Forbes: Fallout 76 is one of the worst-reviewed major releases in recent memory. Can it, and should it be saved?
Fallout 76 has seen many changes over the years but the veterans agree there is one addition that was a real game-changer.
Missing a lootable item was part of the game. Random and chance helped make Fallout so much fun and interesting. This just makes it lazy and disconnected to the simulated events. An interesting feature, but Where are all these veterans that agree so hard?
Fallout 76 players have seen a rise in issues plaguing the servers with the main issue being the "post player join failed" error.
Just put in a different fallout. I hope they turn this into a single player game after their done milking people
GB: "After its disastrous launch all those years ago, many players are rediscovering Fallout 76 and how much it's improved."
As an online focused game I can imagine it'll get better... meanwhile it should have been cancelled rather than released in this piss poor state.
wrong question. the real question is if bethesda can be saved. i say no, they already passed the point of no return with the abysmal fallout 4. corporate greed took another one. there is no turning back from that.
If they can find a way to patch in the fun, I say go for it
The dice has been thrown. Historically, game reviewers have never given a second look at a game after their review, and have never changed the scores given to games. Why should they do so now ? Just because it's Bethesda ? If they do start doing this, they had better start doing it for others as well, or else it's going to look like favours being exchanged.
No