'Take-Two takes security seriously and will take legal action against people or publications who leak...'
Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.
Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.
Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.
"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."
That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.
Blizzard writes: "After careful consideration over the last year, we at Blizzard have made the decision not to hold BlizzCon in 2024. This decision was not made lightly as BlizzCon remains a very special event for all of us, and we know many of you look forward to it. While we’re approaching this year differently and as we have explored different event formats in the past, rest assured that we are just as excited as ever to bring BlizzCon back in future years."
How about you not hold Blizzcon anymore period. You fucking POS company. I really hope Blizzard would just die.
A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.
I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.
I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons
I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.
Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.
At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath
I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.
Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.
I don't know what the law is in the EU, but in the U.S. you can't be held liable for leaking something unless you are under contractual agreement not to. And even then, you can only be penalized in a way specified in that contract deal.
Maybe the documents were stolen from Take-Two. And if they were stolen then it's illegal. "Corporate Espionage" is a form of espionage conducted for commercial purposes, and I have a gut feeling this is what happened. There is no way Trusted Reviews would pay 1.3 Million to a charity and apologize if they did nothing wrong. Some times the media is just as bad as companies in corporate america, after all most media outlets are owned by big corporate companies.
I could have done more with the 1million.
That money will be lost in Management.
Wow. This story is missing some vital information to put things into context.
Namely, the only way trusted reviews would be held liable for releasing classified information is if they had signed an non-disclosure agreement to not say anything about the game that they may be privy to, regardless of how they got it....or T2 actually provided them the document, which they then leaked to the public with an NDA in place.
There is potential that trusted reviews colluded to steal the information, in which case it's both criminal and civil, and T2 may have decided to go the civil route instead of seeking charges.
As this article is written, it just kind of makes T2 look like they're going after any media outlet which gets a hold of confidential information, and trying to control the media in an improper, unethical, and illegal way. But since there was money awarded, there has to be more to it.
But, 1.3 million pounds? How much does trusted reviews actually bring in in revenue, and was the leak really so substantial that it was worth that kind of penalty?