200°

'Fallout: New Vegas 2' Is Highly Unlikely, Says Obsidian

With the recent rumor regarding Obsidian Entertainment being acquired by Microsoft, speculation of a Fallout: New Vegas sequel has been rampant. However, chances of getting it are pretty low according to the company's Twitter account.

ZaWarudo2445d ago

Will never understand why people wants to go back to the Mojave wasteland. The story already has been told there, time to move on to the next setting.

Unless people are referring to a new Fallout game from Obsidian then i wholeheartedly agree.

Nitrowolf22445d ago

That’s what people want, a new FO game by Obsidian. Vegas is still my favorite FO game

gamer78042445d ago

I'd rather something brand new, thats not fallout or anything else.

-Foxtrot2445d ago

Yeah I think people mean a spiritual successor when they say New Vegas 2

New Orleans
Old London
New Miami
Old New York

Something like that

Kingdroopy20182445d ago

exactly the mojave atory is done what about the rest of the west?

MrSwankSinatra2445d ago

great, instead of getting this, we get that trash ass fallout 76. screw bethesda, fallout 4 was crap and 76 aint gonna be no better.

Kingdroopy20182445d ago

How the hell do you know the game is going to be trash? You anti Fallout 76 guys are some cry babies with no friends and anti social issues i see.

InKnight7s2445d ago

Defenders defenders defenders...

I hope these defenders for worthy games of worthy developers, man people knew it when game such DmC is a bad idea and guess what? FFXIII people knew this multiplat deal will miss with the quality and guess what? People knew about Destiny 2 being dump game and guess what? NFS being hated for being online only and guess what? As well as MGS survive.

Fallout 76 is a bad idea to start up with + there is no need for online only for such game at all it just limiting the players and no one asked for it.

MrSwankSinatra2445d ago

its gonna be Trash anyone with eyes can see it, also my friends dont want to play that crap anyways, were gonna be to busy playing rdr 2 online.

j15reed2444d ago

If it's not single player these people throw a fit...

Kribwalker2445d ago

Maybe they will get to make a spiritual successor of sorts if the MS deal is legit. I know i’d buy it

bigmalky2445d ago

They will get to make GaaS games.

No luck!

Baza2445d ago

Obsidian is going to make whatever MS tells them to make.

Kribwalker2445d ago

or it could be like Ninja Theory and they could be given full creative control as part of the purchase

MadLad2445d ago

@krib

I feel this may be the case. Obsidian has been putting out goty contenders for years now, based on what they wanted to make. No reason to cage that success.

Eldyraen2445d ago

I’d rather they do something different.

Obsidian has stated they’d like to see Pillars of Eternity perhaps going in a different direction or even allowing other Devs to handle it, so how about an “Elder scrolls” PoE game? First/third person open world game in the same universe. Something a bit more like kingdoms of Amalur (more action-like combat mechanics) or even a better than Dragon Age Inquisition take on their current isometric party system PoE.

Or if MS wants a post apocalyptic rpg they drop the nuclear bit and go Biblical: make an rpg like how Hellgate London could have been (dark fantasy in post apocalyptic contemporary or historical setting). Diablo like dungeon crawler?

I want something different, not just a clone as that’s sort of one of MS’s problems. And yes my examples fall under that category but are simply baseline examples you can picture easily.

They could just as easily reimagine Scalebound or go with a similar open world rpg with Action RPG elements, custom dragons (maybe Scalebound+Lair but actually be good), character with Dragon armor/skills like Scalebound had, etc. Make it more of a traditional rpg with a huge world filled with small and large scale enemies.

Kingdroopy20182445d ago

I dont want a New Vegas 2, thats unnecessary. A fallout game that takes place in Seattle or The whole of California would be great.

Smokehouse2445d ago

Obsidian won’t be going back to anything. They were bought by Microsoft so they will be making Microsoft IPs. Hopefully new ones.

Show all comments (28)
40°

While Layoffs Hit the Industry, Nintendo Retains 98% of Staff Including 78 With Disabilities

TNS: Based on its most recent ESG data, Nintendo boasts a remarkably low staff turnover rate of just 1.9%, with virtually no reported layoffs.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Jin_Sakai8h ago

Because Nintendo makes great games.

6h ago
rlow15h ago

Well it doesn’t surprise me. As much money as they make and how they value their employees. It’s a great company in that regard.

Xeus74h ago

Good guy Nintendo
Microsoft and Sony are the bad guys

drivxr2h ago

Well, when your games remain full price many years after release.

And you make profit off of outdated hardware.

I would be shocked if they couldn't afford to retain their staff.

Show all comments (6)
170°

It Shouldn't Take Expedition 33's Success to Remind Square Enix That Turn-Based Still Sells

TNS: Expedition 33 was the wake-up call Square Enix needed, telling it turn-based RPGs are still popular, but that shouldn't have been the case.

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
Relientk772d ago

True, but if it does get it through their thick skulls, then that works.

Although, the Dragon Quest 1 + 2 HD remakes will be turn-based and (the worst kept secret) Final Fantasy IX remake should be turn-based I would imagine. Let's see if any newer games go turn-based too.

thorstein2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

DQIII HD Remake was turned based and very successful. Then there was a really obscure turn based game came Balder's Gate 3. I heard it might have done well.

Profchaos2d ago

I wouldn't be shocked if they switched ff to the vii remake combat system

PapaBop2d ago

It won't get through to them though, despite E33's success, they still won't risk going fully turn based for their big budget projects simply because they are still in the mindset that it needs to be action combat to appeal to the mainstream audience. I hope I'm wrong but don't underestimate just how stubborn Japanese execs can be

barom1d 22h ago

Ya'll are hyping up Expedition 33 too much. Reminder that FF XVI sold 3 million in a week and it took Expedition 33 approximately a month to get to that (33 days to reach 3.3 million).

thorstein1d 19h ago

New IP vs established IP.

barom1d 11h ago

1 platform vs 3 platforms
1 week vs 1 month

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 11h ago
DivineHand1252d ago

While it is true that Sqaure Enix has moved away from turn based games compared to how they were in the past, there is a good reason for it.

Older gamers will know this but during the ps2 era, we were flooded with turned based games from Japanese studios and this created a form of fatigue back then going into the next generation.

When Square released FF13, they received heavy criticism for making the game turned based like every other FF game and not doing enough to innovate. This is why they made FF15, FF7 Remake and FF16 have real time combat. It gave the series a fresh spin and has brought in new fans to the series.

I personally would be happy with either turned based FF or the real-time combat version we see today.

Shane Kim2d ago

Remake and Rebirth have "turn based" if you set it in the settings.

Lexreborn22d ago

Dang wish I saw your post before I made mine because we definitely feel the same way lol

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Yeah hit the nail on the head but its like ww2 games we get hundreds of them then a decade of nothing and people start missing them i think we're going to start seeing them return

Claire, dragon quest even yakuza have seen turn based return

Runechaz1d 17h ago

Every Pokémon game is also a Turn Base RPG.. and selling millions

andy852d ago

Only need to look at their own game DQ 11 approaching 10 million to show there's a market. And that's not as big of a name as FF

Runechaz1d 17h ago

you can also look at the Pokemon game number

Tacoboto2d ago

Another article about Expedition 33 and Square Enix and turn-based games? This is starting to sound like propaganda.

The game didn't sell because it's a turn-based game; it sold and is enjoyed because it's a really freaking good game that released completed at a good price without gamer drama attached to it. No Mtx, no wait-until-it's-patched, minimal bloat, a self-contained story, no multiplatform BS. Just a solid original game that absolutely nails what it intended to do.

Redemption-642d ago

I was just about to say the same thing.

anast2d ago

This comment should have a 100 upvotes, at least.

CrimsonWing692d ago

Maybe try actually listening to the fans who have supported the series for decades. This habit of ignoring your core audience just to chase people who were never interested in Final Fantasy in the first place makes no sense. And when that approach fails, doubling down on it is beyond baffling.

The battle system has never been the main reason non-FF or non-JRPG players stayed away. Gutting the series’ identity to chase a broader market doesn’t attract new players. It just alienates the loyal ones.

Keep going down this road and we’ll end up with Final Fantasy Fortnite abomination or a F2P Battle Royale game.. Oh wait…

Show all comments (27)
50°

Rematch is "chasing credibility" but not realism like rival EA FC

Pocket Tactics sits down with Rematch’s creative director, Pierre Tarno, to discuss why Sloclap moved away from Sifu to chase something new.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com