520°

Albert Penello Leaves Microsoft After 18 Years

Albert Penello was the Senior Director of Marketing for Xbox. He was fairly active during leading to the launch of the Xbox One.

Read Full Story >>
gearnuke.com
Gazondaily2205d ago

"He was fairly active during leading to the launch of the Xbox One."

Which wasn't a good thing for Xbox 🤣 To the point where they had to the pretty much gag the fellow.

Christopher2205d ago

The man who created the "highest quality pixels" derision by editing out context from the video.

FITgamer2205d ago

Now they just need to get rid of Greenberg.

dirkdady2205d ago

Wasn't this guy known as the troll of Neogaf?

Gazondaily2205d ago (Edited 2205d ago )

Yeah lol. He had been waiting for Scorpio for ages.

You can't fault his passion but the manner in which that translated in his social media and forum posts and how he got thoroughly shut down on the weakness of those points really made the Xbox brand, in core gaming circles, look worse not better.

Obscure_Observer2204d ago

@FITgamer

"Now they just need to get rid of Greenberg."

Tottaly agreed.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2204d ago
letsa_go2205d ago Show
Obscure_Observer2204d ago

Phil Spencer´s restructure of the Xbox brand is still goin! Since he got promoted we got Booty in his place, Darrell Gallagher is now part of the Xbox Team and now Penello is out!

Future seems exciting! :)

chaos-emeralds2205d ago

Good. Xbox marketing has been awful and probably cost them. Games like sunset overdrive, recore etc should've had a better public perception.

2205d ago Replies(2)
Wikkid6662205d ago

He had NOTHING to do with game marketing.

maybelovehate2205d ago

Recore was just not a good game. As for Sunset Overdrive, definitely agree. Still one of the best games of this generation.

Concertoine2205d ago

Recore is actually pretty good after a year of patches + some content. Weirdly middle market game that reminds me of the 6th gen.

Its evident that MS rushed the game after throwing a pc port on top, a lot for a small team to handle.

darthv722205d ago

the definitive edition of Recore is a much better game than the initial release.

Lenrulesdaworld2205d ago

good guy, glad to have met and interviewed him

masterfox2205d ago

This is actually a good news for xbox.

SuperSaiyanGod412204d ago

I'm surprised Greenberg is still there. I think he needs to go then we will see Microsoft start fresh.

Obscure_Observer2204d ago

@Auron

"Shannon Loftis??"

Will probably be replaced by Darrell Gallagher

PhoenixUp2205d ago

He was in for the long haul

The Xbox brand hasn’t even been around for 18 years yet

yellowgerbil2205d ago

Do you think the released the system the same day Bill gates said "sure let's get into the gaming business"? It takes years to make a console and was probably started in early 1999

Yohshida2205d ago

First XBOX launched in 2001, they started development before that... so yes he was their

No Way2205d ago

Their "Senior Director of Marketing for Xbox," it's in the article.

2204d ago
Christopher2205d ago

He was hired because of the work he did at EA before that as well.

2pacalypsenow2205d ago

The Xbox project started in 1998.

PhoenixUp2205d ago

I know Xbox planning started in the late 90s, but the brand itself still hasn’t been around for 18 years

darthv722205d ago (Edited 2205d ago )

The initial reveal of the xbox was in 2000 the release was in 2001 so yes... it has been around for 18 years.

PhoenixUp2205d ago (Edited 2205d ago )

And the Play Station add-on was unveiled in 1991 with planning starting in 1988, that doesn’t mean that the PlayStation brand has been around for 27 years or 30 years respectively.

I count a brand’s existence as the time since it first released, not when it was first unveiled or its planning stages.

darthv722205d ago (Edited 2205d ago )

A brand does not become live when it releases... there has to be a reveal that sets the stage for the marketing and promotional material and release information for stores.

the release date is just that, when you (as a consumer) can buy it. Prior to that is setting up everything else (including the brand). Xbox has existed longer than 18 years (if you add in the planning stage) but it is the public reveal that is when it becomes live. Xbox was revealed at GDC in March of 2000. That is the date the brand was made public.

you really cant use release dates because back then they were usually staggered. PS released in JP in 94 so do you consider that the year the brand started or do you consider it 95 when it released in the RotW? Or perhaps earlier when they first revealed they were going to make their own game console after the break up with Nintendo (which was spelled differently by the way)?

PhoenixUp2204d ago (Edited 2204d ago )

Look at the documentation for any entertainment product or brand and you’ll easily see that the day it gets released is the day it starts actually existing. Everything prior to that is just conceptual that could very well even turn out to be vaporware.

- PSP for example was unveiled at E3 2003, but nobody adds on that year for the time Sony spent in the handheld market.

- Look at the character of Superman for example. He was conceptuallly created in 1933 but he didn’t actually get his publication until 1938 which makes him 80 years old in 2018, not 85 years.

- Deep Down was unveiled to the public five years ago. If that game were to ever come out, those five or more years wouldn’t be counted to the time the brand has been active.

Of course 1994 is the year the PlayStation brand started. Sony themselves recognize this as they started the first PlayStation Experience conference in 2014 to commemorate such a milestone. They even announced the 20th anniversary PS4 special edition the exact day PS1 first released.

https://m.youtube.com/watch...

Nintendo themselves recognize that 1983 was the year Famicom, ie the NES, released as 30 years later they had their own promotion for the anniversary.

https://venturebeat.com/201...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2204d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2204d ago
Show all comments (54)
310°

It's Time To Stop Giving Xbox Boss Phil Spencer A Pass

Under his leadership, many have lost their jobs and fewer games have made it out the door.

purple1014h ago

people should call for his resignation, he has literally flushed xbox down the toilet.
another 3 studios closed today, thats it now, get out

Tody_ZA3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Well purple101 you'd have to convince Observer and the other Xbox faithful that these studio closures and the fallout from the acquisitions is a bad thing and a sign of what's to come, and I don't think you're going to do that.

Nobody has managed that feat.

Redgrave2h ago

Obscure and Zeref have been summoned to the floor to give their account of these proceedings.

VenomUK2h ago

I 100% blame 'nice guy Phil' for the death of Xbox. The thing to realise is the Xbox Series S & X are performing WORST in console sales and game sales than the much criticised Xbox One - how can this be?

His two big mistakes were 1-not developing enough exclusives and 2 - always trying to beat PlayStation. If he made more exclusives over his decade reign and not tried to 'win' then classic Xbox would still be here in a profitable third place. Instead he tried a series of different projects to win and he ended up ultimately destroying Xbox by changing its relationship with its most loyal customers. What did he do?

* Phil spent a decade only release new iterations of Halo, Forza and Gears and not investing in creating new first party studios and IP. He mishandled Scalebound and shutdown Lionhead Studios.

* Phil tried Mixer, a streaming channel that could be used to promote Xbox dominance with free giveaways...

* Phil tried to create a streaming service that he regarded as too superior to consider PlayStation and Nintendo as competitors! But would instead compete with Netflix and Google...

* But his worst mistake was Xbox Game Pass - a multi billion dollar investment that could only work if completely dominated the worldwide gaming market - but it didn't. Instead it changed the culture of Xbox gamers so they resented spending on third party games as they were now trained to expect everything for free. Now all the games Microsoft had invested so much in were not only NOT making money from other platforms, as ever, but they were now NOT EVEN making money from Xbox customers.

If Phil Spencer had just concentrated on making new games and not non-stop gimmicks to beat PlayStation, I genuinely believe the Xbox would be an attractive platform with regular exclusives like Halo but with others too that would give it its distinct identity and maintain a profitable existence. Phil's been in charge for over a decade, the blame lays at his feet.

amazinglover1h ago

Last MS financial results for FY24 Q2 which is the company's sales data through Dec. 31, 2023. According to the earnings, gaming revenue is up 49% year-over-year.

That doesn't sound like he flushing it down the toilet and that also makes very unlikely he loses his job any time soon.

crazyCoconuts1h ago

Revenue up due to acquisition... Spending 10s of billions for new companies of course revenue is up. They don't tell us profits but they wouldn't be shutting down these divisions if they were in the black. Pretty sure they're shifting so radically because their current state has been an abject failure

Scissorman49m ago

This is 100% due to Activision Blizzard. If that deal had not gone through, Xbox revenue would be flat, which means a game like Starfield failed to move the needle.

Tacoboto4h ago

Phil needs to go. His time is over. When you oversee layoff after layoff after studio closure after studio closure, it's impossible to keep going forward and have people - employees and fans alike - trust you in any way.

Especially after HiFi Rush hit their metrics. I guess we know what to expect for Ninja Theory next once Hellblade is out, and Machine Games once Indiana's out & Todd Howard focuses back on ES6.

mastershredder4h ago

It's not just Phil (Phil is just the dumb kid taking the money) and Kotaku is NOT the voice to listen to as shi7 sites like Kotaku helped contribute to modern gaming toxicity and disinformation. Kotaku staff = Much like Phil, and yes need to go.

Moegooner4h ago

MS has been posting record profits, you think they give a crap about games and gamers? Think again.

DOMination-4h ago

What a prat.

People gave him and Matt Booty the benefit of the doubt for a few years due to the mess they inherited but a decade on and all they've done is ruin gaming for everyone.

The only success they've had is MS Flight Simulator which was developed by a third party anyway - and Forza Horizon which by pure coincidence went downhill in quality the second Playground were acquired (imo) and that's all I can think of. Everything else they've touched has been ruined.

It's genuinely staggering how either of these two guys are still there.

Hofstaderman4h ago

Phil didnt even inherit a mess, he was equally responsible for it because he sat on the executive so the kinect and XBONE roadmap vision was also on him. Mattrick was the convenient public scapegoat back then but now theres no one to place the blame on.

Tacoboto3h ago

If they're to keep anyone, I'd hope it would be Sarah Bond. She's at least consistent, constantly doing quick tweets with green emojis where she can, repping the brand, saying the next hardware will be the biggest leap ever (whatever that means).

Phil Spencer openly minimizes Xbox by going out of his way to congratulate competitors and talking about how great playing non-Xbox devices are; if only Xbox had someone that could even pretend to like Xbox for being Xbox.

LoveSpuds3h ago

This is the point I always found frustrating, the whitewashing of Spencers reputation when he got promoted. He was involved in the slide into mediocrity of the 360 generation!

Aloymetal3h ago

The worse is yet to come and their fanbase don't know it yet, someone at MS posted and deleted a tweet saying all their main ''exclusives'' Halo, Forza, Gears etc will be heading to PS soon so grab a front seat ticket and some popcorn and enjoy the show;) The crying will be hilarious.

Notellin2h ago

Yeah he is absolutely responsible for the abysmal state of Xbox. I can't tell Mattrick and Spencer apart at this point. Both have been horrible executives for the Xbox brand.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2h ago
Show all comments (42)
90°

Baldur's Gate 3: Neil Newbon Explains Why Astarion Was a 'Risk'

In an Interview with Game Rant, Neil Newbon discusses the performance choices he made portraying Baldur's Gate 3's Astarion, and why some decisions were risky.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
80°

Hasbro's $1 billion bet on internal game development

Brendan writes; "Head of digital product development Dan Ayoub tells us about the toy maker's plans to get back in the game."

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz