Or how to ruin the theme "love".
By saying the beginning of the fall are you implying FFIX is a worse game?
It was when plot holes became too noticeable to ignore. From Squall's death to a 3rd party with time powers just showing up to give them up.
@Godmars: that's the beauty of it. I love when there are conspiracies/theories around stories. Squall is dead or not? is Riona the magician from future? etc etc :D
@solideagle: Again, its that plot inconsistencies - lazy writing - in that game's story lead to lazier writing in later games in the franchise. In many ways in fact, it more that things done in 8-bit didn't translate - at all - to more developed, realistic, graphics yet were still done in the transition.
Not lazy writing at all...more like red herrings and leaving things open to the imagination Do you think the ending of Inception, that final scene is lazy writing? Course not...it makes you think so people keep talking about just like FF8
@Foxtrot: I think having your main character get stabbed through the shoulder then fall thirty plus feet on their head only to wake fully healed in an anti magic prison with all their weapons - able to use magic a scene later - is damn lazy writing. Plot gaps caused by production issues, compromises, that was an ever growing crutch in the franchise even before this game. No one questions is Aerith is dead or Cloud died before FF7 started. They do ignore that Tifa was apparently killed. And people really wonder how Red 13 had pups as both a male and only known surviving member of his species. Again, its that there were small plot issues while striving for greater and greater detail that's become the issue. That's how we got FF13 where weapons were literally being pulled out of character's @$$es.
Squall was stabbed in the shoulder and fell off a parade float onto his back. Sure, it would hurt, but it was hardly a deadly "30 foot drop into his head". Sure, FFVIII has some funny writing (e.g. There's no radio communication in the world, but a highly advanced space program exists?) but I never thought the end of Disc one was a plot hole. Edea obviously healed Squall to interrogate him. The dramatic fall from the parade float was nothing more than a dramatic moment to make people hastily throw Disc Two into the tray and find out if Squall survived.
He didn't fall 30 feet and didn't fall onto his head. But lets assume he did both of those things, just for the sake of argument. They would probably kill a normal human. Squall can use his renzokouken to tackle flying giants and leap well over 30 fete into the air. He's not a normal human. He's JRPG/Anime human (aka, super human.) Further, healing magic exists. It's powers obviously aren't limitless, but it's *perfectly* reasonable to assume that he was quite literally healed by magic. (Ps, you the key word in "the only known survivor" for the purposes of reproduction is *known.* Just saying)
So... People are trying to defend FF8 by dismissing the very plot hole that suggests that he died? And still, how many times does it need to be said: the small - relatively anyway - narrative issues in earlier games lead to larger - gaping - ones in later series entries. Nevermind how current franchise entries are being sub-divided into their own franchises at this point. Making main story lines pointless or redundant.
One more time: its not that FF8 has what amounts to minor plot inconsistencies, its that plot inconsistencies have become standard in every later game in the series. Except for FF9. That things happen because they happen, fail to be built upon anything within the context of the game, are explained via outside media, has become Square's go to crutch.
He *didn't* apparently die. And even if the damage he would have taken would have killed a normal human in the real world, this is a world where humans leap several stories, have healing magic, tackle giant dragons, ect, so that it would have killed a normal human in the real world means essentially nothing. Those other complaints *aren't valid criticism of FF8*, they're of the 13 trilogy and 15. And I'm pretty sure you're nostalgia blind, because "this thing happens because it happens" has been a recurring thing all the way back to FF4. (the earliest I've played.) And in JRPGs in general.
Tbh, Square's fall started with X-2, not VIII.
Of all Final Fantasy games, 8th was the one i enjoyed the least, but it wasnt a bad game. About FF9, i think it was a really good game, classic stuff and more easy to understand mechanics. Then FFX wich is a really good game, ffxi was stupid, 12 was a great game, 13 was a meehhhh in the series, 14 got everything ok that wasnt ok in 11 and 15 is a fantastic game even with all the problems it has. I dont think it was the fall of the series after 8, it has its ups and downs.
This is far from true. Square's fall started with X-2. FFIX and FFX are among the best of the series.
Ffix is by far one of the better games in the series.
what clickbait trash
The beginning of the fall lies in FF Spirits Within. Sakaguchi left, merged with Enix, and so on. The workers felt uneasy about change in management and it affected the Final Fantasy series.
Dude are you on crack? The merging of Enix was Squaresoft's fall... I'd say once we went into the PS3/Xbox 360 gen Square had fallen. SNES to PS2 era they were godly.
No, the fall happened when they became Square Enix
FF8 is brilliant. I will never understand the dislike the game gets.
FF8 is a masterpiece. The fall of square started with X-2. Get your facts straight.
Worst bullcrap i read all week
I loved 8 almost as much as 7.
Yeeeah no. FFIX is easily the best in the series, imo. Second favorite game of all time.
N4G is a community of gamers posting and discussing the latest game news. It’s part of NewsBoiler, a network of social news sites covering today’s pop culture.