490°

Game Workers Unite Organization Calling for Bobby Kotick to Be Fired Amidst Mass Layoffs

Game Workers Unite, a grassroots organization of game devs, are calling to fire Bobby Kotick and his $30 million dollars a year salary after the mass layoffs that are transpiring at Activision-Blizzard.

Jin_Sakai2309d ago

He’s worth $7 billion and makes $30 million annually and has the nerves to lay off 800 people?

Disgusting.

Rimeskeem2309d ago

Saying he has nerves is probably a bad assumption. The only nerve he has is when money touches him and makes him feel warm and fuzzy.

Eonjay2308d ago

The main takeaway is that consumers were not happy with Activision or its practices and obviously Neither is Bungie. The people willing to create the types of environments and gut the market are the people at the top of organizations like this. Money reigns supreme to some and even in this comment section there are individuals who will defend the firing of the 800 workers.
They are too dumb to realize that the men making millions are the men who made the decisions that forfeited the employees job in the first place. People are cattle to them and their lack of any higher calling is their downfall because the will simply cannibalize each other as they are a virus on the human race.

excaliburps2309d ago

He's worth $7 BILLION???? WTF!

blacktiger2308d ago

why are you in shock, all ceo makes that much money,

blacktiger2308d ago

i got dislike because i said every ceo makes that kind of money lol?!

KillBill2308d ago

@blacktiger - obviously disagreeing with your outlandish idea that ALL CEOs make that much money. Only very large companies have the ability to pay their CEO the kind of money that you see him earning. Many more smaller companies exist where CEO does not come close to making such money.

IMissJimRyan2309d ago

This is how free market capitalism works. Kotick is doing great as a CEO, making a lot of value tô share holders.

Companies are made to make mkney. Employees are Just dipendable resouces.

I know it's sad but faster you undestand that faster you can flight back.

Godmars2902309d ago

Not to mention contributing to the devaluing the whole of human existence. That's another fun thing capitalism does that no one seems to bring up. Or just say "Oh well" to.

Mind you socialism, when taken to extreme, is no better if not worse, its just that capitalism taken to extreme results in thing like the current US healthcare crisis.

Sono4212309d ago

Wow a lot of socialism in here. What healthcare crisis? Obamacare? yeah I guess you could call the a crisis, but that's more socialist than capitalist. Also it should be noted you are not entitled to a job, your company hires you to make more money, if they have to make cuts they have to make cuts, now is it necessarily the people who got fired's fault? Maybe not, but pointing out how much this guy is worth means literally nothing in this exact situation, who I doubt even had much to do with all of this, he probably simply hires people to mainly run the business for him, we can only hope the people who actually caused the layoffs also got fired, but blaming it on capitalism as a whole, and saying it devalues human life is radical idiocy.

2308d ago
MegaKooter2308d ago

@Godmars290

All socialism is extreme.
Either way thanks to Capitalism more people have been uplifted out of poverty than ever before. The capitalism the better.

madpuppy2308d ago

"free market capitalism" taken to the extreme is a danger but, Socialism still has a 100% failure rate. The US is kind of a hybrid Capitalism with Social aspects...and that is about the best we are probably going to do. It may not be perfect, But I'll take it over this pie in the sky fantasy of somehow full blown Socialism will make everybody want for nothing and all the wrongs of the world will be some distant memory of an eviler time.

Godmars2902308d ago (Edited 2308d ago )

@MegaKooter:
Yeah, all of the Chinese workers who "walked off" their jobs from the top of the Foxcom building, the US steel workers who outright lost their job to 3rd world manufacturing, and even many in the gaming industry that get laid off on a whim with little to no compensation, no real economic protections, would surely agree with you...

@madpuppy:
Think it need to be understood that the US is not an example of socialism and capitalism hybridization. There are just too many examples that it leans towards capitalist extremism, with that then threatening social extremism. Especially because the former is so bad and uncompromising.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2308d ago
Laskin2309d ago

Communists gonna communize...

Ogygian2309d ago

Perhaps he is worth more than those 800 people.

With a bad CEO, the whole company folds, meaning everyone gets laid off.

We shall see.

IMissJimRyan2309d ago

It's not that simple. You can make a company with the objective to grow and expand, trying to make the best for employers and customers. You see this kind of company in Japan and Europe. Even in US pre 80s we had that.

But Activision choose to be a money factory for shareholders. That's an option. And they hire CEOs to acomplish that.

Ogygian2309d ago

@locomorales

And they get their money from customers, who willingly fork over their cash for Activision-Blizzard products.

Anyway, I'm not defending Activision, and I don't like Kotick. I'm just attacking what seem to be rather ignorant praises of socialism and state-restricted markets (i.e. censorship and regulation) in this comments section.

IMissJimRyan2309d ago

In the end you're defending Activision and Kotick. =D

Godmars2902309d ago (Edited 2309d ago )

Not the whole company. Those responsible may not only get out of a folding company with golden parachutes, but further larger ones added to by the pensions and savings of the people they've put out of work.

Still can't get my head around the "business practice" of leverage buyouts where you buy a troubled company with its own value, make it so that it's value then becomes more than it's worth putting it in worse shape than it was before, then running off with the difference leaving everyone else screwed. That such practices have not only been made legal and common, but easier to do thanks to bought politicians and lawmakers.

Cobra9512308d ago

Being pro-fellow-man is not at all the same as socialism. I'm as conservative as it gets around here, and I think the balance is tipped way too far in favor of corporations. And no wonder, with a horrible Supreme Court decision like Citizens United, and corporations basically owning election finance.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2308d ago
Godmars2902309d ago

And he's as likely either done worse or been doing such for years.

Wait. That's not defending the A-hole, is it?

Well good. Screw him anyway.

Poopmist2309d ago

They probably realized that a lot of marketing guys were just unnecessary. Most marketing for videogames is done basically for free via youtubers, word of mouth, and reviews(except for possible bribes of course).

blacktiger2308d ago

it's not disgusting when democracy allows it,

harmny2308d ago

how do you think he is worth 7 billion? hiring people and giving away money?

Mulletino2308d ago

Umm ya if they were costing the company money. Let their talents shine elsewhere where they bring value. Enough with the envy. If you’re that concerned with other people’s money go out and gain some skills, work hard, make some of your own.

MegaKooter2308d ago

Those jobs weren't available anymore. They were esports and social media jobs.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2308d ago
lociefer2309d ago

That's some grade A punchable face right here

CanadianTurtle2308d ago

You'd have to get through his $1000/hour assassin body-guards first xD

2309d ago Replies(1)
XiNatsuDragnel2309d ago

We need this guy out of Activision

M3th2309d ago

i think you missed the bigger picture

AnotherProGamer2306d ago

you should look at a lot of the people that were fired, they weren't involved with the creation of the games. they were positions like social media analyst or e-sports planner

rainslacker2309d ago

GWU has no authority to call for such a thing. Even if EA was a union shop, it wouldn't have that authority. That is the responsibility of the Board of Directors, and if he continues to under perform, then it'll probably happen. Not because he layed off 800 workers, as that's just a result of their poor performance, and likely would have happened to trim the fat anyways, but because of the actual poor performance.

excaliburps2309d ago

Yep. Sad reality but true. If people want this guy out, don't support theirr games.

harmny2308d ago

if you dont support their games they go bankrupt and instead of 800 layoffs you have 8000 layoffs

Smokehouse2309d ago

The only sensible comment in the bunch. Do people really not understand why a CEO makes more than assembly line worker? How are people this ignorant? The havenots are worried about Koticks paycheck and bitch about what investors make compared to them? Okay what money did you put up to start Activision? What money would you owe if Activision went bankrupt? NOTHING LMAO. The pure stupidity of people is frustrating.

ChristopherJack2308d ago

Many executives are not liable or held accountable when their companies fold.

Smokehouse2308d ago

If the company folds the investors put a dumb person in charge and got what they deserved. That’s the risk. If lowly game devs want to share the risk then I say go for it. How many devs would work for free until the game is done and then get a salary based on how the game does? Not many I imagine. If the game is a hit you get a nice raise, if the game flops your pay gets cut in half. If your game gets canceled 2 years in you just worked for free and wasted time and money. Wow that sucks, welcome to the world of investment.

The thing is kotick is making Activision billions of dollars, 30m is peanuts compared the investment put into game development. I have zero love for Activision, I think they are a joke. The only thing I dislike more is the “Capitalism is the devil” types lol. Stupid people, economic illiterates.

If you are a game developer making 100k a year and you are bitching about how a CEO is making millions then you are probably an idiot. Not you personally but you in general.

deafdani2309d ago

The thing is, Activision Blizzard actually had their best year ever in 2018. So nope, the company performed amazing, and it's very likely that Bobby Kotick is now seen as more valuable than ever as CEO. Their reasoning was that, despite their amazing performance, there's a lot of unnecessary positions in the company that calls for a restructuration to arguably yield even better results in the future, so that's why they made the massive layoffs despite being healthier than ever. This is capitalism and corporate greed in a nutshell. Bobby Kotick ain't going anywhere yet.

Smokehouse2309d ago

Greed is some lowly peon with zero risk in the organization demanding their “fair share” of anything. If you don’t like corporations then don’t work for one, it’s that simple. Go get a state job sitting at a desk twiddling your thumbs for awesome benefits and pension. Don’t worry, the American tax payer will take on the debt of your worthless position.

rainslacker2308d ago

They've had a couple severe stock drops in the past couple years. That isn't something investors tend to like, as it gives less confidence that they'll maintain themselves. Otherwise, you're right, if they are still pulling numbers, then he'll probably be fine. The expectations they aren't meeting are the ones they themselves set up, which does affect the selling price of the stocks, but some fluctuations are always going to happen.

Xb1ps42308d ago

@smokehouse

It’s ignorant ppl like you that I can’t stand.... if it’s all about risk then let the damn over paid ceo risk his ass out of the leather chair and make the damn product him self.. oh he can’t now can he... has no damn clue just your typical key board stoker pencil pushing bullshit talker.

HIs position is just as worthless if everyone quit.. a campany can survive with out a ceo.... they won’t survive 24 hrs with no employees making the product, but if he can bullshit himself out of that mess then and only then would he be worth that much..

It’s a real shame how disgusting some ppl turn into when they hit that level of tax bracket, then feel like they don’t have to pay taxes either..

Smokehouse2308d ago (Edited 2308d ago )

Lmao@calling me ignorant with that dumbass dribble you just said.

CEOs are replaceable sure but not as easily as the employees you are talking about. If those 800 people that were fired had value then they wouldn’t be fired in the first place. If kotick tanks the numbers then he will be fired. Comparing some low level game dev to a CEO is laughable. You should be ashamed of how dumb you sound.

How are those employees going to work without a building, without funding and tools to do the job, without the INVESTMENT? You dummy. 100 percent of the risk is on the employer, that’s why they make more. Only a simpleton wouldn’t understand this.

Zenbaby3692308d ago

@Smokehouse Risk is a choice. Risk is not a requirement to earn your share. This CEO isn't risking anything more than his pocket change. You know what though? It is a risk to work for these companies. A risk that according to you, is worthy of more pay. They betting their future on that job, they're risking everything. Lets talk about relativity. Let's talk about how much more CEOs get paid now over the past 15 years as compared to the lack of rising wage of the "peons". I understand where you're coming from, and how you think CEOs aren't easily replaced, but really they are. Sure, sometimes they make the company lots of money, but who are you to say it isn't just luck in many situations? You really think the product, the game that is made by these "peons" isn't what makes money? It is. These 800 people that got fired didn't get fired did have value, otherwise they wouldn't have been hired. They were deemed less valuable than their pay? Sure. But I don't care how "good a ceo is" 30m just doesn't make sense. If a companies profits deem a raise for ceo, everyone should get a raise of equal % because EVERYONE contributed, right?

Smokehouse2308d ago (Edited 2308d ago )

The CEO is the one risking the investors money. I don’t care about the rest of your sob story about relativity. Without the initial investment there would be no game, there would be no job.

Also I didn’t say CEOs weren’t easy to replace, just that the 800 is much, much, much easier. If they are even getting replaced at all, maybe the position is dead. The CEO position isn’t dead lol. The guy before used that example, “well if everyone quit there would be no product!” But everyone didn’t quit, did they? 800 were fired for whatever reason. People don’t quit because they are easily replaced and nothing would change.

Xb1ps42308d ago (Edited 2308d ago )

What’s an investment with no peon skills to work in that building and make the product that is the true revenue resource...

Company had its best year.... all the tax breaks.... still pawn off 800 ppl to collect?! It’s not about fair share it’s about responsibility... when the market crashes let’s see who will be the first simpletons to jump out the top window.. this is not a start up company have some morals and responsibility do a better job on trying to find more revenue by being creative instead of taking the easy way and just firing ppl just so you can buy another multimillion dollar home that you spend a few weeks a yr in. All while us peons take care of the unemployment bill until the economy crashes..

This is bigger than a job title stupid... I’ll put money up you’re a trump turd 💩 maga!

Smokehouse2308d ago (Edited 2308d ago )

@xboxps1

Where are you getting this “no peons to work” shit from? How does 800 employees getting fired turn into Activision not having any employees or applicants? Or did you just say that because it’s the only way your logic works? I bet thousands are waiting to work at Activision.

When the market crashes lol. A lot of “what if’s” in your thought process and you are still wrong on all counts.

Xb1ps42308d ago (Edited 2308d ago )

I’m getting it from your ignorant ass rant on how the real work force are peons to you, and you still fail to see how ignorant that shit is?! Did you not read the title of this subject? I just hope they get enough ppl involved to show ppl like you how ignorant you are..

Oh.... acti... is actively looking to hire 800 ppl?! Please show me the link... I guess you are the only that can assume, must be your non peon job, right...

So you admit my logic works, it just doesn’t fit your agenda with your non peon job..

I guess only ceo’s Are allowed the what if’s.... must be a non peon job thing. nIce of you to glaze over the bigger pic. But hey that’s what ppl like you do until shit hits the fan..

All I know is I will not support this company just as I did att and all the other company’s that’s pull this shit when it’s not needed, will it do anything? Most likely not, I’m sure you wealthy ppl will continue on with your head up your ass..

Smokehouse2308d ago

Lol@you trying to put your dumbass logic on me. My rant about the work force being peons? Don’t push your stupid on me, I said you can’t compare a CEO to a low level developer. It’s not my fault you don’t have a basic understanding of corporate structure or economics lol.

Where did I say they were hiring 800 people? I said they could if they wanted to, if the positions still even exist.

“So you admit my logic works”
Yeah it works when you make shit up and theorize on stupid scenarios like Activisions entire work force quitting. What a moronic thing to say. Stay mad you dummy.

“You wealthy” hahaha I’m a peon like everybody else. I’m just not a f***ing moron demanding a CEO salary or demanding my fair share of something I don’t invest in. I get paid to do my job, keep pipe dreaming, moron.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2308d ago
neutralgamer19922308d ago

Rain

Sad thing is Activision still made billions in profits but it was enough zeros

They keep over estimating that's all. Last COD made 550 million this one 500 million in 72houes yet to investors that's a loss of 50 million while the reality is one game made half of billion in 72 hours

rainslacker2307d ago

The call for his removal, which holds no weight, is due to the layoffs. Investors don't necessarily view layoffs as a bad thing, as it means leaner operations, which means more profits, hence, better dividends.

Truth be told, the layoffs probably would have happened even if they didn't come up under expectations. That kind of thing is usually done in order to trim a bloated work force, and if they felt they weren't going to need those people to continue, layoffs make sense on a business level. Activision isn't anywhere on the verge of having to trim the bloat to stay alive, so this was done to maximize profits come next year, and it's the kind of thing that investors would probably expect to happen, instead of money being spent on people that company didn't need.

I know some people get upset about it, but its the way the business world works. It does suck for those people, and I do empathize with them, but GWU really has no place to call for him to be fired. Not only do they have no actual authority, Activision isn't a union shop. Its unknown how many of those being let go actually belong to the union, which is trying to make a name for itself amongst an industry that generally doesn't want to unionize, and realistically, this seems more like them trying to gain relevance on the back of others misfortune. To me though, they seem to have no clue how the industry or business works, or what the purpose of a union or it's representatives job is.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2307d ago
Show all comments (119)
70°

Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2 devs praise games like Space Marine 2 for "lowering the barrier"

Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun 2 developers discuss the huge success of Space Marine 2 and its effect on the series as a whole.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Jingsing1d 10h ago

How about an official level editor for Boltgun?

220°

Phil Spencer Teases 2026 As A "Really Special Year" For Xbox

2026 will mark the 25th anniversary of Xbox, and Phil Spencer has teased it as a "really special year" for the games division.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
TheEroica2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

You got downvotes by pathetic gamers for feeling hopeful about good games coming out next year. Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy? It is pretty neat to see people's world view blow up in front of them as they realize Microsoft has put themselves in a driver's seat that Sony hasn't been able to touch all generation.... What's even more pathetic is the same people downvoting you are the same people wishlisting Microsoft games on their ps5s 😂

P_Bomb1d 22h ago

“Imagine how small your brain must be to downvote someone excited for future gaming joy?”

My dude your post history shits on EVERYTHING. You never have a good thing to say about anything lol! 🤣

PanicMechanic1d 14h ago (Edited 1d 14h ago )

“Getting ready for those GaaS reveals! Sony is a shadow of themselves this gen.”

You literally said this a couple of days ago. Start applying the clown make up, you hypocritical jester

derek1d 22h ago

Yep we'll see, they have alot releasing next year.

RaidenBlack1d 19h ago

NGL, next year might be one of the best years in gaming ... starting off with RE9 and GTA VI ...
and then all the good games that's been cooking
Pragmata, Sands of Time, Saros, Gears E-Day, 007 First Light, Blood of Dawnwalker,
Mortal Shell II, Onimusha, Marvel1943: Rise of Hydra
current-gen only Infinity Ward's CoD, Duskbloods
+ My guess: Wolverine, Exodus, Mudang, Crimson Desert, Clockwork etc ...
~ seems like it might get too stacked

1Victor1d 17h ago

@rokos:”Hopefully “
I downvoted you not for been hopeful but because I have seen the same “NEXT YEAR WILL BE SPECIAL “ comment for the last 10+ and hasn’t seen anything special from Microsoft.
I hope next year will be the one that everyone been waiting for since the last 3 years of the Xbox 360, it have to be after over $80 billions spent on acquisitions.

Lightning771d 17h ago

So the new excuse is they don't count because it's from the ABK now huh. I guess all those 3rd party games count even less because they don't own them. According to your always crappy logic.

InUrFoxHole1d 8h ago

Lol. You haven't seen anything special? Do you even game?

OtterX2d ago

Always with the "next year..."! 😂

neutralgamer19922d ago

I don't know they have delivered this year and even last year. And they have a lot more content in the pipeline right now than anyone else. We can't just keep hating on MS

Indiana Jones
South of midnight
Avowed
Flight simulator
Hell Blade 2
Minecraft update
Gears of war reloaded
Indian Jones:expansion
Gears E day
Clockwork revolution
Fable
Doom the dark ages
The outer worlds 2
Grounded 2
Call of duty

OtterX2d ago

How many of those titles were just buyouts of companies that were going about making their games anyways? *Throws cash - "Oh look what we made!"

dveio2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

This list, that's been posted again, and again, and again in every single topic like this, contains almost nothing, literally almost nothing from Microsoft's own creational thoughtprocess.

It's a bunch of former 3rd party IPs.

Now even slowly returning to Playstation in some cases like Indiana, Hellblade, probably Starfield soon too, after they were made exclusively to Xbox on purpose.

Due to Microsoft's lack for own IP material except Halo & Forza. Which, the lack of, was the sole reason for all of it to happen in the first place anyway. Please don't pretend it wasn't.

And just look at all the games that come from Obsidian alone.

You really think Obsidian wasn't already working on Avowed and South of Midnight even without Microsoft buying Zenimax?

Microsoft delivered nothing but cheques.

OtterX2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@dveio THIS. Lol, this dude thinks Call of Duty wouldn't exist without Microsoft! smh 😂

neutralgamer19922d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Common narrative I see often — that Microsoft shouldn’t get credit for the games its studios release because they “just bought them.” But this viewpoint ignores key context and sets a double standard that other platform holders aren’t held to

No one is saying these games wouldn't exist at all without Microsoft. But let’s not pretend that having a trillion-dollar company backing a studio doesn’t make a massive difference. Obsidian never had AAA funding before the Xbox acquisition. Pillars of Eternity was crowdfunded, and their resources were always stretched thin. Now they’re working on Avowed, with proper support behind it.

Ninja Theory’s Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice was made by around 20 people, using borrowed equipment and doing mocap in a boardroom. It was a passion project held together by tape and willpower. Today, Hellblade II exists because they were given resources, time, and freedom — something many developers don’t get unless they’re owned by a company that believes in their vision.

ZeniMax (Bethesda’s parent company) was in real financial trouble before the Microsoft acquisition. Reports and insider accounts have pointed out how much they needed a cash infusion. And while some people want to write off Xbox’s ownership of Bethesda titles, they forget the alternative could have meant layoffs or even closures.

The same goes for Activision Blizzard. Would you really prefer the company to stay under Bobby Kotick, after all the documented workplace misconduct and toxic leadership issues? Say what you want about Microsoft, but their acquisition brought accountability and change to a company that desperately needed it.

At the same time, Xbox gets hated on for doing what every major company does. Sony bought Housemarque, Bluepoint, Insomniac — but no one says Spider-Man 2 “doesn’t count” because of that. Why does Xbox get treated differently for acquiring struggling or undervalued developers and giving them a chance to thrive?

And the idea that Xbox locks games away is outdated. They're pushing cross-platform releases, cloud gaming, Game Pass, and backward compatibility more than any other platform holder. They're not forcing all studios into live service. If anything, their upcoming lineup is less GAAS-heavy and more focused on narrative and creativity — Avowed, South of Midnight, Clockwork Revolution, Fable, Perfect Dark, Towerborne, and others show real variety.

Whether people like it or not, Xbox is now the biggest publisher in the industry and owns the most gaming IPs. But what matters more is how they treat their studios. Most of these teams were previously stuck making AA games with limited scope — now they’re getting the tools and support to aim higher.

So when people say “Microsoft didn’t make those games,” they’re missing the point. It’s not about who started the studio — it’s about who enabled them to do their best work. You don’t have to love Xbox to admit they’ve helped a lot of developers and are taking a player-first approach.

Instead of writing off everything they do, maybe try recognizing the good they’re doing for both devs and gamers. At the end of the day, we should want more studios to succeed — no matter who owns them

BeHunted2d ago

I'm surprised Clockwork Revolution (BioShock meets Dishonored) isn't getting more media attention. The game looks interesting and reminds me of the old RPG games.

anast2d ago

The only good game on that list is Flight sim. The rest are either average or will be average. It's not a good look for MS.

TheEroica2d ago

My god.... Look how many comments are upset about microsoft's successes... 😂 This may be my new favorite thread. Not one gamer saying thanks for all the goodness coming their way, just bitter anger and downvoting the very games they themselves will purchase throughout 2026.... Sony really worked you guys over this generation.... Condolences.

DivineHand1252d ago

@neutralgamer1992 You said what needed to be said.

I have heard for years from older gamers that fanboys are the biggest issue with any fanbase. They will defend or gloss over negative news as long as the correct logo is on the box and they bash the competing platform no matter how much good they are trying to bring.

Right now their advocacy for PlayStation is elevating that platform so high that Sony no longer believes they need to do anything to satisfy their loyal fanbase like they did in the PS4 days.

I just hope most of them will eventually start advocating for themselves and encourage others to do the same. No one should blindly support one platform because these companies do not care about anything other than profit.

neutralgamer19922d ago

Hunted

And first proper game done by the studio with proper AAA budget and saying it will be released when ready

Anast

I believe we went through this before that you are objectively wrong. Meta critic, user reviews, game sales. In Playstation top 10 best selling games were 5 from Microsoft studios

Otter

No this dude is saying so many other studios wouldn't be thriving without MS money and people would be getting abused physically and mentally with Bobby kotick and his side kicks

Also maybe look up how the original founder of Bethesda and zenimax was kicked out of his own company by his best friend lawyer. So that was always a shady place and had been struggling financially before MS paid a premium of almost 7 billion

Eroica

I use to be a die hard Playstation fan and now I only have a Pc. I see how these fans are so toxic. They just can't handle any positive news regarding Xbox. When the best selling games on playstation are Xbox titles. Look at Forza horizon being best seller and that's years old game by MS. I guess ms don't deserve credit for that success too since they are the only company in gaming making acquisitions

Forget the fact Sony paid 3.6 billion for bungie and MS 6.9 for zenimax. Which investment has turned out better

Destiny and marathon with a lot of controversy

While zenimax output is nothing short of amazing compared to what bungie has released

crazyCoconuts1d 23h ago

Yeah it's tricky. "Xbox" has morphed to mean different things to different people.
Console, now Windows, GamePass, and the cross platform games. There's a mix of attitudes towards all those things individually, and maybe an overarching attitude towards MS. But can't argue that the game companies MS recently bought continue to flourish, and GamePass PC has been a great value over the last year.

InUrFoxHole1d 8h ago

@OtterX
You're the dude mad at your exes new guy. She's with someone else... get over it.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 1d 8h ago
Lightning772d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They've had good output so far. So waiting for those games shouldn't be a problem.

Who cares if they're buy outs of companies or whatever excuse you want to make. They're games that are being distributed to other console. Play the games and enjoy it instead of fanboying or complaining.

ocelot072d ago

They going to be a he best and biggest publisher on Xbox, Playstation and PC next year. They not really said anything about Switch 2 though spite claiming to be big supporters.

quenomamen2d ago

If you call making one last Xbox before going full Sega, as Great. Then yea.

TheEroica2d ago

Doesn't feel like you're paying attention to what's happening.

RhinoGamer882d ago

It will be, his net work will hit 50 million and he plans to buy a new mansion in Cape Cod. Thanks everyone! #failup

Show all comments (39)
80°

The Witcher 3 Immerse Gamepack — Product Introduction with Marcin Przybyłowicz

Join Marcin Przybyłowicz, Expert Composer at CD PROJEKT RED and the mind behind The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt OST, as he sets up Immerse Gamepack on PC and dives into Geralt's adventures like never before — with spatial audio powered by Embody.

4d ago