780°

EA Appears to Mock Battlefield V ‘Genderfield’ Community Complaints Through the Game’s Launch Party

An image from the game’s launch event in Sweden has surfaced on Reddit which shows various negative quotes from the community about the inclusion of female characters in the game, and it appears that EA is trying to use the negativity around Battlefield V as a marketing tool.

Gardenia2335d ago

We as gamers have to let the developers and publishers know we don't take that bs trend of SJW, LGBT and feminism forced into games. I don't have a problem playing Lara in Tomb Raider because that's how it should be. But a WW2 game were there are just as much women and black man as white, does not make sense. And that has nothing to do with discrimination or racism.

CDbiggen2335d ago

Tfw when you play and enjoy a ton of games as actual strong, not forced, female protagonists and still get labeled a misogynist incel when you merely suggest this may be pandering.

UncertainCategory2335d ago

But it’s a WW2 game that set out to tell lesser known ‘War stories.’ Women and black men did fight in WW2, not as much, but it verifiably happened. With that in mind it does make sense..

What’s the problem with having one of the four War Stories with a female protagonist?

Or are you upset that they put a character creator in the online mode and let people choose their gender and race?

pinkcrocodile752335d ago

Totally agree with the Feminism and SJW argument from both the left and right sides of politics. That includes religion.

As with comedy, there is nothing that you cannot make fun of and that includes, anyone who believes in things that are not real (religion / schizophrenics), feminists, SJW of both the left and right of politics.

However I have a BIG problem with the women in WWII fighting on the front line. If this is the new norm, we should make a movie about the suffragettes staring Samuel L Jackson.

Lynda McCartney will be spinning in her hemp-weave death basket.

CyberRekkr2334d ago

I agree!, I like accuracy in historical games.

Aither2334d ago

ProLogY, the Battlefield V game didn't tell about the women who were in the Russian sniper squad, nor the French Resistance fighters. What it did was literally rewrite history regarding a squad of Norwegian commandos replacing it instead with a story about a girl and her mother. So, if you had said that BFV takes historical events that actually happened and molested them to fit a SJW BS narrative, you would've been more accurate.

BadElf2334d ago

Exactly.

ANd whats wrong with having a sexual, cleavage showing, badass woman...all in one?

frostypants2334d ago

I personally don't care. It's not like BFV is remotely historically accurate otherwise. It has real gameplay issues which are the actual problem.

salmonade2334d ago

Aloy is a female fighting warrior battling robotic dinosaurs and no one cared that she was female because it didn't matter. Female, or male, the story made sense. As you said, you can't FORCE diversity in games, it has to come across naturally and it has to make sense. I don't give a crap that Ellie from the Last Of Us is a Lesbian because it was her character all along from the first game. But when companies like EA try to make a female be a battle-hardened American soldier or whatever fighting in historic WW2, thats just cheesy bullcrap. I hate EA, they just have no clue about anything. They're all boardrooms and management. Creative control is stifled or influenced by suits, and it's so bloody obvious.

kreate2334d ago

If the women were hotter or showed some boobs, I would totally play it.

81BX2334d ago

Oh stop your crying. You kids are out of control.

Eonjay2334d ago

Battlefield is not historically accurate from the jump. It is fantasy. People claiming historical inaccuracy don't like to admit that. If you are upset about inclusion, you are going to have to admit that even if we excluded everyone, the game still wouldn't be historically accurate.

Amphille2334d ago

You absolute muppet. Its not ment to be used in history lessons. Did you cry a lot when the Hellriegel gun was in Battlefield 1. That gun never saw the frontline either.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
Cyfyxtfg2335d ago

i would mock them too, gamers are so entitled its crazy. i understand your community supports you and your game but its their art to portray however they feel. whats the issue with my daughter being able to play as a woman in battlefield. if you care about accuracy, go play a ww2 sim game. not a mass appeal EA shooter. people always take things too far. EA is usualy wrong but not about this.

jmac532335d ago

Totally agree. I'm just glad the toxic little simpletons aren't playing the game because they probably wouldn't even be playing the objective anyways.

pinkcrocodile752335d ago

@jmac53 Toxic? What on earth are you on about? Are you assuming all males who play Battlefield V are HIV+?

That's despicable if that's the case. If however you are suggesting that being a man is toxic, then I will insist you provide evidence and by evidence I mean actual provable facts and not things like

"My best friends, ski instructors, down-syndrome mechanics, favourite bookshop manager (whose a woman) was r@ped by a man in VR so therefore we live in a r@pe culture"

I'd love to know!

KillZallthebeast2334d ago

You're right we only buy their games for 60$ so we should let them jerk us around

2pacalypsenow2334d ago

@jmac53

I think it’s the other way around because no one plays the objective or does their job. Everyone plays like it’s tdm.

kreate2334d ago

Yup. Developers should totally cram their social/political views in their games and portray it as art.

Gamers are so entitled it's crazy!

They told gamers either accept it, or don't buy it! So gamers didn't buy.

Gamers didn't get to enjoy the type of game they were hoping for, and the developers didn't make money.

I guess it works out?

81BX2334d ago

No! This game is 100% accurate. From respawns to everyone being a killing machine. We don't need no stinking girls /s

2334d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
SharnOfTheDEAD2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

When you think your fiction is somehow more interesting than historic fact you deserve egg on your face. The Telemark mission is a fucking insult to the Norwegian and British Soldiers that fought and died there. Portraying the Special Boat Service is dishonourable criminals is crazy...

Launching your game and holding back content to then pretend it's a free dlc for your loyal gamers is idiotic. Developing a WW2 game and not feature any of the major iconic battles or weapons is insane. Releasing 2 maps in 5 months is poor, even a practice range wasn't ready for launch. The Premium pass actually offered more value and content. Making Bombers so powerful that can take out your tanks right at the start of the game, genius. Making the Medic Class useless, iconic.

This game is poor. It should have been better, having a woman on the front cover is a far cry from the actual issues this joke of a game has. People can go ahead and defend it all they want, but why settle for mediocrity?

2334d ago
Aither2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

N4GSINCEBEGINNING, it's called rewriting history. Ever heard of that?

Surely someone as educated and woke as you should've known about a certain group who once rewrote history to claim themselves to be a master race. You may have heard of them, they were called Nazis.

Activemessiah2335d ago

That grave they keep digging for themselves is getting deeper...

sander97022335d ago

They actually didn't learn a thing, Jesus Christ they are deep into their bubble world...

SierraGuy2334d ago

They're so stupid I'll never buy anything EA anymore.

Talk about adding fuel to the fire.

Goldenhawk5212334d ago

5 EA executives downvoted your comment

Majinzo2334d ago

I stopped back in 2011 after what they did to fifa. They are greedy and evil!

2334d ago
TekoIie2334d ago

It's not quite that bad. It's more like they're trying to smother their own child after they hear it saying a naughty word. Battlefield will die if they keep this up and in case they havent noticed EA tends to be very trigger happy when it comes to shutting down studios when they begin to have sales problems.

If they lose their biggest franchise what does DICE have left? Battlefront maybe? But if that struggles like the last then what? Bye bye DICE. And no one will care because they've had this self righteous attitude. If DICE wants to pretend they're fighting this sort of non existent battle then let them. No one will be there when they really need help.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2334d ago
bluefox7552335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Yeah, attack your customers. Worked out great last time, eh? I haven't bought an EA product in a long time, and I intend to keep it that way.

sampsonon2335d ago

you don't get it, they don't want you as a customer. they are ok with 10% of the community not buying the game. same for me, this way i don't have to mute you A- hoolees all the time when I'm playing

isa_scout2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Physical sales are WAY down, a 63% overall decline to be precise. That's far more than 10%. EA is in the business of making money, they've never been at the forefront of social issues. The ONLY reason they joined in fighting social issues is to endear themselves to a wider base(the female audience). In the process they forgot about their target demographic;young men and teenagers who wanted a game about a war that was fought predominantly by young men and teenagers. No one really complained about COD WW2 when it had black female nazis because Activision didn't make a big deal about it. EA made the mistake of marketing the game as historically accurate while at the same time heavily featuring a white female amputee British soldier in its trailers, and then calling out their fanbase when we collectively said,"Wait, what?". The devs don't even really know what BF5 is.

sampsonon2335d ago

@isa_scout: there are no official numbers released. so please stop and wait until the NPD is released. didn't need to read the rest of the garbage you typed.

"63% overall decline to be precise" show me real proof please. not just some junk article with an agenda. waiting....

senorfartcushion2335d ago

@isa_scout

Sales are down? No shi*t, this year has been packed and every AAA game on 4k consoles are services rather than complete experiences. How many multiple-year-spanning first person shooters do you think people want to play during their day?

It has nothing to do with anti-sjw virgins, it's to do with the amount of competition.

2334d ago
2334d ago
Aither2334d ago

SenorFartCushion, using the good 'ol AAA excuse. Sorry to burst your bubble, but this is not some unknown game being released against heavy hitters. Battlefield is a AAA franchise and your reasoning is not a good excuse for it's bad sales numbers. EA is sinking, and DICE becoming a woke subsidiary of the company is just an anchor that is helping to pull it under.

JLynn9432334d ago

Amen. Fewer obnoxious people works for me.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
FunAndGun2335d ago

You are not a customer, so why should they care?

Hungryalpaca2335d ago

The point is to get more customers not push potential ones away

2pacalypsenow2334d ago

And that’s why you’re not running a company...

SierraGuy2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

If they wanted to release a game more open to females fine...but why force it to be WW2 era...just stupid.

And weird.

Gh05t2334d ago

You say that like battlefield doesn't have a "V" after it. Like this is the first game they ever made. Not a customer... Full of crap I bet most of us have purchased their games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2334d ago
Smokehouse2335d ago

It’s just like Hollywood, they will make that one movie you want to see so they can fund all of their agendized garbage you don’t want to see.

Eonjay2334d ago

That sounds like a conspiracy. I assure you they make movies to make money for the sake of making money.

Smokehouse2334d ago

It’s not a conspiracy. Hollywood is heavily political and heavily subsidized by the federal government.

Eonjay2334d ago

If you haven't bought a product from them in a long time, then you quite literally aren't a customer and you can't be under attack. I am saying that you aren't a victim. That's a good thing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2334d ago
annoyedgamer2335d ago

Honestly why are people only now angry with EA? They have been anti-consumer for YEARS. This is nothing new. If you are shocked by EAs behavior you have only yourself to blame. Especially the "bros" who won't stop buying Madden and FIFA, EA's bottom line.

sampsonon2335d ago

adding women to a game in anti consumer?lol

GROW THE F up already. stop acting like entitled brats. the world owes you nothing. buy the game or not, it doesn't matter to the majority of people that just wants to sit back and play a game.

garos822335d ago

it was never about them adding a woman to the game you pathetic cretin.

Keep regurgitating the garbage mass media tells you.

Im glad this crap game didnt sell well, maybe companies will start learning once their bottom lines are hit

Bobafret2335d ago

Maybe some, like myself, find it unsettling to hear a woman groan, grunt, and writhe in agony when I get shot. Not to mention the outright lies they are telling in the single player stories.

ziggurcat2335d ago

@garos:

"it was never about them adding a woman to the game..."

it has always been about that, actually.

annoyedgamer2335d ago

EA thanks you for believing their deflection.

2334d ago
2pacalypsenow2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

No one cares that they added women, it’s the facts that they made it the main selling point of a WW2 game, the cover art is an female soldier... I mean why not make a WNBA game and put a male coach in the cover?

Imalwaysright2334d ago

2pacalypsenow

"the cover art is an female soldier"

And? Guys like you, to me sound like the whiny oversensitive sjws that get offended at everything because to them is all about feelings and the facts be damned. Portraying women in a WW2 game is historically accurate which is what people like you claim to be their banner so what's your problem with the cover art?

Rachel_Alucard2334d ago

"Adding women is anti consumer"

You could not create a bigger strawman then that statement. No wonder EA and the media feed it to you guys as ammo so much.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
senorfartcushion2335d ago

The water has come to a boil and a large portion of consumers are now old/woke enough to understand that they're being milked.

Also: an EA Exec may as well be the President of The US/Prime Minister of The UK, now; the world has naturally grown to be anti-establishment.

2334d ago
Eonjay2334d ago

Because the new wave is claiming victimhood if you are a straight white male. The legitimate stuff is basically ignored. EA is an evil company but not for what this article claims. Surely if people fight for uncensored "fake" child porn in games we can accept blacks/women everything else. What we can't accept is games being replaced with gambling and services.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2334d ago
stefd752335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Sorry but why is having women on the battlefield not historical accuracy, i know for a fact that there were some women fighting on the front lines during WW2, or am i missing something ?

william_cade2335d ago

I think it was the prosthetic and cricket bat. I suppose no woman lost an arm during the war or played cricket.

Really, it just came from people feeling like they have been forced to do shit their whole lives and EA is a great target because they are scumbags.

Parasyte2335d ago

The thing about her prosthetic arm is, it was actually a period accurate design.

william_cade2335d ago

@Parastyle but did they play cricket? XD

sampsonon2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

it a fact that they had prosthetic like that at that time. holy F, why are people so stupid?

ziggurcat2335d ago

@william:

you mean the same kind of prosthetic arm like this one from the 1940's: https://c.slashgear.com/wp-... ?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2335d ago
ZaWarudo2335d ago

Bandwagon and outrage culture. People forget that it's just a damn video game and still plays like any other Battlefield...

senorfartcushion2335d ago

Isn't whinging about women being in an unrealistic ww2 game just people adding to that outage culture?

isa_scout2335d ago

WRONG. Have you even played a Battlefield game before Battlefield 1? Battlefield 4 has almost nothing in common with this game. Take out all the social justice stuff and its still a bland less than average title. They had over 2 and half years to make Battlefield 4 and 1 year to make Battlefield 5. If you don't/can't see the clearly apparent lack of quality then you didn't play a lot of Battlefield before this generation.

PapaBop2335d ago

Potentially.. but it's EA and screw EA because they sure want to screw me.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2335d ago
Fishy Fingers2335d ago

Honestly I think we’re at the point that some people just need something to throw their toys around over.

Genuinely has anyone ever heard someone behave so dramatically over something so trivial in real life as many do online?

AspiringProGenji2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Has anyone ever seen a company insulting its consumers? That alone gives consumers the right to backlash.

monkey6022335d ago

I usually roll my eyes and laugh but I've seen some absolutely crazy stuff in the news this week in regards "Bans" and "Offensive material"

In terms of Battlefield I haven't played the campaign stories so I don't know what they're like but I really can't see a problem with women and other minorities being usable in an online game, be it accurate or not. Some people just want to play as somone they can relate to

rainslacker2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

"Genuinely has anyone ever heard someone behave so dramatically over something so trivial in real life"

Yes. But when I was younger I worked in retail, and managed a pizza place. Forget to put pepperoni on a pizza and people act like you killed their cat, because little Timmy has soccer practice and they don't have time to wait for a replacement....so, how will little Timmy eat.....and offering a free pizza next time and a refund is not enough, you have to come out and resuscitate their cat, paint their house, and marry their daughter to make her a respectable woman out of her, to make it right. Although, they'll still call corporate and complain there too.

The attitudes of expressing what you want vehemently isn't new. But in real life its spread out over a large number of people, so you don't see it as often. Online though, people come to vent, and in this case, let a company know they don't like its product. So, its all concentrated in one place. But as consumers, are we not right to express what it is we don't like about a product, and say that we are not happy and won't buy it, and it may affect future purchases?

JLynn9432334d ago

If people don't have something to whine about, they aren't happy. Of course it's trivial, but you'd think some of them have had heart attacks over character skins.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2334d ago
elazz2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Well then have it accurate in ratio or in the right Frontline. This game is just disrespectful to the people that fought during the second world War because they stated a year before release that rhey were going for the most realistic Battlefield game yet.

But they have complete disregard of the factions during the war. There were 10000s of soviet women fighting but nothing in the game about that. There were barely or I believe none fighting at the fron in Rotterdam yet we see many British females. That's incorrect beside the fact that there was also Dutch resistance and other factions involved. Also Dutch people barely spoke English at the time so don't release a trailer where they do. Also Rotterdam looked like a playhouse full of color which was not the case. It was grey, black, destroyed etc. Then there is the whole bionic equipment fiasco. Its communication that EA did wrong and then they blamed the fans, some who bought every iteration since 1942. Don't alter history or push an agenda and if you do, well, be honest and don't brand it as the most realistic Battlefield experience.

If the game was about a fake world War 2 and character creations then don't built expectations to the core group but also expect for sales to drop and some backlash. They should have given it another name or a subtitle.

I'll be frank although inclusion is what they try to achieve I find the game disrespectful towards the truth of that Era of mankind. It's disrespectful to women, men, countries, flags.

Technically it's a good game but their message was all over the place. I won't buy this. If you want to have inclusion in a game look at Horizon. Nothing shoehorned yet by playing you probably come accros every ethnicity in the world although they have grouped themselevs completely different in the future past. And aloy is an amazing character.

sampsonon2335d ago

they never said BF WAS A SIMULATOR. stfu already and take that energy and put it to good use somewhere where it can actually help someone in the real world. it's just a F-ing game.

FunAndGun2335d ago

Relax, it's not a war sim buddy. disrespectful?...really? My eye roll is not strong enough for your inability to distinguish a video game from real life.

Weeblordbad2335d ago

A female German sniper is just about as disrespectful as playing and having fun in a game portraying one of the bloodiest conflicts in human history. The audacity to believe, oh NOW, NOW it's disrespectful to those who fought is so funny it's ridiculous.

Maybe some of you guys should head to a memorial, have a moment of silence, leave a wreath and perhaps research one of the names of the fallen? Oh who am I kidding!? You guys are so worked up about respect, I'm sure you do that all the time!

Sirk7x2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

I could argue, based on that logic, that it's disrespectful to have fun playing any WW2 game, because millions of people lost their lives and they'd find it insulting that you're laughing and making a game of it. I won't be buying the game, because 1 sucked and I'd rather not give EA money, but people not buying SOLEY for the female character thing need to find better things to focus their thoughts on. It's pretty ridiculous. If historical accuracy is important to them, they should stay away from Battlefield in general.
Also, more women are gaming nowadays, and they tend to like playing as female characters, so expect more of it.

2334d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
AspiringProGenji2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

Their poor choice of words and excuses did more harm than the fact BFV is having women in the game, and proved people were right about them shoving “diversity” into this game

Goes to show once more than consumers are right to hate and expose stupid delicions while the media and the pro Corporate morons insult them and defend companies

rainslacker2335d ago

I've stated elsewhere, and I'm really starting to believe that its how these companies handle the community that is their real problem. While I don't like when companies remain silent to issues, they don't even try to PR it up anymore to ease the tension. Instead of addressing the issue, it seems more like they're letting people handle the PR who seem to get frustrated, and make comments before they've had time to think about it. Usually on Twitter, or sometimes Reddit.

You don't attack your customers know matter how annoying they are. Call out an individual if you feel it prudent, but make sure its framed in a way that is specific to that individual. This mentality of attacking the customer since all this SJW came up is hurting companies. Adding in agenda driven nonsense isn't as bad for them, because people tend to just let it go once they vent...especially in the bigger picture. But people will focus in and attack back once you put them on the defensive by implying they're racist, sexist, unreasonable, or whatever.

I mentioned in another article that Activision does a lot of this crap as well...although usually not as politically agenda driven, and even Ubisoft on occassion(although they're better at keeping context within the scope of the game), and while they get some talk about it, people forget about it because if they address it, they don't make it personal, or insulting....although Activision has had a moment or two over the years.

FunAndGun2335d ago

nope, just male insecurities running amok.

Bobafret2335d ago (Edited 2335d ago )

You mean not being a little beta with daddy issues? Then that's me.

2334d ago
Inzo2334d ago

Lol, you and your penis envy.

2335d ago Replies(5)
senorfartcushion2335d ago

Plus, people seem to be talking about the MP i.e. the part that isn't historically accurate.

Just look at the amount of automatic rifles/ machine guns in BF1 lol

one2thr2335d ago

And none of the characters died nor lived long enough to get gangrene from a severe case of trench foot, shame on EA.

2335d ago
garos822335d ago

you are missing a few loose screws.

The game is such far cry from historical accuracy it is not even a joke. That wouldnt be a problem at all had they not declared they are trying to be accurate

Inzo2335d ago

You are missing something. It is a fact that British women werent allowed on the front line. It is also a fact that little girl twho blew up a German boat were in fact actually done by men who gave their lives to finish their mission. EA and Dice are evil.

2334d ago
Chaos-Dad2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

No there was no Woman in the German / American / France or UK Army... just watch History Channel

Imalwaysright2334d ago (Edited 2334d ago )

The disagrees that you got say everything about this whole "controversy". Very much like the sjws that I despise, the people that are on a crusade against DICE and their game don't care about FACTS. As you said women fought in WW2 and I'll add: died, were injured, tortured and after the war was over some of them had to live with the emotional scars and demons that an event like that can cause in a human being. I don't like EA but kudos to them for sticking to their guns and celebrating the men and women that gave everything they got to give all of us a better future.

tigertron2334d ago

Britain never used women on the front lines, especially ones with bionic arms.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 2334d ago
Show all comments (242)
80°

I Don’t Understand ‘Blue Prince’

Shaz from Pixel Swish: "I had some thoughts (and a lot of questions) on the recently released puzzle roguelike, ‘Blue Prince,’ developed by Dogubomb and published by Raw Fury."

Read Full Story >>
pixel-swish.com
Knushwood Butt19h ago

Me neither. Deleted it. Robocop is clearly more my level.

lukasmain14h ago

It's pretty damn good. I'm about 16 hours into it. Lots of secrets and mysteries. I'm on day 14 I think. Still haven't beaten it. Gotten very close a few times. Unlocked many secrets already. Instead of writing down things, I usually take pictures with my Playstation and write on them using the editor, its very fast. There is a small element of luck, but mostly it's about learning and planning and solving puzzles that are bigger than the one room you're in or the item you're looking at. There are so many secrets that some players will never know unless you put in the time and learn and pay attention. It's an eerie and mysterious puzzle game. I think it's addicting and a lot of fun. 9/10

kpgs7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

I just got to day 4. First 2 days I started going into it blind, and just trying to remember by memory but got overwhelmed pretty quickly. Got a handy dandy notebook and my notes will definitely help in the long run.

Been enjoying it so far, but with Oblivion dropping and me stupidly picking it up, might take a hit to my playtime on Blue Prince.

I like that critical thinking and puzzle solving go hand in hand, and you're not having your hand held the whole time.

jznrpg8h ago

No game is for everyone. We all have different tastes, some have broader taste some have more specific taste and it’s ok either way. Play what you like!

Christopher7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

***The problem is, the game tells you absolutely nothing about what you’re actually supposed to do.***

Getting to room 46 itself is a puzzle and the whole game tells you to solve puzzles.

***But how do you know if something in a room actually has meaning?***

It's a puzzle game. It's not just going to hand you the answer. I guess this is the point where we get to people who want an NPC to tell them how to solve the part of a puzzle and the people who truly want to figure out the puzzle for themselves.

This makes me feel like some gamers are becoming more like my nephews, they're not solving problems, they're just looking for youtube videos of people who have solved them and following what they did.

P.S. Please don't write another first paragraph like the one in this again. It really sets a tone that you don't know what you're doing.

80°

Ubisoft Is Up to Its Old Web3 Tricks Again With Might & Magic Fates

Ubisoft has announced Might & Magic Fates, a blockchain-infused free-to-play card game that's launching on mobile devices at some point in the future.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
490°

Xbox Game Pass downgraded from killer app to ‘just another option’

Xbox boss Phil Spencer suggest Xbox Game Pass is no longer as important to the business as it once was.

8d ago
8d ago
XiNatsuDragnel8d ago

I am not surprised imo because it felt like that for awhile.

S2Killinit6d ago

Truth is that it was always sort of a lie. You were getting a couple of “day one” per year but they had trained people to think they were going to get all games day one.

GhostScholar6d ago

That is just false. It was never even eluded to that any games other than first party would be day one. Also it’s only April and we’ve already got more than “a couple” day one games.

TheEroica6d ago

What a misinformed comment... As bad a take as I've read in a while.

InUrFoxHole6d ago

Cmon guy. You really believed all games were coming day one when they've always said 1st party only?

S2Killinit6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

They did it really carefully, i didnt say they ever said “all games are day one” but they created an impression like that was the case. For instance nowhere did people actually see a list of day one games in articles or from MS’s mouth, but they kept saying “all first party” as if the number of day one games was something amazing. Truth is that they were getting a couple of games per year max on average. (Not sure what its like now)

@GhostScholar
Again, not sure what you got this year. But honestly is it even remotely worth it? Also, they get “day ones” on PSPlus as well, just not first party, and they are not paying $20/month for it.

FinalFantasyFanatic6d ago

It's not like they could do any differently, it takes a lot of money to keep the Gamepass monster fed, to put the majority of games on there day one is just going to drain too much money. They may have considered it at one point to try and kill off Playstation/Nintendo, but it's not a viable long-term strategy.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
Fishy Fingers8d ago

That's an interesting way to interpret it I suppose.

7d ago
Show all comments (62)