890°

What's the one game you think people pretend to like the most?

This weekend's PCG Q&A is a spicy one, inspired by PC Gamer's Andy Kelly putting this out there on Twitter (before being disappointed by the answers, which is just Twitter all over, really). What's the one game you think people pretend to like the most?

ArchangelMike2335d ago

For me it's unfortunately Nier Automata. The hype was unreal about this game, it was supposed to be a masterpeice, a true gem of a game.

And then I played it. *sigh*

I really wanted to like that game, I really did. But I should have never played it. I should have just read the reviews and listened to all the hype, and been content with the idea of it being such a great game. But then I went and played it for myself.

Man, I don't think I've ever been so dissapointed by a game (not even No Man's Sky disappointed me this much). Apart from the combat, nearly everything about that game just screems bad game design. Maybe I've been spoilt by the likes of The Witcher 3, God of War, Fallout 4 - but Nier Automata simple did not do it for me. Don't get me wrong, a blindfolded cyborg ninja chick in a miniskirt is cool and all... but that was about it.

Snookies122335d ago

So... You never got far enough to understand what made it so highly praised. It's one a lot of people give up on early, because of various reasons. Yet it's a game that absolutely shines in its later moments. It went from being something I wasn't interested in, to being one of my favorite games of all time. (I also dislike that it's constantly just taken at face value "robot chick with skirt" type of mentality. When it's quite frankly so much more than that.)

TheOptimist2335d ago

I second the notion of not even knowing about the game to hungrily wanting all the predecessors to have a port on Steam.

ArchangelMike2335d ago

No I completed the first run through, got into the second and began to struggle with so many design flaws. My goodness, the writing is poor and ham fisted, the level design, the map, the side quests are extremely tedious for no real reason, the gameplay mechanis like the upgrade chips, the implementation of the 15second/30 second buffs, etc etc etc I could go on, but ther is so much that could have been implemented better. When you compare it to other open world games like Horizon Zero Dawn, or other games like Bloodbourne/Dark Souls, it's then you realise that it falls short of what it could truly have been.

2335d ago
Kados2335d ago

So it is Final Fantasy XIII-4? Sorry, but a game should not make the player suffer through monotony for hours before getting decent. If it isn't fun from the start, it isn't worth playing.

neutralgamer19922335d ago

No a game can't be a master piece if it requires long grind through to get to the great part

Zenbaby3692334d ago

Sometimes the struggle can be what makes a masterpiece so rewarding. Nothing wrong with a game that makes you grind, it just isn't everyones cup of tea.

Gaming1012334d ago

I bought Nier Automata after the rave reviews and I just don't get it. The graphics are from PS3/360 era, since the previous Nier was from 2010 this game got delayed so much you can tell the graphics are basically a 1080p 360 game with some extra polish, but that's not why people like this game. The combat and upgrades are all decent, not bad but not groundbreaking, it did its job. It's trying to be a bullet hell game and a hack and slash game at the same time, and some people like the novelty.
The side quests are everything we hate about side quests. Literally, you are everyone's errand girl/boy. AC Odyssey is the same fetch quest repetitive crap. Witcher 3 did sidequests better than any game ever, with fully fleshed stories that are better than the main stories in a lot of games, quite frankly.
The story in Nier is extremely Japanese, in that it's very weird. It was incomprehensible by the end. It was vague, or at least the ending I got was vague. The character motivations aren't clearly explained, especially A2, I couldn't figure out the true reasons as to why she did any of the things she did in the entire game. It was all a mess. The story tries to be philosophical, which will impress high school students but for those of us who have actually taken Philosophy in post secondary will see it as paper thin, too weird and trying too hard to be an allegory for religion and the meaning of life.

bouzebbal2334d ago

GTA... i really dont get what people like with this series.
it is overrated to the max.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
TheOptimist2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

The combat was probably the weakest element in the game apart from maybe side quests. Not because it was bad, but it felt like it lacked depth, but then again, it wasn't very shallow, just not something that comes close to say Devil May Cry or even Bayonetta. But it did have the breadth to cover up, it had hack n slash, twin stick shooting, text adventure elements that kept things fresh. And gameplay is not even its strong suit.

-Best OST of the gen easily
-Some of the best animations
-A story so twisted and beautiful, I remember almost every moment of it
-Really good set pieces for an RPG
-The themes and maturity

Then again, you say you have been spoilt by a game like Fallout 4 which itself isn't a paragon of game design. Kinda confusing there.

pietro12122334d ago

The combat is one the games highlights. It may bot has the depth if Platinum's other titles such as Bayonetta 1 and 2, but name an action rpg that plays as fast and fluid as Nier Automata?

Swiftfox2335d ago

I'll agree. Nier Automata is the "Emporer's new Clothes" of the generation. People think it's deep and meaningful when it's honestly very poorly executed. From the story to the characters to the premise to the combat, to the overused, overall theme: the game was below average. Just goes to show you just need a soundtrack, plot, and theme from most "adult" 90's anime and you have a hit. What a disappointment.

goldwyncq2335d ago

Nah, that would be Horizon Zero Dawn.

ArchangelMike2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

@Swftfox
This is exactly my sentiment. To top it off why is the game practically in black and white, with a splash of green here and there?

Livingthedream2334d ago

I think infamous second son and horizon zero dawn

MoshA2335d ago

I agree. I like the world, atmosphere, character designs and combat but the story telling felt amateurish. Also the graphics were pretty bad, a lot of washed out textures and I had some technical issues on PS4, i can only imagine the pc port. For some reason the game forces you to play it twice straight away aswell. That should have been an optional NG+.

DaDrunkenJester2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

You only beat it once? The reason it forces you into playing twice right away is because it tells the story from the other bots perspective. Then on the 3rd playthrough you continue the story and things get twisted. To experience everything the plot has to offer you need to play it 3 times. Then you'll understand why people say the plot and story telling are great.

bigmalky2334d ago

It's not the exact same game after the credits though. If you played it, you would know that.

tontontam02335d ago

You know what I think nier automata is one of the games people "intentionally try to hate" because of the praises it is getting.

goldwyncq2335d ago

It's easily the best Japanese game of this generation along with Bloodborne.

notachance2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

aren't the blindfolded ninja chick just for the first playthrough?
most people praising it probably went all the way until the true ending on the 5th playthrough (not that it's a repeating playthrough, 3-5 are continuation, 2nd is the first but from the view of another character)

Although one thing I would criticised from it is exactly that, shouldn't have broke down the stories to 5 playthrough because most people would just thought it's finished at the 1st one.

disclaimer: I only played 1,5 playthrough because someone borrowed it and have yet to return it to me until this day. Based from what I played it's.. normal? good-ish, but not as amazing as the reviews I read, wanted to go all the way until the 5th ending but first I need my copy back...

_FantasmA_2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

If you have to play a game 5 times for it to git good, then that is a fail. Shouldn't it be good on it's first playthrough? It's like a relationship "hey, I know it didn't work out before, but let's keep trying again and see if we can rekindle the magic on the 5th time." Sorry, but no. The demo was terrible. Shouldn't a demo get me hyped up enough to buy the game. I just don't see the hype. Plus this game goes on sale every other month it seems like, kinda life Destiny 2 and BF5.

bigmalky2334d ago

It's good from the start. It just builds to epic.

And it's not repeating the same game after the credits. Totally new perspective, character and combat style.

ginsunuva2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Just came here to say the same exact thing.

The Tomb Raider reboot is almost tied though.

MWH2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Same here. The first Nier although looks like a monkey's butt its story connected immediately and kept me going, Automata on the other hand didn't. I played a little further after you meet the twins in the alien ship when i finally lost interest.

I asked a friend who finished the game we both agreed that Automata's gameplay is good but he added that the story was not as good as the original, not even close. That was the end of it for me, unfortunately, because i was eagerly waiting for it and advising all my friends to play the original.

neutralgamer19922335d ago

For me it is the Witcher 3, I want to like the game but just can't can't explain

Everyone talks so highly about it so I am in the minority on this one

starchild2334d ago

At least you recognize you're the minority. We all have our own tastes. No game is going to appeal to everyone. For me The Witcher 3 is the best overall game experience I've ever had.

good_sk8er2335d ago

I loved Nier Automata, but then again I loved the first Nier, which didn't seem incredibly popular. Amazing soundtrack, great story, varied and enjoyable gameplay. I dont think it takes a while to get good, but it does seem to get better each time you beat it, but I was having a great time from the get go.

Again just because you dont like something doesn't mean people are pretending to, that's just silly.

DrumBeat2334d ago

Journey, or perhaps Flower.

GameStallion2334d ago

I thought journey was def overrated, but the art direction was gorgeous.

DrumBeat2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

Some people will say what you dislike about Nier is what made it charming. I completely agree... with you. An argument I often hear for this artsy-fartsy, weird-but-not-in-a-good-way game is the varied perspectives and gameplay; twin-stick, hack-slash, etc, but I find nothing about the game compelling in slightest... except for the soundtrack. It's quite good and really compliments the atmospheres. I can't consciously say anything else positive about this masterpiece/not a masterpiece.

sKiiTs82334d ago

completely disagree. the graphics weren't brilliant, but the story, soundtrack and world i thought were AMAZING

kevnb2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

Cant really see what you are talking about, its one of the best designed games of the last few years imo. If we want to talk about a poorly designed game, lets talk about fallout 4... an rpg with no interesting combat, no interesting dialog, no interesting story, terrible world building, and full of bugs.

l3w1s2334d ago

Saying Automata has "bad game design" and calling Witcher 3 anything close to a good game - oh my sides.

starchild2334d ago

Hardy hardy har you're such a gaming god. You know better than everybody else. I happen to think they are both great games. But what do I know, the gaming god has spoken.

pietro12122334d ago

Both games were great. Nier is probably one of the best jprgs to cone out this gen and Witcher 3 is one of the best wrpgs to come out this gen.

l3w1s2334d ago

@pietro1212

Calling Witcher an RPG - that's rich. That shit has no redeeming qualities, whether you look at it as a RPG or an action game. Poor story, ripped straight from the books, flanderization of character (I'm looking at you Ciri, what have they done to you!), poor combat. Enjoy what you want to enjoy, but please don't call W3 a good game. Because it isn't.

ChronoJoe2334d ago

Aside from the combat? The combat is most of the game.

rainslacker2334d ago

Are you pretending to like the game though?

Think the topic of the article is about what game get more people liking it, even though said people probably aren't liking it.

Seems like a dumb topic, since it's based on subjective things, but I suppose there are games out there that get said they're great, even though people are muddling through it, but for some reason, feel they have to pretend to be liking it for some reason. But people can do silly things for whatever reason.

GameStallion2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

Yeah, that game was MASSIVELY overrated. I played it and enjoyed my life less than when I wasn’t playing it.

nommers2334d ago

Disagreeing big time. I don’t know if there’s been another game to do this, but at the end of Automata

•spoilers•

the game goes beyond breaking the 4th wall to practically including the player into the story and in a way that makes sense with the story. It then coerces you in a very good way to even making the selfless decision to delete your save file so another player may live and get through the credit sequence. I know it’s probably not needed and other player data is probably around there on repeat, but it’s very convincing in the manner. Not saying everybody is going to delete their data because it’s such a large amount of work but it does it well enough that many people have. I’ve never experienced or heard of the bringing together of a gaming community this way or this well and having this done in a way that it verges on the brink of being CANON in the story. That is a monumental feat worthy of all the praise.

pietro12122334d ago

Have you played another title developed by Platinum? If you didn't that's mist likely why you get the appeal. Also a lit of the fans loved the concept behind Nier's world (myself included)

Segata2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

Sounds like you just didn't get it. Combat is great and the story is one of the best in gaming and a sequel to Nier & Nier is a successor to Drakengard series. Nier Automata is one of the best games this generation easily. Of course it's not very colorful. It's not supposed to be in a dreary setting. Nier series is posted end of the world. They are tragic tales. This is a world 10,000 years after civilization ended & the sun never sets. The world is off balance and most life is gone.

2334d ago
TheEroica2334d ago

I totally agree... Well said. Neir was trash. To those saying you need to play the game 30 times through to understand how good it is? Get bent. No game should have to be beaten 30 times before revealing itself as halfway decent.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
MeteorPanda2335d ago

zelda breath of the wild. that game was untouchable by negative press, every critism not praising it was shot down. it was dark times.

now ppl are like yeah...theres 4 mobs and weapons break.

Ausbo2335d ago

I agree 100%. I should’ve read this before posting my comment above

NecrumOddBoy2334d ago

10000% agree. I have expressed my concerns but the pitchforks came out hard. BOTW was 100% carried by the Zelda and Nintendo name alone. It would have failed if it was called anything other.

starchild2334d ago

I don't agree. It was a really well crafted game and I enjoyed it a lot.

I do recognize that it was somewhat overhyped, but that goes for most exclusives on all platforms. Exclusives tend to always get overrated and overhyped (anywhere from a little to a lot). The same quality game as a multiplat will generally not receive the same level of hype or ratings.

Sono4212335d ago

Exactly the game that came to mind for me too, the fact it has so many flaws and everyone overlooks them or downplays them still today boggles my mind. I am still confident that if the game simply had a different name and didn't have Zelda in the title, or Nintendo as the name on the product, it would have been slaughtered by reviews for the terrible design.

Kosic2335d ago

BOTW was a terrible, over hyped game. I got a copy on the Wii U and it was an impressive looking game, but for gameplay, we've seen it all before. The arguments people make to tell you how good it is, is rather a joke. "Check out those physics....!"

I love a good Zelda game, but that one I managed to force myself to complete the story, 16 hours in I just rushed too the finish line. I was almost at my peak and calling it quits.

DaDrunkenJester2335d ago

That's a shame. I put well over 100 hours into it and loved it all. I do wish they had more traditional dungeons though like the old games instead of the divine beasts.

MoshA2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Nah, unique art style, beautiful music, immersive sound design and physics based combat and puzzles. Bosses, quests etc.
It's probably hard for casuals to appreciate these things though.

Araragifeels 2335d ago

All Boss fight are trash especially Ganondorf fight which was so easy and boring. Weapon was horrible (Master Sword can be useless and the shield break easily) and is empty world. The only good thing about the game is the art style and fighting mechanic. I prefer playing Twilight Princess again than this

ClayRules20122335d ago

It has nice visuals. But “in my opinion” had it not had Zelda in the title of the game, I don’t believe it would’ve been praised like it has been. I played it with a friend who’s a big Zelda fan, and he didn’t like it, and believed the name alone is the reason why it’s gonna so much praise.

MoshA2335d ago

Twilight Princess will always be the least innovative Zelda game :) Im glad it will be forgotten.

notachance2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

I got bored playing it because the 4 beasts were just copy-pasted with different settings:
you meet champion's successor -> get into the beast with their help -> puzzle -> ganon boss
by the third beast I was like, enough of this man, let's just play anything else.

In fact, the "4 element" settings made me remember Brave Fencer Musashi on PS1 and how varied the journey was to get the 4 elements back then, going up the highest mountain, solving ancient zombie outbreak, travelling deep into illusion forest, going deep down into the bowels of the earth... compare that to the lazy ass copy-paste gameplay and story of BotW I honestly became sad seeing the press blinded by the Nintendo and Zelda logo.

bluefox7552335d ago

Par for the course with big ticket Nintendo games.

Zeldafan642334d ago

You just can't stand the fact that Breath of the Wild continues to sell.

MaxiPower902335d ago

i hated breath of the wild. weapons breaking is a killer.

3-4-52335d ago

I loved Botw. Truly a great game for what it tried to accomplish and what it did accomplish, but there are a few things that still bother me about the game.
Botw's Mistakes:

1.) Weapons breaking is stupid....it's annoying, it's tedious, and it makes you hesitate to want to have as much fun as you could for fear of having to go gather more useful weapons......good idea, poorly executed.

2.) The music.....or lack there of. Legend of Zelda always had really melodic and catchy/memorable music that was very pleasing to listen to and helped set the mood/mindset of the game. They removed that and with it they removed some of the charm.
The music in Legend of Zelda games is arguable my second favorite reason to play the games and they got rid of it. Such a dumb decision.

With the next game, they need to shrink the world by 20% but fill it with 20 more towns. Towns seemed to have been the only place with different and good music as well.

Oh yea....Bring back regular dungeons.

-Foxtrot2335d ago

Preach

People need to realise it's okay to criticize a main line Nintendo game and still like it, the mentality is you either f***** ADORE it, like you think it's amazing, sing praise, talk positively about it all the time and how it's perfect OR you think it's shit, awful, worst game ever and it's you "trolling". There is literally no middle ground at all, people think it's impossible to be anything but one or the other. If you say it's a decent game but list some issues or even just say "I like it as a game but it's very overrated" then you are pushed into the "you hate it, you're a troll, you think it's awful" circle. It's really unfair and it's done as a way to stop people thinking it's anything less then perfect by shooting them down.

Now you get journalists who will write articles criticize things about the game but they never once said that within their perfect glowing reviews, why not? We have seen journalists over the years nit pick things far smaller in other, smaller named games so it's not like they are beyond telling it like it is.

It was a good game, about a 7.5 at least but it did nothing revolutionary as people, journalists or even some arse licking developers go on about. Games like Witcher, Elder Scrolls, Dark Souls, Fallout, GTA, Horizon etc did some features better long before BotW, if this game came out in 2011 instead of Skyward Sword then I'd understand but 2017 was far too late.

People just see it as a main line Zelda game and think they HAVE to like it because of the reputation the franchise has gained. Even Skyward Sword was not that good for other reasons and people still couldn't be honest about that, I think the last good traditional Zelda game was Twilight Princess.

BotW did things worse then past Zelda games, they went backwards from story, memorable characters, a living breathing world full of life, monster variety, epic creative dungeons, massive unique boss fights, towns with their own styles and so on

The main things I liked about the game I can proudly state were the smaller things like turning water into ice and jumping on them as platforms, building things to fly, using a shield on a tall mountain slope, using a paraglider to glide around the map if you need to get down to ground level quickly, the fact the clouds have shadows on the ground that move etc. Little things which added charm to the game and set it's self apart from other open world games but the issue is these little things are not enough to go "I'm going to ignore the dozen or so faults because of this"

Hardiman2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

Yeah I was really let down by it! So much so I just finished it not that long ago. I've completed all main line Zeldas since the NES and BOTW and Skyward Sword were big letdowns compared to the Zeldas before them. Especially Ocarina, Wind Waker and The Twilight Princess and A Link to the Past!

I saw someone say above Twilight Princess was the least innovative Zelda but I'd throw that shade at Skyward Sword and BOTW. The last two just feel lacking compared to the ones before them and just because BOTW is the first Zelda to really embrace open world game design mechanics doesn't make it game changer because like you others have done it before and better! It's like watching the special features on The Girl with all the Gifts and seeing Glen Close and all the actors and producers fawning about how it's such an original idea for this kind of story but it's not because Naughty Dog and Sony did it first and told a much better story with The Last of Us!

starchild2334d ago

"People need to realise it's okay to criticize a main line Nintendo game and still like it, the mentality is you either f***** ADORE it, like you think it's amazing, sing praise, talk positively about it all the time and how it's perfect OR you think it's shit, awful, worst game ever and it's you "trolling"."

That goes for Sony exclusives too. It seems you guys love to dish out constant "criticism" about multiplats and PC, Nintendo or Xbox exclusives, but most of the time I've seen anyone criticize Sony exclusives to any real degree on this site they get downvoted and attacked.

It's very telling that all the most extreme fanboys commenting on this article are mentioning highly rated multiplats and exclusives on platforms other than on the PS4. It's just comical at this point.

I think Sony does a really fantastic job as a publisher and I love some of their games, but that doesn't mean that they are all perfect and
that other platforms' exclusives and multiplats are somehow the only ones that don't deserve their hype or high scores.

Relientk772335d ago

Agree man was BOTW overrated AF. I absolutely love Ocarina of Time, Wind Waker, and Twlight Princess like a milion times more.

Fraggle19872335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Absolutely agree. The mini dungeons were a real dissapointment. The Survivial elements like the breakable weapons shouldnt have been in the game etc. Story rubbish like all zeldas and the graphics were really poor, no AA, the grass; AHHH my eyes. Some performace issues to top it all off and you have a very overhyped game.

good_sk8er2335d ago

It definitely did things a little differently than previous entries, and I can see what a lot of people dont like, but I did feel like it held my interest and the mechanics were great. Slightly embarrassing, but BOTW is the only Zelda game I have ever beaten besides Link's Awakening DX on GBC.

DemoIishor2334d ago

I'm glad you said this. I am a fervent Zelda fan and was really excited to get this game after hearing the hype, but I stopped an hour in and never had even the slightest urge to go back.

Dixiedevil2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

It was the only Zelda game I never finished. It was just soooo boring and the continuous breaking weapons where irritating as hell. Put around 60-70 hours in and just stopped playing out of disinterest.

warriorcase2334d ago

"What's the one game you think people pretend to like the most?"
I thought this was a stupid question at first glance because who the hell pretends to like a game. I can see kids in school or wildly insecure people "liking" fortnite or something just to fit in but that's all I could think of as any regular adult would either just like something or not.

But, this answer made me think a bit more. I remember playing BOTW after seeing all the crazy praise it was getting among users and press. When I dove in I did like it but I definitely felt like I was wasn't seeing something they all did. It felt to me like a prototype for the next Zelda game with a bunch of new ideas and mechanics thrown in to gauge the feedback for a future title. I enjoyed my time with it but man was it not worth the praise so many made it out to be, like it was the next gaming revolution.

Zeldafan642334d ago

I have played Breath of the Wild for almost 900 hours. Tell me, have you EVER played a single game for that long?

EddieNX 2334d ago

It's easily one of the best games of recent times but these people are entitled to their opinion. Lots of people also appreciate it as an amazing game so swings and roundabouts.

There is so much to praise about this game but some people just don't get it and that's fine.

MeteorPanda2334d ago

yeah several, rune factory, every monster hunter entry...mmo's, on multiple characters, dragons dogma...

good for you loving the game but it doesnt hide how basic it is and how close it is to a tec demo

notachance2334d ago

monster hunter world: 1000 hours
dota2: 5500 hours
dota1: there's no counter but I'm sure it's close to 10,000 hours
bloodborne: 400 hours
ds3: 600ish hours perhaps, it's split between ps4 and pc

there's also FFXIV and a local hit called Ragnarok Online which goes beyond the above games, but you get the point.

Zeldafan642334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

Calling Breath of the Wild a tech demo just shows that you're salty that it's sales are higher than any of your precious sony exclusives. And on a smaller install base at that. Not to worry. The Switch will sell more than the ps4 eventually.

yoshatabi2334d ago

Lol. Your username. Obviously you're going to defend a shit game. And no one mentioned the sales or Sony.

yoshatabi2334d ago

My old roommate was fan boying about that game. He let me try it since I didn't have a switch. And I got bored incredibly fast. Such a boring game.

SuperSonic912334d ago

Oh yes. Those Dreamcast graphics and SOTC gameplay.
I remember Miyamoto saying to Aunoma after seeing SOTC on PS2 that the next Zelda game will be inspired by Fumito Ueda's masterpiece and the rest is history.

ocelot072334d ago

Agreed don't get me wrong I enjoyed it but it was no way near a 10/10 game. The review Jim Sterling gave was spot on 7/10 yet he was pretty much crucified for it.

+ Show (21) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
Leeroyw2335d ago

Life is Strange.
The dialogue felt so forced and tried too hard to sound 'cool'. Kids don't talk like that.
I played through and tried to live in that world but I just couldn't relate to the characters. Another game on Switch called Oxenfree was the same
Lauded by critics but I found the voice acting and script insufferable.
I confess I haven't played L. I. S. Part two but I don't want to spend more time with people I find annoying.

Sono4212335d ago

Wasn't the game that came to mind for me, but I very strongly agree. For a game focused entirely on dialog, the writing is absolutely terrible. I'm glad I got it for free with PS+ instead of paying for it, because I almost did because my buddy was bragging it up so much.

TekoIie2334d ago

Nah dude the writing Hella-high!

bluefox7552335d ago

I thought that game was just awful. I still don't understand the hype. The writing was atrocious, the characters were intolerable. It feels like it was made for 14 year old girls. Just don't get it.

SegaGamer2335d ago

I enjoyed the game, but I agree, the dialog was terrible. Definitely up there with the cringiest games I have ever played.

pcz2334d ago

the Monster hunter franchise is over rated.

uth112334d ago

i did like Life is Strange, but you are completely right about the cringey dialogue shaka brah!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
AnubisG2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

For me it's the Witcher 3. I tried, and tried and tried again but the world to me is bland, the combat is bad, the witcher himself is an unlikable character. The two things I liked is some of the sidequest stories and monster design.

Ausbo2335d ago

I respect this comment even though I disagree. Certain RPGs aren’t for everyone

WickedLester2335d ago

Agreed. Plus for me, The Witcher 3 was just too damn big! Usually playing a video game is an exercise in reduction. What I mean by that is, the more you accomplish in a game and put in your rearview mirror, the less of it you have in front of you to finish. The Witcher felt the complete opposite. It felt like the game got BIGGER, the more you completed. It was overwhelming.

DrumBeat2334d ago

Witcher 3 I GUESS you could say was overwhelming, but in a good way. Overwhelming in a bad way would be AC Odyssey.

jeremyj29132334d ago

I completely agree with this. I really wanted to love The Witcher 3 but the combat and magic didn't hold my attention and it got so overwhelming that playing it felt like going to work. I did love the story even though I only got about 15 to 20 hours in.

ArchangelMike2335d ago

@AnubisG

Quick question though, did you play andy of the previous Wither games - no tthat its required. But I loved the Witcher becasue I had played 1 & 2 (and read some of teh book) before playing Withcer 3. It was a direct sequel (Think Mass Effect 3 in relation ot ME1 & 2). So in this regard the story made sense in the context of the prequels.
Anyway, you cna probably tell that I love The Witcher 3, but alot of it's lore, characters and world building had been established in the 2 previous entries.

AnubisG2334d ago

This was the first Witcher game I played. The story wasn't that big of an issue for me as I liked some of the sidequest stories. It was more of what I said about it in my first post.

good_sk8er2335d ago

You know I have the exact same opinion on this the Witcher 3. I beat it, but can barely recall any of it except doing the same thing every battle.

I'm not saying it isn't a good game, but it definitely wasn't something I'd want to slog through again.

DrumBeat2334d ago

His stoic nature makes him an appealing character to me. So long.

Nacho_Z2334d ago

I thought the combat was mediocre and the world was about the same but everything else was absolutely superb, the storytelling was up there with the best that films and tv have to offer.

GameStallion2334d ago

It’s funny with this one, I’ve had two friends say they just couldn’t get into after trying it because it’s my favorite game of all time.

BadElf2334d ago

Interesting...havent heard someone call Geralt "unlikable" . Loved the man....what a legend.
Curious, what did you not like about him?

AnubisG2334d ago

Can't really put my finger on one thing. Just all around unsimpathetic for some reason. I think it didn't help that the best armor I was able to wear for a long time looked like a clowns outfit.

ChristopherJack2334d ago

I got Witcher 2 thinking it was something akin to TES or FO, I was greatly disappointed from the moment I touched it, left it alone for like a year and then, out of nowhere, decided to give it a second chance, I felt the same but I was bored so I pushed myself through for a few hours and by the time I hit Flotsam, kinda started liking it, kept pushing through and I started loving it, then completed it a second time.

Witcher 3 started off the same for me but I already KNEW it was gonna hook me and it didn't take long, by the time I battled the griffin I was already enjoying it and choices made during the Baron story made me quickly fall in love once more. Completed that a few times but only completed the DLC once. As much as I loved it though, fuck trying to 100% it- I did beat the first 2 maps but Skellige was too big and traveling was boring to bother.

DaGR8JIBRALTAR2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

That's definitely a game you feel like you're supposed to like. I agree I couldn't get into it either but Bloodborne , which released the same year, had/has me captivated.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
Ausbo2335d ago

I could be completely wrong, but I did not like Zelda breath of the wild. Put about 10-15 hrs into it and I couldn’t continue. I feel like that game is overrated and people pretend to enjoy it. Mario odyssey was way better

WickedLester2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Same. Maybe it's because I had just finished Herizon Zero Dawn but, by comparison Zelda BOTW's world felt empty, the story was weak and uninteresting to me, and the breakable weapons were beyond frustrating (why in hell would your bow break after using it?). Its not a bad game, but it's not the monumental 10/10 that so many sites gave it. In truth, it's a solid 8. Yes, there are a lot of firsts here for a zelda game, but certainly nothing ground-breaking that several other open world games didnt already do and better. I mean, I'm not going to sprout a boner just because Zelda can suddenly jump! (Ooooh, so innovative!)

septemberindecember2335d ago

*Link* has been able to jump since Links Awakening. Jumping mechanics isn’t why it was called innovative. You should try playing the series before saying they are just firsts for Zelda games.

Nintentional2335d ago

https://youtu.be/aVPXKdSEGN... Horizon doesn’t hold a candle to Breath of the Wild

WickedLester2335d ago

Well with a name like "Nintentional" I would expect your opinion to be nothing less.

Jaces2335d ago

I too, think Zero Dawn offered more from the story perspective and that the world just felt more alive and the enemy engagements were so intense and fun. There are aspects to BoTW that I loved, climbing mechanic, variety of weapons that can be used (not the breaking part, my GOD), challenge temples were very fun, and the exploring was rewarding but at times overwhelming because it was a little to MASSIVE for me. I think they need to pack more in to a smaller map. I hate that some developers think the bigger map size is for the better. It's really not guys. BoTW is overrated but I still enjoy it and am happy Nintendo took a different approach to change things up.

Hardiman2334d ago

Yeah playing through HZD and completing it right before I jumped into BOTW did BOTW no favors from my perspective. It really was Day and night but it wasn't just Horizon but the other Zeldas that made some of the devs decisions seem odd! Ocarina, Wind Waker and Twilight Princess were all great games as well as Zelda games but BOTW felt as if it was missing what those games had.

I was really shocked by how bare and repetitive the game was and how badly the weapons were handled. Wild Hunt did the weapons system so much better and I feel this would've benefited BOTW better then how easily they break in Nintendo's game.

TekoIie2334d ago

"why in hell would your bow break after using it?"

You think Bowstrings don't snap? What rock have you been living under to not have the common sense to think of that?

" mean, I'm not going to sprout a boner just because Zelda can suddenly jump!"

You know I honestly want to believe that you're not that stupid, but it comes across as though you're confusing Zelda with Link. Zelda doesn't jump in BotW... Because you don't play as her. You're clearly ignorant and just making things up.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
Sono4212335d ago

It's not just you, Mario odyssey is way better, every inch of Mario Odyssey's worlds is superbly well thought out, where as almost nothing in Breath of the Wild is thought out well at all, with such terrible design choices and nothing meaningful. Breath of the Wild tries to give the illusion of having a story, but doesn't, where as odyssey never even tries to fool you, it's all about the gameplay and it shows.

EddieNX 2334d ago

This is the least true thing I've ever read. BOTW open world is truly meticulously designed and well thought out. I dunno what you were doing or playing.

notachance2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

so true, playing odyssey was such a blast I finished it in a weekend, that concert at new donk city was just pure celebration of mario history.

I actually fell asleep at the third beast on BotW.. by the fourth beast I gave up completely. Utter horsesh*t copy-pasted sequence for all beasts.

DazaMc2335d ago

I put 150 hours in to mine, really loved it. The only thing i'd change is MORE story and more traditional style dungeons.

Zeldafan642334d ago

I have played Breath of the Wild for almost 900 hours.

BadElf2334d ago

Cant be "wrong" having an opinion on a game

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
Show all comments (371)
180°

Far Cry 4 Update 1.08 Adds 60 FPS Support For PS5

Ubisoft's latest Far Cry 4 update enables 60 FPS on PS5 after releasing an update earlier for Far Cry New Dawn with similar improvements.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
RaidenBlack37d ago

late but still a good move, oobi

InUrFoxHole36d ago

Seriously, it's great to see devs add things to older games.

OhReginald37d ago

Sony....you're really letting ubisoft out of all all companies to out class you??? Give us the bloondborne 60 fps patch....ffs

dantesparda37d ago

I second this (Bloodborne 60fps) plus damn, Ubisoft, you're doing great but now the last thing I want youi to do is mae Far Cry Primal 60fps and AC Unity

Profchaos36d ago

Everytime someone asks for a bloodborne patch it gets delayed 1 day.

ETA next century

I_am_Batman36d ago

They know it's gonna cost them sales of the inevitable Remake that'll probably come around the PS6 launch.

raWfodog37d ago

Good news for when, or If, I ever play it. It’s waaay down on my backlog list lol.

P_Bomb36d ago

I like these 60fps patches. Hoping they’ll do Ghost Recon Wildlands someday.

Yi-Long36d ago

Kudos to Ubisoft for once again going back to older titles and then offering a nice upgrade for free. I know the company gets a lot of criticism, in quite a few cases understandable and justified, but in this area of contintued post-launch support for their SP games, they deserve some credit.

Show all comments (15)
150°

Ubisoft Removes Nudity in Silent Far Cry 4 Update (New Info: Changes Reverted)

Update: Ubisoft has acknowledged that the Japanese version of the game, which includes regional censorship, was mistakenly released globally. The company says it has reverted these changes in the game's worldwide branch.

Ubisoft has quietly removed nudity from Far Cry 4 in a recent update, sparking speculation about Tencent’s growing influence on the publisher.

Read Full Story >>
powerupgaming.co.uk
CrimsonWing6961d ago

You can murder, mame, and viciously attack people, but anything that deals with showing a body in a natural state whether for titillation or narrative, is some truly terrible thing. We are so weird with our puritan thought process. Feed our bloodlust and fuel our enjoyment for entertainment of simulating acts of harm and murder, but god forbid you see digitized TnA. It will never make sense to me.

Rebel_Scum60d ago

tbh even if they did remove it, it doesnt matter. I dont even remember when there was nudity in the game. If it was there it was so inconsequential.

B5R60d ago

Agreed. It absolutely makes no sense

Also, even though Ubisoft reverted the changes that removed nudity, there's the bigger issue of developers being able to make large changes to the game you paid for whenever they want.

Kassanova0760d ago (Edited 60d ago )

Stellar Blade comes to mind. This is why buying physical is the way to go.

100°

Video Games Proud To Not Be For Everyone

Plenty of games have made a name for themselves as being proud of the fact they’re not to everyone’s taste over the years.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
thorstein124d ago

If you make something for everyone, you please no one.

mkis007123d ago

I mean I can do without nintendo games if given the choice. They are not nearly as mature rated as the average.

Yui_Suzumiya123d ago (Edited 123d ago )

Yeah but I use my Switch OLED primarily for anime booba style games (visual novels and JRPG's) and ultra violent FPS's. Far from kid friendly, lol

JohnBLZ123d ago

The problem with that line of though is that games have never been as much "for everyone" as in 2025.
The only thing that's not for everyone in gaming lately is the gatekeeping. Devs will try to appeal to as many people as they can, but if you dare have your own tastes and prefer something a bit more obscure, then you have "L takes" because at the moment, popular opinion equals right opinion.
So devs should simply own the fact they water down their games and go Hollywood to please everybody. Then indies will go back to being trendsetters that are different from AAAs, instead of being roguelike and gacha copycats.

123d ago
JohnBLZ123d ago

Okay, but "games I'm not meant to love" means I won't play them.
Games are for fun. They're their own art, it's a disservice to reduce them to interactive stories. You can focus on making your audience entertained on a positive way and still stand out.

jznrpg123d ago

No game is for everyone. Some games are more mainstream or casual friendly but there is always someone who won’t like it. Same with anything else