Screen Rant writers, "Battlefield V is an incredibly well-made showcase of what modern large-scale shooters can be, and it elevates the series above the competition."
Fantastic! Looking forward to playing this.
I'll catch you on the battlefield fella, I cannot wait either, I have always loved this series and have been gagging for a return to WW2 for a while. It looks like DICE delivered on their vision and the game strikes a nice balance between authenticity and gameplay, this is going to be great!
I’ll check on it again in 6 months when microstransactions are fully implemented. Gotta see if female cyborgs are still in the game. Got a feeling they’ve got an awful bag of tricks they are waiting to unleash until everyone has bought the game then it’s too late, no refunds.
I agree that battlefield v is the best shooter this year. I also like and play a lot of cod b.o 4 and I like it a lot but I definitely think bf v is a lot better in a lot of ways.
I was gagging to jump back in ww2 aswell but this BF5 ain't the ww2 I wanted to Jump back into
@Skull521: you sir are a loser. grow up.
Yes @skull, they’re waiting an extra 6 months before they start unleashing cyber robot fembots to destroy your fun in any videogame going forward. Make sure to check under your bed each night so not to have a surprise visit from incels and any other crazy sjw narratives you’ve got hiding under there in the meantime.
Agreed. Day 1. Was hoping for their take on BR right away, but other than that, totally stoked.
Its better this way. let them work on it more and BR later on will extend our BF5 gaming
Game as a service....I will wait till the beta phase is over to try it.
It's a full fledge multiplayer game as is but the campaign is like a tutorial for it. Don't expect much. But with what's coming on top of that, pretty impressive. It's not a beta in any way given how polished it is.
So you are saying I shouldn't pick it up for the campaign, oh well.
Have you played it? What makes you say it’s a beta? I’ve been playing it all week and it feels like a full blown BF game to me. I’m curious to hear what you have to say from personal experience with the game.
"What's interesting with Battlefield V as a product is how clearly designed for the long-term it is. A War Story displayed in the menu isn't available yet, for example, and the game's Combined Arms co-op mode isn't even releasing until March. That's also when players will be able to play the Firestorm battle royale mode. In between now and then, other features are coming as well, from another map to a Firing Range practice area. These additional features and content packs are delivered as part of Battlefield V's Tides of War, a totally free live service which aims to keep players invested through continuously evolving and growing the game. It's here where more rewards and challenges will be added to the experience as well. " Most of the game is not being released at launch. This is a game as a service and is unfinished, I call this a beta phase...or if it makes you feel better its an early access game...sorry
I think people are skeptical of the free DLC rollout and that battle royal isnt even ready till atleast spring 19'. Seems like they released an unfinished game, but the reviews are good and it sounds like yall like it i guess
COD fan reads title, but not article -- makes angry comment anyway.
more like "women haters have mommy issues and cannot get over them"
Better pull those pants up sampsonon, your beta male is showing
Sampsonon, you may want to work on articulating your thoughts a little more clearly. I am not sure what mark you are trying to hit with your wavering arrow.
@TheOtherMoon: oh? you didn't hear? the game has women with cyborg arms. the hatred of women in the comment section in regards to this game = men having mommy issues. or haven't you been paying attention?
Well up against the half a game COD put out that's a pretty easy victory, but good for them nonetheless.
This has just as little content.
So no docking for neutering the gunplay, the map design, the single player campaign, the basic missing features at launch? 9/10 is almost perfect and it is a glaring fact this game has some serious issues in those regards. Paid for review or just a completely dishonest one
Neutering gunplay in what way?This is the best gunplay in BF to date.
Not even close
well I don't get what you're playing. Map design is great imo, single player is great imo, basic missing features like what? When a game is giving all dlc free but cosmetics, it's not a fair complaint. BFV intends to only profit off the initial sale and MT of people who decide they want it to buy extras. The best review is one that takes into account what you're getting overall. You're getting everything now and all future content. New Single player missions over time and new maps etc. The player maybe actually enjoys the game that much. Based on the version I played like Sept. The game was great and I spent hours on it.
How can the singleplayer be great? It’s one man army sneak around AI who can’t hear or see you. The AI is worse than AI from the 90s dude.
It blows my mind that nobody complained about Black Ops4 not having a campaign having not as many maps (i don't ever remember the number) with a lot of them being old maps... and getting praised from most sites. While this game actually has a campaign and also has 8 maps of high quality as it seems(only time will really tell) free DLC with most probably tons of new content and improovements. Improved its gameplay over the last Battlefield in almost any way posible... Still people critisize any positive impression or review and act as if there is a coonspiracy.
I criticized BO4 the same way.
I can't be the only one completely burned out on multiplayer shooters.
Last one I played was Battlefield One, that's the secret buddy, don't burn yourself out on shooters, although, it is tough if it's a genre you love I suppose.
I've been playing and it's really good, dont understand all the hate for the game. I get the hate for EA but battlefield 5 is good.
I still can't decide on whether to bite the bullet and buy the deluxe version or not.
What's different with delux version
If only DICE weren't such assholes lately. I can't deny it though. Been playing just yesterday at a friends and its really really good.
It wasnt Dice it was soderlund and he left already
I don't think its fair just to label DICE. I imagine a lot of the staff working on the game don't share the opinions of a few higher up in the wage structure. We all know wherever EA are there will always be a muppet speaking on their behalf, unfortunately that always brings innocent people down with them. Play the game, not the politics.
Sadly dice has shown their hand several times and confirmed they are to blame just as much as ea
At some point, the workers under the idiots higher ups pay the consequences. That's just reality and no reason to deny the reality of the situation. The best thing for those people, is for the idiot higher ups to be called out on their crap at the earliest time possible, because that's the lower employees best chance and employment survival. Not when everyone pretends its ok, so it gets worse, until it reaches a head, and it all blows up. In the end, bs can't continue, and won't, so, unfortunately, life isn't perfect, and innocent people get fired. But if people hold others to account earlier, it's less likely to blow up.
Its EA honestly, DICE just gets the blame because of them.
I bet polygon, vox, and kotoku will give it a 11 out of 10. For reasons we all know....
And how is that any worse than people ragging on the game for the very same reasons?
Those ragging have a legitimate gripe, the SJW's don't. You see, EA didn't need to bow to the psycho SJW's and in the process alienate its fans. Since they did, a response should be expected. To lay blame, you have to know where the ball started bouncing. Higher fake review points due to unnecessary and insane alterations of a WW2 FPS game is basically the definition of pandering to the lowest common denominator. There is no legitimate reason for SJW's to complain if the SJW things weren't included in a WW2 FPS game. Thus EA created this 'outrage' because they are legitimately stupid. Millions of people will still play their game, including those that hate the SJW crap in it. But not as many as would otherwise. They also won't quite enjoy it as much as they would have otherwise, which then may affect sales of the next iteration of the series. These things aren't one-off events, but go together with past screwups/successes that will help raise or drive a series into the ground. Eventually, people have enough and just move on. It's not like people don't have backlogs of dozens or hundreds of games to play. We're in a saturated market, the alternatives to gamers is boundless. This is just another screwup to add to the list. Of course, if somehow technical problems or savegame problems or online connectivity problems hit on launch day, all this will multiply against each other. EA better pray it doesn't.
It has a SP campaign so I'm definitely buying.
whatever happened to everyone hating ea for ruining this or that and microtransactioning everything?? now they're back in your good graces?🙄... this is why developers and publishers tend to ignore gamers complaints...cause they know they will buy the games anyway.... i won't be buying this game, not because of any microtransactions it might have but for the lack of a good long solo campaign....however, i may check it out down the road once it's added to ea access.
Ikr? Maybe it's because "ma wahmen" and "dem reprezentation" are in this game, they suddenly forgive EA lol
i don't know what you mean by ma wahmen or reprezentation.... i just know that there are a slew of people hating ea for adding this or taking out that. ruining madden, star wars, and hating on anthem a year before release, now that there is a new battlefield out that looks good everyone doesn't seem to care what they did before. 🙄
Personally I've never been on the hate EA train, I just simply don't purchase the games that ruffle the wrong feathers or engage with mt's. But I'm just pointing out, Battlefield has never been about the campaign. BF1942 all the way to 2142 had zero SP beyond bot matches. Bad Company 1 to Hardline had proper campaigns but even with those campaigns spending full price on BF4 at launch specifically for SP was a bad move. It's an MP game, the SP might as well not be there.
...hence why i said i wouldn't be buying this new one....it doesn't have to be strictly multiplayer. the last battlefield game i played through (the modern one, i think it was 4) had a very decent campaign, the only downside was that it was rather short for my tastes but it was well done nonetheless....I don't consider hardline part of the battlefield narrative since it has nothing to do with those games or any war for that matter. it's more of a spinoff or side story. regardless, i enjoyed that campaign a great deal and hope there's a sequel for it at some point.... neither of those games did i jump into multiplayer since i don't care for it. i rate games based on their solo campaigns if they have any....if ea decides to omit a solo campaign from their games then they easily cut down their revenue since there are a lot of people that don't care for multiplayer gaming....games like overwatch, and black ops 4 i won't even consider, not even on sale because i know they have no campaigns.
I've mostly played bf on pc but it's out of date and thinking of getting this for xboxone x. Think this is good on console? I had no problem gmaing with controllers and I loved halo so I'm curous.
u guys know BR mode wont be available at launch right ? They adding that in later.
Hahahaha a near perfect score from SJW central Screen Rant. This game could be crap and sites like SR, Polygon and Kotaku are going to give it scores like this simply because of its sjw propaganda.
I can totally look past all the "controversy" because I play this game for the fun Battlefield mechanics. See you guys on the battlefield.
cant decide if i should get it on xbox one x or pc. Kinda hate using origin on pc
This review is an illegally posted paid advertisement disguised as a legitimate review …… No where does this state it is sponsored content nor does this review discus micro-transactions, bugs, glitches …. Meaning this article does nothing but promote a game while omitting details and facts about the game to put it in a more favorable light in an attempt to boost sales. LOCK THEM UP !!!!!
You guys ain’t played a lot of shooters then. This is a very average and painfully buggy experience that doesn’t even stick to its theme properly.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.