590°

Marvel's Spider-Man Versus Batman: Arkham Knight - Who Did It Better?

Insomniac’s first dive into the superhero genre has been a positive experience. The acclaimed developer of titles like Spyro the Dragon, Ratchet and Clank, Resistance, and Sunset Overdrive made another massive leap by creating one of the best superhero games with Marvel’s Spider-Man. However, how does it stack up against the final game in the acclaimed Batman Arkham series? Widely regarded as the best superhero franchise of all time does Marvel’s Spider-Man outshine the final installment in the Batman: Arkham series or will Insomniac need to step up in the game’s eventual sequel? Let’s find out.

Read Full Story >>
gamingaccessweekly.com
Hardiman2418d ago

I adore the Arkham series! I love the three main games for different reasons but Spider-Man is well Spectacular, Amazing and Superior! The good thing is I have both!

pandehz2417d ago

Most importantly who did it first.

Insomniac learned from Rocksteady. In fact the whole industry learned from the Arkham games.

Don’t get me started on how many games ripped off Arkhams combat.

2417d ago
Android2417d ago

Agreed. Spiderman would not be what was if it wasn't for the influence of Rocksteady's Batman.

Being able to walk towards an army of enemies and confidently dismantle, counter and evade opponents without them landing a hit was never heard of before Batman.

CarlDechance2417d ago

"ripped off"? Oh wow.....that is a rabbit hole discussion. Was everything in Arkham original? Afraid not. No game made these days is completely original. Thank goodness the good stuff is "ripped off" by other developers. Do you really want that awesome Arkham combat to live and die ONLY with Batman? Don't get me started on all the games with crap combat that sure would have been better off "ripping off" Batman. So I would be careful complaining too much about stuff getting "ripped off" in games.

MoonConquistador2417d ago (Edited 2417d ago )

Ripped of is a bit of an overstatement. We all learn from things that have been done before and the combat mechanics in the Arkham series was one of it's best points. Shadow of Mordor tried the same type system but it didn't have quite the finesse of the Arkham series.

Imitation is the greatest form of flattery. Which is just the same as saying "ripped off" or "plagiarized” but from a different point of view.

Carl's point above illustrates what I'm trying to say perfectly

bouzebbal2417d ago

Batman is extremely well built but as said above Spiderman is much more spectacular. Pressing L2 R2 and X all the time is so satisfying and i love some details like when he suddenly has to squeeze himself through narrow spaces

nicsaysdie2417d ago

I agree the fluid combat in arkham is/was a game changer. Pun intended.

Movefasta19932417d ago

Rocksteady copied off assassin's creed, with the counter based combat.

Moe-Gunz2417d ago

The combat in Arkham isn't original. Jet Li's Rise to Honor please look that up.

sampsonon2417d ago (Edited 2417d ago )

actually Arkham took from the old spider man games first. they just did it better up to now.
the first Arkham game came out after spider man 2 and look who was doing it first. https://www.youtube.com/wat...

spider man 2 release was 2004 and Arkham was 2009

Yi-Long2417d ago

"Being able to walk towards an army of enemies and confidently dismantle, counter and evade opponents without them landing a hit was never heard of before Batman."

Well, there was Viewtiful Joe...

justchilliando2416d ago

How many games did Arkham rip the combat from, assassin's Creed for one has had the same combat way before arkham , there's been a million games that started that same combat before arkham , Now Arkham improved on that combat, from others , the old Spiderman games even had it, first but not as good , I love rocksteady ncarkham games

2416d ago
+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 2416d ago
starchild2417d ago

They are equally good as each other.

chrisx2418d ago (Edited 2418d ago )

Arkham Knight is a real awesome game I enjoyed it every bit, but spiderman is a much better game imo, the city being alive with pedestrians, combat etc makes it a better experience

AspiringProGenji2418d ago (Edited 2418d ago )

I agree. Rocksteady yet again purges gotham city and I hated that. What is funny is that later Scarecrow is throwing that bomb to an empty city of civilians and his own grunts lol that really made no sense. Most of the side content was also shit and I also hated I needed to do everything, including the annoying Riddler trophies, to unlock the true endind

I still enjoyed the combat and some of the story but Spiderman seems to be better at everything

starchild2417d ago

I think they both have their pros and cons. I enjoyed them to about the same degree. Curiously enough they both have the same metacritic score.

Eonjay2417d ago

Infamous came before Arkham City.

AizenSosuke2418d ago

Spidey did the "Arkham" formula better in my opinion.

InKnight7s2417d ago

New York was always better place to begin with.

CorndogBurglar2417d ago (Edited 2417d ago )

Well...let's not pretend like Gotham wasn't created as a dark version of New York...

BLAKHOODe2417d ago

Ehhh, I dunno about that. New York is New York; you can change a few things and still say it's New York, but you can't be ridiculous in changing it or you can no longer call it New York. Basically, you're limited. But Arkham is pure fiction, which means you can do whatever you want with it without restrictions and make it into the greatest city ever superior to New York in every way.

rainslacker2416d ago

Don't be silly corndog. We all know that Gotham is the dark side of Metropolis.:)

Sharingan_no_Kakashi2416d ago

Gotham is based off of Chicago actually. Metropolis is based off of New York.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2416d ago
Masterchief_thegoat2417d ago

Better than GOTY Arkham City? Hell No

CarlDechance2417d ago

I started off thinking the same thing, but the further I get into Spider-man the more it plays superior. Especially now that I have unlocked more gadgets which are far better than anything in the Arkham series, imo.

FallenAngel19842418d ago

Obviously Spider-Man because it doesn’t force you into a car every so often

EddieNX 2417d ago

The bat mobile was awesome! The framerate was horrible on xb1 tho which hindered the driving experience.

bouzebbal2417d ago

agree with you.
i loved the Batmobile too.
i have been gliding for 3 full episodes and batmobile was a neat addition imo.
i platinumed Arkham Knight but i understand other people who disliked it.

CarlDechance2417d ago

I loved the tank battles in the bat mobile. Great stuff!

FallenAngel19842417d ago

The Batmobile was shoehorned in far too frequently that it’s appeal wore off.

If they used it sparingly it would’ve been appreciated, but I and many other dreaded anytime Batman took behind the wheel for the umpteenth time

CorndogBurglar2417d ago

I agree. The Batmobile should have been nothing more than alternate mode of transportation. With maybe it being required to reach a section or two of the city, and maybe a boss fight.

But my favorite part of the Arkham games was always the boss fights and seeing what villains I was going to have beat down. Arkham Knight took that away by turning ALL the boss fights into Batmobile fights. Plus most of the puzzles. The Riddler stuff.

It was just too much.

Inzo2417d ago

What! The Batmobile was absolutely brilliant.

CorndogBurglar2417d ago

The Batmobile itself was done well. It played well and looked cool.

What wasn't done right is basing so much of the game around using the Batmobile.

Rimeskeem2417d ago

I would say that Spider-man has better combat and traversal . Web slinging is awesome and the gadget use is basically required on hardest difficulty. The enemies also have a wider range imo. But, both are unique with their atmosphere and each do make you feel like the hero.

CarlDechance2417d ago

Spider-man wins the traversal hands down, but that is just the nature of being Spider-man. Arkham does a damn good job with the gliding and grappling.

The hand to hand combat....about a draw for me. They both do it very well. But the gadgets are so much better with Spider-man. Those definitely give overall combat the nod to Spidey.

ChristopherJack2416d ago

Never really used the gadgets. Swinging dropkicks & stealth were too over powered to require them in my playthrough.

Show all comments (113)
110°

Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered Multiplayer Mod Takes Shape and Looks Solid So Far

A Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered multiplayer mod is in development by the community, and there's even early gameplay footage.

119d ago
310°

Marvel's Spider-Man Generated Almost $4 Billion In Revenue During Its First Year

Insomniac Games' 2018 web-swinging adventure, Marvel's Spider-Man, has generated almost 4 billion US Dollars in revenue during its first year.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
145d ago Replies(5)
VersusDMC144d ago

For those spreading lies here about Marvel making the most out of the deal...

The rate has tiers. 9% to 18% physical and 19% to 26% digital for the first 7 mil. So even if it's 26% for all versions it's not that much. Considering all platform holders charge 30%. And just like 30% is how much Sony is getting from call of duty.

Now let's think about how much money Microsoft is making off Indiana Jones on PS5 and steam since there is a platform cut of 30% plus the disney cut...ouch. 😏

Chevalier144d ago

Plus why would Disney mess with a deal where they sit back and make a crap ton of income without lifting a finger?! Idiots think Disney will say no to money? Lol

144d ago Replies(4)
goken144d ago

Yes considering the IP, 19-26% isn’t really that crazy.
For context google and apple wants 30% for selling your console and PC games on a phone.

Tacoboto144d ago

False
Proof: you are able to purchase titles within the Steam and PS Apps. You've always been able to.

The one exception is Xbox, where they both (1) have their own mobile store agenda, and (2) have remote play built into the core Xbox app, while PS Remote Play and Steam Link are separate apps.

144d ago Replies(1)
Ezio2048144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

Can someone explain me the math here. 20 million copies x $60 = $1.2 billion max (assuming every copy was sold at $60 which it possibly couldn't).

Even Gta5/RDR2 didn't generate this much revenue in their first year even though they sold much more. Something is off here with this revenue calculation.

144d ago
Chevalier144d ago

Basically people like Boxx don't know wtf they are talking about. There was also an expensive collector edition of the game, faceplate, controllers and a special edition console. Add in new customers to Playstation buying the system to specifically play Spiderman and yeah you can bump up revenue in multiple areas. Spiderman is that popular.

144d ago
144d ago
mkis007144d ago

It's a guy saying their games helped generate revenue...not any official revenue. He's touting revenue that wouldn't exist without the game. So ya toys and comics. This is not a sony financial report.

VersusDMC144d ago

https://www.theverge.com/20...

It took GTA 3 days. And Spider Man had a season pass as well that released all it's content a couple of months after launch.

1Victor144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

“It took GTA 3 days. And Spider Man had a season pass as well that released all it's content a couple of months after launch “

Reminds me how many devices was gta released on and who’s fanbase bigger CoD or gta 🤦🏿.
Edit:Congrats to Sony.
Damn I missed a obscured account troll comment 😩

Amplitude144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

Spiderman didn't have a season pass in the traditional sense. It was 3 story missions included in the Deluxe edition, but with the ability to purchase them all separately as a pass. They were multi-hour stories as well - It's not like Insomniac has been constantly building on Spiderman, collecting money monthly from players in exchange for monthly content drops.

Hell, all the skins they released were free for everybody and there have been a ton of them.
Why are we comparing Spiderman to GTA5 anyway? You can pick literally any game or media release and it doesn't compare to GTA5 sales - plus, one is exclusive to Pla-... this is dumb.

Redemption-64144d ago

It's only off if you decide to exclude accessories and custom consoles/bundles. Those are all part of the revenue

144d ago
Redemption-64144d ago

@TysonDor
Sure, if that helps you sleep better at night. You might not be smart enough to know this, but most games don't get bundles or their own custom consoles. If Sony, Nintendo, and MS create a custom console of a game that ends up selling millions, that revenue is counted towards that game. Video game sales are not the only way games make money.

They are not fudging any numbers, they are counting the money they made through this game, hell I would say it's more if we include merchandise sales too, but that goes to Marvel, not Sony

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 144d ago
Show all comments (53)
110°

We hand-picked the 20 best Steam Deck games under $10 in the Steam Autumn Sale, up to 95% off

Abdul writes: "The Steam Autumn Sale is now live, and we've selected the 20 best Steam Deck-compatible games that you can get for under $10 right now."

DivineHand125144d ago

I would also add Risk of Rain 2 as long as you don't stray too far from a power source as each run can be long as the hours melt away. Another thing to note is that based on the reports, the FPS may drop into the 40s if a lot of enemies are on the screen.

There is also the Half Life series. If you haven't played half-life before then you can do so now at the super low price.

cthulhucultist144d ago

Mafia was amazing looking and had a great story. Played flawlessly at 30fps as well without dips 99% of the time.

The same is true for Jedi Fallen Order

Sony games as also on sale. Picked up Rachet and Clank, cant wait to try it!