220°

Why Days Gone isn’t a Zombie Game

Days Gone creative director and writer John Garvin describes the upcoming PlayStation 4 game as a piece of interactive post-apocalyptic fiction; survival horror cast in a story told through the journeys of a motorcycle one percenter.

The problem was that they wanted this game to take place in an open world that’s completely explorable by players. While there are plenty of open-world games that feature stories, few find a way to pair the two in a way that makes the story as compelling as the distracting world in which it takes place.

CP_Company2273d ago

yeah, we know it is not a zombie game.
just dumb people don't get that.

King_Noctis2273d ago

So what are the zombies doing in the game, and show up on almost every of the game’s trailers?

sprinterboy2273d ago

Last time I checked, zombies don't eat, sleep, talk etc

DaCajun2273d ago (Edited 2273d ago )

@sprinterboy
When is the last time you've met a zombie? LMAO They are fictional, that means not real, made up, and you can make them anything you want. There are movies out there that have zombies that do talk, sleep and for the record they all eat. Zombies eating is the biggest aspect in Zombie fiction, they literally eat other humans. WTF?

There are thousands of books and movies with all different types of interpretations from the creators of these works of fiction of what they think a zombie can be or would be like if real. For you to just say what you think could be and has to be because of your limited knowledge of these works of art is very short sighted and ignorant.

Now if you want to venture into the real life voodoo culture you will find that these supposed zombies do eat, talk, and sleep because they are reanimated human corpses.

Since the creators of this game says they aren't zombies, ok fine they aren't zombies then. Since they share so many characteristics of zombies from various works of art then there will always be plenty referencing to this unfortunately and that's the price to pay for the similarities. Just like every other open world game is compared to each other, like every FPS is compared to each other, and so on.

King_Noctis2273d ago (Edited 2273d ago )

@sprinter

I mean, there is nothing wrong with labeling this game as a zombie game, because it is, and no amount of PR will ever change that.

Also, why deflect the fact that this game is a zombie game just because Sony say it isn’t? As long as the game is great (and by the look of it, Days Gone is shaping up to be one of the biggest Sony’s title), who the hell should care what genre it is?

AmUnRa2273d ago

They are NO zombies, they are infected with a virus, they are not dead, so they are NOT zombies. End of story. When you want a zombie game wait for WW Z. Thats a zombiegame.

King_Noctis2273d ago

“they are infected with a virus, they are not dead, so they are NOT zombies.“

...But they are acting like zombies aren’t they?

CP_Company2273d ago

" “they are infected with a virus, they are not dead, so they are NOT zombies.“

...But they are acting like zombies aren’t they?"

and how they are acting like zombies? do they sleep like zombies? do they drink like zombies? do they develop like zombies? are those animals also zombies? how so? can zombie die if it don't eat or drink? can zombie die if i shoot him in the stomach?

Livingthedream2273d ago

They behave like zombies, look like zombies, I mean these things dont look like a regular human, but they used to be humans right? If you have to constantly remind people that they're not zombies, then maybe you understand that they look a lot like zombies. It's not like an airplane developer ever has to say, hey this isn't a car OK, it's not a CAR, because the difference is obvious.

ShadowWolf7122273d ago

Zombies are, by definition, mindless. Period. The voodoo variety do not do anything they're So no, even utilizing DaCajun's loopholes, these are not zombies. They're mutants.

DaCajun2272d ago (Edited 2272d ago )

@AmUnRa
All the zombies are not the dead that come back to life in Resident Evil games and movies. They are bitten and infected with a virus an then start to eventually exhibit rabid animal like instincts, then some mutate. Hmmm, sound familiar? Even in World War Z they are infected not dead coming back to life. So many holes in all these fanboys defenses. LMAO It's going to be a fun game regardless but I don't get why all these rabid fanboys are getting so defensive,triggered, and going on the offensive, lol. Thank you for all the laughs.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2272d ago
lxeasy2273d ago

Just because there are thousands of Zombies and you have to shoot the thousands of Zombies and you have to escape the Zombies and its a Zombie apocalypse doesn't mean its a zombie game.......................... .

DrumBeat2273d ago

Yeah, we're all "dumb" for noticing the zombies. You can spin a zombie as much as you want, but at the end of the day, it's still a zombie, and you can't, with any intellectual honesty, look at these "freakers" and dismiss the zombie characteristics. These antagonists aren't unique. This has been done in other works of zombie fiction.

That said, I decided to pre-order the game and I'm looking forward to it. I'm a sucker for this kind of setting and story.

CP_Company2273d ago (Edited 2273d ago )

drumbeat, so you are zombie?

and yes, who says it is zombies, they are dumb. that's the fact. and you can spin how ever you want, the fact that they are not zombies still is the fact.

chris2352273d ago

sure. just like the evil dead is no horror movie and marvel movies are not about superheroes. the pr for days gone is a bit lazy.

ILostMyMind2273d ago

I always thought The Evil Dead was a comedy.

PhoenixUp2273d ago

Game that features zombie like creatures isn’t a zombie game? Lmao yeah right

Nacho_Z2273d ago

Everyone who makes a new zombie game thinks they've done something so unique with the genre that it transcends such simple classification, but no it's still a zombie game. Zombie doesn't have to mean mindless being that just stands there drooling, there are loads of different takes on it.

Anyway, that aside the game is shaping up really well, I appreciate what they're doing with the story by trying to make it into a character driven piece rather than a sandbox with a story tacked on.

Show all comments (43)
380°

The Days Gone Remaster Is an Unsurprising Cash-Grab and Nothing More

Honestly, who is the Days Gone remaster for? Fans of the original won't find anything new here.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
Christopher43d ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted. It is a new thing in the remaster. Perhaps it's not worth the $10 upgrade if you've played. But, I mean, if you never played the game, then just wait for it to go on sale, forget about it, and continue not playing it like you did for the last 6 years?

TheEroica42d ago

The downvotes are likely from the excuses... Horde mode doesn't obsolve Sony from cash grabbing its easily duped fanbase.

S2Killinit42d ago

I love how people call this a money grab while the real money grabbing is in other genres. But, I think people who are that dumb deserve to be fed with skins and micro-transactions, and don’t get to complain that single player games of this caliber are few and far in between.

IAMRealHooman42d ago

@TheEroica
they changed the header. it was originally the " Remaster has nothing new" or something similar.

Christopher42d ago

It's still in the description: "Fans of the original won't find anything new here."

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 42d ago
princejb13443d ago

Days gone is amazing regardless and for those that didn’t play the original I highly recommend.

SimpleSlave43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

Yes. All of Sony's Remasters - all the ones stemming from the PS4 library - are cash-grabs. When all they needed to do was patch them to run at 60fps, up the resolution, and be done with it. But then they had to actually care about Bloodborne, and that's a cardinal sin over at Sony.

On a side note. I just got The Sinking City Remastered for free, because I owned the game. Weird...

anast43d ago

The Bloodborne thing is a real issue.

SimpleSlave43d ago

I'm sure they banish people to the Nightmare Frontier if they as much as whisper the name in the office.

Bebedora42d ago

Cash-grab or not. As long the Bend Studio gets their share, I am for it. I don't know, but I still hope for making of a second title. However, in a way It's a cash-grab. They still put something extra to it (horde mode), that is.

anast42d ago

lol Yeah they seem to hate the idea of a new Bloodborne anything.

I've still got to play the shrinking city. I enjoy Lovecraftian stuff.

RaidenBlack43d ago

Hope the recent remasters like Sinking City and Oblivion, ups the ante and alters the industry's approach.
But what fans really want is just a straight up sequel ... oh and add sequel to 1886 as well.

GhostScholar43d ago

I would love a days gone sequel. Days gone to me is such a better game than the last of us. The world in days gone was so great.

43d ago
mkis00742d ago (Edited 42d ago )

To me they appeal to different players outside of just being zombie games. I like them both, but days gone is more fun to me. The last of us 2 is my murder game though along with red dead 2 and gta 5. Love the realistic violence.

jznrpg42d ago

I’m a big fan of Days Gone but TLOU is a better made game. How much you enjoyed each game is of course up to you.

neutralgamer199242d ago

With the recent cancellation of Bend Studio’s live-service project, there’s now a real and exciting opportunity for the studio to revisit Days Gone 2. This might be the perfect time for Sony to greenlight the sequel—especially with the PS6 likely on the horizon—because Days Gone already has a strong foundation, a passionate fanbase, and significant untapped potential.

It’s worth remembering that Days Gone was Bend Studio’s first major AAA title developed for a home console. Before that, the studio had primarily worked on portable systems like the PSP and PS Vita, or acted as a support studio. That leap to a full-scale open-world console game was ambitious, and although the game launched in a somewhat rough state, that context is crucial to understanding its initial reception.

Gaming critics were often harsh in their reviews, frequently comparing Days Gone to other PlayStation exclusives that came from more seasoned console studios like Naughty Dog or Santa Monica Studio. Despite these comparisons and the early technical issues, Days Gone still went on to sell over 7.6 million copies—a remarkable achievement for a new IP. Even more importantly, Bend Studio listened to fan feedback and steadily improved the game through patches, updates, and optimizations. Today, Days Gone stands as a much more polished and enjoyable experience than it was at launch.

That kind of growth shows Bend Studio’s resilience and potential. A sequel would not only benefit from their hard-earned experience, but also avoid many of the pitfalls that affected the original’s development. Much of the foundational tech, gameplay systems, and world-building has already been done, meaning the studio can focus more on innovation and storytelling rather than reinventing the wheel.

Compared to the high-risk, long-development timeline of a new IP—which could take 5+ years just to get through pre-production—returning to Days Gone is both a smarter and more efficient route. If Sony and Bend Studio commit to Days Gone 2 now, there’s a strong possibility it could be a key PS6 launch title—offering a fan-driven, proven IP with greater polish, depth, and scope.

Let’s not forget Bend Studio’s deep legacy either. This is the same team that brought us Syphon Filter, a series that helped define early PlayStation experiences. With the right support and direction, they can absolutely deliver a worthy sequel that lives up to the franchise’s potential and the studio’s legacy

Harkins172143d ago

Loved it on PS5. Cant wait to play again at somepoint on PC when on sale

Show all comments (45)
210°

Days Gone PS5 Is a 'Really Good Piece of Work', Say Tech Experts

Sammy writes: "Back when Days Gone Remastered was announced, many fans were squinting to see the differences between the excellent original PS4 version and its PS5 re-release.

But now with the game readily available – and our 8/10 review declaring it the “definitive version of a fan favourite” – we’re beginning to get some meaningful tech analysis.

And according to Digital Foundry, this is not just the bare-bones resolution upscale some had anticipated – “a lot of effort has gone into it”, according to the tech experts. "

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
IAMRealHooman57d ago

First game sell well enough to warrant a sequel? Our received well enough?

Alos8857d ago

It sold well but reviewed only okay, which apparently wasn't enough for Sony.

Cacabunga56d ago

Sold well and received even better.. had a bad first month due to technical issues but ended up being one of the best games from last gen

Knightofelemia56d ago (Edited 56d ago )

That's the nature of the beast. If a game like a movie does not meet certain numbers then they write off the franchise. EA scrapped DS2 because the DS1 remake did not meet certain numbers. I was hoping the remaster of DG and the fact it also came to PC would convince Sony to green light a DG sequel.

PanicMechanic56d ago

Critic reviews were appalling. The worst reviewed game I’ve ever seen. By that I mean, poor quality journalism, dishonest writing and review scores which are out of touch with fan reception.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 56d ago
anast57d ago

Fans are having fun with this one.

380°

Days Gone Original vs Remastered – Is The Visual Upgrade Worth Revisiting?

Days Gone Remastered is now available, and if you’re looking to find out how it compares with the original PS4 version, read ahead.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Cacabunga61d ago

Huge difference i must admit, but not sure i would notice without 2 screens next to each other.

Not getting this game still, i want a new game and im tired of remasters

Muigi61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

It’s $10 and there are plenty of games out there for you.

Flewid63861d ago

Then its not a huge difference?

Killer2020UK61d ago

Of course you wouldn't, nobody would. If you have never experienced the other, then you don't have the reference needed for comparison.

TheEroica61d ago

Sony getting ready to milk some more people on dumb products.... I can see the psvr1 and 2 owner salivating over days gone remaster. Lol. What a ruse song is pulling.

Knushwood Butt61d ago

How can Sony milk customers if it's such a 'dumb product'? If it's so dumb, nobody will buy it, and there's no milking.
Plus, there's nothing preventing people from getting a copy of the PS4 version.

61d ago
Babadook760d ago

As a PSVR2 owner. Yup. If there’s a VR version I would be there day one.

Greg280161d ago

There are plenty of people who never had a chance to play this game, now they can with the remaster.

Don't understand why people who already played the game complain about a remaster. No one is forcing you to buy it. There are plenty of new games to play

MoonConquistador47d ago

And then there's a group of people who did play the game, thought it was awesome and would be happy giving it another play through.

Unfortunately I'm one who only got it on the PS5 instant game collection so no path for a 10 quid upgrade for me.

marioJP8761d ago

Huge difference where? Besides blue color filter and darker lighting?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 47d ago
Fishy Fingers61d ago

Settings > Graphics > Change preset from medium to high.

Remastered.....

Tedakin61d ago

Sony is now remastering games with 71s on metacritic.

Bathyj61d ago

Like that's a judge of anything
This game got scored before it was released.

andy8561d ago

Days gone is 85+. It got heavily marked down at launch for bugs where as others get a free pass for that. It's a fantastic game.

MoonConquistador47d ago

One of my favourites actually, I thought it was fantastic from beginning to end.

Kosic61d ago

And it's not even a big overhaul remaster. It's list turning up the graphic level by one. It's quite embarrassing, as the original wasn't that bad. And the remaster isn't that noticeable

PanicMechanic61d ago

“And it's not even..”

Bugs bunny NO meme

TheEroica61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

Poorly remastering if images are to be believed.

Tapani61d ago

To me it was very close to The Last of Us Part I. It was that good quality.

PanicMechanic61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

Shut up. Best open world zombie game on the market

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 47d ago
andy8561d ago

I spoiled myself by modding this game on my PC. Genuinely one of the best looking games I've ever seen. Whilst this remaster looks nice it just doesn't compare to that sadly. It shows the effort that these remasters could put in if they wanted

REDGUM61d ago

I so hope this game or DLC for those of us who own the original sells well.
Ive said it before, its an underrated game for sure & was unfairly judged upon release.
Please try this game if you haven't already.

For those who say 'i won't purchase digital only' you can pickup a hard copy for 5 bucks here in Australia, then add the DLC and you have a superb game for $20 or so.

Give it a shot, tell me I'm wrong After completing the game.

Game on gamers.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH61d ago

It was full of bugs at release I wouldn’t call that being unfairly judged. If you want your game to score well then release it in a completed state. Now with that being said I think the game was pretty good.

Knushwood Butt61d ago

It really wasn't.
The worst I encountered was a horde spawning on top of me when exploring a cave.
Did you even play this at launch?

S2Killinit61d ago (Edited 61d ago )

It wasnt full of buggs, it was very playable. That was the excuse for the hit job at launch before people started to speak up about how great the game was.

Show all comments (59)