The Call of Duty franchise is riding a roller-coaster through time. Originating as a World War II-based experience, the series jumped ahead about sixty years to modern times for its fourth main installment, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, which was critically acclaimed and a commercial blockbuster, perhaps due in part to the change in setting. Many would wonder why the newest installment, World at War, brings the series back to its bread-and-butter time period. They would also rightfully question the swap in development teams, with the less-popular developer Treyarch taking the wheel this time around. So, can World at War prove itself a worthy successor to Modern Warfare and avoid the ugly step-child status of Call of Duty 3?
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 Zombies Terminus Island map is recreated for World at War and it looks scarier than the original version!
Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."
Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.
2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.
A very devoted fan of Call of Duty: World at War racks up incredible in-game stats while playing regularly for the past 15 years.
Of course you will hit a ridiculous stat after 15 of anything.
My main character for Everquest had over 500 days played in the first 6 years of the game. I was young then and had a lot of time on my hands. I don’t think I could duplicate that again until I retire and not sure I could match it if I tried.
Treyarch has utterly surprised me. i got an early copy of the game, and I'm having at least as much fun as I did with Modern Warfare... :)
OK one quick question and yes I know I will losing all my bubbles and will be getting lots and lots of disagrees over it, but just one small question. When Call of Duty does scripted events it is a Masterpiece, but when Killzone 2 does scripted events it is bashed and it is derivative and its totally utterly generic. Why?
COD WAW is an awesome game, I sold my copy of COD4 after I played WAW beta. If it wasn't for the beta I would still have my copy of COD4. when I heard it was going back to ww2 I was like, i'll pass but I played the beta and fell in love with it. I played gears2 and R2 and I would recommend WAW before any of those 2 titles, going by the multiplayer experiance. R2 and gears2 are great single player games but WAW will own most of my time in the long run, I agree with the score
I finished the campaign(got early version of the game as well) and had fun playing nazi zombies, especially when you play with another person, its a totally different experience. I agree with this review 100%