440°

Rockstar Games Launcher - Download & get GTA San Andreas for free

Introducing the Rockstar Games Launcher, a new way to play all the latest Rockstar Games titles on PC.

Read Full Story >>
rockstarintel.com
XxExacutionerxX2083d ago

GREAT, YET ANOTHER GAME LAUNCHER!!!! I guess this is why Red Dead 2 hasn’t come out yet on pc. They want you to download this crap first and Red Dead 2 will be exclusive to the Rockstar Games store. Looks like a big fat NO from me.

traumadisaster2083d ago

I was the same until recently and I gave in. Turns out It’s not that hard to select a new icon.

Lighter92083d ago

Ikr? Always talking about being superior, and yet too lazy to click a different icon.

CDbiggen2083d ago

I locked myself out of my Uplay account yesterday - so I respectfully disagree.

ocelot072083d ago

I don't know man selecting another icon on my desktop sounds way to difficult /s

Fishy Fingers2083d ago (Edited 2083d ago )

It's not clicking the icon. Its creating the account, finding all your friends again and if you care about achievements, having them split by the platforms.

It also makes less competition for game prices between Stores.

Pretty sure if Uplay, EA, Blizzard and now RS did this on consoles you'd have more to say about it.

Lighter92083d ago

@Fishy

Well, I play mostly SP games, so in that sense, you might be right. I can also agree with creating a new username, etc. For me it would only be Uplay or RS, as I don't give EA or Blizzard any money.

Teflon022083d ago

I don't mind as long as they don't start handing out money to make exclusives outside of Rockstar titles. I'd prefer on Steam though since I get to get my achievements which is important to me personally as a completionist. lol
But it's pure ignorance if you think it's all about clicking another icon.
1. one more launcher to keep up to date. If you don't want to have to sit waiting on updates every so often. You have to make all the launchers auto launch.
2. I have, Steam, U Play, Origin, Battle net, adding more and more is pretty ridiculous and one of the things that steer ppl away from pc gaming when they see nothing is unified. It's becoming a giant mess

Thunder_G0d_Bane2083d ago

Lool so true. I’m playing borderlands not caring it’s on a launcher I never had before I couldn’t care less.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2083d ago
2083d ago
zodiac9092083d ago

Is someone putting a gun to your head to download this launcher? chill the eff out.

Orionsangel2083d ago

Be funny if this Rockstar launcher was actually Rockstar getting ready to launch PC versions of Bully 2, RDR Remastered, RDR2 and GTA6 exclusively on their launcher, lol.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2083d ago
DivoJones2083d ago

I hope every game gets its own launcher! My PC definitely needs more bloatware and proprietary software platforms/DRM that constantly need updating and serve as a vessel for pumping ads and gathering my personal data!

I_am_Batman2083d ago (Edited 2083d ago )

Yeah Man. I'd much rather have a monopoly as well. It's awesome to have a company take a 30% cut of games it neither developed nor funded. Clicking on a seperate icon to launch a different game seems like a chore (I still don't get how people did it before game launchers were a thing). Also competition sucks.

JackBNimble2083d ago

Sony and MS take 30% and you still need to pay for psn and xbox live , unlike steam who doesn't require a payment for an active account.

I've never heard dev's complaining about the cost of doing business until EGS came around.

porkChop2083d ago

@Jack
"I've never heard dev's complaining about the cost of doing business until EGS came around."

Then you haven't been paying attention. Devs have been complaining for years about both the 30% cut and visibility on Steam. This isn't new.

I_am_Batman2083d ago

@JackBNimble:
1. Just because a 30% cut is the industry standard, doesn't mean it's not bad. Consoles are a closed platform so there is no way for someone to just put their own launcher on there. On PC that's a different situation. Having to pay for basic online capabilities has always been ridiculous, but that's not really relevant to the topic, unless you're trying to suggest that steam is fine because worse examples exist, which would be illogical.

2. Are you trying to say, that indie devs and publishers are happy with giving 30% of their revenue away? As porkChop said Indie devs and publishers have been complaining for a long time.

Cobra9512082d ago

You restored my faith in (a small part of) humanity. Thank you.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2082d ago
2083d ago Replies(2)
sander97022083d ago

Red Dead Redemption 2 PC announcement incoming! :)

Show all comments (75)
300°

Rockstar issues surprise updates for LA Noire and Max Payne 3 on PC

Throws in all the DLC for free. It's a steal.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
andron1502d ago

Would love a remaster of MP3. The load times were so long, it became a chore to play...

FPS_D3TH1502d ago

I’d love a remaster of the whole series but I really do miss Max Payne 3 multiplayer. That shit really slapped

roadkillers1501d ago

I agree! After the story, the speedruns and trails were fun. Again, brought down by the loading.

Flewid6381501d ago

Runs in 4K 60fps on PC with quick load times. Not sure how much more of a remaster they could do here.

At this point, might as well just do a remake.

andron1501d ago

Yeah PC is good, was hoping for some console remaster though...

hiawa231501d ago

They can fix that by just adding the game to the Xbox back compat, 4K enhanced list.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1501d ago
RaidenBlack1502d ago

Max Payne 3, the good stuff. Played it on PC. Shooting and attention to detail was astounding.
Still looks pretty good to this day.
Would really love a sequel with better story-pacing and bit less psychedelic brooding.

TheColbertinator1502d ago

LA Noire was a gem. Did not care for that ending unfortunately.

mkis0071502d ago

Always felt it should have had a branching story depending on which cases were solved.

Patanu1502d ago

I figured it was supposed to be disappointing, like how no matter how much good you do, some bad people are just going to get away with it. And that despite Cole being a good cop, he still had issues kinda shows that not everything has happy ending. Not saying it was good, but kinda fitting.

CobraKai1502d ago

That’s what I felt. Lots of “noir” stories didn’t end well.

TheColbertinator1502d ago

I felt that too but had hoped the endings would be different depending on performance or even key decisions.

Two endings that are considered "bad" would have worked for me.

King_Noctis1502d ago

Man, it is as if they ran out of budget during development or something when they came up with that ending. A really disappointing ending to an otherwise great game.

TheColbertinator1502d ago

Wouldn't surprise me considering Rockstar was pumping out phenomenal games at that time but the budget for LA Noire was astronomical.

1nsomniac1502d ago

Played through both games recently and they both hold up better than most games released to date. Have not aged badly at all.

SDuck1502d ago

Meanwhile, Atlus is preparing to make content of a game older than these 2 into DLC on the upcoming remaster for SMT Nocturne

Show all comments (22)
240°

I want Grand Theft Auto 6 to be more like Red Dead Redemption 2

PC Gamer writes: Dreaming of a more grounded GTA.

isarai1578d ago

I sure as hell don't, i went too hard on "simulation" aspect. Killed a lot of the fun IMO.

PoSTedUP1578d ago

it added fun for me. i hope its balanced.

isarai1577d ago

Shitty fast travel system, barely able to swim 10ft, having to re-equip your long guns everytime you get off your horse, the long LOOOOOOOONG rides between objectives, etc, i don't get how that's fun. Some of the simulation aspects are fun/cool, but some are literally nothing more than cumbersome.

EazyC1573d ago

Some people like immersion, which RDR 2 had in spades

Storm231578d ago

I know this is unpopular opinion, but I thought RDR2 was mostly boring. I loved the first one. I hope GTA6 is just plain old fun.

dennigo1578d ago

you are 100% correct, i liked the story but too much realism kills the fun part.

stupidusername1577d ago (Edited 1577d ago )

What you're stating as a unpopular opinion is actually a very popular opinion. Although It's not my opinion as I loved rdr2 and thought it successfully did something different than other games in aspects of immersion when it comes to; simulation, animations, npcs and world building. But I fully get that the game was way to slow for many.

KyRo1578d ago

I totally agree. I found RDR2 overly boring because if it.

Fluke_Skywalker1578d ago

Totally agree, I wanted to like it so much, but it just wasn't "fun" to play at all. If GTA6 is like that I'll not be a happy chappy.

poppatron1577d ago

100% in agreement with you.

They can keep their slow motion realism/simulation and moody story for red dead. Gta is meant to be super fun and fast.
It’s such an enormous earner for them I can’t image they’ll look to alter the formula too much

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1573d ago
Kados1578d ago

I just want GTAV campaign DLC.

Skuletor1578d ago

Having a San Fierro and Las Venturas dlc would have been awesome. An almost 8 year old game getting new campaign dlc though? Doubt it

kevinsheeks1578d ago (Edited 1578d ago )

that's terrible imo we can get mp dlc all day everyday but not any sp dlc even though they continue to make money and would still make money with sp dlc.

I can't find the article but I remember the company saying if we continue to support them in future products more sp dlc will be made and here we are.

Kabaneri1578d ago

GTA4 has better animations and NPC AI than GTA5.

Storm231578d ago

He’s right. GTA4 had a lot of things that GTA5 didn’t have. Tons of YouTube videos showcasing how GTA4 was more advanced in a lot of ways. Hopefully 6 just has a good story, fully featured and is lots of fun

chiefJohn1171578d ago

Ya but it had a Boring story, less content, bad protagonist, horrible driving

Profchaos1578d ago

Story is subjective I thought it was better than v however. But cars no chance the handling in 4 felt way more realistic car suspension shifted the weight of the car on each turn plus it takes ok skill to master high speed evasions.

V felt like an arcade driving game which required no skill imo it was a huge step back.

KyRo1578d ago

Prof and this this the issue. GTA is never about realism. Yes GTA4 went down a more serious toned route but GTA has generally always been outrageous over the top fun. Real life can be dull enough, I don't want games to be to by focusing to heavily on realism. GTAVs car handling was perfect for the game it is.

chicken_in_the_corn1577d ago

I disagree. Enemy AI is exploitable in combat. Very predictable

Duke191578d ago (Edited 1578d ago )

I enjoyed the wackiness of GTA3, San Andreas and Vice City so much, wish they would go back to that direction. I don’t need a super realistic city/crime simulator

LucasRuinedChildhood1578d ago (Edited 1578d ago )

You don't think that GTA5 was wacky as well? None of those games have a protagonist anywhere near as crazy as Trevor.
https://youtu.be/XGBN6__37f...

Duke191577d ago

GTA5 was a great game, but a DRASTICALLY different feel from the games I listed. It was far more grounded in reality just with a crazy story line.

GTA3/VC/SA weren't about realistic animations or being bound by "somewhat real-world" physics. They were decidedly more cartoony with everything. I just preferred them for gameplay, but GTA5 of course had the better overall package when you talk about story and character development.

RosweeSon1578d ago (Edited 1578d ago )

Yeah I felt after those 3, 3 and vice being my favs* that 4 went too grounded simulatory? And just a bit bland niko was great character story was cool soundtrack was pretty decent not a patch on the 3 before tho I struggle to think of a tune off top of my head not one I’m desperate to go back to but I did 100% and some 😂😂 felt the handling was too stiff just lost a lot of the fun for me. Don’t get me wrong don’t wanna be surfing cars smashing people Up with giant dildo’s (thanks saints row 😏😂) saints row was alright mainly while I waited for GTA4 but protect the pimp was cool the whole game was a poor mans GTA tho even animations were cut and paste for some parts. However GTA5 just needs to be bigger? Better and just keep doing what they do. They are obviously taking their time with it I just hope it’s not rushed and is half a good as the last one.

*san Andreas was good great even but didn’t like the sim go to gym aspects stats etc learned to love them tho it makes sense type of game it is but wasn’t a fan and yeah soundtrack was brilliant I love hip hop but just preferred first 2 felt they had better settings soundtracks and smaller tighter games compared to SA went a bit just cause massive open game bit empty In places 😂 unless you like collecting any old 💩 😜 waaay too many collectibles on SA.

Safe to say i cannot wait. Also the DLC for GTA4 was some of the best ever shame online was such a beast and GTA5 never got the same but sure GTA6 will make up for it hopefully by end of next year

Sorry last edit just thought this is the first new GTA For 3 generations this is gonna be incredible give them a few months to get best out of Ps5 tho ey 😜🙌🏻 28514; or the other one 🤷🏻‍♂️🥴 😂 12-18 months I cannot wait let’s have it 🤞🏻🤞 27995;

Unknown_Gamer57941578d ago

You do realize those games were cutting edge for their time, correct? What you're likely experiencing is the fascinating phenomenon wherein the games created to work within the limits of hardware of the time are regarded as being uniquely enjoyable in a way that only games from that time can be. Sure, modern games are enjoyable in their own right, but they of course have a different flavour to them.

It's no mystery why many indie studios have attempted to recreate games of the past. The 16-bit era has gotten a lot of love, so perhaps it's high time for some AA studios to try and bring back the charm of the 6th gen.

Note though that Rockstar has always been about pushing the boundaries of what can be done with a city/crime simulator, and I doubt that is going to change anytime soon. Also, have you played GTA Online? Clearly even modern GTA isn't all serious business. Heck, there are parts of GTA 5 you should revisit too if wackiness is your thing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1577d ago
BehindTheRows1578d ago (Edited 1578d ago )

No. Let GTA remain GTA. That’s what made it so successful in the first place.

Unknown_Gamer57941578d ago (Edited 1578d ago )

Agreed. If the author wants to play a RDR game...that's why that series exists. There's more to what makes each respective series tick than the setting. RDR is not an Old Western GTA, and GTA is not and shouldn't be RDR in a modern city.

Show all comments (47)
50°

Save Up To 67% Off On Select Titles From Rockstar Games

Daily Video Game writes: "Amazon is offering up to 67% off on three of the best titles from Rockstar Games for PlayStation 4 and Xbox One for a limited time. If you still haven’t owned any of these games from the legendary Rockstar Games, it’s time for you to do now!"

Read Full Story >>
dailyvideogame.com