1100°

First Look At Google's New Video Game Controller Leaks

A new trademark filed by Google may have just revealed what its controller will look like if and when the massive technological company enters the gaming space with a console.

Read Full Story >>
comicbook.com
Jin_Sakai1864d ago

This looks super uncomfortable.

Cyb3r1864d ago

Yeah it kind of reminds me of the Ouya controller

PlayableGamez-1864d ago

Ouya controller looks better.

Gaming1011864d ago

They will create moulds and have people playtest them, so the final design won't be this or anything uncomfortable. It's not the days of the N64 and first xbox controller, a smart company like Google isn't going to repeat the mistakes of its competitors.

The question is, will Google be able to create something innovative that blows all of our minds, like cloud computing? Or a Netflix gaming subscription with all the latest games in a Games as a Service model that actually works? Maybe the end of consoles will be eminent if Google can stream games right through your tv on an app. If they just try to copy what is already out there and compete for the same market share, they are just going to spend a giant pile of money and get a small portion of the already existing pie, rather than going after an untapped pie.

Saigon1864d ago

@Gaming101

Your question is actually what they are trying to do. Google is supposed to be present their concept design and project capability at GDC this year. Many are wondering how they will implement cloud gaming among a few other things. Google is trying the same concept as MS, this Netflix for gaming idea.

I think it is the future, but the future isn't now. I say that because we have been talking about this the last 2 generations in whole and no one has yet to come out with anything legit. However, there are great devices out now that can fully stream games but not everyone is capable of using them to their full ability. I believe, from the concepts that were developed this generation, next generation we will have something a little more consistent but nothing will be ready, fully implemented, until the generation following the next.

StormSnooper1864d ago

I’m not going near their console. I don’t think we need another paywall.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1864d ago
Maybay1864d ago

Microsoft and Sony must be worried. Google has the money to compete (buying studious and exclusives). Nintendo, not so much because they don't rely on third party's as much as the other two.

Jin_Sakai1864d ago

“Microsoft and Sony must be worried. Google has the money to compete (buying studious and exclusives).“

Money doesn’t solve all problems. Hence the reason Sony and Nintendo put out some of the best and most polished games in the industry.

SuperSonic911864d ago

MS has all the money in the world yet it did not solve its problems with the gaming public.

And Nintendo knows mobile gaming has taken a huge chunk of its once captured market. That is why they are bringing their exclusive games to mobile a platform where they make more money compared to Switch hardware.

PS4 is okay because it has games experiences amd a captured market that can not be replicated in mobile gaming. Nintendo's casual and kiddie market and kiddie style of games can easily be replicated on mobile that is why Nintendo needs to act fast and get inyo mobile before Google have a huge lead.

Sgt_Slaughter1864d ago (Edited 1864d ago )

Another day, another SuperSonic91 comment where they obsess over Nintendo and over exaggerate to make a non-valid point.

mark3214uk1864d ago

i think it will be a streaming only console

sampsonon1864d ago (Edited 1864d ago )

God Of War, The Last Of Us 2, Days Gone, The Order, Horizon, GT, Detroit, Dreams, Infamous ss, UC4, Ghost Of Tsushima, The Show, Bloodborne, Spider-Man, Death Stranding.

right, Nintendo released exclusives like these and more right? lol

and the reason i added Spiderman, bloodborne, and Detroit is that non of these devs will be bought out by some company going into gaming for the first time.

in the future please try to put Nintendo to the side, because they make children's games that never really change.

Sony is a beast and could care less about streaming only services because they know what the real gamer wants. a good AAA games that you unwrap and stick into a player.

blasphemy

No Way1863d ago

Jin_Sakai - You're correct; however, Google certainly has the money to let devs take their time and do what they need to do. I'd say they are also more likely, than some, to let devs have keep their creative freedom.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1863d ago
blackblades1864d ago

Lol was thinking the same thing like literally exact same thing.

Fist4achin1864d ago

Yes it does.

Hey Google, instead of getting into gaming, how about spreading the option of google fiber elsewhere so i dont have to stay with Comcast as my internet provider?! Im tired of their high prices and crappy service.

1864d ago
Twinblade1864d ago

Like most controller concepts, this isn't going to be the final controller design.

No Way1863d ago

"Now, it's worth pointing out that in the patent itself Google outlines that "no attempt is made to show structural details in more detail than may be necessary for a fundamental understanding of the disclosed subject matter and various ways in which it may be practiced." In other words, this isn't what the final product will necessarily look like, it simply is an illustration to provide a foundational understanding of what it will generally look like and what functions it will perform."

Let's hope that is true.

n1kki61862d ago

Apparently nobody understands what a utility patent is. There is little to no chance that the controller looks like that. It was concept art based on the utility patent. The design patent, if they file one, is where you describe and show the actual design. The most basic understanding of business is lost on the gaming community.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1862d ago
yellowgerbil1864d ago

What are they parenting? It looks like there is nothing new here. Looks like an off brand 360 controller.

porkChop1864d ago

It's a trademark, not a patent. And the controller has a voice/search button, which implies a built-in mic. I'm not sure if any console has ever had that before.

yellowgerbil1864d ago

Read the article the picture is a patent, you don't trademark a design, you trademark a name or logo

KwokXi1864d ago

Seems like the Nvidia Shield controller that has a mic in it, it is actually a pretty great controller

sprinterboy1864d ago (Edited 1864d ago )

You do realise that's just gonna be a Google assistant BS right with some chat support. Hardly revolutionary.
ie Netflix play, youtube start, play tlou pt2 oh wait.

porkChop1864d ago

Weird. The article starts by saying Google filed a new trademark for the controller, and then mentions a previous patent that was filed in October.

Cobra9511864d ago

More like an off-brand Dual Shock, because of the layout.

thexmanone1864d ago (Edited 1864d ago )

More like a PS controller, Looks no where near a 360 controller. The analog sticks were off set on the 360 controller.

Sirk7x1864d ago

That controller is basically a carbon copy of a Playstation controller.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1864d ago
Sly051864d ago

Apparently it's not a streaming device and will be more powerful than the XB1 X.

Could be a real competitor to the big 3.

porkChop1864d ago

There are two Google projects. A streaming service that will be available on many devices, and the actual console. And yes, more powerful than the X.

BlueBlue1864d ago

It should be able to compete with next generation consoles, not only be more powerful than the X.

rainslacker1864d ago

Google will make an interesting entrant into the console market if that's their goal. They could go a couple routes, either traditional console, or some weird paradigm thing that will likely cause them to fail.

I just hope if its the traditional, that they have the support, and some first party lined up, because I don't want to see another party just coming in to buy up properties and be just another 3rd party device to play games on.

sprinterboy1864d ago

Could be the end of MS in the console space tbh.

rainslacker1864d ago

@Sprinter

I think Google would have to specifically target the same market that MS is to force them out of the console business. As it is, MS is diversifying it's Xbox brand into a service, and the console is going to play a key part of that. Google is already primarily a service provider, but they actually have a broader reach than MS because of Android. Unfortunately, mobile and console alignment, and the games that appear on both, have been disparate and spotty at best.

But, Google does now have that streaming game service, which could be adapted, and it's apparent that Apple may not be opposed to these services on their platform with Sony now having remote play on the iOS. This leaves Google with a rather sizable target market, and the console for them can be similar to what MS is also trying to do.

However, as I said in my prior post, Google will have to either go traditional, or offer up some new type of console. New types of consoles haven't really taken off. Steam and Shield being the only real contenders, and any mobile based platform has pretty much failed miserably. But, if Google can leverage newer smart phones to have TV out, with controller support, then they could have an easily accessible console, even if it's just through streaming. I think Google would have to hit the ground running though, and to make it more appealing, internal game support through 1st party, and certainly 3rd party support would be extremely important.

If they also have, or go the traditional console route, they could possibly put more pressure on both Sony and MS, but then they will need to have more internal support, because as of now, Google just isn't a strong gaming brand. People play games on Android, and their streaming service seems to work well, but Google isn't known as a hardcore platform. Targeting the more casual mobile type market isn't consistent enough for a traditional console, as many failed attempts have proven. So, they have to actually go after the traditional console market if that is their goal.

The interesting thing in all this is is that Google has quite a few options, and signs have been around for a while that Google wants to get more into gaming. Same with Amazon, who may also throw their hat into the ring. But I believe Amazon may take a different approach. Google has options though, and it'll be interesting to see which route they take, which partnerships they make, and most interestingly, which market they're going after, because once they make that known, it'll either ignite a new variation of the console war, or be mocked among all gamers with a united voice....as we've seen so many times in the past.

It's almost a shame that the entrance fee to get into the console market is so high. Because I think there are several companies who could bring fresh ideas to the market. But, despite the popularity of console gaming, and it's rather unexpected growth this gen, there is still a limited market to do well. On top of that, the industry itself isn't really interested in supporting more, because it means more resources have to be expended, which means more risk. Unfortunately, for the traditional console paradigm to work for devs/pubs, less options is better, and more unfortunately, there isn't a singular API for any of the consoles. A singular API may be desireable but at the same time, it can cause restrictions on the hardware, and allow one company to gain too much control, or force the console development paradigm to be more high level, which reduces the effectiveness of the hardware. There are just too many balances that have to be worked out.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1864d ago
Dark_Knightmare21864d ago

No the big three are too entrenched this won’t be successful

PhantomS421864d ago

Just like the Ouya was going to be a competitor to M,S,N? lmao okay.

sprinterboy1864d ago

Nobody knows what it is, my guess is. Alittle amazon fire style box to play and stream there service with a controller and a subscription service of 3rd party games and indie titles.
However over time I think they'll venture in to AAA titles of there own also in the coming years and they'll go big with AR/VR in the future.

rainslacker1863d ago

I think VR will be part of their plans. They're already in that field and have had modest success in that market. Nothing spectacular in terms of games, but the basis is there. If they could stream games to something like Google Cardboard, and people could use their own phones, it could be kind of impressive, especially since faster phones with higher resolution screens are getting to around the $500 mark for new ones.

Spurg1864d ago

With 0 significant studios in Google's portfolio, I don't know what the appeal will be. I don't think they are going to compete with SP or MP games we want instead they will cash in on the free to play model with Fortnite, Apex and other being center points. Not even Amazon who has 40% of the cloud install base has any studio of significant under their wings.
With the value and games on Gamepass,12 studios(and more to come) and range of IP there isn't a doubt that Ms has already secured the crown for the best streaming service. MS have made their intentions known for a streaming gaming service with an pc, console, and devices echo system.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1863d ago
yarbie10001864d ago

This is not a leak, it's literally a mock-up

plmkoh1864d ago

Yeah not sure how a patent document available to the public can be considered a leak.

Double_O_Revan1864d ago

It doesn't. But you clicked the link and therefore the author did what he intended, bait people into clicks.

SierraGuy1864d ago

Looks like something from Souljah boy.

Gwiz1864d ago

I just took a leak as well.

Show all comments (81)
20°

Review: GameScent AI Aroma Diffuser | Hardcore Gamer

GameScent is aiming to push gaming forward with the ability to fill the room with an aroma that matches the game being played.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com
280°

Xbox's Preservation Step Sets A Much-Needed Example, Especially For Nintendo

Hanzla from eXputer inquires: "If Xbox can care about preserving its games and legacy, what exactly is wrong with Nintendo, trying to kill game preservation single-handedly?"

purple1013d ago

Ahh yes the good old game preservation of saving all your games to a removable hhd on the Xbox 360, taking it round your mates house, setting up multiple tvs to
Be met with “save data corrupted, please re download”

Or how about removing 360 games
From the store
, download them now or else, and, better hope to god that save data doesn’t corrupt, or it’s lost for ever

Nice one ☝️

Zeref2d ago

It's better than what Nintendo and Playstation is doing. It might not be perfect but at least they are TRYING. Unlike the others.

DarXyde2d ago

Trying? Take off the blinders for a moment, mate.

1. A failure to preserve games is just that: a failure to preserve games. Don't try to sugarcoat it: NO ONE is doing it properly. Better than awful is nothing to write home about.

2. At the time of this comment, isn't it the case that you need an internet connection to play Xbox games even if you buy physical discs that are hardly in circulation anymore? I don't have a Series X and I can't verify, but I think that is correct. I'm fairly certain you can at least play PS5 games at version 1.0 (not much of a win really when many games require day one patches). I think Microsoft's all digital, licensing approach is by far more aggressive than anyone else's. They really try to push you to game pass where you lose your entire library by umm.... Skipping a month of payments.

I don't think anyone is doing it right whatsoever. Don't get me started on Nintendo, who goes after anyone looking to preserve their games better than they ever would with extreme litigation.

Don't be a simp for any of these companies. Get it together.

PhillyDonJawn2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@DarX never speak on Xbox again. You lost all credibility with your internet connection comment. Smh you have 0 clue and misinformed yet speaking on something you don't no squat about.

Einhander19722d ago

What has Sony done exactly? You guys keep deflecting to Sony but I am not actually seeing any results, and ai am certain nothing that you can come up with even comes close to what Microsoft has done and what they have tried and failed to do, like tie all your disks to your account on xbone.

Microsoft removed their whole indie section when they moved to the xbone because they were going to only allow games on the service that came from a publisher, id@xbox started after xbone launched and it only exists because Sony embraced indie and Microsoft was forced to cancel their plans and reverse course.

And every single game that was part of games for windows live including disk games (I have gta 4 on disk that won't work) so hundreds of games that use that DRM no longer work unless the company themselves patched it out which of course very few did.

MrBaskerville2d ago

Not trying. Tried. they killed of the backcomp program years ago. They set something up again, but sounds like it's more of an attempt to save the current library on whatever they are planning next. With luck they save everything and more, but let's see. I could see them killing off parts of the OG xbox and 360 libraries. Can't imagine that they would allow us to play Forza 5-7 in the future.

With that said, I do like what they've done and really wish they could have done more.

shinoff21831d 22h ago

Zeref

So killing off physical media is trying what exactly. Ms don't really give a fk if you think they do your kidding yourself.

Profchaos1d 21h ago

They are not trying this team is established for forward compatability the team is. It interested in preserving Xbox or 360 games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 21h ago
isarai2d ago

Is that why Hellblade 2 is digital only?

Zeref2d ago

Just because it's digital only doesn't mean you can't preserve it. Just put it on an external and you have the exact same functionality of what a disc does.

MrNinosan2d ago

Guess you're trolling, but if you actually think that's how it works, I'd recommend buying some braincells.

mkis0071d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

Volitile vs nonvolitile data. A disc will not corrupt either. A drive can be corrupted.

Einhander19722d ago

This is just a scammy PR move to distract from the fact they are going digital only and trying to push streaming and subscriptions only.

No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft.

Without discs there is no preservation, preservation can't be done by the rights holders it can only be done by the consumers, anything else is a lie.

2d ago Replies(3)
Einhander19722d ago

Anyone remember xblig which Microsoft removed their whole 360 indie section removing hundreds of games from people?

2d ago
2d ago
Zeref2d ago

Do you know you can put your games on an external and preserve them that way? There are no benefits to discs. ZERO. Idk why some of you are still obsessed with them.

DarXyde2d ago

Because games like Persona 5 exist. It's STILL V1.00. On Playstation, that's a win because 1.00 is installed on the disc—no need to download anything.

If a game does not require any updates, it's all on the disc.

Extremely low bar in the modern era, of course. It's not much of a win by any stretch.

But for now, physical media does have a purpose, at least on Playstation.

Einhander19722d ago

That is factually not how game licensing works, try plugging your hard drive into someone else xbox, It's not going to work, and it won't work if the licensing servers ever go down.

Einhander19722d ago

Anyone remember games for windows live.

I have around a dozen games, some on Steam itself that will not work because Microsoft shut off the licensing servers.

BehindTheRows2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I do. I STILL have games (Gears of War being the big one) I cannot access because Games for Windows LIVE is total garbage and no one has held Microsoft accountable.

Zeref2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership.

Chevalier2d ago

"You don't have an Xbox apparently. Because you can 100 percent plug in your external and play games from it on any Xbox console lol. You just have to be logged in to prove ownership."

Damn how many times do people got to explain your idiocy to you? You can take a copy of Persona 5 like someone used as an example and play that game on ANY console WITHOUT logging in which means I can lend the game to a friend without internet and they can play my game. Can you lend your hard drive to anyone without logging in for them to play? NOPE. That is a huge difference and if you think otherwise then sorry you're an idiot.

Tacoboto2d ago

"No gaming company has pushed harder to remove ownership than Microsoft."

Ubisoft is literally erasing games people bought from their libraries... My PS1-3 discs are useless on modern hardware. Nintendo's re-published and resold almost their entire Wii U library, and the eShop is completely dead with no BC mechanism in the Switch software. Microsoft publishes everything they make today day one on Steam and Xbox/Windows. Sony only brings to PC the titles they think you might want some years later and Nintendo won't even design a functional long-lasting joystick.

You're absolutely trolling and not serious if you think Microsoft today is the worst offender.

shinoff21831d 22h ago

Yay steam

Not everyone fks with computers though. The disc is still the best way as a console player. Period.

Tacoboto1d 20h ago

How do Sony and Nintendo feel about these discs from 2001-2013?

Don't be stupid, you know Xbox is the best at this today.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1d 20h ago
Hofstaderman2d ago

Nobody wants this. Sales or the lack of it in the case of XBOX is very telling. I wonder how the adorably all digital series X will fare. Adorably dismal perhaps?

crazyCoconuts2d ago

Only time will tell, but for from someone like me suspecting that Xbox is trying to gracefully exit the console market, that "forward compatibility" team is trying to get Xbox games playing on Windows PCs. I mean, it's nice that they're not planning on exiting with a "enjoy your games while the hardware still works" message, so that's nice. They still have a brand to protect via Microsoft so probably feel obligated to have a better exit strategy.

Xeofate2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

That is not their plan, their plan is to transfer users accounts to the cloud.

Phil Spencer himself said as much a few months back, plans could have changed but I think people are reading way too much into one statement where Phil said he would allow Epic on xbox because he wants to be able to sell xbox games directly on other platforms. Aka, instead of selling Sea of Thives through PSN he wants to have an xbox store to sell his games on PlayStation without giving PlayStation any money.

Again, it's extremely unlikely that Phil plans to put PC on xbox and licensing would prevent them from just giving out other publishers games purchased on xbox copies of thier games on PC, Microsoft does not own their games.

crazyCoconuts1d 8h ago

The thing that doesn't align with the cloud strategy is the giving up on exclusives. You'd still need strong exclusives for cloud streaming - it's still a "platform" , just with a lower upfront hardware investment. I feel like they've learned what PS learned with PSNow long ago. We're not ready to stream games and it's only gonna lose them money to try at this point

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 16h ago

I would love that, I'd buy up some of the Xbox games if they could run on PC, like the Rare Replay, Lost Odyssey and Dead or Alive Ultimate, probably a pipe dream though.

Show all comments (43)
240°

Is Driver (PS1) Still Worth Playing in 2024?

"Driver was a technical achievement for PS1, a pioneer in cinematic gaming, and an often brutal challenge - TechStomper asks if its brand of 70s car chase antics still holds up."

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
PrimeVinister3d ago

The driving holds up, most of everything else does not.

PrimeVinister3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

@Shane Kim

Well, I mean the driving physics hold up. The draw distance, police AI, visuals in general etc do not

Cacabunga2d ago

One of my all time favorites on PS1. I spent a summer vacation playing this was so good

isarai3d ago

Sadly youd be hard pressed to find any driving game with better physics these days. But the draw distance really kills it for me

PrimeVinister3d ago

The physics hold up ridiculously well. And the draw distance is a real hurdle at first.

__y2jb3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Nonsense. The physics in any modern game or any 360 game is light years beyond Driver.

Dandizzle3d ago

This game is hard, you will fail and quit

PrimeVinister3d ago

But you will get there eventually... maybe

jznrpg3d ago

Stop with is it worth it articles. If you want to play a game play the damn game!

anast2d ago

I loved this game awhile back.

Barlos2d ago

Yeah but is it worth reading pointless articles?

__y2jb3d ago

It wasn’t worth playing in the 90’s.

Espangerish3d ago

My thoughts exactly. I bought it at release for full price and got frustrated and bored with it very quickly.

Show all comments (41)