550°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Graphics Comparison: Xbox One vs. Xbox One X vs. PS4 vs. PS4 Pro

A detailed look at the visual fidelity of Red Dead Redemption 2 on both Xbox One and PlayStation 4.

sammarshall1022374d ago

I'm only on the base PS4 so I'm glad that version still looks amazing

mrmikew20182374d ago

They really did do a great job on all platforms.

sammarshall1022374d ago

They really did and it seems they've raised the bar on being a detailed open world

Ceaser98573612372d ago

I read R* was wanting to make this game for last gen even but probably back off due to hardware...

Hardiman2373d ago

It looks amazing on my 65 KS9000 running on the Pro! I tried it on my kids base PS4 running on their 55 E series 4K HDR tv and it looks great as well! Just a beautiful game!

thrust2373d ago

According to reports it looks much better aswell with a Xbox one X, they did a great job by the sounds of it push all consoles to limit!

gravedigger2373d ago

Textures quality are the same on both Pro and X, but Pro looks blurry because bad implement of checkerboard resolution.

2373d ago
2373d ago
thrust2373d ago

Yeah native 4k is amazing and also better performance is very nice, it’s good they pushed all consoles 👍

2373d ago
Donnie812373d ago

Actually you are right reports do say it looks much better on the 1x. This guy bellow is kidding himself of he thinks the difference is minor. The difference in native res alone is a huge difference. These people on n4g can tell the difference between 1080p and 900p but 1440p and 4k are the same. Take your L buddy...... Just take it

Gaming4Life19812373d ago

Downvotes because the xbox one x version looks better lol. Well it's TRUE but the game looks good on all consoles.

Hardiman2373d ago (Edited 2373d ago )

I see you missed the "amazing" part of my comment! Amazing is good enough for me and games like AC Origins, Odyssey and Red Dead 2 look amazing on the Pro so there's no need for me to spend $500. because again amazing is good enough for me!

It'd be different if it looked and ran like shit but it doesn't, it looks amazing and as long as I get amazing I'm good!

It also appears others feel the same because last night at pickup everyone I saw got the PS4 version or Pro bundles. No one is denying the X is a superior piece of hardware but for most that isn't enough to pull the trigger on $500. even if we could afford it when we can get amazing with what we have.

CyberRekkr2373d ago

Lies, Doesn't look much better! You just an Xbox Fanboy. I have all the systems in my house & I have compared the Pro and X & there's not a big difference.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2373d ago
rainslacker2373d ago

I know we plan on doing comparisons at work today. But for technical curiosity reasons.

It's a nice advantage of my job that they get all these games in to see how things work.:)

crazyCoconuts2373d ago

What kinda company do you work for, out of curiosity?

rainslacker2373d ago

We make engine tools for developers and engine makers. Mostly graphics renderers/shaders and portability tools. We have professional reasons to look at the game, and see how well they did, although I won't go into our reasons for that. Just one of the perks of the job.:)

alb18992373d ago

The X versión is the one I'm gonna buy. Native 4K and better frame rate 😍

BrettAwesome2373d ago

Great tv! I had one of those! Unfortunately it died, so now I'm on a 65 SONY X900E

Hardiman2373d ago

How's the Sony? I'm gonna be shopping late this year or early next year.

BrettAwesome2372d ago

It's a great value for money tv. Very accurate color reproduction. Full array local dimming too. If you end up with a Sony TV, just be sure to get a 900 series or better. The 800s aren't quite as impressive

2373d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2372d ago
sprinterboy2373d ago

I do scratch my head when they do these analysis videos and kinda laugh when they do the zoom 50/100X comparisons. I agree the X is the better version but you shouldn't have to do a zoom in to see it.
I think DF do go alittle too deep sometimes. I'm 2hrs in so far and it looks great on my launch ps4

Brave_Losers_Unite2373d ago

Zooming in shows better detail of differences. I dont get why you wouldnt want to see that

BLUEKNIFE2373d ago

Can you spot the difference between 2 butterflies?, Probably not and that's the point, zooming in at that level doesn't make any sense.

Razzer2373d ago

His point is that you don't notice any of this stuff DF points out while in game.

rainslacker2373d ago

All that really matters is what you see while playing, and sometimes, videos on the net don't really express just how much of a problem it is, and I would also posit that many people wouldn't really notice many differences if you didn't have the guy going, "Hey....look here, look here....it's not as good!!!". Particularly true since most people will only play on one console.....maybe two if they get a remaster next gen.

uth112373d ago

my eye can't see it when I'm
playing the game, so I really don't care what it looks like zoomed in.

that's for fanboys trying to justify their purchase

mcstorm2373d ago

Tbh this will always happen people get off that the game o there console looks far better when you zoom in 50%.

At the end of the day we will know the ps4 has more power than the Xbox one and games should look better on this console and the x has more power then the pro so should look better on this console.

I've never got a game on a console because xyz said it looked better on it I get it on the console I want and that's it.

RDR is not for me but gta is not to but this game looks like it's going to be massive and a joy to play so enjoy it eveyone on which ever console you own.

rainslacker2373d ago

@mc

When I was younger, and had both a Sega and Nintendo console(across a couple gens)....which was rare for a kid back in the day, I would consider which one looked better. Depending on which gen we're talking about, and the style of the art, I generally felt one console did better than the other. So, back then, I can say it was important to me. But back then, we didn't have a lot of this nitpicking, and games generally ran fine, or like crap. Nowadays, I'm not really fussed either way. I prefer Sony consoles, and I'm not ashamed of it. I play there because as of now, its the best console I have, and if I had an X1X, I may play my multi-plats there, although I'm not anywhere near as invested in the ecosystem there. Otherwise, most games still don't bother utilizing the mid-gens properly, so I see no reason to get another mid-gen, when I haven't even been overly impressed with the one I already brought.

sprinterboy2373d ago

I play the game, I don't go up close to every tree, leaf, zoom in on the horse testicle details lol.
My mate used to do that back in the half life days and I'd be like you gonna play the game or what.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2373d ago
2373d ago Replies(1)
Razzer2373d ago

I think it is hilarious that we have to have labels to tell us what console each video segment is from.

rainslacker2373d ago (Edited 2373d ago )

I thought it would be more hilarious if one of these sites maybe one day mixed up the labels, then came out a couple days later and said "oops....sorry about that".

Only because I can imagine the sudden changes in people's opinions when it happens.

gangsta_red2373d ago

Yeah, it's been like that since the beginning of of this gen. That's why we would always people patiently waiting for DF articles even when gameplay was already available to compare.

@rain

Didn't something like that already happen with CoD where they accidentally put the higher res label on the a low res version running the game and nobody noticed?

Also it happened with the new Killzone where it came out later that the MP was running at a lower res and no one knew or could tell until it was reported.

rainslacker2373d ago

I can't remember. But if it was COD, it was probably because I don't really follow that series much, and comparing the different releases of those games seems pointless since Activision doesn't exactly push the envelope of graphics, and don't spend much time optimizing either way.

KZ was a different scenario. But yeah, I think people didn't know, but they also didn't have it hammered in their heads at the time what checkerboarding was, or how it could affect graphics. I believe I even mentioned as much during my many comments about how people often can't tell the difference, and it becomes even less noticeable the higher the resolution becomes for what's being compared.

alb18992373d ago

The thing is that almost everyone watch DF on screens that are too small or don't support 4k and HDR so that's why you don't need the difference until DF make that zoom

Razzer2373d ago

ok.....so "almost everyone" is lying then. Guess that goes for those who are praising the superior Xbox One X version as well then. But even if you are on a 70" TV and standing close to the screen, most are not going to know what difference to detect. You still have to have DF stop the video and draw a circle around the area that is different.

HonestGamer52373d ago

My understanding was that they zoom in bcuz if you are watching it on a small screen that's the only way to see the difference (phone/monitor). But on a tv screen you can see the differences without zoom.

rainslacker2373d ago (Edited 2373d ago )

zooming in changes the native pixels, so that makes no sense. If you change one pixel to four pixels, or more in some cases, you're immediately introducing variances to the picture. That variance can exaggerate what is being shown. A murky texture becomes more murky as the "murk" is stretched across a great area. Aliasing become more pixelated because instead of a few pixels showing crawl, you now have double or triple the pixels showing crawl in not just one direction, but two. Shadows which are defined well enough in a non-zoomed image, suddenly become undefined because you add in excessive edge dithering. So on and so forth.

On a screen, a pixel is a pixel. There is no truer unit of display. Doesn't matter the resolution. So, if they wanted to show it properly, they'd show a cropped part of the image, unaltered in resolution, which would fit on a person's screen, without the image being stretched or compressed in any way. If the difference isn't readily apparent without zooming in, then the difference is probably minimal, and likely would go unnoticed except maybe in side by side comparisons, which are extremely rare in the home...so a person is likely to feel the same about either version if they were to play it.

The zooming in thing sounds more like an excuse to show off things which really aren't readily apparent.

KickSpinFilter2373d ago

Ya it’s kinda funny since most play at at least 8ft from their screen. 4K vs checkerboard rendering is of diminishing returns. Sure if your playing from 2 feet away ya XB1X is much better. But we can see from sales of consoles resolution really doesn’t matter all that much to folks

conanlifts2373d ago (Edited 2373d ago )

I will play it on the X, but while it is the better looking version ultimately the experience and enjoyment would be the same whether I played it my X or standard PS4.

Hardiman2373d ago

Yeah the fact they have to zoom in so much to show the "difference" has always come kinda silly to me. If it was a major difference I could see all the fuss. As it is I'm playing on the Pro and I haven't experienced any slow down and it looks magnificent! I also played it on my kids base PS4 and it looked awesome as well so really in the end it's all good!

Rhythmattic2372d ago (Edited 2372d ago )

Its a technical analysis so this approach is expected and appreciated.
In the end, whats important is if you enjoy the game, no matter the platform.

MikeNike3102372d ago

I appreciate their attention to detail but your right, the extra curricular zoomage doesn't necessarily translate to what the average consumer will experience. It actually still looks good from normal viewing angles no matter the console.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2372d ago
XabiDaChosenOne2373d ago

Not seeing the considerable difference DTF referred too.

Brave_Losers_Unite2373d ago

Thats because IGN shouldnt be doing comparison videos

mad-dog2373d ago

I have a PS4 Pro and the game doesn't look as good as it can look on it. There is something wrong with the checkerboard rendering in this game. It's a real shame. Let's hope that a patch can fix this a bit.
Now you can dislike this post but that doesn't mean it's not true. I think this site should remove the likes and dislikes. It's toxic and just brings out the worst in a lot of people.

gobluesamg2373d ago

I gave you a DISAGREE. I hope you can get through this trying time.

mad-dog2373d ago

Oh i'll manage. But neither your disagree or your post has anything constructive that i can work with. So while i know you disagree with something in my post, i have no idea what it is.

michaelknight352373d ago

I agree with you on that n4g should remove likes and dislikes because people on here will dislike a person comment because they know can

rainslacker2373d ago (Edited 2373d ago )

I felt on the Pro they looked a bit faded compared to the X1X. I don't know if this is an effect of the checkerboarding, or just a byproduct of the lighting effects. I didn't really dive too deep into this this morning when we were checking out the different versions at work.

Overall, I wouldn't really have a problem with either version, as they both look fantastic.

As far as the likes/dislikes, I sometimes wonder why people disagree with innocuous comments, or statements of fact...even when they're not console war related, but I try not to let it get to me. If people want to disagree that's fine. If they can't bother to discuss it, then their opinion doesn't really matter to much to me.

EverydayGuy2373d ago

Why not just make 20 word lock on the like and dislike, so you would have to make a comment?

King_Noctis2373d ago

Most sites don’t even have dislike button. They remove that and keep only the like button. I wish this site would do the same.

MikeNike3102372d ago

I kind of like the dislike button. It lets you know what kind of audience your dealing with. It shouldn't be something that affects you at all but act as more of a barometer.

mad-dog2372d ago

A barometer for insecurity?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2372d ago
Show all comments (106)
70°

Top 10 Video Games That Feel Like Reading a Good Book

For World Book Day, here are 10 video games that feel like reading a good book—emotional, thoughtful, and unforgettable stories.

Read Full Story >>
clouddosage.com
S2Killinit1d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

I would have included the Uncharted games as well. Good list though.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 12h ago

Island would be #1 but that would be anything from Frontwing.

QueenOfFrowns1d 12h ago

Haha it is not lost on me that two of the games in the top four were already novels before they were games

120°

GTA5 Has Sold Over 210 Million Copies, Red Dead Redemption 2 Has Sold Over 70 Million Units

Take-Two announced its financial results for the third quarter of fiscal year 2025 and an update on sales of GTA5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
gold_drake77d ago

fuckz those are insane numbers

Gamingsince198163d ago

I wonder if they count all the free copies everyone got from the epic store 🤔

gold_drake63d ago

i doubt that, it says sold and not given away fro free ha.

Gamingsince198163d ago (Edited 63d ago )

I have to wonder where all the people are then, because there are def not 200 million playing online, not even close. It's not a dig at the game (besides the fact they abandoned everyone that doesn't play online) I have been enjoying gta since the first gta on playstation.

gold_drake63d ago

gta 5 has been out for

ps3, xbox360, ps4,xbox one, pc, ps5 (ps5 version)

Giga_Gaia77d ago

We need a 60fps patch for RDR2 for PS5/XSX

Cacabunga77d ago

I would rebuy , say again goodbye to my social life and replatinum like i did on PS4. The best thing i have ever played

DodoDojo77d ago

And that is why GTA6 doesn't need to be priced at $100.

vTuro2477d ago

It's honestly insane how massive GTA has become.

jznrpg76d ago

Sadly I own it for PS3/4/5 even though I’ve never played it. I did get them for super cheap though and still unopened.

70°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Steam Discount Sees Game Hit New Concurrent Player Record

Red Dead Redemption 2 continues to impress with its success, this time seeing its all-time concurrent player count broken on Steam.

Goodguy0185d ago

Such a great game, loved the story and characters. It just sucks there was some annoying real slow mechanics and such that made it an inch from perfect for me.