1120°

Sony Patents Gaming Controller With a Touchscreen Display, Check Out the Image Explaining the Tech

PS5 controller might have a touchscreen? Sony files patent for gaming controller at the USPTO. There's an image as part of the patent explaining the tech too.

Skull5212409d ago (Edited 2409d ago )

Ugh, the touchpad on the DS4 is pretty worthless except for being an extra button, not the direction I would take the controller in. I would just replace that touchpad with a few extra buttons. Sounds like a good way to turn the controllers battery life into complete s***, not to mention an undoubtedly higher controller cost.

Dreamcatcher452408d ago

I think the only thing it is good for is bringing up maps in open world games.

jagermaster6192408d ago

Totally agree, on paper it sounds like it could be cool but the PS4 controller battery life sucked so these will most likely have way worse.

Snappy2408d ago

Guessing you haven’t played Astrobot then

kneon2408d ago

As long as they aren't going for the latest and greatest high PPI resolution, HDR screen then the cost is rather insignificant, just a few dollars for the quantities they would be buying.

As for uses, I can think of plenty. The obvious one is dynamic controls that change depending on context. You could also implement the Pip Boy UI on the controller for Fallout.

bouzebbal2408d ago

Nothing worthless more than an xbox fanboy talking shit about the competitor...

1nsomniac2408d ago

It works great as a separate button for the map but also worked great in The Witcher and very few others where swiping it up,down,left or right brought up a different menu each.

DarXyde2408d ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't you a fervent Xbox One supporter since it was announced?

If so, I'm not sure you're the best judge of directions a company should take.

Either way, it's just a patent. Sony does this a lot; they file patents often, but the follow-through is somewhat spotty. If anything, they would probably rather integrate smartphone interactivity than have it baked into the controller.

Segata2408d ago

It's not the Touchpad. It's the Selectangle. All it was good for.

FinalFantasyFanatic2408d ago

As cool as the touch pad is, hardly anything uses it, I have seen some cool uses, but the majority of the time it's just a glorified big button.

gamer78042408d ago

this sounds a bit different, more like a touchscreen similar to a smartphone, it could work if done well, but yeah it could increase the cost of their controllers. I agree that the current touchpad is not very useful, some games its annoying.

SwampthingsSon2408d ago

No idea why you have disagrees. The touch pad is very under utilized.

blazin82408d ago

look at the disagrees you're getting. the touchpad is pretty much worthless. there have always been complaints about the battery. what would adding a full on touchscreen serve

LiamKreptic2408d ago

It’s a patent...may never see the light of day, but keep complaining!

nitus102408d ago

WOW! How many games have you played on the PS4?

Sure the touchpad on the DS4 can be used as a single button but many games or at least the games I play the touchpad can double as two buttons and in addition, it also acts as (gasp) a touchpad with swipes implementing certain actions or gestures.

In addition, the DS4 has a six-axis detector as well as an inbuilt speaker and the ability to connect a stereo headset and speaker which allows one to uses voice commands (implemented from the release of the first PS4).

As for the battery. You are correct the battery does not have the capacity the DS3 had. However, you can replace the DS4 battery with a better one for only a few dollars. See YouTube for a How To.

GTgamer2408d ago

How is extra buttons worthless 🤔 it's not Sony fault that third party devs didn't find allot to do with it but I love it in open world games hell I still hit in RDR2 thinking it gets me to the map.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 2408d ago
DevilHunterDante2408d ago

Are you the guy who only says interesting on this website?

-volt-2408d ago

Sony copying yet another idea.

roadkillers2408d ago

Lets say they are copying it, why would it work? They copied the WII with the PS3's motion controller. That failed and they got rid of it. Uncharted 2 scrapped it within the game and Warhawk was the only good game that pulled it off.

In my opinion, Sony and other high profile console devs should put more focus on VR. It sounds crazy now, but I think that is the next huge step forward in hardware. If we can get rid of the wires and have a VR treadmill that actually worked at under $1000 starting price, that's the future.

Why?
1. Excersize will bring positive media towards games. It happened with the Wii, every media outlet was handing out free publicity and praising the Wii. In actuality, it honestly wasn't much for a workout.

China is currently in the process of regulating video games. No one under 18 can play for more than 2 hours a day (more strict for younger ages). Now China's still communist, but I believe that if you can get excersize from a video game that the positives will outweigh the negatives. Plus that's 1+ billion market.

2) More realistic if pulled off correctly. We all talk about how emersive a game is.

3) Draw of watching someone else play. I purchased a Vive with Beat Saber, everyonr of my friends wanted to play after watching me. Picture someone legit jumping to reach the ledge in Uncharted 5.

Now, something like this would cost 6,000 if compared to other like-wise products, which do not work well. Make it under $1000 with support and they will sell like hotcakes.

2408d ago
fr0sty2408d ago

@roadkillers +Motorstorm, Wipeout (just about any other racing or flying game that used it as well), flOw, flOwer, just to name a few others that also made good use of the motion control.

cooperdnizzle2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

Roadkillers. Man the whole comment was the worst thing I think I’ve ever read on here. Worst comment ever! Your name fits! You are killing things.

telekineticmantis2408d ago

With how much Nintendo has copied, it's only fair, the Dreamcast had an interactive screen in their controller also

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2408d ago
thejigisup2409d ago

More like... livin la 'vita' Loca...

zahdab2409d ago (Edited 2409d ago )

More like wii u (they hii shii) ing it up

CobraKai2409d ago

The WiiU deserves the credit.

RizBiz2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

The Vita launched a whole year before the Wii U, you wankers.

deafdani2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

@RizBiz: are u serious? This is for a controller with a screen for a console. This mirrors the Wii U, not the Vita.

If you want to include handhelds on the discussion, then the DS says hello... that thing came out in 2005.

thejigisup2406d ago

And just to confirm can you use the day with the Wii or Wii u? I know my Vita could control my PS3 and 4.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2406d ago
Kribwalker2409d ago (Edited 2409d ago )

the battery life on the PS4 controller is so terrible with just the light on it. Imagine a full on touch screen lol

Looking at the patent picture, it looks an awful lot like there is planned cloud processing

nucky642409d ago

yea, but i can't believe sony doesn't address the battery issue when doing ps5. and btw - is that light on the ps4 controller the most worthless thing or what?

Ricegum2408d ago

Krib

Can always count on you to put a negative on this. Do you even have a PS4?

Speaking of controllers, do your Xbox controllers still use external batteries?

Clark882408d ago

Coming from a ps4 hater so typical

Kribwalker2408d ago

@unreal

i’ve posted multiple times that i have a ps4, haven’t turned it on since God Of War, but i do.

I use rechargeable batteries in my elite controller. I’ll get 15-20hrs out of a single charge and there’s always a set of batteries waiting. And if the batteries stop holding a charge (haven’t had that yet this gen with them) i could toss them out and get new ones. Unlike the built in battery on the ps4 controller

@Clark
lol, is the ps4 controller battery life bad or not?.......

gangsta_red2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

Considering the actual article makes mention of PS4's horrible battery life, where's the lie?

@unreal

"Speaking of controllers, do your Xbox controllers still use external batteries?"

Mine does, I got some rechargeable batteries for them and they last for a long time. Wish Sony's controllers would give me that option instead of what they offered.

one2thr2408d ago

Its not the light that drain the battery, its literally the touch pad, its always on/active when the control is on.

andibandit2408d ago

@Unreal actually I wouldn't mind external batteries since both my DS4(from 2013) both run out of juice after 4-5 hours. What were they thinking with 1000mAh batteries???, seriously you can get 2800mAh AA batteries now.

SpaceRanger2408d ago

I know right. They should stop innovating with new battery and touchscreen technology and go back to adding batteries to controllers! /s

CoinOrc2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

I have never had a problem with the battery life. I just recharge it when it gets down to one bar, which takes quite a while. As for the touch screen, I can see a lot potential uses for it, but just because they filed a patent doesn’t mean they will follow through. Companies do this all the time. As for not turning on your PS4 since god of war, I haven’t turn on my Xbox One since quantum break.

BehindTheRows2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

Yet, I’m sure you take no issue with having to buy a charge cable (or batteries) for your Xbox One controllers (a 2013 device with a very outdated concept even then). Spare the artificial concern.

OT: Take the current idea and expand. The current touchpad, while under utilized, was a nice touch on the DS4.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 2408d ago
rainslacker2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

Yeah, but I doubt this controller will work very far from the base unit. So it's more like WiiU'ing it up....assuming the 2nd screen can display the actual game on that screen, which I think is probably a waste of money to put into a controller since it's likely to be rather tiny. If its more like the Dreamcast VMU, then that'd be OK. That thing was pretty cool for the 3-4 games which used it.

bluebenjamin2408d ago

Dreamcast was ahead of its time and many freaking ways Sega needs to come back and fix gaming

DarXyde2408d ago

Oh boy.

Just so you know, Nintendo's recent console ideas are similar to Sony's patents and ideas preceding them.

Sony demoed their intentions for PS Move with PS2 before Wii was even a thing and Wii U/Switch are basically remote play made standard.

It's disingenuous to suggest Sony copied Nintendo here; it is perhaps more accurate to say Sony had the idea first, Nintendo acted on the ideas and, in light of its success, Sony followed through in creating their own version(s) of things.

I do, however, believe Sony copied Nintendo's touch screen implementation.

Team_Litt2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

So his comment is not wrong then? Because he never suggested Nintendo never copies from Sony, I'm not sure where you got that idea.

Kinda went off on a tangent about eye toy there too.

deafdani2408d ago

Nintendo also demoed Wii Remotes during the gamecube era. Look it up. This notion that Nintendo copied Sony's experiment with the PS wand during PS2 days is false.

Take a look:

https://nintendoeverything....

DarXyde2408d ago

Deafdani,

1. Did you really just provide a link to Nintendo Everything to prove your point?

2. This article was written less than a month ago.

So I'm able to provide you with this....

https://www.gamasutra.com/v...

... outlining that demonstrations were given prior to the PS2 LAUNCH, and published in 2006.

I think my notion still holds true.

SuperSonic912408d ago

The Dreamcast had a controller with a screen, boi.

wonderfulmonkeyman2407d ago

Not even close to being the same thing as modern examples, BOI.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2406d ago
hench072409d ago

Looks like Sony is going for gimmicks next gen, interesting to see if the fanbase eats it up or laughs at it like they did the Wii U.

MasterCornholio2409d ago (Edited 2409d ago )

They will still release plenty of quality games though. So while the controller might have a screen, the console itself will still be supported with plenty of core games.

As for what Sony is going for next gen i would say games, games and more games. Just like this gen.

Sorry about that.

wonderfulmonkeyman2408d ago

The Wii U had plenty of core games too; the controller was still hated, as was the system itself.
If someone hated the Wii U's controller for having a big screen, it will be hypocritical of them to like it when Sony does it.

MasterCornholio2408d ago

@Wonder

The problem here is that the DualShock will always be the default controller. If Sony does produce a Wii U like controller it will be optional just like PSVR is. Which wasn’t the case with the Wii U’s gamepad.

DarXyde2408d ago

I actually enjoyed the games on Wii U. But yeah, the gamepad was not perfect. I hated the way it felt.

blazin82408d ago

how far up sony's ass can you be? what good are the games if your controller turns out to be trash. I shouldn't have to buy 3rd party peripherals just to enjoy my games.

MasterCornholio2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

@Blazin

The PS5 won’t have a garbage controller. So the games will still be great on that system. It’s not like Sony is going to make a Wii U controller the default controller for the system. They will probably just evolve the DS5 even further.

Also there’s no need for the personal attack.

wonderfulmonkeyman2407d ago (Edited 2407d ago )

You say that, but Sony made a pretty big push to sell all those motion controllers when the PSVR came around, "optional" or not.

It's not outside the realm of possibility for Sony to pull a Wii U, and make this the default controller, if they go for it.

Of course, this is all moot until something crops up proving that they'll even use the patent, but at the same time, there's nothing stopping Sony from doing so if they think they can get away with it.

And judging from some of the comments here, I think they might be able to get away with it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2407d ago
rainslacker2408d ago

Eh, the touchpad was worthless, but Sony didn't spend an inordinate amount of time making it a main focal point of their PS4 marketing, so whatever. I could actually see more practical use for the touchscreen, but I feel it's probably just more of an expense than really necessary, especially if it doesn't receive enough support like the touchscreen did.

If it's like the Dreamcast VMU, then that'd be alright I suppose, but I'd rather have longer battery life, than the ability to carry around my expensive controller on it just to play mini-games. Think if Sony wanted to go that route, they should just allow people to use their phones. In any case, touchscreens would be bright light on the front of the controller, and I can see that as distracting. On the backside of the controller, I never notice the lights, and also found them pointless outside of where you needed the light for the camera to see it.

Thundercat772408d ago

You don't even know what this is. You should eat your garbage.

wonderfulmonkeyman2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

If [and that's a BIG IF] it even happens and this patent gets used, they'll eat it up, because it's Sony.
Doesn't matter if they hated it when the Wii U did it; they'll use some excuse to say it's amazing on a Sony console.
I expect some sort of Vita reference as one of the many excuses.

bouzebbal2408d ago

in the meantime, i am laughing at your comment..

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2407d ago
ILostMyMind2409d ago

Is the joystick on that image? Because i didn't see It.

pcz2408d ago (Edited 2408d ago )

It must have been difficult getting a patent for a replica of a wiiu controller. They probably just moved the start button 1 millimetre to the left

Asuka2409d ago (Edited 2409d ago )

No thank you. Just look at the Wii U. Hell just look at the touchpad on the DS4. hardly utilized, and whenever it is used its just a gimmick or is nothing more than a remapping of existing buttons/functions. Focus on battery life please.

Eonjay2408d ago

I am thinking more on the lines of the Dreamcast VMU. Not the Wii U. Why would they go that route. They wouldn't unless it was a Switch like add on.

Segata2408d ago

Wii U sold better than Dreamcast so comparing it to a VMU is making it worse. MS nearly included VMU's with the original Xbox but noticed in focus tests no one looked at the VMU on the Dreamcast. It's a neat idea on paper that is ultimately just not wanted by most people.

xX-oldboy-Xx2408d ago

Segata - how were the focus tests for Kinect?

As for a screen on my controller? I'll pass, doesn't interest me in the slightest.

Show all comments (126)
50°

DF Direct Weekly #210: Next-Gen Sony Handheld , Cyberpunk DLSS on Switch 2, Docked VRR In Question

Join Rich, Oliver and Alex for discussion on the latest leaks surrounding the mooted PlayStation handheld and the myste…

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net
Profchaos55d ago

I really want to know what's going on with docked vrr cause cyberpunk at 40 fps docked seems to be a choice driven by vrr

450°

PS5 price increases prove that console generations are truly screwed, if they’re not already dead

The recent PS5 price increases have proven that the old format of console generations are no longer viable for game companies.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
Lightning7762d ago (Edited 62d ago )

It's greed. Next gen prices aren't gonna be much better. I won't be surprised if next gen games are at 80. Then Sony, MS and other devs will do the usually PR of the most powerful console ever or fastest SSD or whatever to "justify" the price hike.

They'll further push ppl to PC.

Tacoboto62d ago

"It's greed"

Oh. Please do tell us how. What components are getting cheaper?

"They'll further push ppl to PC."

Oh. Ok so Nvidia and their pricing is not greedy, then?

shaenoide62d ago

Companies making billions of dollars in profits every year is more than enough.

rokos62d ago

Another comment on the topic pointed out how how when the PS5 launched the NVMEs of this size were around £200 and now they are around £60 moreover they are using the old 7nm nodes for the CPU and GPU are getting cheaper with time and not more expensive. Both AMD and Nvidia are manufacturing their GPUs on the 4/5nm for a second generation. That is about the components
The push to PC might happen by pushing people to spend the money they would have for a console to make their PC better since most people have a PC or a Laptop. Then those people could take advantage of the more competitive nature of the PC ecosystem (Stem, GOG, Epic) and free online multiplayer. I don't think that would be a large number though.

Lightning7762d ago

Why aren't the components going down? Why are the components rising in cost?

Why are Nintendo prices going up, PSN prices going up and the inevitable GP price gonna go up?

Cacabunga62d ago

Console gen will die when console games die. We are in a slow curve but not close to claim death of console gen

senorfartcushion62d ago

Yeah - it's still greed.

Don't be naive.

Profchaos62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

Exactly this gpus have trippled in price since the 20 series

CPUs have gone up

PC games still cost just as much as console games on sale

PC gaming is not some magic realm where you buy a GPU and get every game for a fiver.

I would still be a pc first player if it was

TheEroica62d ago

The complicit folk like this comment above are what ruin the hobby.... Apologists claiming it's not the corporations fault, it's your fault.... Gross. These people are the ones buying junk at premium prices and slowly bringing the hobby to its knees.

Reaper22_62d ago

I guess some people are saying if you're paying PC prices for consoles you might as well just buy a PC.

Tacoboto61d ago

"The complicit folk like this comment above are what ruin the hobby.... Apologists claiming it's not the corporations fault, it's your fault..."

If you want to bury your head then that's your choice but I think gamers also need to be held accountable for the environment they've curated.

Like, I certainly didn't teach Sony any pro-consumer lessons by buying the $200-$250+ collector's editions of TLOU Part 2, Ghost of Tsushima, and the discless GOW Ragnarok Jotnar Edition. What are PS5 Pro buyers teaching them buying a $700 console without a disc drive?

What lesson has Nintendo learned, with MK8 DX selling some 60+ million units, no price drops on Switch hardware, while selling defective joycons for 8 years on their most profitable hardware platform?

What about Microsoft and Xbox, what lessons should they take away from practically giving their games away, to declining/flatlining hardware sales?

Once you think about that, I encourage you to then factor in the reality of the ever-increasing-costs of hardware production, shipping, tariffs and taxes, and the salaries of those they employ...

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 61d ago
generic-user-name62d ago

Yeah I hear the new 50 series nvidia gpus are very affordable.

Games_People_Play62d ago

Nvidia isn’t the only GPU manufacturer out there. In fact, IMO AMD is killing it now with CPUs and GPUs. There is also Intel now, for more budget minded gamers.

Eonjay62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

I don't buy that. Consoles don't exist inside of a vacuum. Everything is going up. Does that mean that everything is screwed? PC gaming isn't a solution is the issue is rising costs. Neither are dead. The real issue is that consumer income has not keep pace with inflation.

There are more adults gaming than kids but the media that caters to us still treats us like children who can't hold complex ideas and critical thinking.

kayoss62d ago

it is also common knowledge that most consoles are sold at a lost. Its not until later that they release a slim version of the console where they make a bit of profit.

Lightning7762d ago (Edited 62d ago )

Believing? No it's called facts. You know me I always have facts on hand.

https://www.thestationwagon...

Sony hasn't sold at a loss for 4 years now.

https://www.theverge.com/20...

As I said Sony makes money off console MS loses it.

kayoss60d ago

@lightning77
So for the last 4 years Sony hasnt sold at a loss. What happens before those 4 years?

kayoss62d ago

For console, its not greed. Companies like Sony are most likely selling the consoles at a lost. Most of their profits and revenue comes from software.

Lightning7762d ago (Edited 62d ago )

Sony aren't selling the console at a loss they make money from it. However Xbox is however they lose about 200$ or so with each console sold. Probably why they're so reliant on multiplat Software sales GP stuff rather than selling consoles.

Profchaos62d ago

Even the switch 2 is being sold at a loss this is a first for Nintendo

Eonjay62d ago

Lol @Lightning77.

Imagine believing that it cost Microsoft $200 more to make the series X than it cost Sony to build a PS5. Imagine getting played so hard when the competition is routinely beating you in non Pro match ups. If that were real (it's not) then of course MS would stop making console because they spending way more to get zero or worse results than a cheaper PS5!

Bateekh62d ago

Extremely L take.

No it will NOT push anyone to PC. You must be quite disconnected from reality. Go ahead and search up prices of just the GPU to be able to play modern games. an RTX 5070 will cost you around $700 alone if not a little more, and if you want a 4K capable machine that can run games at decent settings then you're going to need a stronger card which will run you closer to $1000. We haven't even gotten to the CPU or PSU or RAM or SSD, or Motherboard. A 4k gaming pc capable of running at 30+fps will run you $1500+ minimum, and if you want 60+ FPS then you guaranteed will be over $2000. If you want 2K capable machine then maybe around $1400-$1600 or so.

you bafoons are complaining about what, a $450 console (switch 2) an an $80 game? LOL get real. Console gaming is much cheaper, even PS5 Pro at $700 is a crazy deal compared to any modern gaming PC. So no, nobody is going to PC.

And anybody who thinks it's greed is disconnected from reality and just a brokie looking for a handout. Cry more.

Lightning7762d ago

Then why are all these YT gamers (even PS centric ones) building a PC? gaming publications and even ppl I know moving to PC or building a PC? Allot more than they have last gen?

Yep must me all in my head I guess.

So you can afford These prices and price hikes. Sounds like a child with mom's money or someone who has absolutely no life of his own.

NotoriousWhiz62d ago

^ Ironically, having a life is one of the main reasons to go console over PC. No tinkering, no googling or searching protondb to figure out if a game will work on your PC. Just turn it on and press play.

Jawsh66658d ago

It is greed, but this isn’t standard greed and by that I mean these price increases aren’t just wealthy businessmen increasing costs just because they can. This is partially an effect of tarrifs and the prices are just gonna keep going up regardless of if we’re talking PC or Console.

Ps5conehead62d ago

You want to know what greed is it’s insulin pump manufacturers. I have to pay 600 a month . For pump supplies. I have no choice but to spend it. But you can decide if you want a console are not. Mine is life and death. This here is gaming

Extermin8or3_62d ago

First episode of new series of black mirror is for you i think....

Jingsing62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

The sad thing is if Microsoft would just bugger off then none of this acceleration-ism to cloud gaming (the end goal) would be happening. They will ultimately use this expensive pricing to have us paying $100 a month for game streaming in the future.

badz14962d ago

maybe going mainstream was a mistake for gaming. sure revenues have increased several folds from the PS2 times due to that but in a capitalistic market, shareholders always want more year after year. 200mil profit this year, and if they only make another 200mil in the next year, it's not considered as a "success" thus people getting fired, studio got closed down just so that they can say that they made "more" than last year for the investors! if only these people are as passionate about gaming like they do about their margin, gaming would still be an enjoyable and affordable hobby.

I'll be looking at how Sony handles the PS6. if things get crazier in pricing than this gen already is, I think I will just stop at the PS5 and not invest in next gen.

thorstein62d ago

This article is fake. Consoles are dead despite them selling more than ever?

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 58d ago
Games_People_Play62d ago

I find myself playing games on my pc more and more this generation. I have my PC which I built myself, hooked up to my 65 inch oled tv.
I got Indiana Jones for free with my gfx card, my steam library is 500+ deep. I’m only buying consoles at this point because of physical games. Once the consoles go all digital, I will just be a pc gamer, because I can build whatever I want, without any limitations.

ziggyzinfirion62d ago

Without limitations?? Are you sure about that? 😏

gold_drake62d ago

so u have 500 games u probably even havent played.

arent u part of the problem tho? ha

Games_People_Play62d ago

Most of my games were $5-$10 summer and winter sales. Some of them are F2P.
And about 40 of them were full price release day purchases. My account is almost 20 years old.

Michiel198962d ago

unlike consoles, steam doesn't get a 5-6 year reset on their games, i know this is a shocking revelation. if part of the problem is only having to buy your games once, we sure are guilty

Extermin8or3_62d ago

@michiel1989: alll my ps4 gsmes work on my ps5. So that's approaching 14 years worth of content. Also you say that but it's not strictly true. I own pc gsmes from way way back in like 2007/2008 that literally can't run on modern drivers and stuff. You have to go online and find ancient software and install it and often it conflicts with the modern versions of the same software so you have to deal with that to get those titles running.

Michiel198962d ago

most games since windows xp work fine and if its a title from 1990 i don't mind having the option of not having to buy it again and just run a virtual version of 1998 or something alike to play it, but most often there are way easier fixes. Also i can play multiplayer for games that have been shutdown by the publisher, because the pc community is awesome.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 62d ago
bRuud8362d ago (Edited 62d ago )

It looks like we are going to a new video game crash like in te 80s. Games are going to cost too much, the PS6 and next Xbox will be a huge and costly dissapointment.

Christopher62d ago

We honestly do not need a new generation of consoles at all. Even PC gaming is seeing more and more reduced gains on technology advances.

carrotcakeag62d ago

The crash was about very poor quality games on Atari in the days before NES even released. Games are much better now and people will never stop playing. Pricing won’t force people to change hobbies because games like Fortnite start as low as free. Most AAA games end up with massive discounts after a while. Nintendo don’t discount but everyone keeps buying them full price anyway. Those are my thoughts when people predict a total industry crash. The industry will rather change and adapt. Companies that fail to adapt will go bust but there will still be big winners like GTA VI.

Extermin8or3_62d ago

Erm not really. The coat of hardware and such is all increasing if anything given inflation games have gone down in value since 2007 and even further down in value since the 1990s. What's changed is everyone feels entitled to buy everything new day one and not have to save for anything. Sadly that's just not how the world works.

Abnor_Mal62d ago

I’ve already decided that I won’t get a PS6 until the PS7 is released. That way the console will cheaper as will the games and most will be complete editions with all dlc.

I’m too old to be worrying about playing games as soon as they’re released, just so I can say I bought it day one. I will continue to play my last gen and vr games in the meantime as I wait for price drops. This will not push me towards PC gaming though.

DefenderOfDoom262d ago

I still have not bought a PS5 yet . I want to wait till next fall to buy one, hoping they have a price drop on all PS5s . I do not have a PC to game on . Unfortunately I do not think I can wait to next fall because DOOM The Dark Ages is being released on May 15 of next month. .

Abnor_Mal62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

I waited three years before I got my PS5, and to tell the truth it really wasn’t worth it, besides PSVR2.

There aren’t many games for it that is strictly PS5, that I was interested in, many were still available on PS4. The ones that are PS5 only pricing is still a bit high, but I understand you wanting to get a PS5 for DOOM. Hopefully you get one during some kind of sale between now and then.

generic-user-name62d ago

"no longer viable" as the PS5 out paces the PS4 and that's before GTA6 releases. The Switch 2 will almost certainly be a smash hit also.

Show all comments (81)
180°

What Does Switch 2 Mean for PS6, Xbox?

Welcome back to Next-Gen Console Watch! Ryan and Max are back as they discuss what the Nintendo Switch 2 Pricing means for the eventual PlayStation 6 and next Xbox. Can any console going forward reach the same success as the original Switch? And for handheld gaming PC's and the Xbox handheld, can we expect those to cost $450+, just like the Switch 2? .

gold_drake66d ago

probably not much.

the new gen will have its big appeal for alot of people.

the big question will be if the dwitch 2 will be left behind by devs again due to the games being too demanding, again.

but, and ive said this before, nintendo will be fine without it.
their big selling point is nostalgia and people eat it up.
and thw handheld option, but we are yet to see how the battery life actually holds up.

Abear2164d ago

Portal already allows third party games like Cyberpunk on a handheld so I think people are hyping this up too much. Games will look better on Portal and have better battery life. My only interest in S2 is exclusives.

Lightning7765d ago

Means PS6 and SX2 are gonna be expensive af

OtterX65d ago

doesn't even matter for me, because my Switch 1 was 80% a handheld system for me throughout its lifetime. PS5, then PS6 will continue to be my proper console, bc Nintendo will always stay gimped in that regard. With that said, I'm excited for the Switch 2's extra power solely as a handheld. I don't find the system price unreasonable, but I do find the game prices crazy.

Profchaos64d ago

Yeah tend to agree ps is my main but i travel for work and having a switch has always helped with flights and hotel stays

jznrpg64d ago (Edited 64d ago )

I use to bring my PS5 with me everywhere with a huge case hehe. Now I bring my Portal with me everywhere unless I am going to a cabin with no Wifi and then I bring my Pro with me.

porkChop64d ago

The Switch 2 is, what, $629 CAD? I'm not paying that, I'll wait for a price drop. But I'm just wondering how expensive the next PS and Xbox are going to be. I'm definitely not buying them at launch.

This is where shit is just getting too expensive to be worth it for me. Smaller jumps in visuals each gen, poor quality games in general, many games broken or borderline unplayable on launch, mtx out the ass, higher game prices, etc. For me it's not worth paying so much more for so much less. I'll stick with PC where I have a higher cost but so much more utility and usability for the money.

NotoriousWhiz64d ago

PC upgrade costs are astronomical as well. Furthermore, AAA games on PC will be priced comparably to AAA games on console. If you want cheap quality games, there are hundreds of good indies out there which will run just fine on a console or low powered PC.

Show all comments (20)