380°

Microsoft Reduces Shipment Targets for June

Peter Moore says they're simply being conservative.

In every way, Xbox 360 had outperformed the original Xbox, but despite having a year-long lead on the competition, the machine hasn't exactly sold in gangbusters, as many were predicting. Consequently, Microsoft has quietly scaled back its shipment predictions for June. They had previously aimed for between 13 and 15 million hardware units, whereas now it's simply 12 million, says The Mercury News.

Microsoft exec. Peter Moore, however, says it's the result of the company being conservative, in light of inventory build up at retailers, and to move those consoles would require heavier marketing, which would require more money, and, for now, Moore seems content not taking that step quite yet.

XboxKing6290d ago (Edited 6290d ago )

Mercury News did the full story and 1Up gaming is just talking about it, so read this story also.

http://blogs.mercurynews.co...

Raiyel6290d ago (Edited 6290d ago )

COULD IT BE THAT THEY ARE CUTTING BACK BECAUSE NO ONE IS BUYING THEM AND THEY ARE ALL SITTING ON SHELVES? UMMM... YES.

"He said that inventory built up higher than was prudent at retailers in North America and so Microsoft is going to be cautious and scale back both sales expectations and its replenishment rates. "

plain and simple if everyone bought them then there would be none on the shelves and they would send more.. so obviously they have shipped far more then anyone has bought. I think that's really funny. Finally from the mouth of M.soft themselves they say "Whoa... okay guys, we're making too many of them, let's cut back the stores are flooded"

Case in point. Xbox, good night and good luck, the PS3 is starting to gather momentum and when that beast splashes in late 2007 we'll see some serious waves.

XboxKing6290d ago (Edited 6290d ago )

Read the full story and it say a little more on why they are cutting back on 360.
http://blogs.mercurynews.co...

Syko6290d ago

It is because there are so many PS3's piled up there is no room for 360's and the Wii's just keep "Falling off the truck"!

Jesus Kid try reading next time please. Left to right, group words together to form a sentence. Tylenol for any headaches, Midol for any cramps.

Sphinx6290d ago

You got me in trouble! I laughed so hard everyone in the office here gave me a weird look. I see a "what are you looking at on your computer" speech coming in my near future!

Booneral6289d ago

A piece of rock gains momentum too when it's falling down, so your point is agreed. PS3 is pretty much gaining momentum going downwards.

ScorpioKyle6287d ago

core systems are rotting on the shelves right now, but i can't keep the 399 units in stock at my store.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 6287d ago
True Gamer6290d ago (Edited 6290d ago )

I also expected more from the xbox 360, it is just barely selling more than the xbox 1 here in the USA.

http://www.vgcharts.org/usa...

mandrake6290d ago

It's not moving quickly enough because $300-400 is still a lot of money for a console. I'm surprised they managed to move as many as they have already.

power of Green 6290d ago (Edited 6290d ago )

Man i talk to game shop employee's that call me lucky. $400 bucks is a grip of money; the sooner MS shows the masses the 360 is more than a game machine that plays DVD's the better.

Show all comments (85)
130°

Paying Extra For Early Access Cannot Be The Industry Norm

Charging for early access has started to become a regular practice in several AAA games, and the gaming community should not tolerate this.

CrimsonWing697h ago

Don’t uh… don’t pay for it then? 🤷‍♂️ It’s 3 days early, let people who can’t wait pony up to pay for early access. I’d hope people have more control over themselves if they don’t want to pay extra. I personally, do not see an issue with the option. If I’m hyped for a game and they give you early access, I’ll pay. If it’s something I can wait to play on “actual release” I won’t pay extra. It’s as simple as that.

Crows907h ago

Except your entirely mistaken if you think it's "early access"

Theyre just charging you extra to play it on release. So gullible.

Obscure_Observer5h ago

"Theyre just charging you extra to play it on release. So gullible."

Not really.

In some cases, paying for early access will grant you access to play those games at the same time media outlets and reviewers are playing their copies.

Besides, it´s a single player game. It´s not like early access to MP competitive games like Battlefield which EA would grant a full week early access to those willing to pay; which gives a unfair advantage to those gamers and breaks the game´s balance.

CrimsonWing695h ago

are you playing it earlier than retail release?

If that’s the correct answer, how is it not early access?

Crows907h ago

It's not early access...it's playing on release...early access is when the game isn't finished and needs a little more time...you also get it months in advance.

Let's not get confused here..

Andrew3363h ago

You get access to the game before it goes live for people who purchased the standard version of the game... thus you are getting early access.

Crows902h ago

Nope...you get access to the game the day it goes live. Those who didn't pay extra are blocked from accessing it as a punishment for not paying full price

VersusDMC6h ago

Microsoft has been doing premium edition early access for awhile(Forza and Starfield recently) ...so why is it an issue now when Ubisoft does it?

It can't be the gamepass excuse as Ubisoft has day one subscriptions as well.

Obscure_Observer5h ago

I´ve paid for Starfield´s Premium Edition to get early access to the game, plus Shattered Space expansion.

I don´t regret my decision and I mighty pay for it again to get early access to Fable and TESVI.

Andrew3363h ago

@VincentVanBro yea like the kind of idiots who worry about how adults spend their money.

Crows902h ago

@andrew

Just like the kind of idiots who get scammed and don't realize it.

gold_drake5h ago

as long as people are paying for it, it will be a thing unfortunately.

the fear of missing out is ... huge. especially online.

CrimsonWing695h ago

I don’t think it’s about missing out. Think of it like a movie you’re hyped for. You can see it early if you pay extra or just wait until Friday when it officially releases.

It’s nothing more than that.

Crows902h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Nope. You're not seeing it early. Everyone else is seeing it late.

When a product releases to the public...that's the release date. If they company then chooses to block access to the product unless you pay extra...that's not early access...that's day 1 access.

CrimsonWing691h ago(Edited 1h ago)

@Crows90

No, there’s a public release date and an early release date. Just like with movies having early screenings and then public screenings.

They let the public know the release date and then give people an option to play early by paying more.

Show all comments (31)
110°

It's A Crime That There's No Sleeping Dogs 2 Yet

Huzaifah from eXputer: "Sleeping Dogs from the early 2010s is one of the best open-world games out there but in dire need of a resurgence."

LG_Fox_Brazil1d 4h ago

I agree, I consider the first one a cult classic already

isarai22h ago

You say "yet" as if it's even possible anymore. United Front Games is gone, along with anyone that made this game what it is

CrimsonWing699h ago

That’s what happens when games sell poorly. And I’ve seen people wonder why people cry when a game sells badly… this is your answer.

solideagle8h ago

Majority of the time it's true but if a company/publisher is big (in terms of money), they can take a hit or 2. e.g. I am not worried about Rebirth sales as Square will make Remake 3 anyway but if FF 17 doesn't sell then Square might need to look for alternative. <-- my humble opinion

Abnor_Mal7h ago

Doesn’t Microsoft own the IP now since they acquired Activision?

Abnor_Mal3h ago

Oh okay, Activision owned True Crime, but when that didn’t sell as intended it was canceled. Six months later Square Enix bought the rights and changed the title to Sleeping Dogs.*

*As per Wikipedia

boing16h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Sleeping Dogs was a sleeper hit back then. It was fantastic. It actually still is. Would love a sequel to this, or at least a revive of True Crime series.

Show all comments (9)
100°

Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle-earth II - PC Wore it Better

Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle-earth II was an intriguing and unique RTS title, that sadly suffered in its console port.

dadavis199219h ago

Was just thinking about this game and wishing I had a way to revisit it. The way EA scrubs these titles from existence once their licensing runs out is horrid.

Michiel19898h ago

there is a client made by modders and it also works online.

kevco338h ago

Indeed. The game can still be played online on PC.

Xbox 360 players, though? Bang outta luck.