatform release came out earlier this year he put her front and centre…kept his mouth shut for most of it

Michiel19896h ago

weird huh for a president of a division to say thing about said division?

Reaper22_2h ago

A game can be successful and still not reach a intended goal. No one likes to see studio closures and lost job but there's always the risk of this happening. At the end of the day the companies are going to do what they want.

TheCaptainKuchiki3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

The press is FINALLY calling out his lies and calling for his resignation.
Bakc then they would say amen to all his lies. But he can't lie anymore.

purple10121h ago

Perhaps they think they can sweep this one under the rug, gamers will forget about it,

We will not

They made a good game and you put the whole studio in the bin, this couldn’t be clearer, ms don’t care, everyone suspected it, but now we KNOW it

Amplitude20h ago(Edited 20h ago)

She's kinda got the verbal communication of 3-years-ago Biden trying to say something he knows nothing about.
What she meant to say is: "We wasted our budget for the next couple years buying Call of Duty, and we're moving all our chips to that one series"

It's starting to seem quite obvious that XBox is going to be shutting down most of their studios or selling them off, then focusing on some sort of PC/Console hybrid OS for the next XBox where they can collect royalties Valve style.

esherwood19h ago

To be fair I don’t think there is a good answer, I’d rather her been honest but that probably would have pissed more people of then the word salad route.

Silly Mammo17h ago

Amp- Do you ever get tired of trying to make everything political?

1Victor16h ago

@amp please leave your political red ruby sleepers at the door this is a gaming site or go back to truthfoxnewsmax to comment over there.
BACK ON TRACK
It’s obvious that Microsoft is moving on the money now direction guided by their investors watching all the failures from the 3rd quarter of the 360 gen to this generation I wouldn’t be surprised if they have a plan to replace Phil with Bobby as he proved for years he kept making money for activision.

shinoff218314h ago

Bobby jeez that would be an interesting turn of events and they'd certainly go 3rd party

shinoff218314h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Always that one guy bringing politics.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14h ago
Show all comments (36)