Dualshockers writes: "We went hands-on with Wolfenstein II on Nintendo Switch at a Bethesda event during PAX East, and came away with some concerns."
“Who is your hero?”
It’s a question that comes up during job interviews and college essay writing, and every time I’m asked, I always answer the same way: my grandmother. But I’ll never tell her that.
It's a video game, but I feel it s about time to forget this image of the guy in a pyjama with a David 🌟 and start to show the militant, philosophic and brave people they truly are.
💪💪🇮&# 127473;🇮🇱
Replies(3)I mean, it's a video game. It doesn't prove anything. But sure, Jews do pretty well in the world, they don't need their value reaffirmed by some game.
The big break-up could be good news for Switch fans.
It means you get to make an article, pretty much the only thing it actually means regarding Nintendo.
Bethesda has published a number of different games on Switch thus far, including The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, Doom, Wolfenstein II, and Fallout Shelter. The company isn’t stopping there having recently confirmed that Doom Eternal will be on the console. This time around, the Switch version will drop alongside other platforms.
I bought them all and they ended up being my favorite versions. Hope they can port Fallout 4 over...can't wait for doom eternal.
Most third party developers have had nothing but good things to say about the sales of switch versions of their games. Much different than the Wii U days.
If the Wii U had been more like the Switch in terms of power and portability, things would have been so much better. Also not calling it a name with Wii in it.
Eh, the supposed Wii name confusion thing was just something Nintendo's marketing division conjured up to try and cover the Wii U's failure. The "Super" NES had no trouble selling. The Gameboy "Advance" had no trouble Selling. The "3"DS sold extremely well (after a rocky start, due more to the 3d gimmick).
I'm not saying its name couldn't have been better, but it was hardly a factor. If the Xbox "One" can sell, so can anything.
It was the biggest factor for it, it was so bad Target marketed it with the tablet on top of the old Wii when the Wii U was releasing.
Post E3 2011 when they announced it, so many news outlets and consumers were confused as all hell.
SNES after NES made sense and they made sure you knew the difference, and Xbox has been in every console name. Those two can't compare to the Wii/Wii U issue.
@Sgt_Slaughter,
Eh, if Wii U sales had been better third party developers would have found ways to put their games on it. Remember it got Deus Ex, Mass Effect, Batman, Assassin's Creed, and more in its early days. Those developers were releasing on Wii U right out the gate because, like Nintendo, they were confident the success of the Wii would carry over. Switch is doing so much better and on top of that it's just such a convenient console to play, which really helps software sales.
@Nebaku,
You are correct that it wasn't just the name. But I think when the name is brought up it kind of encapsulates the idea that Nintendo was expecting success just because they were continuing with the Wii brand.
I’m sure they are but if you want any more of my business, you’ll have to patch them as well. Skyrim has had the sound glitch since release and to my knowledge, it’s still an ongoing issue. Not everyone is going to get these issues but for those of us that do, it ends the gameplay then and there.
With the lack of games early on its no surprise, plus Bethesda games are not popular anyway
He's being a troll. Basically its the anytime something sells well on the switch its because there are no games argument. Also in typical troll fashion they tend to babble incoherently. Hence the Bethesda games not being popular part. Lol
At this rate I'm convinced EA just don't want to put games on Switch because of some pride issue. The majority of third parties seem to be throwing ports on there and saying they are doing fine but what are they doing?
I suppose they think they'll look like fools begging Nintendo to take them back.
Well, some games like Battlefield are pretty CPU heavy and really just wouldn't run on Switch. They really should be putting NHL and Madden on it though, along with all of their "indies" like Unravel and A Way Out. They also should look at putting things like the Sims and Mass Effect Trilogy. Battlefield Bad Company 2 with all the DLC and expansions should straight up be ported/remastered for all current consoles, including Switch.
To be honest I don’t want any of EA’s games near the Switch. Keep those MTs and lootboxes infestation away.
All multiplatform games on Nintendo Switch are Like the Worst Way to Experience the games unless it's on another Nintendo system
People should just get over the fact the switch is a portable...sorry but it is. It will be the worst way to experience all 3rd party games. Its just really really cool to be able to play them anywhere. That is where the switch shines. I've had mine hooked up the the TV twice since Christmas 17.
Isn’t that true for most multiplats on the system
You’re basically trading performance for the ability to play it portably
It's portable so your comparing apples to oranges. As it stands the Switch is the only portable version and has no other portable version to compare it with. PC max settings is where you'll find the best performing version, not on consoles.
Unfortunately its one of those best games of 2017 people forgot to buy.