290°

Cayde-6 Had to Die so Destiny 2 Could Live

So…Cayde-6 is dead. If you had any doubts about Cayde during the trailer, Steve Cotton and Scott Taylor confirmed his death in an interview after Sony’s E3 conference.

Read Full Story >>
gamerpros.co
maybelovehate2137d ago

Curse you Uldren.. You will pay

saniyaga2137d ago

that is exactly how I feel!

Kane222137d ago

sided with uldren on this one....not all guardians are good:)

Kane222136d ago

@D3TH_D33LR
I wasn't talking about cayde at all..i was talking about guardians who dont want to be good. that and i dont care for cayde's death...im not attached to any character in the destiny universe..

NorthernFrost2137d ago

Wow, kind of a strange way to reveal his death. A trailer seems like a lackluster place to kill a fan-favorite character, but maybe Bungie needed to symbolize their step forward from the outside.

saniyaga2137d ago

Unless he dies in an early mission, and have to helplessly watch Uldren kill him. Man, that would be brutal :(

Christopher2137d ago

It's to sell the game. It's marketing. Look, we can kill off a puppy! We've changed!

Godmars2902136d ago

Seems in keeping with the Destiny's been done actually.

Seraphim2136d ago (Edited 2136d ago )

they continuously say via their streams they don't want to give too much info, that fans should experience it for themselves and they pull this? Further proof Bungie has no idea WTF they're doing with Destiny. And as if they absolutely had to kill Cayde to keep D2 going? Lack of creativity anyone? I'm a bit pissed personally. Cayde was awesome!! Why not kill Zavala instead? I mean does anyone truly enjoy or like his blue, awoken ass?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2136d ago
DevilishSix2137d ago

Bungie go ahead and nail your coffin. Your franchise is nearly dead with your poor decisions and anti consumer dlc pricing. Now another poor decision and killing off the best character. Lol good luck with all that.

mechlord2137d ago

not really. look at the outcry out there. his was a martyr's death. you know what usually happens when a martyr dies right?
besides, this gives them space to grow and they can change how they approach characters now. they can change the other two to make them more relatable because of this. they can even introduce another character as likeable as cayde (doubtful). They gave themselves space to be able to write the best revenge story ever. will they deliver? probably not.

PapaBop2137d ago

Should have killed off Tess instead, even if it's just to replace her with someone else for Eververse, killing off Tess would have gone down really well with the fanbase.

Show all comments (24)
150°

With Larian Out Of The Picture, Will The Baldur's Gate IP Be In Safe Hands?

Huzaifah from eXputer: "With Larian Studios washing their hands of the IP, what is the ultimate fate of the legendary Baldur's Gate series?"

RaidenBlack19h ago

If anybody's gonna mention BioWare, then look at Archetype Entertainment, they're the new BioWare
or else
Obsidian is still a good choice but not independent anymore.

anast18h ago(Edited 18h ago)

No, WoTC is pivoting to mobile. They can use Larian's work to justify DnD Go and everyone will accept it.

RiseNShine18h ago

Short answer, nope. Long answer, f*ck nope.

robtion1h ago

Correct answer. Most people don't realise that the companies that are still making good games using common sense and a customer focus are generally not American. They are from Poland, Belgium, Japan, or other countries that have not yet become completely corrupted by 'extreme capitalism'.

Before you down vote me into oblivion I am not anti-american. I just don't like greed and corruption which unfortunately seems to correlate with power.

I would guess the next Baldurs gate will probably be filled with GaaS.

Christopher18h ago

Honestly, we're talking completely new engine and none of Larian's built-in stuff with regard to environments and the like that they had from their past divinity game. No one is going to have that just ready to go. So, they need to shop for a dev studio that has a past game that shows what they want.

Obsidian doesn't have that, maybe the closest being Dungeon Siege 3 or Pillars of Eternity, but those are very basic, not as open, very little environment related and altering capabilities. So, we're talking a step way back on what Larian delivered. Zero scene experience to line up with what was done in BG3. Okay conversation tree designs, but still needs more complexity.

inXile has Wasteland 3 as a base model engine, and I think that's better than Pillars of Eternity from Obsidian. But, still needs to be more open world, more environmental effects, and a much heavier rules set adaptation. But, not a bad overall engine as a base, but still a ton of work. Zero scene experience to line up with what was done in BG3. Needs a ton of work on that entirely.

Tactical Adventure did the Solasta game. Really good and more accurate as far as 5e rules than BG3. But, again, if the expectation is similar to what made BG3 a big hit, engine isn't designed for moving the camera, is a bit outdated in graphics, doesn't have in-game scene elements, and needs much better writers/voice actors.

Owlcat of pathfinder games is another choice, even though they've recently moved on to WH40k licensed games. Again, though, the engine is the biggest issue here to match up, but it's a much better option overall than Tactical Adventure. Another question is writers/story telling, as much of their overall story telling bits are very limited with a lot of random worldbuilding elements that are just +\- of some attributes.

TBH, no matter who takes over, it's just not going to be like BG3 much like how BG3 isn't at all like BG1/2. And BG3 was so successful because of how much Larian was able to put in with their engine and how focused they were on players having ridiculous control over the story being told. I just don't see the next BG being the same and depending on what it is, it might be good but I'm not as big of a reach as BG3. It's way more likely players are going to go into BG4 (or its spiritual successor if it moves away from Baldur's Gate and into Neverwinter or something like Plansescape) expecting much of what is in BG3 with more options, new and older characters, and the same level of control over what they're doing. If it doesn't have that, regardless of who makes it, it won't be as successful, IMHO.

exputers1h ago

Yes, I completely concur.

As good and talented as inXile and Obsidian are in their own specific way of making their particular games, none of them have Larian's attention to detail, dynamic worlds, and reactivity, so even if they end up making a new Baldur's Gate, it's going to be a significant step-down in terms of gameplay if not narrative.

CrimsonWing6917h ago

Probably not, but maybe… just maybe…

Show all comments (8)
30°

Human Fall Flat 2 Delayed, Devolver Details Major 2023 Sales Decline

As part of its latest financial report, Devolver Digital has announced that upcoming physics platformer Human Fall Flat 2 has been delayed beyond 2025.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
260°

Microsoft has ‘let Blizzard be Blizzard’ following its acquisition, studio says

Microsoft has 'let Blizzard be Blizzard' following the acquisition of the veteran developer according to World of Warcraft's executive producer.

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Kaii1d 16h ago

Diablo 4 storefront being a cash grabbing shitshow does unironically attest to that, kudos.

kythlyn9h ago

Microsoft needs to be guiding Blizzard to be what it USED to be, not allowing it to continue to be the greedy bastardization of itself that it has become.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

Okay i will be interested if they become old Blizzard but might as well be dead.

Rynxie22h ago

They will never be old blizzard. Most of all the OG's left from developers to those on the top (even some decision making folks left).

Vits1d 13h ago

Shame most of the people that made Blizzard what they were, have already left a while ago.

ApocalypseShadow1d 13h ago

I was about to say this. How can they be blizzard when they're no longer blizzard from yesteryear?

Hofstaderman1d 3h ago

Just like Rare and Bioware...

blacktiger1d 3h ago

Rare was the thing I lost heart

victorMaje1d ago

Exactly. Blizzard hasn’t been Blizzard for a long time.
Oh how the mighty have fallen.

Knightofelemia1d 9h ago

Blizzard is not the same Blizzard like it use to be.

PassNextquestion1d 3h ago

Were you expecting Microsoft to hire everyone that had left Blizzard long before they purchased the company...

Microsoft has let the Blizzard company they purchased continue to be the Blizzard company they purchased.

thesoftware73021h ago

Wow, PassNextquestion,

You fully understand what that saying means, unlike some people on here who just have to say negative garbage talk.

When someone says, "Just let *blank* be *blank*, "they are just letting them operate how they operate.

It's pretty much how Sony "let Bungie be Bungie."

This comment section is full of outright haters, but you have to "let N4G be N4G"

GamerRN19h ago

This site leans so heavily in one direction...

BISHOP-BRASIL10h ago

I don't think people commenting are necessarily blaming MS for anything here, this is just collective longing for what Blizzard/Vivendi was before Activision's meddling.

Show all comments (43)