560°

What Studios Should Microsoft Look at Acquiring?

Two of TICGN's editors try to come up with theoretical answers to an increasingly popular question: What studios should Microsoft look at acquiring?

Sciurus_vulgaris2650d ago (Edited 2650d ago )

Playground Games is the studio Microsoft should most logically purchase. Playground is a proven developer, I am very interested to see how the studios non-racing project (likely Fable). However,we don’t know if Playground wants to be bought. I would rather Microsoft enlarge the Coalition, 343i and Turn 10, and give creative freedom to the 3 studios.

Additionally, looking at how Sea of Thieves is being received. Rare need some new management or restructuring. It is unacceptable for Rare to be so inefficient when compared 343i, the Coalition and Turn 10. The latter studios make AAA games in 2-3 years and thier titles have a good amount of content and review well. Meanwhile, Rare over the cross of 3-4 years made a title with marginal content and a lower reception. Rare may have affectively killed their game from release....

I have high hopes for Ori 2 this year. I also have some interest in Crackdown 3 and State of Decay 2. However, if the rumours of ‘Fable 4’ and the rebooted Perfect Dark aren’t true. The only true high production quality AAA games one could expect from MS would be Halo 6, Gears 5 and more Forza.

Cyborgg2648d ago ShowReplies(6)
Cmv382648d ago

After the sea of thieves debacle, I would prefer if Microsoft, didn't buy anyone. The track record of success is non existent.

zerocarnage2648d ago Show
2648d ago
mark_parch2648d ago

super excited for state of decay 2 and ori the will of the wisps but I think crackdown 3 will be another disaster unfortunately. I'm actually loving sea of thieves but I'm obviously in the minority

Gaming_1st2647d ago Show
Kribwalker2647d ago Show
zeuanimals2647d ago Show
2pacalypsenow2648d ago

Difference is 343i, the Coalition and Turn 10 only make games from established Ip's. None of them have made a new IP since they were established, 343 and Coalition are just continuing what was started by Bugie and Epic. Rare has tried making new Ip's and failed.

DaDrunkenJester2647d ago

I wouldn't say Rare has failed.

Say what you will about them focusing on Kinect, but their games were the best ones for the dang device. Also Viva Pinata (not really my style) was well received as well.

SoT is sitting at 70 on meta and had over a million unique players day one and topped the UK charts for the week... I wouldn't really classify that as a "Failure". Did it live up to the ridiculous hype and pressure people put on it? Doesn't seem like it.

Gaming_1st2647d ago Show
2pacalypsenow2647d ago

"So Wtf would i buy a Xbox 1 much less a less Xbox x, i would have mental issues."

I wouldn't go that far.

Most people even if they had a Ps4 might not be interested in those exclusive games, Majority of my friends all play in COD, BF1 and Fortnite which is on Xbox.

I myself enjoy the exclusives, but i'm only speaking for myself.

rainslacker2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

MS tends to manage from above. New management would require the management within MS itself to be changed up, and I doubt they see it as them doing a bad job. The board, or group that oversees the management within their devices division would have to see the management needs changing up, and I'm not convinced they care that much given that Spencer is now part of that group. If anything, it appears that MS is happy with what Spencer has done or achieved, or at least have confidence that he can achieve something.

Ori 2 probably will be good though, but MS doesn't manage that studio. In fact, many 2nd party games from MS this gen have been pretty good.

@2pac

Making games in an existing franchise doesn't mean it'll be good. Halo 5 had criticism over it's campaign. GeOW was probably the worst in the series. About the only thing MS has been consistent on is Forza, which is more like a sports franchise to them, where each release is just a refined version of the prior iteration.

2648d ago
Tko11112647d ago

SOT is a success. Stop reading bs from the bias site trying to down play any game from Xbox. No man sky had to refund owners of the game can’t say that about sea of thieves. Lower install base and came in as #1. Has a digital entry point of $10 and sold more physical copies as an exclusive. That is success...

badboyz092647d ago (Edited 2647d ago )

EA they both SUCK!!!!!!!!!

conanlifts2647d ago

I think they should expand studios as you said plus purchase a few new large studios. Personally i think they need something huge like capcom. Particularly if they want to be the Netflix of gaming.
In addition the management at rare should be held accountable for ignoring all of the alpha and beta feedback. The feedback all said great game but very lacking in content and variety. Yet they failed to address this.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2647d ago
ziggurcat2650d ago

They should be investing in the ones they have, and supporting brand new IPs from those studios.

Direwolf4842650d ago

I absolutely agree. All four (heck, maybe even Mojang but that's a small team) are worth doubling down on. Just thought it was interesting to look at who else they should "bring into the family" so to speak.

ziggurcat2650d ago

I mean, I wouldn't be upset if they picked up the studio that made cuphead...

Gaming_1st2647d ago

@ziggurcat

WTF. So let MS buy another company and squeeze the life out of them to make them irrelevant? Good choice.....SMDH

Cyborgg2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Microsoft don't operate in that way. I expect them to take the easy way out and just buy EA and Valve and call it a day

PS. I see them trying to invest in Steam

Gaming_1st2647d ago

ROFLMAO.....FUNNIEST THING I HAVE SEEN IN A WHILE.

Atticus_finch2648d ago

They can't acquire any until they can run the few they have, otherwise what's the point.

The Wood2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

Manage the ones you have in your nest better before you acquire more. Baby steps mate. I get that they desperately need new talent and ideas but others things have to change high up including the ethos before real improvements can be sustained. Get your lap times up before you jump to into the car with a bigger engine

_-EDMIX-_2648d ago

That's actually exactly how I feel I used to always feel that Microsoft didn't have enough Studios but it's starting to realize that the problem has nothing to do with that they don't have enough it's everything to do with how they're currently treating the ones they already have ,so they can't just get a studio and dedicate them to just the Fable Gears of War Halo what have you and then to our amazement those Studios begin to create lackluster experiences that begin to fatigue the audience.

What is sad is they closed-down lionhead for not performing well but it's like what did you guys expect you guys basically only gave them the ability to make Fable then you're shocked that they're getting fatigued and uninspired? Could you imagine if the only thing that Sony did for the last three generations was release Jak and Daxter and naughty dog never got to make Uncharted or The Last of Us? Understand that just because Sony hires them to make Jak and Daxter that doesn't mean inside of those writers Minds that those games are not being thought of because one day that team is going to have enough of that crap and they're going to leave Sony and go to another publisher that inevitably ends up making Uncharted or the last of us so people need to understand that people make games ,not just companies.

Believe me Destiny existed in someone's mind while they were working at Microsoft.....

So it seems like there's a pattern of a lot of EX Microsoft developers making something else somewhere else. If anything Capcom would be another good example of this look at how many of their former developers went on to find success elsewhere like with Evil Within or Bayonetta Vanquish would have you.

Gaming_1st2647d ago

Amen brother, well said.

ajax172647d ago

The only logical solution

Gaming_1st2647d ago

MS, doesn't care as long you buy their box and use cable. Who give two shits about games.....SMDH. Sad thing is people actually defend MS, im sorry you're mentally ill.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2647d ago
2650d ago Replies(2)
jhoward5852650d ago (Edited 2650d ago )

Microsoft needs to purchase platinum games because MS needs some fast-paced action game like Nier, devil man's cry, etc. The next studio MS should purchase is sega because they have the franchises that I think will grab many gamers attention, including the Japanese gamers. Third devs MS should purchase is playground because they have proven themselves to be a good fit for MS. Last but not least, MS should purchase From software because they have showcased some of the best action horrors in gaming and FS would be a great addition to MS's line up of studios.

DigitalRaptor2649d ago

I couldn't imagine a more incompatible studio for them to pick up after how Scalebound ended up.

rainslacker2648d ago

God no. I like Platinum games. I can't imagine MS and P* would coexist happily, and likely, the creative talent that exists within that studio would just go elsewhere. Buying P* would just give MS a name and some franchises. Franchises that MS doesn't seem to care about to begin with, and if they don't care, then they aren't likely to do anything meaningful with them.

MS does need more games like you say, but they need to make them good. Just having them means nothing.

Atticus_finch2648d ago

Wow that's a horrible idea. Would Xbox fans even support those games, highly doubt it. Ps4 gets criticism for having those amazing games.

Dragonscale2648d ago (Edited 2648d ago )

After the scalebound debacle lol. If ms bought platinum no one would stick around to make any games. Anyhow the last thing they'd wanna do is end up making shallow multiplayer based gaas, platinum make single player games tbh which goes against ms's current policy. Fat chance.

FinalFantasyFanatic2647d ago

Please don't let them take platinum games, I'll be really upset.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2647d ago
Lennoxb632649d ago

The ones that they are getting game previews from.

Show all comments (177)
40°

Rematch is "chasing credibility" but not realism like rival EA FC

Pocket Tactics sits down with Rematch’s creative director, Pierre Tarno, to discuss why Sloclap moved away from Sifu to chase something new.

Read Full Story >>
pockettactics.com
660°

Microsoft planning “major” Xbox layoffs next week

The cuts are expected to be announced next week.

Microsoft is also planning thousands of job cuts that will impact other parts of it businesses

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
1d 1h ago Replies(1)
1d 1h ago Replies(1)
Obscure_Observer1d ago

MFs has been beating their chests over great quarterly results and big profits to shareholders while firing people by the thousands just like Sony.

I wonder if at the top of those rumored layoffs they´ll also cancel upcoming or unannounced games while shutting down more studios as well.

1d ago
pwnmaster30001d ago

Always got to throw shade at Sony smh.
Yes we get it,
MS good Sony bad
MS bad Sony is also bad lmao

1d ago
Obscure_Observer1d ago

F* them both!

Just for the record, I don´t care about your victim complex crap either. Find someone else who cares.

blacktiger23h ago

He was talking about both. Why you getting offended when he's using both names

pwnmaster300023h ago(Edited 23h ago)

@Blacktiger

Im not offended , that’s just his formula lol
He can’t help help himself, he needs to bring Sony down when the topic involves MS.
Whether is good news for MS or bad, it some how leads to Sony doing bad lmao.
It’s actually hilarious.

InUrFoxHole18h ago

He's not wrong but im tracking what youre saying. In this case is should just be MS bad. Thats a lot of people fired

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 18h ago
Tacoboto1d ago

"just like Sony"

Gosh you're insufferable, not everything needs to be both-sides'd. Sony's had layoffs, but nothing like what Microsoft has been doing and is continuing to do.

CrimsonWing691d ago (Edited 1d ago )

I mean, no offense, but this is why you’re not some corporate business person running a major corporation. Big profits don’t mean jobs are safe. Do you understand why things like this happen:

Cutting jobs to maintain or increase profitability, especially in underperforming divisions like parts of Xbox like other gaming divisions.

Corporate restructuring and relocating resources for strategic stability in ever changing markets and consumer behaviors.

Investor expectations and optimizing operations to maintain investor confidence. Whatever boosts stock prices and improves future margins.

And there’s many other factors at play. It’s never as simple as business doing well, everyone’s safe. That’s just you not understanding at all how corporations work and have been working since the beginning. This isn’t something that’s specific to Xbox, you can bet your ass Sony and Nintendo do this and if it’s not clear by now, game development is not a stable job nor has it ever been for many. A lot of developers are contractors and guess what happens when a project is done?

Ganif22h ago

Nintendo said they have no plans for layoffs, and you can't seriously claim that the scale of Sony's layoffs most of which involved Bungie which is self managed as even close to the same scale as what Microsoft has done since they purchased Zenimax. And that significantly less layoffs would have happened if those publishers had stayed independent. Keep in mind that much of these layoffs have been due to redundancies specifically related to these buyouts.

CrimsonWing6922h ago(Edited 22h ago)

@Ganif

Nintendo:

https://gamerant.com/ninten...

Sony:

https://gamerant.com/playst...

https://techxplore.com/news...

I don’t think it’s realistic to treat Sony’s layoffs as somehow outside the norm for the industry right now. Even if Bungie is self-managed, Sony’s cuts went far beyond that like Naughty Dog, Insomniac, London Studio being shut down completely, and multiple teams across the globe took hits. These weren’t just minor adjustments.

Nintendo, I had to look up and you’re right. They seem to be an outlier, but rest assured at some point it happens. And even then there’s been layoffs, albeit a smaller amount and contractors.

Would fewer layoffs have happened if studios from acquisitions stayed independent? Maybe. But even independents have been hit hard and look at what’s happened with Embracer’s fallout, or smaller devs like Digic, Roll7, or Volition. This isn’t just a “Microsoft problem” or strictly tied to acquisitions; it’s a broader correction happening across the whole industry, and unfortunately, layoffs are a big part of that process right now.

Ganif21h ago

From your article:

"According to reports, Nintendo of America restructured its testing operations, leading to layoffs of about 120 contractors, part of a strategy for global integration.

Nintendo of America, publisher of iconic franchises like Mario and Zelda, is shifting some contractors to full-time roles for better development integration."

Contractors are not employees, and even if you want to count them as that, it's 120 people vs around 7500 since Microsoft purchased Zenimax.

In an era of game industry layoffs, Nintendo is hiring more people
https://automaton-media.com...

Nintendo Announces 10 Percent Pay Raise For Devs Despite Lower Profits
https://kotaku.com/nintendo...

Nintendo CEO’s refusal to layoff staff goes viral following industry-wide cuts
"Satoru Iwata took pay cuts to ensure staff didn’t have to be let go"
https://www.nme.com/news/ga...

And as for Sony you're comparing less than 1000 total jobs to an estimated7500

Has the industry faced layoffs, yes, but that still doesn't account for the mass layoffs due to redundancies that was easily predictable, or that fact that at least 1/3 of Microsoft's layoffs and studio closures happened before the industry downturn.

thorstein21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

Take the L, Crimson.

People hate Nintendo, but Ganif proved why they deserve support.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 21h ago
-Foxtrot23h ago

It's like banging your head off a wall, he just can't help himself.

Microsoft can do no wrong, Sony sucks at everything and Nintendo is bigged up because it's less hassle than trying to defend Microsoft all the time

What's going to happen when Microsoft finally turn completely third party, then what?

anast23h ago

I enjoy Obscure. Obscure does good work.

crazyCoconuts23h ago

Did you know that the first n4g was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program.

Tacoboto22h ago

I wouldn't be surprised at this point if anast and osbcure were both alts for the Admin.

We know how Obscure especially drums up additional comments and clicks with his spam-worthy remarks that somehow never get moderated

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 22h ago
Profchaos20h ago

Thats business present a strong front to your shareholders while your company burns around you.

Keep shareholders happy at all costs andnif not happy keep them numb to the reality of you organisation

Angyobangyo11h ago

" Just for the record, I don´t care about your victim complex crap either. Find someone else who cares. "

Just for the record, you clearly you do if you have to vent this hard.

TheExecutioner7h ago

Basically you think like kids when it come to choose between candy or chocolate.

Sonic18817h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Are you and Anast the same person?

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 7h ago
1d ago
Show all comments (86)
140°

Sony Faces Class Action in the Netherlands Over Allegedly Inflated PlayStation Store Prices

Mass Damage & Consumer Foundation in the Netherlands has filed a class action against Sony for inflating PlayStation Store prices.

dveio23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

My personal opinion:

Manufacturers and publishers have indeed inflated the industry.

From $700 million development costs for games like Call of Duty, to digital (store) prices for games and DLCs, online multiplayer fees on consoles (why can you play Helldivers 2 online for free on PC but not consoles?) or still preventing sell/lend digitally purchased games.

Sometime in the future, this bubble will collapse.

They should know better, but they just can't help themselves and suck even the last penny out of our wallets.

BeHunted21h ago

Because Sony knows people will be forced to pay those prices for single player and multiplayer games, not everyone prefers PC gaming. Sony also has a monopoly on PlayStation digital games. In 2019, they stopped allowing retailers and game key sellers to sell PlayStation digital games, making them available only through the official PlayStation Store

anast23h ago

The Dutch gov. wants a piece of the pie.

Eonjay22h ago

They should be suing the individual publishers increasing the prices to $80 instead of suing the store. There are plenty of publishers still selling game for like $50 with much success (like E33). But this proves that the publishers are the ones setting the prices.... so again nothing changes because they aren't even going after the main offender. How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD? Sony being the number one store in the market doesn't mean that publisher have to charge us an arm and a leg. Again the industry is laughing at us because consumers never get real representation. Just these fake platitudes that are meaningless.

BeHunted21h ago

"How is suing Sony going to make Microsoft not charge $80 for the next COD"

Because Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly, I can purchase Call of Duty at a huge discount from CDKeys or other gaming retailers. The only way to purchase digital PlayStation games is through the PlayStation Store.

djl348519h ago

Weird, I swore GoW, Stellar Blade, Horizon Zero Dawn, TLoU, etc. were on the steam store....uh.....

BeHunted16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

@djI3485

I'm talking about PlayStation games that you can only purchase on PlayStation. I can purchase Steam and Epic games from 3rd party retailers and key stores.

"Sony to stop selling full-game download codes at retailers"

https://www.videogamer.com/...

Killer2020UK21h ago

About time. There is zero fair reason why digitally distributed products that you cannot recoup any value when you want to dispose of them, should be priced higher than that of physical copies that entail all of the costs and the benefits of owning.

Show all comments (12)